Front. Robot. AI Frontiers in Robotics and AI Front. Robot. AI 2296-9144 Frontiers Media S.A. 995813 10.3389/frobt.2022.995813 Robotics and AI Original Research Design engineering a walking robotic manipulator for in-space assembly missions Nair et al. 10.3389/frobt.2022.995813 Nair Manu Harikrishnan * Rai Mini Chakravarthini Poozhiyil Mithun Lincoln Centre for Autonomous Systems, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom

Edited by: Xiaofeng Wu, The University of Sydney, Australia

Reviewed by: Qiang Shen, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China

AbdulHalim Jallad, United Arab Emirates University, United Arab Emirates

*Correspondence: Manu Harikrishnan Nair, 18710796@students.lincoln.ac.uk

This article was submitted to Space Robotics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Robotics and AI

14 10 2022 2022 9 995813 16 07 2022 12 09 2022 Copyright © 2022 Nair, Rai and Poozhiyil. 2022 Nair, Rai and Poozhiyil

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

In-Space Services aim to introduce sustainable futuristic technology to support the current and growing orbital ecosystem. As the scale of space missions grows, there is a need for more extensive infrastructures in orbit. In-Space Assembly missions would hold one of the key responsibilities in meeting the increasing demand. In the forthcoming decades, newer infrastructures in the Earth’s orbits, which are much more advanced than the International Space Station are needed for in-situ manufacturing, servicing, and astronomical and observational stations. The prospect of in-orbit commissioning a Large Aperture Space Telescope (LAST) has fuelled scientific and commercial interests in deep-space astronomy and Earth Observation. However, the in-situ assembly of such large-scale, high-value assets in extreme environments, like space, is highly challenging and requires advanced robotic solutions. This paper introduces an innovative dexterous walking robotic system for in-orbit assembly missions and considers the Large Aperture Space Telescope system with an aperture of 25 m as the use case. The top-level assembly requirements are identified with a deep insight into the critical functionalities and challenges to overcome while assembling the modular LAST. The design and sizing of an End-over-end Walking Robot (E-Walker) are discussed based on the design of the LAST and the specifications of the spacecraft platform. The E-Walker’s detailed design engineering includes the structural finite element analysis results for space and earth-analogue design and the corresponding actuator selection methods. Results of the modal analysis demonstrate the deflections in the E-Walker links and end-effector in the open-loop due to the extremities present in the space environment. The design and structural analysis of E-Walker’s scaled-down prototype is also presented to showcase its feasibility in supporting both in-orbit and terrestrial activities requiring robotic capabilities over an enhanced workspace. Further, the mission concept of operations is presented based on two E-Walkers that carry out the assembly of the mirror modules. The mission discussed was shortlisted after conducting an extensive trade-off study in the literature. Simulated results prove the dual E-Walker robotic system’s efficacy for accomplishing complex in-situ assembly operations through task-sharing.

in-space assembly large aperture space telescope mission requirements assembly challenges walking robotic manipulator design engineering finite element analysis

香京julia种子在线播放

    1. <form id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></form>
      <address id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></nobr></address>

      Introduction

      The evolution of robotics and artificial intelligence has revolutionised state-of-the-art space systems. Robotics, Automation and Autonomous Systems (RAAS) solutions have helped the space community conduct ground-breaking research in various planetary missions and on the International Space Station (ISS). Building upon these substantial achievements, the next few decades would unfold new chapters in orbital missions. Over the years, Extra-Vehicular Activities (EVA) have proven beneficial for servicing and maintenance missions on the ISS (Culbertson 2003). The installation of corrective optics on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) is another explicit example of the success of EVA (Burrows 1991). However, the unfavourable space environment constantly risks EVA operations (Thirsk et al., 2009; Fazekas 2020). With future missions involving large-scale high-value infrastructures, assembly and maintenance would be much beyond human capabilities, requiring autonomous robots. Advancements in RAAS have resulted in a paradigm shift in space exploration as it would facilitate a multitude of In-Space services. In support of the plans to be a dominant candidate in the In Orbit Services and Manufacturing (IOSM) market, the UK Space Agency, along with multiple enterprises, are in plans to invest in relevant futuristic space technologies (Catapult 2020). In-Space services can facilitate numerous missions such as manufacturing, assembly, servicing, debris removal, astronomy, and Earth Observation (EO), to list a few (Alondra Nelson et al., 2022). Amongst the innumerable tasks which In-Space services can expedite, this paper focuses on assembling a Large Aperture Space Telescope (LAST) in orbit. LAST would promote a series of astronomical and EO missions (Baiocchi and Stahl 2009, Catapult 2020).

      The move towards LAST commenced ever since the successful launch of the HST. Launched in 1990, the HST with a 2.4 m monolithic Primary Mirror (PM), became the ‘eye in the sky’ for any astronomer. It has helped mankind pin down the age of our cosmos, prove the existence of supermassive black holes and other numerous contributions (Hubble 2020). Thereafter, its successor, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) mission, was launched in December 2021. The JWST has a folded-wing design to incorporate the 6.5 m PM, with capabilities to visualise a hundred million years after the Big Bang (Lockwood Optics 2020). As understood, there exists a constant scientific and commercial clamour to upgrade the telescope sizing for a better resolution and signal-to-noise ratio. Addressing these requirements, the space community is moving towards deploying telescopes with a much larger aperture in orbit. Assembling a LAST on the ground is not practical given the limited fairing size of current and planned launch vehicles (Nelson, Mast and Chanan 2013; Garzón et al., 2017). Much like the trend for planned futuristic space designs, LAST would facilitate a modular design approach for the mirror units to fit well within the fairing limits of the launcher. The modules of the LAST system are to be autonomously assembled in orbit using RAAS. Existing literature provides conceptual models of various approaches to carry out in-situ assembly missions of LAST. These include a hexbot, robots inspired by the Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator, a fixed-to-base robotic manipulator concept and mobile robotic manipulators, to enlist a few (Oegerle et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2016; Nanjangud et al., 2019; Rognant et al., 2019). However, a wide knowledge gap exists in design engineering autonomous space robotic systems. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to shift from concepts to simulations and eventually realise large-scale robotic assembly in orbit. Previous studies presented a five Degrees-of-Freedom (DoF) End-Over-End Walking Robot (E-Walker) as a potential candidate for efficiently assembling a LAST in-orbit (Nair et al., 2020a; Nair et al., 2020b; Nair et al., 2020c). The initial design, kinematic and dynamical modelling of the E-Walker integrated with an industrially proven Proportional-Integral-Derivative Computed-Torque Controller (PID-CTC) to successfully track the joint parameters within its limits was discussed in (Nair et al., 2020a). A detailed feasibility analysis on a series of mission concepts and a potential mission concept was presented in (Nair et al., 2020b; Nair et al., 2020c).

      This paper presents an updated design of the E-Walker for efficiently assembling a 25 m LAST in orbit. Initially, this paper elicits the top-level assembly requirements of LAST, the robotic system and the spacecraft platform. To meet the mission requirements, a seven Degrees-of-Freedom (DoF) fully dexterous E-Walker is introduced. The E-Walker draws inspiration from the Canadarm2 and the European Robotic Arm (ERA) on the ISS. The two links of the Canadarm2 are separated by a joint offset in the elbow, making it complicated for the robot arm to walk around connector ports placed in a straight line. On the other hand, the ERA has both its links attached to the side of its elbow joint, limiting the complete rotation of its the elbow joint like the Canadarm2 to an end-to-end motion. In comparison to Canadarm2 and ERA, the E-Walker has both its links in line about its elbow joint, allowing it to walk end-over-end like Canadarm2 without an offset. Either end of the E-Walker is equipped with a Latching End-Effector (LEE) to latch onto the static connector ports on LAST and the spacecraft platform. The proposed E-Walker’s redundant design and mobility features offer access to a much larger workspace than conventional fixed-to-base robotic manipulators. Also, the LAST design presented can be considered as a baseline for futuristic LAST designs, which can be scaled up for PMs up to 100 m aperture.

      An in-depth design engineering exercise has been carried out for the E-Walker according to the system and mission requirements for 1) optimising the link and LEE parameters 2) actuator selection. Initially, different link shapes of a given link length were compared to analyse the mass and area moment of inertia. Thereafter, to evaluate deflection, stress and strain, and open-loop performance under external disturbances in orbit, Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was carried out for the E-Walker components through Static Structural Analysis (SSA) and Modal analysis. The torque requirements for joint actuators were obtained using E-Walker’s dynamic equation formulation, which eventually helped in selecting the electrical actuators for the system. Additionally, a scaled-down prototype for the Earth-analogue testing is introduced, which underwent a similar FEA analysis. The E-Walker prototyping work is now in progress at the University of Lincoln; therefore, the experimental verification and validation will be published separately. Figure 1 presents an overview of various applications of the E-Walker along with its configuration. Finally, this paper discusses a potential mission concept of operations (ConOps) to carry out a sequential assembly of the 25 m LAST. The presented mission concept is chosen based on an extensive feasibility study carried out in (Nair et al., 2020b). The ConOps utilise two E-Walkers to assemble the PM, showcasing the extensive cooperative task-sharing capabilities of a dual robotic system, much required in futuristic robotic space missions.

      E-Walker applications and configuration.

      The rest of the paper is organised into five sections. Top-level assembly requirements discusses the LAST mission’s top-level assembly requirements, including the robot and spacecraft system requirements. The Space grade E-Walker’s extensive design engineering is presented in End-over-end walking robot, where the full-scale system is optimised and analysed using SSA and Modal analysis under microgravity conditions. E-walker scaled-down Earth analogue design introduces the scaled-down Earth-analogue E-Walker prototype design. Mission concept of operations discusses a mission concept involving a dual E-Walker system to carry out the assembly. A flowchart is presented to depict the execution of this mission. In Conclusion and future research, the main inferences are covered, including an insight into planned experimental testing and further research.

      Top-level assembly requirements

      The top-level system architecture of the 25 m LAST mission comprises the robotic system (E-Walker), the 25 m LAST and the spacecraft platform. The spacecraft platform is a composite system inclusive of the Bsc, Ssc and truss modules. Throughout the paper, it is assumed that the components of the spacecraft platform remain docked. To carry out the assembly tasks in orbit, each system should meet certain requirements for a safe and precise assembly. The E-Walker has to meet certain mission-oriented goals to carry out the assembly of the 25m LAST, i.e., in terms of mobility, and pick and place operations. Table 1 presents the top-level requirements of the E-Walker.

      Top-level requirement list for E-Walker.

      Sl. No Requirements
      R 1 The E-Walker should be able to assemble the telescope in space. Post assembly, it should be able to service any mirror module. To aid this requirement, the following specifications are recommended
      • Full dexterity using a 7DoF E-Walker
      • Total length of the E-Walker should enable it to traverse across the spacecraft platform via connector ports
      • Two LEEs at each end to connect to the connector ports
      • Select actuators to provide sufficient torque to lift a payload of one PMS.
      • Material selection should take into consideration the extremities of the space environment
      R 2 The E-Walker should carry out precise and delicate handling of the mirror modules
      R 3 The mobility feature of the E-Walker should be utilised to enhance its workspace
      R 4 The E-Walker should avoid any collision with the spacecraft platform and with the mirror modules. If multiple E-Walkers are used, the path-planning algorithm should also consider collision avoidance with each E-Walker
      R 5 Once the telescope is operational, the E-Walker shall not obstruct its field of view
      <inline-formula id="inf10"> <mml:math id="m10"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>25</mml:mn> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> </inline-formula> PM requirements

      Figure 2 illustrates the system architecture of the modular 25 m LAST and its spacecraft platform. The modular design of the 25 m PM results in a compact stowed configuration that fits well within the fairings of current launchers like Ariane five or 6. Based on the launch-vehicle sizing, the number of Primary Mirror Units (PMUs) for assembly could reach up to 342 units. Each hexagonally shaped PMU ( 1 m flat-to-flat) would be equipped with a backplate consisting of connector points on each side. As seen in Figure 2A, 19 PMUs constitute a Primary Mirror Segment (PMS) and 18 of these PMSs form the 25 m PM. A deeper insight into the 25 m PM assembly in Figure 4 reveals that connectors exist with two different dimension sets. If the PMS in Figure 3A is considered, PMU1 is the central mirror to which PMU2-PMU7 gets connected on one side. Therefore, it can be understood that throughout the assembly of the 25 m PM, there would be PMU connectors which receive a connection from other connectors (Rx Connector) and which get connected to other connectors (Transmits Connection–Tx Connector). In this paper, both the Rx and Tx connectors are cylindrical, with a height of 50 m m . The Rx connector has an outer diameter of 110 m m and an inner diameter of 100 m m . Alternatively, the Tx connector has an outer diameter of 100 m m (excluding tolerance) and an inner diameter of 90 m m (excluding tolerance). Based on the assembly strategy, this unique feature establishes that every PMU would have a unique identity with the different Rx and Tx combinations. It helps to distinguish each PMU with unique identifiers to assist with the assembly sequencing. In a real-mission assembly, the E-Walker could scan these unique identifiers to ensure that the PMUs are picked up sequentially. Additionally, the connector ports prevent the E-Walker from directly interacting with the mirror itself. The modular design of each PMU facilitates the requirement R 2 , given that the E-Walker’s motion should be precisely controlled.

