Front. Psychol. Frontiers in Psychology Front. Psychol. 1664-1078 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648404 Psychology Original Research The Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment on the Relationship Between Emotional Labor and Work Engagement of Teachers Sezen-Gultekin Gozde 1 * † Bayrakcı Mustafa 1 † Limon İbrahim 2 † 1Educational Administration and Supervision Program, Educational Sciences Department, Faculty of Education, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey 2Mithatpaşa Anatolian High School, Sakarya, Turkey

Edited by: Ana Campina, Infante D. Henrique Portucalense University, Portugal

Reviewed by: Yahya Altinkurt, Muğla University, Turkey; Gilbert Ernest Franco, Beacon College, United States

 *Correspondence: Gozde Sezen-Gultekin, gsezen@sakarya.edu.tr

†ORCID: Gozde Sezen-Gultekin, orcid.org/0000-0002-2179-4466; Mustafa Bayrakcı, orcid.org/0000-0002-7196-6203; İbrahim Limon, orcid.org/0000-0002-5830-7561

This article was submitted to Organizational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

 05 07 2021 2021 12 648404 31 12 2020 18 05 2021 Copyright © 2021 Sezen-Gultekin, Bayrakcı and Limon. 2021 Sezen-Gultekin, Bayrakcı and Limon

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

This study aims to investigate the mediating role of teachers’ organizational commitment (OC) on the relationship between their emotional labor (EL) and work engagement (WE). The study employed a cross-sectional design. The sample of the study consisted of the teachers working in Sakarya province of Turkey. They participated in the study voluntarily and responded scale items online. The findings showed that teachers’ perceptions of EL, OC and WE is relatively high. Also, there are statistically significant and positive correlations among variables. On the other hand, the findings confirmed the hypotheses. Teachers’ EL predicts their OC and WE. Additionally, OC predicts WE and plays a mediating role on the relationship between EL and WE. Based on the findings some suggestions were made.

 emotional labor work engagement organizational commitment organizational psychology teachers

香京julia种子在线播放

    • <form id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></form>
      <address id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></nobr></address>

      

Introduction

      In order to accomplish competitive advantage in the modern world, organizations need human resources with high levels of energy, efficiency, and commitment (Bakker and Schaufeli, 2008; Chen, 2018). Many organizations already realize that positive job-related attitudes such as commitment and engagement are of critical importance in terms of their competitive advantage (Walker, 2001; Chew, 2004). Teachers are not an exception in this sense and are expected to demonstrate strong professional motivation and have a high level of dedication and work engagement (WE). Engaged teachers are completely devoted in their work, entirely committed, and dedicated to it, while actively disengaged teachers are frustrated and dissatisfied with their jobs, perform poorly, and have a negative effect on their co-worker’s efforts in the organizations (Paulík, 2020). Considering the present economic landscape, the competitive advantage of organizations can be improved by an engaged workforce (Hoole and Bonneman, 2015). As WE refers to favorable emotions and motivating energy, engaged workers tend to exhibit behaviors that may result in desired outcomes for organizations. Employees who are actively engaged are inclined to cope better with extreme requirements in the work environment, respond more easily to organizational change, and creatively solve the problems (Bakker and Demerouti, 2008; Othman and Nasurdin, 2012). In recent years, researchers from different academic disciplines and business people from many industries including educational sector have paid considerable attention to WE (Bakker and Demerouti, 2008; Schaufeli, 2013; Breevaart et al., 2015; Demerouti et al., 2015). However, evidence suggests that only 40% of employees were strongly engaged (Towers Watson, 2014). WE is thus still accepted as a very important issue by researchers and business people (Iqbal et al., 2012). So, it is of great importance to investigate the processes through which WE can be boosted.
      

      Studies on WE focused especially on determining its predictors and outcomes (Schaufeli and Bakker, 2004; Kim et al., 2009). In some of these studies WE was associated with personal resources, such as loneliness at work (Sezen, 2014) and self-efficacy (Akhtar et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2017) as well as on job resources, such as team climate and organizational support (Xanthopoulou et al., 2013; Song et al., 2015). On the other hand, there are many studies focusing especially on teachers’ WE mainly based on three reasons. The first one is the relationship of teacher effectiveness and student achievement with WE of teachers. The second is the assumption that engaged teachers generally experience less burnout problems. The third is the belief that engaged teachers tend to be more productive, display organizational citizenship behaviors more frequently and contribute to school (Bakker and Bal, 2010; Klassen et al., 2012).
      

