This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
香京julia种子在线播放
In-space assembly and manufacturing (or ISAM) represent the next frontier to building and maintaining space infrastructure. By assembling and manufacturing components directly in space, we may be able to overcome the limitations of launch vehicle size and payload capacity, enabling the creation of larger, more complex structures. This capability is crucial for advancing space exploration and utilization, as it allows for the construction of habitats, satellites, and other systems that are optimized for the space environment rather than being constrained by the need to survive the rigors of launch. In-space manufacturing also opens the door to utilizing local resources, such as lunar or asteroid materials, which can reduce the cost and increase the sustainability of long-term space missions.
The potential applications of in-space assembly and manufacturing are vast and varied. For instance, it can facilitate the development of large-scale solar power stations that can provide clean energy to Earth, the creation of advanced scientific instruments and telescopes that offer unprecedented views of the universe, and the construction of space habitats that support human life for extended periods. Moreover, this technology can enhance the repair and maintenance of existing satellites and space stations, extending their operational lifetimes and improving their performance.
Instantiation of almost any ISAM capability require robotics that are sophisticated and of enough fidelity and strength to translate to the large and varied manipulation applications envisioned. While “robots” have existed for some time on the International Space Station (ISS) through robotic arms and augmentation elements, the creation of autonomous independent robotic elements that can exist on free flying platforms is relatively new. The ability to manipulate in space translates to extending a single monolithic platforms primary function (i.e., a satellite) into a multi-purpose servicing platform that opens up incredible possibilities for expanding what is done in orbit, after launch.
The field of space robotics is an order of magnitude more complicated given the sheer difficulty of real time communications, visualization of objects, and compliance required to account for multiple degrees of freedom required to operate in the space environment. The articles included here are meant to offer some insight and thought on the various challenges and potential solutions to enabling various levels of dexterity, manipulation, and thus potential functions that on orbit space robotics can affect.
Relative to the challenges identified above there is a large trade space between “compliance” and “control” that enables both assembly of structures too large to fit into launch vehicle fairings today, as well as control down to micro-scale similar to the dexterity of a human hand. A mini article “Compliant Robotic Behaviours for Satellite Servicing” from
Architecture changes to support very large structures are explored in “Built On-Orbit Robotically-Assembled Gigatruss (BORG): Mixed Assembly Architecture Trade Study” by
Dexterity and working with assembly that requires high compliance is the topic of “A Hybrid Soft Material Robotic End-Affector for Reversible In-Space Assembly of Strut Components” from
The idea that a robotic arm or manipulator must be fixed is also challenged from
The contributions in this Research Topic offer a broad perspective on the multi-dimensional approaches to both execution and architecture for in space assembly. Various strategies and approaches are showcased that address the challenges in execution. These findings encourage further research in this direction and suggest additional investigations orthogonal to the activities to-date.
DB: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. RM: Writing–review and editing. MR: Writing–review and editing. ND: Writing–review and editing. CH: Writing–review and editing.
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.