      Top-level mission architecture (A) 25m last (B) truss; (C) Bsc and Ssc.

      25 m PM and Truss (A) PM Design; (B) PMU-PMU distance; (C) Position of Truss Connectors.

      Figure 2A shows a close-up view of the PMU connector’s dimensions and design. Based on the assembly sequencing, the E-Walker would be provided with the information on the available connector ports to which it can latch on to. Understandably, the connector ports connected to other PMU ports should be left free. In addition to the Rx and Tx connectors on the sides of the PMU’s hexagonal backplate, there exists a Tx connector on the back side of every PMU1 of a PMS (Txb connector), which gets connected to an Rx connector of the Truss. As a result, there would be 18 Txb’s on the 25 m PM as shown in Figure 3A; unlike a regular front-faced hexagon, there exists an alignment shift. Figure 3B shows the parameters used to find the centre of each PMU, represented as ( x , y ), which follows the norm ( ( a / 2 + b / 2 ) , ( 3 a / 2 + b + 2 a b ) ) . Here a is the flat-to-flat distance of the PMU, which is 1 m and b is the height of the PMU connector, which is equal to 50 m m in this paper). This equation helps identify the 3D position of the Txb on PMU1 of each PMS. The height of the Txb along the z-axis is held constant ( = 50 m m in this paper).

      Spacecraft platform requirements

      The spacecraft platform comprises the Truss element, Base Spacecraft (Bsc) and a Storage Spacecraft (Ssc). The requirements associated with the platform are elicited below:

      Truss requirements

      The truss is built using 18 modular truss units to hold the assembled Primary Mirror Segments (PMS) by providing a rigid connection using 18 Rx connectors. The alignment shift in positioning the Truss Rx connectors can be visualised while mapping the Txb onto the Truss. As seen in Figure 3C, the bold line is a regular representation of the Rx connectors if placed in each truss element’s centre. However, the dotted line represents the alignment shift while mapping the Txb’s of the space telescope. Based on the ( x , y ) values, the 3D configuration of the Txb’s can be identified and, therefore, for the Truss connector ports. In addition to the 18 Rx connectors to support the PM, there exist 10 Rx connector ports to assist with the E-Walker’s movement. Based on the strategy used for assembly, the E-Walker can also utilise the 18 Rx connectors for the PM support either for mobility or pick and place operations.

      Establishing the importance of the in-zone mirror positions is necessary to carry out a safe and efficient assembly. These are positions on the truss that can be considered the adjacent mirror positions of any truss connector port. The red and orange circles, in Figure 2B indicate the in-zone mirror positions for the truss connector ports 5 and 8 , respectively. The E-Walker on a truss connector port must not place a PMU or PMS in its in-zone positions, as it would lead to a collision. For example, considering the E-Walker is on truss connector port 5 (C5), then mirror positions 3 and 12 are in-zone positions. On the other hand, if the E-Walker is on truss connector port 8 (C8), then mirror positions 6 and 8 are considered in-zone mirror positions. Planning the assembly process by avoiding in-zone positions would help the E-Walker satisfy R 4 .

      Base spacecraft and storage spacecraft requirements

      The adequate number of connector ports on the Bsc, Ssc and truss would help the E-Walker easily access the entire system (Figures 2B,C). Figure 4 shows the dimension of the Bsc and its grapple fixtures. As shown in this figure, the state-of-the-art design of current three-pin grapple fixtures on board the ISS to support Canadarm2 and ERA is utilised in this paper. These Power and Data Grapple Fixtures (PDGF) have a flat base plate, a small grapple shaft or pin with a ball on the top and three ramped bars around them to provide additional rotational stability post grapple. In addition, there exist four data and power cable ports and a target pin for the robotic arm to position itself using the camera on-board. To latch on to these fixtures, the Canadarm2 and the ERA have a Latching End-Effector on it is either end. The LEE features a carriage with a rotating ring inside it. The ring incorporates three snare wires, such that when the ring rotates, it closes the snare to lock itself onto the grapple pin, retracting the carriage to latch itself to the spacecraft. Similar PDGF and LEE configurations are designed for the spacecraft platform enabling the E-Walker to move around and perform pick-and-place operations.

      Base spacecraft (A) dimensions (B) PDGF Configuration–top view (C) PDGF dimensions.

      The connector ports on top of the Bsc are dimensioned with ϕ o u t = 37.5 c m and ϕ i n = 35 c m , to which the E-Walker can get connected for power, data, and mechanical support during the assembly process. These numbers are a rough estimate based on the LEE dimensions of the Canadarm2 and ERA. In order to refrain from having a bulky design of the PMU, the PMU connectors are much smaller than on the spacecraft platform. The LEE of the E-Walker is assumed to have a design that adapts to both these dimensions (Figure 2A). During the mission, the modular mirror units would be stowed inside the Ssc in a stacked-up approach. The Ssc would then be lifted off to dock onto the Bsc during the mission to serve as a collection point for the E-Walker. The Bsc ensures attitude stabilisation of the coupled system at all times and helps with the E-Walker’s precise operation during the assembly.

      Other assembly requirements (E-Walker workspace)

      For this assembly mission, it is crucial to obtain E-Walker’s maximum workspace, which is necessary to carry out the operations utilising its walking feature. Figure 5 shows measurements which are useful to dimension the E-Walker for the real mission. Based on the dimensions of the spacecraft platform in this paper, Figure 5A shows the distance between C8 and the Tx connector at the back of PMS 14 , Figure 5B measures the distance between Bsc_C13 to Truss connector C3 and Figure 5C shows the distance between Bsc_C9 and the bottom of the Ssc. The length of the E-Walker from J2 to LEE2 is shown in Figure 5D. These measurements reveal that the E-Walker’s workspace is within 7.5 m . Therefore, it is concluded that an E-Walker with a total length of 8 m would suffice to assemble the 25 m PM. Compared to a fixed-to-base robotic manipulator, which would otherwise require a 12.5 m long arm to assemble the PM, there’s a reduction of 4.5 m in the total length for the E-Walker. This design optimisation minimises the mass, volume, launch cost, and power requirements for the whole mission.

      Distance between Bsc, Ssc and Truss Connector ports (A) Truss C8—PMS6_PMU1; (B) Bsc_C8—Truss C3; (C) E-Walker J2—Ssc lower edge; (D) E-Walker J2—E-Walker LEE2.

      End-over-end walking robot

      In this paper, the robotic architecture presented to facilitate the autonomous assembly of the 25 m LAST in orbit is an End-Over-End Walking Robot (E-Walker). The choice is conclusive evidence of the extensive review by (Nanjangud et al., 2019a) and the proposed architecture in (Brooks et al., 2016; Nanjangud et al., 2019b; Letier et al., 2019; Rognant et al., 2019). The E-Walker’s space design is symmetric and draws inspiration from the Candarm2 and the ERA onboard the ISS and the robotic manipulator presented in the Modular and Re-Configurable Spacecraft (MOSAR) project (Cruijssen et al., 2014; Glen Gook, 2015; Deremetz et al., 2021). The symmetric feature was also introduced in a five DoF earth-based walking robot manipulator—the Climbot (Guan et al., 2011). This section compares the E-Walker design with the other identified walking robotic manipulators and identifies the key differences to propose a novel robotic solution for the upcoming in orbit missions.

      A top-level comparison between the state-of-the-art walking robot manipulators in space and the E-Walker space design is shown in Table 2. In terms of design comparison, the Canadarm2 has an offset around the elbow joint, which provides it with the capability to walk end-over-end, however, the connector ports have to be placed in a spacing equal to the joint offset to enable a straight-line motion. In comparison, the ERA and MOSAR have in-line elbow joint without an offset. However, as the two links are clamped onto the elbow joint on the sides, both the arms are limited of a full rotation around the elbow and end up in end-to-end walking. This results in an increased dependency on the roll joints of these robot manipulators, which is not recommended for a space mission. The E-Walker is an amalgamation of all the key features of the above-mentioned robotic arms, i.e., achieving end-over-end walking with an in-line elbow joint to achieve easy motion along a straight line without joint offset. For the earth-based design, the Climbot is a walking robot manipulator which has a similar elbow joint feature as the E-Walker. However, its workspace, redundancy and dexterity are limited due to the reduced number of joints (5 DoF).

      Space-system comparison.

      Features Canadarm2 ERA MOSAR E-Walker
      Links 2 2 4 2
      Joints 7 7 7 7
      End-Effectors 2 2 2 2
      Total Length ( m ) 17 11.3 1.6 8 (customisable)
      Weight ( k g s ) 1497 630 30 475
      Payload ( k g s ) 116000 8000 10 > 1000 (to be tested)

      In comparison, the E-Walker prototype is dexterous with seven DoF and facilitates a modular design with customisable end-effectors. A comparison between Climbot and the E-Walker prototype design is enlisted in Table 3.

      Earth-analogue comparison.

      Features Climbot E-Walker
      Links 4 2
      Joints 5 7 (customisable)
      End-Effectors 2 2
      Total Length ( m ) 1.55 Prototype length - 1.3 (customisable)
      Weight ( k g s ) 17.5 12
      Payload ( k g s ) Unknown 2 (1st Prototype), customisable
      End-Effector type Fingered Gripper Magnetic (1st Prototype), customisable

      The E-Walker’s capability to connect to static connector ports onboard the Bsc and Truss helps to cover a workspace much larger than its span. This enhanced reachability is an added benefit for assembly missions. In this paper, the E-Walker is assigned two key operations throughout the mission. These operations involve assembling PMSs using PMUs, thereafter, performing pick-and-place operations of the assembled PMSs onto their respective truss locations. The E-Walker would facilitate mobility around an attitude-stabilised Bsc, with a predefined motion that will not alter the attitude of the Bsc. This is contrary to the state-of-the-art concept of a space robot which requires additional effort in the Guidance, Navigation and Control unit. This is due to the complexities involved in maintaining attitude due to the non-linear dynamic coupling effects between the spacecraft platform and the fixed-to-base robotic manipulator (Flores-Abad et al., 2014).

      The seven DoF E-Walker has three revolute joints, each in the shoulder and the wrist, and one DoF in the elbow joint. The dexterous symmetric design provides access to any part of the workspace (see Figure 1), satisfying the requirement R 3 completely. The seven DoF E-Walker can use either of its two LEEs to latch on to the Bsc. During each phase, the LEE on either side of the E-Walker, attached to J1 or J7, is locked to the spacecraft platform. A fixed-to-base robot manipulator would require a full-length span of 12 m to assist with the assembly when placed at the centre of the 25 m LAST system (Nanjangud et al., 2019a). On the contrary, the E-Walker’s dimensions can be reduced subject to the availability of the connector points and the payload sizing.