      On the other hand, teachers are emotional workers (Yin, 2015). Teachers’ performance, self-efficacy, job satisfaction, burnout, and instructional effectiveness have been found to be affected by their emotions (Taxer and Frenzel, 2015; Lavy and Eshet, 2018). Since teachers experience complicated relationships with students, colleagues, and parents, emotional labor (EL) plays a fundamental role in teaching. In the school context, EL of teachers can be defined as the requirement to control emotions according to organizational rules and guidelines carrying out the teaching profession (Yin, 2016). Rafaeli and Sutton’s (1987) EL theory suggest that EL effects both the individual and organization. Additionally, Bakker and Demerouti (2008) suggested the job demand resources model arguing that employees’ EL affects psychological well-being individually at first, which in turn affects results at the organizational level. The teaching profession is being gradually regulated by administrative bodies similar to service sector workers who follow the forms of EL (Bolton, 2010). Although the previous studies’ significant contribution to the literature and business management, there are still much to discover in terms of WE and EL in educational organizations.
      

      Moreover, literature suggests that organizational commitment (OC) has a considerable effect on organizational performance. Teachers who have higher OC to their schools have stronger beliefs in the school’s aims and values and prefer to stay in the school (Chan et al., 2008; Meyer et al., 2019). They tend to have a higher motivation to belong to the organization and display organizational citizenship behavior more frequently (Agu, 2015). Employees with a higher commitment experience feeling of warmth, appreciation, and loyalty toward the organization as a result of their positive thoughts and interactions within the organization and have a deep desire to remain within the organization (Casper et al., 2011). Research also found significant relationship between OC and WE.
      

      In the literature, studies mostly focus on the linear relationship between teachers’ EL and WE, or EL and OC (Akın, 2021). However, there is a gap in literature investigating the indirect relationships between these variables which provide insight into processes through which WE can be fostered. Therefore, this study tests a structural model which investigates the relationship between EL and WE and the mediating role of OC on this relationship for teachers.
      

Theoretical Background

Work Engagement

      Positive psychology focuses on the measurable, developable, and manageable strengths and psychological capacity of the human, rather than the negativities such as burnout, conflict, job dissatisfaction in the workplace. For this reason, organizations now look for energetic, dedicated, and focused employees, that is, individuals who are engaged with their work (Sezen, 2014) because such employees are more creative and productive by devoting their abilities and experience to the organization (Bakker and Demerouti, 2008).
      

      Work engagement is described as a positive and fulfilling emotional state about work which is represented by vigor, dedication, and absorption (Schaufeli, 2013). Previous research suggest that the basic elements of WE are dedication and vigor (Schaufeli, 2013; Taris et al., 2017). Employees who have higher levels of vigor and dedication find various ways to manage job demands and obstacles, while achieving psychological and physical health (Mache et al., 2014). Moreover, the absorption dimension, which refers to a complete concentration in work, is often defined by the rapid passing of time or the difficulty of detaching oneself from one’s work (Mauno et al., 2007). According to Schaufeli et al. (2001), vigor refers to the physical power of the body or mind as one works; dedication refers to the emotional condition of the worker, in which he/she has a sense of excitement toward work; and absorption means a cognitive situation in which the individual is engaged to a job with complete concentration (Salanova et al., 2005).
      

      When we consider various definitions in the literature, key features to clarify WE are the positive and exciting motivation that employees show in achieving their job objectives while feeling fully engaged and dedicated in carrying out their job duties (Markos and Sridevi, 2010; Schaufeli, 2013). Teachers’ WE can be regarded as important in terms of overall success of schools because previous research found statistically significant and positive relationships between teacher WE and student achievement (Wilson and Corcoran, 1988; Bakker, 2005). Cardwell (2011) also argued that one of the predictors of student engagement is teacher engagement (cited in Butakor et al., 2020). Engaged teachers achieve more than their formal responsibilities and duties and support their students academically by following various approaches and methods resulting in better a academic performance (Kirkpatrick, 2009; Ariani, 2013).
      
      

Emotional Labor

      Emotional labor is characterized as a term related to proper management of emotions in the workplace and defined by Hochschild (1983) as “the management of emotions to create a publicly observable facial and body display” (p. 7). Ashforth and Humphrey (1993) accordingly represented EL as the attitude of displaying the appropriate feelings. EL can be used as a way to control emotions efficiently in order to achieve organizational goals and to manage attitude or frustration against a coworker or client, which may contribute to improved work efficiency (Grandey, 2000). By this means, Grandey states that EL is about adjusting emotions and remarks to organizational requirements. Jobs which include more physical interaction and therefore require characteristics of EL, include teachers, health care workers, call center workers, etc. (Sloan, 2004; Diefendorff et al., 2006).
      