      The initial design of the E-Walker considered a five DoF model, which included two revolute joints, each in the shoulder and wrist, one revolute joint in the elbow and two LEE on either end (Nair et al., 2020a). The five DoF E-Walker provided an insight into the minimum DoF required to realise the cyclic motion dynamics; this was a baseline design to carry out an end-over-end motion. This design met the requirement R 4 partly. However, for space-based operations, both redundancy and dexterity are essential (Dalla and Pathak 2019). Redundancy offers enhanced reachability and acts as a significant backup in case of a joint failure. Therefore, to overcome the challenges of the five DoF E-Walker’s limitations, the seven DoF E-Walker design was introduced as an upgrade. The enhanced mobility feature of the seven DoF E-Walker can also help satisfy the requirement R 5 post the assembly.

      Link design optimisation

      Designing the E-Walker link requires optimising the link shape and dimensions prior to carrying out the SSA. An optimum link design should have the lowest mass and undergo minimal deflections under loading.

      Link configuration

      In this study, a solid tube, a hollow tube, and a rectangular beam were considered for the shape of the link (refer: Table 4). For tube shaped links, r is the radius, ϕ is the diameter, whereas h is the link height. The rectangular beam has l and b as the link length and breadth. These shapes were then analysed based on their mass and area moment of inertia (IA). These parameters determine the deflection under loading, which is independent of the link length. The equations for IA for the shapes considered are shown in Table 4.

      Link shape, IA and volume equations.

      Link Shape IA Volume
      Solid Tube π r 4 / 2 π r 2 h
      Hollow Tube π ( r 1 4 r 2 4 ) / 2 π ( r 1 2 r 2 2 ) h
      Rectangular Beam b h 3 / 12 l b h

      Table 5 presents the dimensions of the three shapes to down select a single link based on their calculated parameters. To down select a single link shape. The space-qualified material, Aluminium 7075, with a density of 2750 k g / m 3 is considered for the fabrication and it meets the requirement R 5 (Younger and Eckelmeyer 2007; Dursun and Soutis 2014). The link length is considered to be 3.5 m in all the cases ( R 3 ). These values were then used to determine the ratio of mass to area moment of inertia for each of the different shapes. A smaller ratio is optimum since the corresponding shape will exhibit lower deflection levels for the same mass. A ratio was used as it removes dimensions from the analysis. Therefore, the conclusions from Table 5 are valid regardless of the final selected link parameters. Table 5 shows that the hollow tube link exhibits the lowest mass to IA ratio and is selected as the optimum link configuration for the E-Walker.

      Link parameters.

      Shape Dimensions ( c m ) Volume Mass (kg) Area Moment of Inertia Mass to Area Moment of Inertia (105)
      Hollow Tube ϕ o u t = 30 t = 1.5 0.0615 169.33 3.46 × 10 4 4.89
      Solid Tube ϕ = 30 0.247 680.35 7.95 × 10 4 8.56
      Rectangle b = 30 h = 20 0.21 577.5 2 × 10 4 28.87
      Link dimensions

      Link configuration section presented the validation of selecting a hollow aluminium tube as the link shape. Therefore, to select the appropriate sizing of the link, different dimensions of a hollow tube were taken into consideration to conduct Finite Element structural analysis in Ansys. Table 6 shows four main sets (Set 1—Set 4) of link sizes considered for the analyses. Dimensions smaller than 20 cm were not considered as the links would have wirings running through their inner walls to support the actuators and other related electronics.

      E-Walker link dimension sets.

      Set ϕ o u t ( c m ) ϕ i n ( c m )
      Set 1 50 47
      Set 2 40 37
      Set 3 30 27
      Set 3.1 ϕ o u t 1 = 30 ϕ o u t 2 = 25 23
      Set 3.2 ϕ o u t 1 = 30 ϕ o u t 2 = 20 18
      Set 4 20 17
      Link static structural analysis

      The maximum deflection and stress on the different link sizes can be analysed by computing the deflection of a single link. If the E-Walker is assumed to be erect with LEE1 being fixed to the base, the maximum loading would be experienced by L1 due to J4-J7, L2, LEE2 and the payload. If LEE2 is fixed to the spacecraft platform, L2 would experience a similar load (J1-J4, L1, LEE1 and payload) due to the symmetry of the E-Walker. Therefore, if the design is validated for L1, then those results would be sufficient for L2. To carry out the link deflection tests, the E-Walker is assumed to be in the initial state of Phase 1, i.e., standing straight, carrying a payload of a PMS ( 342 k g = 3420 N ). Therefore, the mass of J4-J7, Link 2, the LEE, and the payload act on L1. A torque of 100 N m is also provided, considering a situation where J2 is under motion, trying to bring the whole E-Walker to complete Phase 1, thereby imparting a twist on L1. This is a good estimate for the maximum load on the L1. The deflection and stresses on L1 due to this loading and torque was further analysed using FEA simulation. The simulation was set up by providing a 5 c m tetrahedral mesh to L1, fixing one end and applying the respective force and torque values on the other end. The selection of this mesh type is attributed to its simple 3d mesh, which can be easily applied to any shape and allows for quick and accurate modelling (Hughes, Cottrell, and Bazilevs 2005). To verify the selection of the mesh size, the mesh convergence on the area under maximum stress in the whole link, i.e., the top end of the link, was considered. For reference, the design goal for this study, i.e., the maximum deflection of L1, under maximum loading is limited to 0.05 mm.

      Modelling the Set 1 link produced minor deflection of 0.01 m m . The total mesh displacement equivalent elastic strain and the Von Mises stress plots are shown in Figure 6. The convergence percentage of the mesh at the top of the link was set as low as 5 % to verify the mesh sizing of the link. As seen in Figure 6, the mesh size is well converged, validating the link design. Similar steps were followed to measure the above parameters for the rest of the link sets and the results obtained are illustrated in Figure 7. From Figures 7A,B, it is observed that the Set four link produced a deflection of around 0.08 m m , which exceeds the design goal limitation, and is not further considered for analysis. In contrast, the Set three link produced a deflection of around 0.022 m m and provided a mass reduction of around 92 k g when compared to Set 1 design. Therefore, the Set three link was modified to further reduce the mass. The design and FEA simulation results of the modified link is shown in Figures 7C,D respectively. The dimensions of Set three are a near estimate of Canadarm2 and the ERA.

      Link Set 1 (A) SSA; (B) Mesh convergence.

      Link Set: (A) Ansys FEA of modified link; (B) Displacement and Strain Radar Chart of Link sets; (C) Stress Radar Chart of Link sets.

      As seen from Figure 7C, a design with wider ends of 30 c m diameter was proposed as they can withstand higher stress levels. The inner rod has a slender design with two size sets, Set 3.1 and 3.2, respectively. In order to validate these changes, the same FEA analysis was carried out to ensure that the modifications do not induce unacceptable amounts of deflection or stress. Set 3.1 had a maximum mesh displacement of 0.04 m m , which was well within the design goal, whereas Set 3.2 produced changes of about 0.062 m m , which exceeded the design goal; Set 3.2 was not considered for further evaluation. The Eigen Value Buckling of Set 3.1 link showcased a load multiplication of 129 (refer Figure 7D), which is a reliable safety factor for the E-Walker link to perform the assembly. To conclude, the final link design chosen for fabrication is Set 3.1.

      Latching end effector design analysis

      The E-Walker consists of a Latching End-Effector (LEE) on either end to provide the required connection to the spacecraft platform and PMU connectors. The LEE is therefore subjected to loading conditions and requires further analysis to optimise the design (Figure 8). The LEE design in this paper has two ring features, one to latch onto the spacecraft platform ( ϕ o u t = 35 c m , thickness = 2.5 c m ) and a dimensionally smaller inner ring ( ϕ o u t = 10 c m , thickness = 0.5 c m ) to latch onto the PMUs (refer Figure 8A). It is important to independently estimate the structural analysis of both the ring features.

      Latching end effector (A) large ring SSA; (B) small ring SSA.

      For the SSA, one LEE of the E-Walker is assumed to be fixed on to the spacecraft and the other end is to be carrying the maximum payload of one PMS. For the larger ring, the maximum normal force would be applied when it bears the mass of the whole E-Walker carrying one PMS. The smaller ring experiences the maximum normal force due to the payload alone. Structural analysis of one LEE is enough due to the symmetry of the E-Walker. Referring to E-Walker’s initial position in Phase-1, a force of 8000 N is applied vertically on the larger ring and that of 3500 N is applied on the smaller ring. Figure 8B shows the structural analysis of the LEE’s larger ring fixture with displacements as low as 0.002 m m . The Eigenvalue buckling results show a load multiplier of at least 3300 , which is a significant safety factor for the E-Walker. The smaller ring had a maximum deformation of around 0.008 m m and a buckling multiplier of at least 687 , which is a significant safety factor (Figure 8C), validating the design of the LEE.

      Actuator selection

      Selecting actuators for space missions revolves around understanding the dynamics of the system. The dynamical model of the E-Walker helps evaluate individual joint torque limits and the type of actuator needed for each joint.

      Dynamic modelling of E-walker

      Using the Euler-Lagrange equation (Spong, Hutchinson, and Vidyasagar 2006), the non-linear dynamic equation of the seven DoF E-Walker is given as: D ( θ ) θ ¨ + C ( θ , θ ˙ ) θ ˙ + G ( θ ) = τ where, τ R n is the joint torques, θ R n represents the joint angles and θ ˙ R n represents the corresponding joint velocity vector. Considering a link i with mass m i and an inertia matrix calculated about its centre of mass (CoM), D ( θ ) R n × n is the mass matrix, which is symmetric and positive definite for all joint angles θ R n . It is given as: D ( θ ) = i = 1 n [ m i J v m i ( θ ) T J v m i ( θ ) + J ω m i ( θ ) T R i ( θ ) I i R i ( θ ) T J ω m i ( θ ) ] Here, the Jacobian matrix J R 6 × n matrix is comprised of the linear Jacobian, J v m i R 3 × n and the angular Jacobian, J ω m i R 3 × n . The linear velocity of the ith joint is given by v i = J v m i θ ˙ and the angular velocity for the ith joint is expressed as ω i = J ω m i θ ˙ . The mass matrix is a crucial component in the robot dynamic equation and plays a significant role in robot control.

      C ( θ , θ ˙ ) R n × n , comprises of the Coriolis and Centrifugal forces that act contrary to the motor commands and can be given by: c i j = i = 1 n c i j k ( θ ) θ ˙ k = i = 1 n ( 1 / 2 ) { ( d i j / θ k ) + ( d i k / θ j ) ( d k j / θ i ) } θ ˙ k During a space mission, due to the microgravity conditions, the effect of potential energy is usually neglected. However, near-less gravity plays an essential role in the control of robot dynamics in orbit and is taken into consideration in this paper. In Eq. 1, the gravity matrix G ( θ ) R n considers a microgravity value of 10 6 g m / s 2 , where g = 9.81 m / s 2 , is the acceleration due to gravity on Earth. Based on the masses obtained in Latching end effector design analysis and Actuator selection, the link and LEE mass were increased to incorporate the mass of additional electronics, wiring etc. The ERA, with an 11.3 m length weighs around 630 kgs. Considering the ERA as a reference design, the total mass of the E-Walker that uses similar components is around 475 kg.

      The maximum torque required by an E-Walker’s actuator can be computed with E-Walker completely stretched out by J2 and carrying a payload using a LEE. In this configuration, using Eq. 1 and considering E-Walker’s inertial parameters, the simulation was carried out with the E-Walker in its initial configuration of Phase 1, moving to the extreme position in 60 s . The maximum torque experienced at J2 was around 70 N m (refer Figure 9), which is well within the torque ( 100 N m ) applied during the structural analysis of L1 in Link static structural analysis section. Using this value as a reference, space-qualified actuators could use a frameless motor with a harmonic drive attached to it (Space Actuators 2017; Harmonic Drive SE 2022). The dynamic torque analysis helps satisfy the requirement R S 6 .

      Joint two maximum torque.

      E-walker modal analysis

      Based on the E-Walker’s design optimisation in Link design optimisation, Latching end effector design analysis, and Actuator selection sections, the entire model was put under open-loop testing and no-load conditions in an ideal environment. As seen in Figure 10, the deflection is minimal. However, the challenge for the E-Walker is more severe as it has to move a PMS under the extreme environment in space and therefore requires frequency or modal analysis. The modal analysis in Ansys helps estimate the dynamic behaviour of the E-Walker when prone to different frequencies in the extremities of the space environment. The worst case performance of the E-Walker was evaluated in its most vulnerable position, i.e., with the arm completely stretched out about J2 with a maximum payload ( = 1 PMS) at its end. Six modes were considered, and the total displacement of the links and the LEE were analysed under each mode with a different frequency (Figure 11). As observed in Figure 11A, link two experiences a maximum link deflection of 7.8 c m and the LEE experiences a deflection of around 8.9 c m . It is to be noted that the modal analysis provides significant insight into the dynamical characteristics of the E-Walker in an open loop. The deflections obtained through this analysis could be modelled as disturbances while developing and optimising a suitable closed-loop robust controller for the E-Walker.

      E-Walker SSA with no Payload.

      E-Walker Modal Analysis (A) Ansys Simulation of Links and LEE (B) Deflection analysis (C) Stress Analysis (D) Strain Analysis.

      E-walker scaled-down Earth analogue design

      Verifying the large-scale model of the E-Walker is near to impossible under Earth analogue conditions, given the high torque demands due to Earth’s gravitational pull and the limited microgravity environment test facility on the ground. Due to these reasons, a scaled-down prototype of the E-Walker is considered for fabrication to verify and validate tasks involving mobility and pick-and-place operations. The design engineering exercise similar to the one carried out in End-over-end walking robot is repeated for the prototype in Sections 4.1–4.4. The comparison of the full-scale E-Walker and its scaled-down Earth-analogue design helps understand the issues with scalability and the impact of Earth’s gravitational acceleration. Table 7 presents a summary of the design trade-offs of the full-scale E-Walker and its prototype. Detailed SSA and actuator selection methods are presented in the following subsections. Similar to the full-scale space design, it is significant to identify the design requirements specific to the E-Walker’s scaled-down prototype ( R P i ) to carry out operations under Earth’s gravity. Table 8 presents the list of requirements.

      E-walker full scale and prototype comparison.

      Parameters Full-scale Prototype
      Scale 1 : 1 1 : 6
      Total Length 8 m 1.3 m
      Mass 475 k g 12 k g
      Payload 350 k g (maximum for a mission) 2 k g
      Link Maximum Deflection 0.04 m m 0.14 m m
      Link Load Multiplier 129 75
      LEE/Base LEE Large Ring LEE Small Ring Base
      LEE/Base Max Deflection 0.002 m m 0.008 m m 0.002 m m
      LEE/Base Load Multiplier 3350 680 4030
      Actuator Torque 70 N m 42 N m

      E-walker prototype requirement list.

      Sl. No Requirement
      R P 1 The E-Walker’s earth analogue design should be a scaled-down prototype the meets industry standards but for space qualification
      R P 2 The E-Walker should have 7 DoF for full dexterity
      R P 3 Payload capacity is 2 kg
      R P 4 Preferably Pancake BLDC Actuators are to be used for implementing high torques
      R P 5 Aluminium or Carbon fibre 3D printing can be considered for prototyping purposes
      R P 6 The base plate should incorporate ON-OFF electromagnets for E-Walker to attach itself to metal rails
      Bending moment, stall torque and actuator selection

      A similar FEA-based analysis used in End-over-end walking robot design can be used to optimise the link design for the scaled-down prototype. Figure 12 helps identify a general equation to calculate the bending moment and the corresponding torque needed to traverse a desired trajectory. Considering the actuators and payload of a given dimension, Figure 12A shows the Bending Moment (BM) for the links of the seven DoF E-Walker. Corresponding to this worst-case configuration, L1 will experience a larger bending moment than L2. The symmetrical design of the E-Walker suggests that evaluating the bending moment on L1 alone at the stretched condition is sufficient to get a conclusive estimate of the maximum twist experienced.

      E-Walker Configuration (A) To calculate Bending Moment on L1 (B) To calculate Stall Torque on J2.

      The links, actuators and payload are considered to have uniformly distributed load, with its weight considered to be concentrated at its centre of mass. From Figure 13, the following parameters are used to evaluate the B M : P–Payload; Li–Link; Ji–Actuator; m p —Payload mass = 2kg; m j —Actuator mass; m l —Link mass; W p —Payload Weight = 20 N ; W j —Actuator Weight; W l —Link Weight; d p —Payload length; d j —Actuator length/diameter; h j —Actuator height; d l —Link length. The Bending moment equation is derived as: B M = [ W l W p W j ] [ 2 d l + d j 2 d l + 0.5 d p + 3 d j + h j 7 d l + 7.5 d j + 0.5 h j ] .

      E-Walker prototype ansys FEA (A) Link (B) Base plate.

      The maximum stall torque is estimated considering that all the actuators are of the same specification, and the E-Walker has to implement motion using either of its ends whilst carrying a 2 k g payload. The E-Walker experiences the maximum stall torque when it carries the 2 k g payload with its arm stretched out (Figure 12B). This is much similar to the fully stretched configuration of the human arm, 90° with respect to the shoulder when carrying a load. Therefore, in the case of the E-Walker, if J2 is stretched out as shown in Figure 12, it will experience the maximum stall torque, and the rest of the actuators could be selected based on this calculation. The same can be considered with the case of J6 due to the symmetry of the design. The stall torque equation is derived as: S T = [ W l W p W j ] [ 2 d l + 4 d j 2 d l + 0.5 d p + 4.5 d j + h j 7 d l + 14.5 d j + 0.5 h j ]

      Based on Eq. 4 and Eq. 5, two case studies were carried out for different actuators available commercially (R100 KV90 2022; RMD-X8 Pro V2 2020; AK80-80 2022). In this research, a bespoke design of an using industrially available motors, gears, and encoders were not considered, given the compatibility issues, assembly costs and lead time. The RMD and AK series actuators had a diameter range between 5 and 10 cms. Therefore, a 5 cm and a 10 cm actuator is used to evaluate the range of BM and ST to carry a 2 kg payload ( W p = 20 N ). Aluminium 7075 is considered for fabricating the 20 cm links. Based on these parameters, the BM and ST corresponding to these design parameters are shown in Table 9. For the E-Walker assembly, the actuator casings would support clamps which would help with joint-joint and joint-link rigid assembly. The data from the case studies in Table 9 reveal that for the E-Walker, an actuator with a 5 c m diameter would need a stall torque of 20 N m and that of a 10 c m diameter would need an ST of 43 N m . Based on this analysis, the AK80-80 actuator from T-Motors is selected for the prototype (AK80-80 2022). It has an external diameter of 98 m m and a mass of 790 g . It has a continuous stall torque of 48 N m and a peak torque of 144 N m , which falls within the required specification of the E-Walker.

      Case Studies for E-Walker prototype design.

      Case d j ( m ) h j ( m ) W j ( N ) d l ( m ) W l ( N ) d p ( m ) B M on L1 ( N m ) S T on J2 ( N m )
      Case 1 0.05 0.025 4 0.2 1.49 0.05 19.82 22.94
      Case 2 0.1 0.065 8 0.2 1.49 0.05 34.01 43.05
      Link design optimisation and static structural analysis

      Similar to the link design optimisation in End-over-end walking robot design, Table 10 shows the dimension sets considered for SSA. An optimal design reference was set for the links not to bend more than 0.5 m m with sufficient buckling tolerance. SSA was performed on Sets 1 - 5 with an estimate of the BM in each case along with the weight of the other motors, L2 and the payload. The total deformation and stress were evaluated in each case. As per the results presented in Table 10, Set 5 has a deflection of 0.69 m m , which exceeds the design criteria. Set 4 has a total deformation around 0.42 m m with an eigenvalue buckling of 45 , which is a good safety factor. As Set four provides the maximum mass reduction among Set 1–4 with deflections within the desired limits, it is considered as the reference for design modifications. The idea is similar to that seen in End-over-end walking robot, i.e., to keep the ends wider with the middle link section slimmer. The updated design and FEA simulation results are depicted in Figure 13A.

      Comparison of design parameters for different link dimensions.

      Set Outer dia ( m m ) Thickness ( m m ) Mass ( k g ) B M ( N m ) Stress ( M P a ) Max deflection ( m m ) Load multiplier
      Set 1 50 3.5 0.149 34.1 22.88 0.215 61.548
      Set 2 45 3.5 0.132 34.03 29.12 0.284 58.268
      Set 3 40 3.5 0.118 33.9 36.841 0.328 53.916
      Set 4 35 3.5 0.103 33.86 44.841 0.424 44.805
      Set 5 30 3.5 0.087 33.8 59.368 0.688 39.051
      Base plate design analysis

      E-Walker’s prototype has a base plate equipped with on-off electromagnets on either end to fix itself on metallic structures and carry payloads (Electromagnet 2022). The maximum load on the base plate would be experienced when the E-Walker is erectly carrying the payload ( 2 k g ). The base plate would then have to bear the weight of the seven actuators, clamps, two links and the payload. A cumulative normal force of 150 N was applied on the base plate’s top face. A torque of 100 N was also applied to take into consideration any moments generated. Figure 13B presents the SSA results illustrating a deformation of 0.002 m m and a load multiplier of 4000 , which is a sufficient safety factor.

      Mission concept of operations

      A detailed feasibility analysis was carried out in a previous publication (Nair et al., 2020b), where a potential mission scenario, namely Mission Scenario 2b, was shortlisted after a trade-off analysis of eleven mission scenarios. A maximum of four E-Walkers were considered to carry out the assembly of the 25 m LAST. The analysis took into consideration the mission cost, lifting mass, net power requirements, control and motion planning complexity. This paper presents Mission Scenario 2b, which involves only two E-Walkers, namely EW1 and EW2 to carry out the in-orbit assembly of the 25 m LAST (Figure 14A). The mission ConOps provide an insight into task-sharing and co-manipulation with the collaborative operation between the two E-Walkers. This mission concept facilitated by two E-Walkers could facilitate futuristic LAST assembly missions with much larger apertures of 50 m or 100 m.

      Mission scenario 2b: (A) Artistic illustration (B) flow chart (C) simulated trajectory.

      Mission Scenario 2b involves both the E-Walkers sharing equal responsibilities in the assembly process. The tasks are split into assembling the PMS using the PMUs and performing pick-and-place operations to place the assembled PMSs to assemble the 25 m PM. To undertake the assembly, each of the E-Walkers is initially assigned one-half of the truss. This paper considers EW1 to take up the responsibility of the left half of the truss, whereas EW2 is responsible for the right half. The E-Walker’s reach is considered large enough to attend to the inner-ring assembly (positions 1–6) by staying on the Bsc. For the outer-ring assembly (positions 7–18), the E-Walkers will move to pre-designed connector points on the truss.

      For a quick and efficient assembly, the operation is carried out in two modes. In Mode 1, both the E-Walkers collaborate to assemble a PMS, using the PMUs stored in the Ssc, in the inner ring of the truss. Once a PMS is assembled, one E-Walker steps onto the respective connector point on the truss (EW1 for the left-half and EW2 for the right-half) to pick and place the assembled PMS onto the respective outer-ring positions. Considering an operation where EW1 moves onto a left-half connector point on the truss to place a PMS, EW2 will begin assembling a new PMS while EW1 is away. Once EW1 places the PMS, it climbs back onto the Bsc to assist EW2 with the ongoing PMS assembly. For the right-half assembly, the roles of the E-Walkers are switched. Mode 1 of operation sees a majority of the outer ring being assembled.

      Mode two of the assembly operation involves both the E-Walkers taking up individual responsibilities to assemble the PMS and to perform the pick-and-place operation in their respective halves. This is with the intent to utilise the E-Walker’s walking capability and reduce the overall sizing of the E-Walker. Additionally, each of the E-Walker will assemble PMSs simultaneously in the inner ring. The E-Walkers can attend to their respective halves in the inner ring from the Bsc itself. In Mode 2, both the E-Walkers collaborate to work independently and simultaneously, resulting in a faster assembly.