      Emotional labor strategy may be used, as Hochschild (1983) argues, either with surface acting as altering external appearance to represent required emotions – emotions that are not actually felt privately, or deep acting as modifying their physical expressions in addition to their inner feelings. The surface actor suppresses or conceals his genuine feelings and behaves in a way in that complies with the requirements prescribed by the organization with respect to the emotional displays of its employees. On the other hand, a deep actor adjusts his/her feelings in order to comply with organizational expectations as he/she genuinely feels in any specific circumstance (Lazanyi, 2011). Surface acting requires the simulation of feelings that are not actually felt by the careful display of acceptable verbal or non-verbal signals, either by artificial expression of positive feelings or by suppression of negative feelings (Ashforth and Humphrey, 1993; Grandey, 2000; Diefendorff et al., 2005). Deep acting, on the other hand, requires the real internal modification of negative feelings and attempts to experience the emotion that should be seen (Ashforth and Humphrey, 1993; Diefendorff et al., 2005). In particular, deep acting will occur first and will be preceded by surface acting if it is not appreciated during an interaction (Gross, 1998).
      

      Teaching, as an activity, is an emotional process and teachers repeatedly use emotions in their classroom performance as well as outside the classroom (Deliveli and Kıral, 2020; Töre, 2020). Students prefer teachers who are disciplined but not authoritative, funny but not cynical, and who can pay attention to each student individually and behave equally in punishing and rewarding (Wragg and Wragg, 1998). To establish a thorough classroom atmosphere, positive relationships are required in which teachers should handle, supervise, and adjust their emotions (Zhang and Zhu, 2008; Akın et al., 2014). Teaching is also a demanding job that requires strong human relationships (Genç, 2004) and includes managing frustration and facial expressions in and outside the classroom since repeated declaration of felt tense feelings to students can have a negative impact on the learning process. Teachers are also expected to conform to some tacit organizational intentions for emotional demonstration to students and parents (Berquam, 2020). In addition, monitoring schemes are putting more pressure on them to change their behavior to focus on performing rather than caring aspects in order to pass observations or inspections (Lindqvist et al., 2019). Ineffective emotion control can also negatively affect relationships with colleagues and leaders outside the classroom. Winograd (2003) argued that teaching fulfills Hochchild’s (1983) three criteria that requires EL, which are, (a) face-to-face communication between teachers and others (b) teachers’ producing some emotional state (e.g., joy or fear, and excitement or anxiety); and (c) a degree of external influence over teachers’ EL, which usually comes in the form of cultural expectations or professional norms. Teaching as a profession, therefore, involves the use of a considerable amount of EL (Tösten and Toprak, 2017).
      

      Loh and Liew (2016) observed that teachers perform EL in and outside classrooms; they manage, conceal, and manipulate their emotions in their interactions with students, parents, and colleagues. Emotional display rules in schools and the emotional acting in which teachers engage are embedded within each individual practitioner. Collectively, these rules become a part of the school culture, which in turn plays a significant role in shaping teachers’ conceptions of themselves as professionals in the workplace (Brown et al., 2014). Many teachers consider the performance of emotions which lack in authenticity to be stressful (Ogbonna and Harris, 2004). To facilitate disciplined and orderly classes daily, teachers can incur significant levels of stress considering the amount of EL they experience (Loh and Liew, 2016). This condition has arguably worsened because of numerous demands from schools and students, resulting in a substantial increase in EL over the last 10 years (Taylor, 2020). Considering the previous literature, further examination is needed as teachers today are exposed to ever-increasing levels of EL.
      
      

Organizational Commitment

      Organizational commitment refers to an attitude or psychological condition that characterizes the relationships of employees with their employer and ultimately influences their intentions to stay or leave the organization (Kotzé and Nel, 2020). Numerous definitions of OC can be seen in literature. Bateman and Strasser (1984) suggest that OC involves an employee’s loyalty to the organization, level of aim and value consistency with the organization, and desire to stay within the organization. Commitment is described as a linkage between a person and the organization (Buchanan, 1974) and a psychological condition that characterizes the relationship of employees with the organization with its conclusions to stay within the organization or not (Meyer and Allen, 1997).
      