      Assembly constraints and strategy

      The LAST mission poses a few constraints to the E-Walker for an efficient assembly. For example, the E-Walker should maintain a clearance of 0.5–1 m from the assembled PMSs to reduce the chances of any collision. Additionally, while assembling or placing the PMSs, the E-Walker should make sure the task is not being carried out in an in-zone mirror position. Therefore, it is understood that the E-Walker has to be outside the zone of assembly at all times. A few strategies for assembly that takes into account these constraints are:

      1) The assembly process can begin with the E-Walkers assembling the PMSs using the PMUs stored in the Ssc. Realising the fact that the E-Walkers have a reach to assemble the inner-ring positions from the Bsc, the assembly of the PMSs can be initially conducted on a certain inner-ring position. This allows the E-Walkers to walk around freely between the Bsc and truss.

      2) The outer-ring positions can be filled in first. The assembled PMS in the inner ring can then be placed on to an outer ring position by an E-Walker moving onto the respective connector point based on their assigned halves. Assemble the outer ring mirrors first to allow the E-Walker to walk around the truss during the assembly process.

      3) The mode of operation can be switched when a situation arises i.e., when the independent task execution of the E-Walkers in their assigned halves can help with a quick and efficient assembly.

      4) Once the outer ring is completely assembled, the E-Walkers can climb back onto the Bsc to fill in the inner ring positions.

      Flow chart of assembly process (mission scenario 2b)

      The flowchart uses the following abbreviations:

      Bsc - Base Spacecraft; Bsc_C - Base Spacecraft Connector; Cb - Connector point on truss; Ⓐ - assembles/assembling; PMS - Primary Mirror Segment; EW- End-Over-End Walker; Pos - Position.

      The mirror positions with their inner and outer ring positions and the corresponding connector points on the truss can be recalled from Figure 3. The connector point numberings on the Bsc can also be understood from Figure 3. With the information on Mission Scenario 2b provided in Mission concept of operations (ConOps), a flowchart is presented in Figure 14B, which provides more in-depth insight into the mission ConOps. The terms used are:

      a—In use Connector number array on Bsc; b - In use Connector number array on Truss.

      mode—select the mode of operation.

      mode 1—where EW1 and EW2 work together.

      mode 2—EW1 and EW2 work parallelly on the left half and right half mirrors. p2l and p2r mirror arrays would be assembled in mode 2.

      p'—Array of Initial Mirror position on Truss

      p1—Array of outer-ring mirror positions to be assembled during mode 1

      p2l—Array of final mirror positions to be assembled by EW1 on left-half of the truss–mode 2.

      p2r—Array of final mirror positions to be assembled by EW2 on right-half of the truss (Positions in sequence: 8, 4, 3, 2)—mode 2.

      c—PMS counter; m—array index of a; n—array index of b; i'—array index of p'; k—array index of c;

      i—array index of p, provides insight into the number of assembled PMS.

      It is to be noted that the above-mentioned variables m, n, i, i' and k start from 1.

      d—Array of E-Walker Numberings; m - array index of a; n - array index of b; i1—array index of p2l

      i2—Array index of p2r; l—Array index of d

      Mission scenario 2b analysis

      The assembly process of the 25 m LAST in the flowchart for Mission Scenario 2b begins with EW1 and EW2 taking their positions on their Bsc connector ports. EW1 takes a position on Bsc_C8 and EW2 on Bsc_C14. Positioning the E-Walkers on two sides of the Bsc helps with their move onto the truss connector ports in the respective halves. Now, the truss positions can be filled in with the assembled PMS from either half of the truss. In this paper, the assembly of the right-half outer ring of the truss is considered first. The positions of the truss are filled in a specific sequence based on the positions shown in Figure 2. The mission has two modes of operation to carry out the assembly.

      The mode is initially set to 1 suggesting the collaborative working of both the E-Walkers. During mode 1, both the E-Walkers begin assembling the PMS on the inner-ring truss position 4, using the PMUs stored in the Ssc. Throughout the operation, the PMUs are considered to be readily available. Once the first PMS is assembled, EW2 moves onto C5 on the truss. EW2 then picks the assembled PMS from position four and places it on position 13, filling the first position of the 25 m LAST. While EW2 is performing the pick-and-place operation, EW1 starts assembling the second PMS. Post placing the first PMS, EW1 moves onto the Bsc to assist EW1 with the assembly of the second PMS. Positions 11 and 10 are filled similarly as seen with the first PMS, completing the placement of three PMSs. Thereafter, the same process is repeated to fill in positions 12 and 9, with EW2 moving onto C4 as position 12 is in-zone of C5. Now, a majority of the right-half outer ring is filled in.

      To assist with the assembly of the left-half outer ring, the roles of the E-Walkers are switched. EW1 and EW2 assist with the assembly of the PMS, while EW1 now has an added responsibility to place the assembled PMSs by moving onto C8 on the truss. C8 helps the EW1 fill positions 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 to successfully complete the placement of ten PMSs. Similar to the right-half assembly, EW2 continues to assemble a new PMS while EW1 is placing the previously assembled PMS. Once the assembled PMS is placed, EW1 climbs back onto the Bsc to assist EW2 with the assembly of the new PMS.

      The mode of operation now switches to mode 2. With eight positions left to be filled, two positions are in the outer ring, while six positions are in the inner ring. In mode 2, EW1 and EW2 have individual responsibilities of assembling the PMS and perform the pick-and-place operation in their respective halves. To fill out the outer ring, EW1 assembles a PMS in inner-ring position five while EW2 assembles a PMS in position 3. Post assembling the PMS, EW1 moves onto C6 and EW2 to C2 on the truss. EW1 moves the assembled PMS from position five to position 7, while EW2 places the PMS on position 8. This step is well represented in Figure 14A. This marks the successful assembly of the outer ring of the 25 m PM. For the inner-ring assembly, EW1 and EW2 move onto Bsc and performs a simultaneous assembly of the PMSs on each half of the truss. While EW1 assembles the inner ring positions 5, 6 and 1, EW2 completes the assembly by filling up positions 4, three and 2. The assembly of the 18 PMSs marks the successful completion of the 25 m LAST.

      The systematic assembly presented eliminates the risks of the E-Walker colliding with the mirror modules by avoiding in-zone mirror positions. This helps in satisfying the top-level requirement R4 of the E-Walker. Requirements R 2 , R 3 , R 4 and R 5 are to be achieved throughout the mission, to fulfil requirement R 1 . It is to be noted that in this paper the successful tracking of the joint parameters at each step by avoiding in-zone mirror positions is assumed to result in a collision-free assembly. However, in a real mission scenario there exists possibilities of the E-Walker colliding with the Bsc, Ssc and Truss due to inappropriate docking. Successful docking is achieved with the help of Camera Lighting Units on the E-Walker alongside the controller constantly tracking the joint parameters under perturbed conditions.

      Mission trajectory tracking

      Figure 14C shows the trajectory tracking of EW1 during the Mission Scenario 2b assembly process in a simulated environment. Trajectory 1 represents EW1’s motion from Bsc_C11 to Bsc_C8. The motion is quite similar to Phase-1 of Cycle-1. Considering joint 1 is fixed at Bsc_C11, the motion of the EE attached to q7 is tracked to reach Bsc_C8. This satisfies the initial condition check for EW1 in the assembly process, depicted in the flow chart. Trajectory two represents the tracking of joint 1’s motion to fetch a PMU from the Ssc. During this motion, joint five is locked at Bsc_C8. The third trajectory portrays a common motion for EW1 during the operation in Mode 1, where EW1, with joint five fixed to Bsc_C8 moves onto C8, on the truss, to pick and place the assembled PMS in the relevant truss position on the left half of the truss.

      Conclusion and future research

      This paper introduced the design and feasibility of a walking space manipulator for in-situ robotic assembly of a 25 m Large Aperture Space Telescope (LAST). It captured the critical challenges of in-space robotic assembly mission, elicited the mission and system-level requirements and provided a deeper understanding of the design engineering of the E-Walker. The seven DoF End-over-End Walking Robot (E-Walker) selected for this mission provides the modularity, dexterity features alongside manoeuvring capabilities over an enhanced workspace. Detailed design engineering helped identify an optimised design for the E-Walker to carry out the assembly of LAST. These included static structural and modal analysis of the full-scale space design of the E-Walker. This provided an insight into understanding the dynamical behaviour of the intercoupled links and the end-effectors of the E-Walker while carrying a payload under different environmental conditions.

      The E-Walker presented would be able to extend the mission lifecycle by carrying out routine maintenance and servicing missions post assembly. The E-Walker design shown is versatile, and it is a candidate robot for future planetary and orbital missions. In addition to the full-scale design, a scaled-down ( 1 : 6 ) prototype design of the E-Walker is also presented, along with its detailed structural analysis. The optimised design analysis (considering a payload) identifies the E-Walker prototype to also be an ideal candidate for servicing, maintenance, and assembly operations on the ground. An example could be the E-Walker carrying out regular maintenance checks on a wind turbine, given its capability to manoeuvre anywhere in a 3D space. Once the detailed design engineering for the E-Walker was discussed, a mission concept, namely Mission Scenario 2b, was presented to carry out the assembly of the 25 m LAST. The assembly flow presented using the dual-agent system (two E-Walkers) realises robotic task-sharing capabilities in orbit. The mission serves as a baseline study for large-scale future missions requiring multiple agents. Overall, this paper presents the top-level system design to assemble a 25 m telescope in orbit, with a detailed analysis of the E-Walker design to be integrated into future in-orbit and terrestrial operations. This paper is a useful case study for future LAST missions with Primary Mirrors of apertures planned up to 100 m .

      Future research includes finalising the design specifications of the true-scale E-Walker for the 25 m LAST mission. Additionally, an Earth-based small-scale E-Walker prototype is under development for further hardware-in-loop experimentation. This prototype can then be tested with space-qualified robust controllers, like the Proportional-Integral-Derivative-Computed-Torque-Controller or the H controller for precise joint tracking under external disturbances and parametric uncertainties. Given the huge commercial interest in this topic, Space agencies and industries have developed their road maps for orbital robotics missions. The LAST mission and the E-Walker model have also drawn commercial and scientific attention. Over the next 5–10 years, it is envisaged that researchers and industries will carry out further development to assess E-Walker’s feasibility. These include prototyping an E-Walker for a precursor mission involving a 2.5m/5 m LAST. The E-Walker’s capability for assembling the secondary mirror, truss modules and baffles is not yet realised.

      Data availability statement

      The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

      Author contributions

      MN—Lead researcher; MR—PhD Supervisor and editorial support; MP—Simulation and editorial support.

      Funding

      This research is fully funded by the University of Lincoln as part of the PhD process of MN.

      We would like to thank the UK space In-Orbit Servicing and Manufacturing working group, comprising several Space industries, for their constant encouragement and commercial interest in orbital robotic missions. Thanks to Steve Eckersley at Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd. for the advice on mission requirements.

      Conflict of interest

      The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

      Publisher’s note

      All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

      References Baiocchi D. Stahl H. P. (2009). “Enabling future space telescopes: Mirror technology review and development roadmap,” in The astronomy and astrophysics decadal survey (Astro2010). Brooks S. Godart P. Backes P. Chamberlain-Simon B. Smith R. Karumanchi S. (2016). An untethered mobile limb for modular in-space assembly. In Proc. 2016 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 19. USA: MT. 10.1109/aero.2016.7500878 Burrows Christopher J. (1991). “Hubble space telescope optics: Problems and solutions,” in Proceedings Volume 1494, Space Astronomical Telescopes and Instruments, Orlando, FL. Editors Bely P. Y. Breckinridge B. B. , 528533. 10.1117/12.46708 Cruijssen H. J. Ellenbroek M. Henderson M. Petersen H. R. Verzijden P. Visser M. (2014). The European robotic arm: A high-performance mechanism finally on its way to space. NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS). [Online]. Available: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20150004070/downloads/20150004070.pdf (Last Accessed: September 03, 2022). Culbertson F. (2003). “Operating the ISS: A world-wide team effort,” in Proc. AIAA international air and space symposium and exposition: The next 100 years (Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics). 10.2514/6.2003-2701 Dalla V. K. Pathak P. M. (2019). Power-optimized motion planning of reconfigured redundant space robot. Proc. Institution Mech. Eng. Part I J. Syst. Control Eng. 233 (8), 10301044. 10.1177/0959651818814133 Deremetz M. Letier P. Grunwald G. Roa M. A. Brunner B. Ferrán Cfiuentes A. (2021). “MOSAR-WM: Integration and test results of a relocatable robotic arm demonstrator for future on-orbit servicing missions,” in Proc. 2021 international astronautical congress (IAC2021). Cyberspace Edition (Dubai. Dursun T. Soutis C. (2014). Recent developments in advanced aircraft aluminium alloys. Mater. Des. (1980-2015) 56, 862871. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.002 Fazekas A. (2020). Top 5 space station repair spacewalk dangers. National Geographic Society Newsroom. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://blog.nationalgeographic.org/2013/12/20/top-5-space-station-repair-spacewalk-dangers/ (Last Accessed: September 03, 2022). Flores-Abad A. Ma O. Pham K. Ulrich S. (2014). A review of space robotics technologies for on-orbit servicing. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 68, 126. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2014.03.002 Garzón M. A. R. Nottensteine K. Wedler A. Grunwald G. (2017). “Robotic technologies for in-space assembly operations,” in Proc. 14th symposium on advanced space technologies in robotics and automation (ASTRA), 20-22 june 2017 (Leiden, Netherlands. Gobin S. UK Farnell (2022). 58-0250 24 VDC electromagnet. [Online]. Available: https://hk.element14.com/stephenson-gobin/58-0250-24-vdc/electromagnet-type-58/dp/7200924 (Last Accessed: September 03, 2022). Gook D. G. (2015). The Canadian designed and built SPAR/MDA canadarms - Canada’s contribution to space exploration. [Online]. Available: https://documents.techno-science.ca/documents/CASM-Aircrafthistories-SparMDACanadarms.pdf (Last Accessed: September 03, 2022). Hughes T. J. R. Cottrell J. A. Bazilevs Y. (2005). Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 194 (39–41), 41354195. 10.1016/j.cma.2004.10.008 Lee Ni Paul B. Joel B. Pellegrino S. Fuller C. Hogstrom K. Kennedy B. 041207 (2016). Architecture for in-space robotic assembly of a modular space telescope. J. Astronomical Telesc. Instrum. Syst. 2 (4). 10.1117/1.jatis.2.4.041207 Letier P. Yan X-T Deremetz M. Bianco A. Grunwald G. Roa M. A. (2019). “Mosar: Modular spacecraft assembly and reconfiguration demonstrator,” in Proc. ASTRA 2019 symposium (Netherlands: Noordwijk), 2728. Lockwood Optics (2020). Ritchey-chretien cassegrain telescope design equations. [Online]. Available: http://www.loptics.com/ATM/ (Last Accessed: September 03, 2022). Nair Manu H. Saaj C. M. Esfahani A. G. Nanjangud A. Eckersley S. Bianco P. (2020). “In-space robotic assembly and servicing of high-value infrastructure,” in Proc. 2020 international astronautical congress (IAC2020). Cyberspace Edition (Dubai. Nair M. H. Saaj C. M. Adlen S. Esfahani A. G. Eckersley S. (2020). “Advances in robotic in-orbit assembly of large aperture space telescopes,” in Proc. 15th international symposium in artificial intelligence, robotics and automation in space (i-SAIRAS) oct 2020 (US: Pasadena). Nair M. H. Saaj C. M. Esfahani A. G. (2020). “Modelling and control of an end-over-end walking robot,” in Proc. 21st towards autonomous robotic systems (TAROS) conference, online, 16 september 2020 (Nottingham, UK. 10.1007/978-3-030-63486-5_15 Nanjangud A. Blacker P. C. Young A. Saaj C. M. Underwood C. I. Eckersley S. (2019). “Robotic architectures for the on-orbit assembly of large space telescopes,” in Proc. 15th advanced space technologies in robotics and automation (ASTRA) 2019 symposium, 27-28 may 2019 (Netherlands: Noordwijk). Nanjangud A. Underwood C. I. Bridges C. P. Saaj C. M. Eckersley S. Sweeting M. (2019-25 October 2019). “Towards robotic on-orbit assembly of large space telescopes: Mission architectures, concepts, and analysis,” in Proc. 70th international astronautical congress (IAC) (Washington DC, USA, 21. NASA (2020). Hubble makes surprising find in early universe. [Online]. Available: https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2020/hubble-makes-surprising-find-in-early-universe (Last Accessed: September 03, 2022). Nelson A. Koizumi K. Uzo-Okoro E. (2022). Space servicing, assembly, and manufacturing interagency working group of the national science & technology council. Executive Office of the President of the United States, April 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/04-2022-ISAM-National-Strategy-Final.pdf (Last Accessed: September 03, 2022).In-space servicing, assembly, and manufacturing national strategy Nelson J. Mast T. Chanan G. (2013). Segmented mirror telescopes BT - planets, stars and stellar systems: Volume 1: Telescopes and instrumentation. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 99136. Oegerle W. R. Purves L. R. Budinoff J. G. Moe R. V. Carnahan T. M. Evans D. C. (2006). “Concept for a large scalable space telescope: In-space assembly,”In Proceedings Volume 6265, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation I: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter, Orlando, FL. Editors Mather John C. MacEwen Howard A. , 62652C. 10.1117/12.672244 Raffo G. V. Ortega M. G. Rubio F. R. (2011). Nonlinear H∞ controller for the quad-rotor helicopter with input coupling*. IFAC Proc. Vol. 44 (1), 1383413839. 