      There are three dimensions of OC; affective, continuance, and normative commitment (Meyer and Allen, 1997). Affective commitment is the employees’ sense of the emotional attachment with the organization. Continuance commitment specifies employees’ understanding of the cost of leaving the organization. Normative commitment refers to the understanding of the employees of their normal obligation to the organization (Agu, 2015). These three types of commitment are accepted in the literature as a psychological situation that either identifies the relationship of employee with the organization or has the significance to affect whether the employee will stay with the organization or not (Meyer et al., 1993). Research indicates that those with a powerful affective commitment will continue the organizational membership because they want to, with a powerful continuance commitment will continue because they have to, and those with a normative commitment will continue to the organization because they feel that they have to (Meyer et al., 1993).
      

      As for teachers, three types of commitment are introduced in literature: commitment to school, profession, and students. Commitment to school can be defined as the intensity of the identification of an individual to a particular school (Mowday et al., 1979). Commitment to the profession, on the other hand, can be regarded as a positive attachment to teaching. Finally, commitment to students is a teacher’s dedication to student learning (Park, 2015). Previous research shows that teacher’s OC is significantly related to job satisfaction, school performance and self-efficacy (Dee et al., 2006; Park, 2015). Their OC has an important effect on efficacy and success of their work (Fresko et al., 1997; Wang et al., 2020). Teachers with high OC have positive emotions about the mission and ethics of their schools and tend to stay within the school (Hong and Matsko, 2019). OC of teachers is associated with student success and better quality in schools (Nehmeh, 2009; Balay, 2014; Akdemir, 2019). Based on the previous literature, we can say that committed teachers are one of the most important assets of schools.
      
      
      

Conceptual Framework

Emotional Labor and Work Engagement

      Although there are many studies in the literature focusing on basic dimensions of EL together, Öztürk (2020), which has been accepted as a basis for this study, proposed a three-dimensional EL model for teachers which is similar to deep acting that perceived EL as a positive drive for teachers. Although most of the studies about EL in the literature are carried out on the service sector employees, Öztürk (2020) investigated teachers’ EL and developed a model of “EL in schools.” Öztürk’s (2020) three-dimensional model of EL in schools comprises “emotional effort,” “emotional transparency,” and “negative emotional transfer” which accepts EL as a positive organizational attitude for teachers as in deep acting.
      

      Previous studies (Chan, 2009; Wang et al., 2010; Heo and Lee, 2015; Kim et al., 2015; Pelosi, 2015; Yoo, 2016; Yoo and Jeong, 2017; Han S. S. et al., 2018; Öngöre, 2019; Košir et al., 2020) found that EL is positively associated with WE. The studies investigating the interaction of EL and employees indicate that deep acting yields positive outcomes (Kim, 2008), and reduces emotional dissonance through a mechanism that makes emotions harmonious to expressions (Richards and Gross, 2000) in terms of WE. Engaged teachers, convinced of their usefulness to the school and the students, are willing to devote their full efforts to their job, despite the difficulty presented by the demands of the profession and the disruptive influences which complicate their work (Paulík, 2020). WE is supposed to foster the positive attitudes or actions of employees toward clients, work, and the organization. The more employees who have WE have sufficient psychological and physical energy levels, the more they display deep emotional activities. So, WE is positively associated with deep acting (Yoo and Arnold, 2014), and accordingly EL is positively associated with WE (Lu and Guy, 2014). Also, EL affects WE positively (Kim et al., 2015; Han S. S. et al., 2018). Therefore, the following hypothesis was suggested.
      


      H1: Teachers’ emotional labor positively predicts their work engagement.
      
      
      
      

Emotional Labor and Organizational Commitment

      Previous research in the literature indicates that the relationship between commitment and EL are likely to be stronger when they point out similar goals and contexts (Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975; Lavelle et al., 2007). When we consider the correlation between EL and OC, both have been justified to be connected (Xin et al., 2017). Wong and Law (2017) found that performance of EL by employees affects their OC. Moreover, deep acting is specifically based on the employees’ inner feelings (Ashforth and Humphrey, 1993), this type of EL is more consistent with a genuine concern for one’s clients, considering the increased psychic effort involved in deep acting. Deliveli and Kıral (2020) argued that employees’ intentionally presentation of EL to accomplish institutional aims may lead to OC. It may also be inferred that employees who includes emotions into their organizational activities are most likely to stay with that organization meaning that they have higher level of OC (Deliveli and Kıral, 2020).
      