10.3182/20110828-6-it-1002.02453 Robot Shop (2020). RMD-X8 Pro V2 brushless DC servo motor 1:9, MC300A. Available at: https://Www.Robotshop.Com/Uk/My-Actuator-Rmd-X8-pro-v2-Brushless-Dc-Servo-Motor-19-Mc300a.Html. 2020. Rognant M. Cumer C. Biannic J. Roa M. A. Verhaege A. Bissonnette V. (2019). “Autonomous assembly of large structures in space: A technology review,” in Proc. 8th European conference for aeronautics and aerospace sciences (EUCASS). Satellite Applications Catapult (2020). In-space services - a major opportunity for the UK - satellite applications Catapult . https://sa.catapult.org.uk/in-space-services-a-major-opportunity-for-the-uk/ (Last Accessed: September 03, 2022). Space Actuators (2017). Space sector brochure, moog components group. Moog. Available at: https://Www.Moog.Com/Products/Actuators-Servoactuators/Space.Html February, 2017). Space Robotics (2022). Aerospace, harmonic drive SE. [Online]. Available: https://Harmonicdrive.de/En/Applications/Aerospace. 2022 (Last Accessed: September 03, 2022). Spong M. Hutchinson W. S. Vidyasagar M. (2006). Robot modeling and control. T-Motor (2020). AK80-80. [Online]. Available: https://Store.Tmotor.Com/Goods.Php?Id=1032 (Last Accessed: September 03, 2022). T-Motor (2022). R100 KV90. [Online]. Available: https://store.tmotor.com/goods.php?id=1032 (Last Accessed: September 03, 2022). Thirsk R. Kuipers A. Mukai C. au fnm 2009). The space-flight environment: The international space station and beyond. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 180 (12), 12161220.10.1503/cmaj.081125 Yisheng Guan Y. Li Jiang L. Haifei Zhu H. Xuefeng Zhou X. Chuanwu Cai C. Wenqiang Wu W. (2011). Climbot: A modular bio-inspired biped climbing robot. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. –1478. [Online]. Available:. 10.1109/IROS.2011.6094406 Last Accessed: September 03, 2022) Climbot: A modular bio-inspired biped climbing robot Younger Mandy Eckelmeyer Kenneth (2007a). “Aluminum alloys for satellite boxes : Engineering guidelines for obtaining adequate strength while minimizing residual stresses and machining distortion,” in Technical report (Albuquerque, NM, and Livermore, CA, United States: OSTI.GOV). 10.2172/922072
      ‘Oh, my dear Thomas, you haven’t heard the terrible news then?’ she said. ‘I thought you would be sure to have seen it placarded somewhere. Alice went straight to her room, and I haven’t seen her since, though I repeatedly knocked at the door, which she has locked on the inside, and I’m sure it’s most unnatural of her not to let her own mother comfort her. It all happened in a moment: I have always said those great motor-cars shouldn’t be allowed to career about the streets, especially when they are all paved with cobbles as they are at Easton Haven, which are{331} so slippery when it’s wet. He slipped, and it went over him in a moment.’ My thanks were few and awkward, for there still hung to the missive a basting thread, and it was as warm as a nestling bird. I bent low--everybody was emotional in those days--kissed the fragrant thing, thrust it into my bosom, and blushed worse than Camille. "What, the Corner House victim? Is that really a fact?" "My dear child, I don't look upon it in that light at all. The child gave our picturesque friend a certain distinction--'My husband is dead, and this is my only child,' and all that sort of thing. It pays in society." leave them on the steps of a foundling asylum in order to insure [See larger version] Interoffice guff says you're planning definite moves on your own, J. O., and against some opposition. Is the Colonel so poor or so grasping—or what? Albert could not speak, for he felt as if his brains and teeth were rattling about inside his head. The rest of[Pg 188] the family hunched together by the door, the boys gaping idiotically, the girls in tears. "Now you're married." The host was called in, and unlocked a drawer in which they were deposited. The galleyman, with visible reluctance, arrayed himself in the garments, and he was observed to shudder more than once during the investiture of the dead man's apparel. HoME香京julia种子在线播放 ENTER NUMBET 0016www.librbn.com.cn
      gzgywq.com.cn
      www.eyzwnl.com.cn
      www.etxxme.com.cn
      www.ipingo.com.cn
      njepxy.com.cn
      nqglgs.com.cn
      nmbtrl.com.cn
      www.qcindg.com.cn
      www.pqlepz.com.cn
      处女被大鸡巴操 强奸乱伦小说图片 俄罗斯美女爱爱图 调教强奸学生 亚洲女的穴 夜来香图片大全 美女性强奸电影 手机版色中阁 男性人体艺术素描图 16p成人 欧美性爱360 电影区 亚洲电影 欧美电影 经典三级 偷拍自拍 动漫电影 乱伦电影 变态另类 全部电 类似狠狠鲁的网站 黑吊操白逼图片 韩国黄片种子下载 操逼逼逼逼逼 人妻 小说 p 偷拍10幼女自慰 极品淫水很多 黄色做i爱 日本女人人体电影快播看 大福国小 我爱肏屄美女 mmcrwcom 欧美多人性交图片 肥臀乱伦老头舔阴帝 d09a4343000019c5 西欧人体艺术b xxoo激情短片 未成年人的 插泰国人夭图片 第770弾み1 24p 日本美女性 交动态 eee色播 yantasythunder 操无毛少女屄 亚洲图片你懂的女人 鸡巴插姨娘 特级黄 色大片播 左耳影音先锋 冢本友希全集 日本人体艺术绿色 我爱被舔逼 内射 幼 美阴图 喷水妹子高潮迭起 和后妈 操逼 美女吞鸡巴 鸭个自慰 中国女裸名单 操逼肥臀出水换妻 色站裸体义术 中国行上的漏毛美女叫什么 亚洲妹性交图 欧美美女人裸体人艺照 成人色妹妹直播 WWW_JXCT_COM r日本女人性淫乱 大胆人艺体艺图片 女同接吻av 碰碰哥免费自拍打炮 艳舞写真duppid1 88电影街拍视频 日本自拍做爱qvod 实拍美女性爱组图 少女高清av 浙江真实乱伦迅雷 台湾luanlunxiaoshuo 洛克王国宠物排行榜 皇瑟电影yy频道大全 红孩儿连连看 阴毛摄影 大胆美女写真人体艺术摄影 和风骚三个媳妇在家做爱 性爱办公室高清 18p2p木耳 大波撸影音 大鸡巴插嫩穴小说 一剧不超两个黑人 阿姨诱惑我快播 幼香阁千叶县小学生 少女妇女被狗强奸 曰人体妹妹 十二岁性感幼女 超级乱伦qvod 97爱蜜桃ccc336 日本淫妇阴液 av海量资源999 凤凰影视成仁 辰溪四中艳照门照片 先锋模特裸体展示影片 成人片免费看 自拍百度云 肥白老妇女 女爱人体图片 妈妈一女穴 星野美夏 日本少女dachidu 妹子私处人体图片 yinmindahuitang 舔无毛逼影片快播 田莹疑的裸体照片 三级电影影音先锋02222 妻子被外国老头操 观月雏乃泥鳅 韩国成人偷拍自拍图片 强奸5一9岁幼女小说 汤姆影院av图片 妹妹人艺体图 美女大驱 和女友做爱图片自拍p 绫川まどか在线先锋 那么嫩的逼很少见了 小女孩做爱 处女好逼连连看图图 性感美女在家做爱 近距离抽插骚逼逼 黑屌肏金毛屄 日韩av美少女 看喝尿尿小姐日逼色色色网图片 欧美肛交新视频 美女吃逼逼 av30线上免费 伊人在线三级经典 新视觉影院t6090影院 最新淫色电影网址 天龙影院远古手机版 搞老太影院 插进美女的大屁股里 私人影院加盟费用 www258dd 求一部电影里面有一个二猛哥 深肛交 日本萌妹子人体艺术写真图片 插入屄眼 美女的木奶 中文字幕黄色网址影视先锋 九号女神裸 和骚人妻偷情 和潘晓婷做爱 国模大尺度蜜桃 欧美大逼50p 西西人体成人 李宗瑞继母做爱原图物处理 nianhuawang 男鸡巴的视屏 � 97免费色伦电影 好色网成人 大姨子先锋 淫荡巨乳美女教师妈妈 性nuexiaoshuo WWW36YYYCOM 长春继续给力进屋就操小女儿套干破内射对白淫荡 农夫激情社区 日韩无码bt 欧美美女手掰嫩穴图片 日本援交偷拍自拍 入侵者日本在线播放 亚洲白虎偷拍自拍 常州高见泽日屄 寂寞少妇自卫视频 人体露逼图片 多毛外国老太 变态乱轮手机在线 淫荡妈妈和儿子操逼 伦理片大奶少女 看片神器最新登入地址sqvheqi345com账号群 麻美学姐无头 圣诞老人射小妞和强奸小妞动话片 亚洲AV女老师 先锋影音欧美成人资源 33344iucoom zV天堂电影网 宾馆美女打炮视频 色五月丁香五月magnet 嫂子淫乱小说 张歆艺的老公 吃奶男人视频在线播放 欧美色图男女乱伦 avtt2014ccvom 性插色欲香影院 青青草撸死你青青草 99热久久第一时间 激情套图卡通动漫 幼女裸聊做爱口交 日本女人被强奸乱伦 草榴社区快播 2kkk正在播放兽骑 啊不要人家小穴都湿了 www猎奇影视 A片www245vvcomwwwchnrwhmhzcn 搜索宜春院av wwwsee78co 逼奶鸡巴插 好吊日AV在线视频19gancom 熟女伦乱图片小说 日本免费av无码片在线开苞 鲁大妈撸到爆 裸聊官网 德国熟女xxx 新不夜城论坛首页手机 女虐男网址 男女做爱视频华为网盘 激情午夜天亚洲色图 内裤哥mangent 吉沢明歩制服丝袜WWWHHH710COM 屌逼在线试看 人体艺体阿娇艳照 推荐一个可以免费看片的网站如果被QQ拦截请复制链接在其它浏览器打开xxxyyy5comintr2a2cb551573a2b2e 欧美360精品粉红鲍鱼 教师调教第一页 聚美屋精品图 中韩淫乱群交 俄罗斯撸撸片 把鸡巴插进小姨子的阴道 干干AV成人网 aolasoohpnbcn www84ytom 高清大量潮喷www27dyycom 宝贝开心成人 freefronvideos人母 嫩穴成人网gggg29com 逼着舅妈给我口交肛交彩漫画 欧美色色aV88wwwgangguanscom 老太太操逼自拍视频 777亚洲手机在线播放 有没有夫妻3p小说 色列漫画淫女 午间色站导航 欧美成人处女色大图 童颜巨乳亚洲综合 桃色性欲草 色眯眯射逼 无码中文字幕塞外青楼这是一个 狂日美女老师人妻 爱碰网官网 亚洲图片雅蠛蝶 快播35怎么搜片 2000XXXX电影 新谷露性家庭影院 深深候dvd播放 幼齿用英语怎么说 不雅伦理无需播放器 国外淫荡图片 国外网站幼幼嫩网址 成年人就去色色视频快播 我鲁日日鲁老老老我爱 caoshaonvbi 人体艺术avav 性感性色导航 韩国黄色哥来嫖网站 成人网站美逼 淫荡熟妇自拍 欧美色惰图片 北京空姐透明照 狼堡免费av视频 www776eom 亚洲无码av欧美天堂网男人天堂 欧美激情爆操 a片kk266co 色尼姑成人极速在线视频 国语家庭系列 蒋雯雯 越南伦理 色CC伦理影院手机版 99jbbcom 大鸡巴舅妈 国产偷拍自拍淫荡对话视频 少妇春梦射精 开心激动网 自拍偷牌成人 色桃隐 撸狗网性交视频 淫荡的三位老师 伦理电影wwwqiuxia6commqiuxia6com 怡春院分站 丝袜超短裙露脸迅雷下载 色制服电影院 97超碰好吊色男人 yy6080理论在线宅男日韩福利大全 大嫂丝袜 500人群交手机在线 5sav 偷拍熟女吧 口述我和妹妹的欲望 50p电脑版 wwwavtttcon 3p3com 伦理无码片在线看 欧美成人电影图片岛国性爱伦理电影 先锋影音AV成人欧美 我爱好色 淫电影网 WWW19MMCOM 玛丽罗斯3d同人动画h在线看 动漫女孩裸体 超级丝袜美腿乱伦 1919gogo欣赏 大色逼淫色 www就是撸 激情文学网好骚 A级黄片免费 xedd5com 国内的b是黑的 快播美国成年人片黄 av高跟丝袜视频 上原保奈美巨乳女教师在线观看 校园春色都市激情fefegancom 偷窥自拍XXOO 搜索看马操美女 人本女优视频 日日吧淫淫 人妻巨乳影院 美国女子性爱学校 大肥屁股重口味 啪啪啪啊啊啊不要 操碰 japanfreevideoshome国产 亚州淫荡老熟女人体 伦奸毛片免费在线看 天天影视se 樱桃做爱视频 亚卅av在线视频 x奸小说下载 亚洲色图图片在线 217av天堂网 东方在线撸撸-百度 幼幼丝袜集 灰姑娘的姐姐 青青草在线视频观看对华 86papa路con 亚洲1AV 综合图片2区亚洲 美国美女大逼电影 010插插av成人网站 www色comwww821kxwcom 播乐子成人网免费视频在线观看 大炮撸在线影院 ,www4KkKcom 野花鲁最近30部 wwwCC213wapwww2233ww2download 三客优最新地址 母亲让儿子爽的无码视频 全国黄色片子 欧美色图美国十次 超碰在线直播 性感妖娆操 亚洲肉感熟女色图 a片A毛片管看视频 8vaa褋芯屑 333kk 川岛和津实视频 在线母子乱伦对白 妹妹肥逼五月 亚洲美女自拍 老婆在我面前小说 韩国空姐堪比情趣内衣 干小姐综合 淫妻色五月 添骚穴 WM62COM 23456影视播放器 成人午夜剧场 尼姑福利网 AV区亚洲AV欧美AV512qucomwwwc5508com 经典欧美骚妇 震动棒露出 日韩丝袜美臀巨乳在线 av无限吧看 就去干少妇 色艺无间正面是哪集 校园春色我和老师做爱 漫画夜色 天海丽白色吊带 黄色淫荡性虐小说 午夜高清播放器 文20岁女性荫道口图片 热国产热无码热有码 2015小明发布看看算你色 百度云播影视 美女肏屄屄乱轮小说 家族舔阴AV影片 邪恶在线av有码 父女之交 关于处女破处的三级片 极品护士91在线 欧美虐待女人视频的网站 享受老太太的丝袜 aaazhibuo 8dfvodcom成人 真实自拍足交 群交男女猛插逼 妓女爱爱动态 lin35com是什么网站 abp159 亚洲色图偷拍自拍乱伦熟女抠逼自慰 朝国三级篇 淫三国幻想 免费的av小电影网站 日本阿v视频免费按摩师 av750c0m 黄色片操一下 巨乳少女车震在线观看 操逼 免费 囗述情感一乱伦岳母和女婿 WWW_FAMITSU_COM 偷拍中国少妇在公车被操视频 花也真衣论理电影 大鸡鸡插p洞 新片欧美十八岁美少 进击的巨人神thunderftp 西方美女15p 深圳哪里易找到老女人玩视频 在线成人有声小说 365rrr 女尿图片 我和淫荡的小姨做爱 � 做爱技术体照 淫妇性爱 大学生私拍b 第四射狠狠射小说 色中色成人av社区 和小姨子乱伦肛交 wwwppp62com 俄罗斯巨乳人体艺术 骚逼阿娇 汤芳人体图片大胆 大胆人体艺术bb私处 性感大胸骚货 哪个网站幼女的片多 日本美女本子把 色 五月天 婷婷 快播 美女 美穴艺术 色百合电影导航 大鸡巴用力 孙悟空操美少女战士 狠狠撸美女手掰穴图片 古代女子与兽类交 沙耶香套图 激情成人网区 暴风影音av播放 动漫女孩怎么插第3个 mmmpp44 黑木麻衣无码ed2k 淫荡学姐少妇 乱伦操少女屄 高中性爱故事 骚妹妹爱爱图网 韩国模特剪长发 大鸡巴把我逼日了 中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片 大胆女人下体艺术图片 789sss 影音先锋在线国内情侣野外性事自拍普通话对白 群撸图库 闪现君打阿乐 ady 小说 插入表妹嫩穴小说 推荐成人资源 网络播放器 成人台 149大胆人体艺术 大屌图片 骚美女成人av 春暖花开春色性吧 女亭婷五月 我上了同桌的姐姐 恋夜秀场主播自慰视频 yzppp 屄茎 操屄女图 美女鲍鱼大特写 淫乱的日本人妻山口玲子 偷拍射精图 性感美女人体艺木图片 种马小说完本 免费电影院 骑士福利导航导航网站 骚老婆足交 国产性爱一级电影 欧美免费成人花花性都 欧美大肥妞性爱视频 家庭乱伦网站快播 偷拍自拍国产毛片 金发美女也用大吊来开包 缔D杏那 yentiyishu人体艺术ytys WWWUUKKMCOM 女人露奶 � 苍井空露逼 老荡妇高跟丝袜足交 偷偷和女友的朋友做爱迅雷 做爱七十二尺 朱丹人体合成 麻腾由纪妃 帅哥撸播种子图 鸡巴插逼动态图片 羙国十次啦中文 WWW137AVCOM 神斗片欧美版华语 有气质女人人休艺术 由美老师放屁电影 欧美女人肉肏图片 白虎种子快播 国产自拍90后女孩 美女在床上疯狂嫩b 饭岛爱最后之作 幼幼强奸摸奶 色97成人动漫 两性性爱打鸡巴插逼 新视觉影院4080青苹果影院 嗯好爽插死我了 阴口艺术照 李宗瑞电影qvod38 爆操舅母 亚洲色图七七影院 被大鸡巴操菊花 怡红院肿么了 成人极品影院删除 欧美性爱大图色图强奸乱 欧美女子与狗随便性交 苍井空的bt种子无码 熟女乱伦长篇小说 大色虫 兽交幼女影音先锋播放 44aad be0ca93900121f9b 先锋天耗ばさ无码 欧毛毛女三级黄色片图 干女人黑木耳照 日本美女少妇嫩逼人体艺术 sesechangchang 色屄屄网 久久撸app下载 色图色噜 美女鸡巴大奶 好吊日在线视频在线观看 透明丝袜脚偷拍自拍 中山怡红院菜单 wcwwwcom下载 骑嫂子 亚洲大色妣 成人故事365ahnet 丝袜家庭教mp4 幼交肛交 妹妹撸撸大妈 日本毛爽 caoprom超碰在email 关于中国古代偷窥的黄片 第一会所老熟女下载 wwwhuangsecome 狼人干综合新地址HD播放 变态儿子强奸乱伦图 强奸电影名字 2wwwer37com 日本毛片基地一亚洲AVmzddcxcn 暗黑圣经仙桃影院 37tpcocn 持月真由xfplay 好吊日在线视频三级网 我爱背入李丽珍 电影师傅床戏在线观看 96插妹妹sexsex88com 豪放家庭在线播放 桃花宝典极夜著豆瓜网 安卓系统播放神器 美美网丝袜诱惑 人人干全免费视频xulawyercn av无插件一本道 全国色五月 操逼电影小说网 good在线wwwyuyuelvcom www18avmmd 撸波波影视无插件 伊人幼女成人电影 会看射的图片 小明插看看 全裸美女扒开粉嫩b 国人自拍性交网站 萝莉白丝足交本子 七草ちとせ巨乳视频 摇摇晃晃的成人电影 兰桂坊成社人区小说www68kqcom 舔阴论坛 久撸客一撸客色国内外成人激情在线 明星门 欧美大胆嫩肉穴爽大片 www牛逼插 性吧星云 少妇性奴的屁眼 人体艺术大胆mscbaidu1imgcn 最新久久色色成人版 l女同在线 小泽玛利亚高潮图片搜索 女性裸b图 肛交bt种子 最热门有声小说 人间添春色 春色猜谜字 樱井莉亚钢管舞视频 小泽玛利亚直美6p 能用的h网 还能看的h网 bl动漫h网 开心五月激 东京热401 男色女色第四色酒色网 怎么下载黄色小说 黄色小说小栽 和谐图城 乐乐影院 色哥导航 特色导航 依依社区 爱窝窝在线 色狼谷成人 91porn 包要你射电影 色色3A丝袜 丝袜妹妹淫网 爱色导航(荐) 好男人激情影院 坏哥哥 第七色 色久久 人格分裂 急先锋 撸撸射中文网 第一会所综合社区 91影院老师机 东方成人激情 怼莪影院吹潮 老鸭窝伊人无码不卡无码一本道 av女柳晶电影 91天生爱风流作品 深爱激情小说私房婷婷网 擼奶av 567pao 里番3d一家人野外 上原在线电影 水岛津实透明丝袜 1314酒色 网旧网俺也去 0855影院 在线无码私人影院 搜索 国产自拍 神马dy888午夜伦理达达兔 农民工黄晓婷 日韩裸体黑丝御姐 屈臣氏的燕窝面膜怎么样つぼみ晶エリーの早漏チ○ポ强化合宿 老熟女人性视频 影音先锋 三上悠亚ol 妹妹影院福利片 hhhhhhhhsxo 午夜天堂热的国产 强奸剧场 全裸香蕉视频无码 亚欧伦理视频 秋霞为什么给封了 日本在线视频空天使 日韩成人aⅴ在线 日本日屌日屄导航视频 在线福利视频 日本推油无码av magnet 在线免费视频 樱井梨吮东 日本一本道在线无码DVD 日本性感诱惑美女做爱阴道流水视频 日本一级av 汤姆avtom在线视频 台湾佬中文娱乐线20 阿v播播下载 橙色影院 奴隶少女护士cg视频 汤姆在线影院无码 偷拍宾馆 业面紧急生级访问 色和尚有线 厕所偷拍一族 av女l 公交色狼优酷视频 裸体视频AV 人与兽肉肉网 董美香ol 花井美纱链接 magnet 西瓜影音 亚洲 自拍 日韩女优欧美激情偷拍自拍 亚洲成年人免费视频 荷兰免费成人电影 深喉呕吐XXⅩX 操石榴在线视频 天天色成人免费视频 314hu四虎 涩久免费视频在线观看 成人电影迅雷下载 能看见整个奶子的香蕉影院 水菜丽百度影音 gwaz079百度云 噜死你们资源站 主播走光视频合集迅雷下载 thumbzilla jappen 精品Av 古川伊织star598在线 假面女皇vip在线视频播放 国产自拍迷情校园 啪啪啪公寓漫画 日本阿AV 黄色手机电影 欧美在线Av影院 华裔电击女神91在线 亚洲欧美专区 1日本1000部免费视频 开放90后 波多野结衣 东方 影院av 页面升级紧急访问每天正常更新 4438Xchengeren 老炮色 a k福利电影 色欲影视色天天视频 高老庄aV 259LUXU-683 magnet 手机在线电影 国产区 欧美激情人人操网 国产 偷拍 直播 日韩 国内外激情在线视频网给 站长统计一本道人妻 光棍影院被封 紫竹铃取汁 ftp 狂插空姐嫩 xfplay 丈夫面前 穿靴子伪街 XXOO视频在线免费 大香蕉道久在线播放 电棒漏电嗨过头 充气娃能看下毛和洞吗 夫妻牲交 福利云点墦 yukun瑟妃 疯狂交换女友 国产自拍26页 腐女资源 百度云 日本DVD高清无码视频 偷拍,自拍AV伦理电影 A片小视频福利站。 大奶肥婆自拍偷拍图片 交配伊甸园 超碰在线视频自拍偷拍国产 小热巴91大神 rctd 045 类似于A片 超美大奶大学生美女直播被男友操 男友问 你的衣服怎么脱掉的 亚洲女与黑人群交视频一 在线黄涩 木内美保步兵番号 鸡巴插入欧美美女的b舒服 激情在线国产自拍日韩欧美 国语福利小视频在线观看 作爱小视颍 潮喷合集丝袜无码mp4 做爱的无码高清视频 牛牛精品 伊aⅤ在线观看 savk12 哥哥搞在线播放 在线电一本道影 一级谍片 250pp亚洲情艺中心,88 欧美一本道九色在线一 wwwseavbacom色av吧 cos美女在线 欧美17,18ⅹⅹⅹ视频 自拍嫩逼 小电影在线观看网站 筱田优 贼 水电工 5358x视频 日本69式视频有码 b雪福利导航 韩国女主播19tvclub在线 操逼清晰视频 丝袜美女国产视频网址导航 水菜丽颜射房间 台湾妹中文娱乐网 风吟岛视频 口交 伦理 日本熟妇色五十路免费视频 A级片互舔 川村真矢Av在线观看 亚洲日韩av 色和尚国产自拍 sea8 mp4 aV天堂2018手机在线 免费版国产偷拍a在线播放 狠狠 婷婷 丁香 小视频福利在线观看平台 思妍白衣小仙女被邻居强上 萝莉自拍有水 4484新视觉 永久发布页 977成人影视在线观看 小清新影院在线观 小鸟酱后丝后入百度云 旋风魅影四级 香蕉影院小黄片免费看 性爱直播磁力链接 小骚逼第一色影院 性交流的视频 小雪小视频bd 小视频TV禁看视频 迷奸AV在线看 nba直播 任你在干线 汤姆影院在线视频国产 624u在线播放 成人 一级a做爰片就在线看狐狸视频 小香蕉AV视频 www182、com 腿模简小育 学生做爱视频 秘密搜查官 快播 成人福利网午夜 一级黄色夫妻录像片 直接看的gav久久播放器 国产自拍400首页 sm老爹影院 谁知道隔壁老王网址在线 综合网 123西瓜影音 米奇丁香 人人澡人人漠大学生 色久悠 夜色视频你今天寂寞了吗? 菲菲影视城美国 被抄的影院 变态另类 欧美 成人 国产偷拍自拍在线小说 不用下载安装就能看的吃男人鸡巴视频 插屄视频 大贯杏里播放 wwwhhh50 233若菜奈央 伦理片天海翼秘密搜查官 大香蕉在线万色屋视频 那种漫画小说你懂的 祥仔电影合集一区 那里可以看澳门皇冠酒店a片 色自啪 亚洲aV电影天堂 谷露影院ar toupaizaixian sexbj。com 毕业生 zaixian mianfei 朝桐光视频 成人短视频在线直接观看 陈美霖 沈阳音乐学院 导航女 www26yjjcom 1大尺度视频 开平虐女视频 菅野雪松协和影视在线视频 华人play在线视频bbb 鸡吧操屄视频 多啪啪免费视频 悠草影院 金兰策划网 (969) 橘佑金短视频 国内一极刺激自拍片 日本制服番号大全magnet 成人动漫母系 电脑怎么清理内存 黄色福利1000 dy88午夜 偷拍中学生洗澡磁力链接 花椒相机福利美女视频 站长推荐磁力下载 mp4 三洞轮流插视频 玉兔miki热舞视频 夜生活小视频 爆乳人妖小视频 国内网红主播自拍福利迅雷下载 不用app的裸裸体美女操逼视频 变态SM影片在线观看 草溜影院元气吧 - 百度 - 百度 波推全套视频 国产双飞集合ftp 日本在线AV网 笔国毛片 神马影院女主播是我的邻居 影音资源 激情乱伦电影 799pao 亚洲第一色第一影院 av视频大香蕉 老梁故事汇希斯莱杰 水中人体磁力链接 下载 大香蕉黄片免费看 济南谭崔 避开屏蔽的岛a片 草破福利 要看大鸡巴操小骚逼的人的视频 黑丝少妇影音先锋 欧美巨乳熟女磁力链接 美国黄网站色大全 伦蕉在线久播 极品女厕沟 激情五月bd韩国电影 混血美女自摸和男友激情啪啪自拍诱人呻吟福利视频 人人摸人人妻做人人看 44kknn 娸娸原网 伊人欧美 恋夜影院视频列表安卓青青 57k影院 如果电话亭 avi 插爆骚女精品自拍 青青草在线免费视频1769TV 令人惹火的邻家美眉 影音先锋 真人妹子被捅动态图 男人女人做完爱视频15 表姐合租两人共处一室晚上她竟爬上了我的床 性爱教学视频 北条麻妃bd在线播放版 国产老师和师生 magnet wwwcctv1024 女神自慰 ftp 女同性恋做激情视频 欧美大胆露阴视频 欧美无码影视 好女色在线观看 后入肥臀18p 百度影视屏福利 厕所超碰视频 强奸mp magnet 欧美妹aⅴ免费线上看 2016年妞干网视频 5手机在线福利 超在线最视频 800av:cOm magnet 欧美性爱免播放器在线播放 91大款肥汤的性感美乳90后邻家美眉趴着窗台后入啪啪 秋霞日本毛片网站 cheng ren 在线视频 上原亚衣肛门无码解禁影音先锋 美脚家庭教师在线播放 尤酷伦理片 熟女性生活视频在线观看 欧美av在线播放喷潮 194avav 凤凰AV成人 - 百度 kbb9999 AV片AV在线AV无码 爱爱视频高清免费观看 黄色男女操b视频 观看 18AV清纯视频在线播放平台 成人性爱视频久久操 女性真人生殖系统双性人视频 下身插入b射精视频 明星潜规测视频 mp4 免賛a片直播绪 国内 自己 偷拍 在线 国内真实偷拍 手机在线 国产主播户外勾在线 三桥杏奈高清无码迅雷下载 2五福电影院凸凹频频 男主拿鱼打女主,高宝宝 色哥午夜影院 川村まや痴汉 草溜影院费全过程免费 淫小弟影院在线视频 laohantuiche 啪啪啪喷潮XXOO视频 青娱乐成人国产 蓝沢润 一本道 亚洲青涩中文欧美 神马影院线理论 米娅卡莉法的av 在线福利65535 欧美粉色在线 欧美性受群交视频1在线播放 极品喷奶熟妇在线播放 变态另类无码福利影院92 天津小姐被偷拍 磁力下载 台湾三级电髟全部 丝袜美腿偷拍自拍 偷拍女生性行为图 妻子的乱伦 白虎少妇 肏婶骚屄 外国大妈会阴照片 美少女操屄图片 妹妹自慰11p 操老熟女的b 361美女人体 360电影院樱桃 爱色妹妹亚洲色图 性交卖淫姿势高清图片一级 欧美一黑对二白 大色网无毛一线天 射小妹网站 寂寞穴 西西人体模特苍井空 操的大白逼吧 骚穴让我操 拉好友干女朋友3p