      Lin (2005) found that individual EL has a positive effect on OC and EL plays a mediator role on this relationship (cited in Xin et al., 2017). Furthermore, Zhang and Zhu (2008) had a similar finding regarding the relationship between EL and OC. Öztürk (2020) also proposed EL as a positive organizational variable in his study which is carried out on teachers and accepted as a basis for this study. Society also tests the behavioral performance of teachers using high moral expectations and requires them to act as models to correctly lead students’ learning (Zhang et al., 2020). Additionally, teachers’ commitment is regarded as having an emotional foundation (Berkovich and Eyal, 2017). Meyer et al. (2019) stated that commitment can indicate an emotional connection to particular goals. EL represents one’s emotional management, exhibiting emotions in line with organizational rules and interactions with actors (Hochschild, 1983). Thus, we consider teachers’ commitment is highly affected by their EL in school. Therefore, this study investigates the nature of the association between EL and OC. Based on the previous literature, we developed the following hypothesis.
      


      H2: Teachers’ emotional labor positively predicts their organizational commitment.
      
      
      
      

Organizational Commitment and Work Engagement

      Previous literature suggests a positive association of WE with well-being (Halbesleben, 2010; Dilekçi and Limon, 2020) and a negative one with turnover intention (Wood et al., 2020). The OC of teachers was identified by Tsui and Cheng (1999) as the relative intensity of their identification with and participation in a specific school. From this point of view, OC of teachers can be characterized by a powerful belief in and recognition of the aims and values of the school, a willingness to utilize noticeable effort on behalf of the school, and willingness to maintain school membership (Sezgin, 2009). While WE was described as a positive state of mind characterized by high energy, excitement, and a complete concentration at work (Schaufeli et al., 2002), OC, on the other hand, was seen as the strength of the identification of the employee with the organization (Mowday et al., 1979; Li, 2014). Saks (2006) emphasizes that while OC reflects attitudes and attachment of employees to the organization, engagement is not attitudinal and thus reflects the focus and absorption of individuals while performing tasks (Santos et al., 2016).
      

      In literature there are different views on conceptualization of the relationship between WE and OC. Some studies hypothesized WE as an antecedent of OC and explored its impact on OC (Hu and Schaufeli, 2011; Albrecht, 2012; Karatepe, 2013); while some others suggested WE as an outcome of OC and investigated the effect of OC on it (Barnes and Collier, 2013; Zhang et al., 2015; Rivkin et al., 2016).
      

      The studies describing OC as an antecedent of WE argue that when employees are attached to their organization, they may demonstrate higher WE (Barnes and Collier, 2013; Zhang et al., 2015). It means OC precedes WE, and when employees are committed to their organizations and willing to pay back to the organization, WE emerges as a kind of repayment (Choi et al., 2015). This view implies that as a result of the attachment of the employees to the organization, attachment to the work occurs, as well. On the contrary, some other studies argue that WE could lead to increased OC (Albdour and Altarawneh, 2014). These studies suggest that when people have WE, they form a connection with work and colleagues and by this means, employees develop commitment to their organization (Kim et al., 2017). When we consider teachers, engaged teachers are more likely continue to work in their current school, thus they have OC (Bakker et al., 2003). On the other hand, teachers with relatively less OC generally look for chances to leave the organization (Shirbagi, 2007). Based on these, the following hypothesis was established.
      


      H3: Teachers’ organizational commitment positively predicts their work engagement.
      
      
      
      

Emotional Labor, Organizational Commitment, and Work Engagement

      Although there is a growing interest in teachers’ emotions, there is not still enough empirical evidence regarding positive emotions of teachers and how positive emotions influence individual and organizational outcomes. The dynamics of teacher engagement also holds great importance as their attitudes and level of engagement have a direct impact on their students (Roth et al., 2007). Teachers’ WE determines the quality of their teaching and the nature of classroom behavior. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the factors that lead higher levels of teacher engagement and its relationship with EL to enhance quality in schools.
      

      Previous research investigated the associations of EL, OC, and WE with burnout (Lapointe et al., 2012; Xin et al., 2017; Han S. S. et al., 2018), self-efficacy, optimism, trust (Agu, 2015; Tösten and Toprak, 2017; Liu and Huang, 2019), compassion, work ethics, leadership (Mauno et al., 2016), organizational support (Xin et al., 2017), job satisfaction (Lin et al., 2020), and well-being (Rusu and Colomeischi, 2020). However, these were mostly carried out in business or hospital contexts. However, the current study aimed to explore the relationships between teachers’ EL, WE, and OC in school contexts. In this way, it aimed to extend the literature on these variables by examining the mediator role of OC on the relationship between WE and EL. Thus, the following hypothesis was suggested.
      


      H4: Teachers’ organizational commitment mediates the relationship between their emotional labor and work engagement.
      
      
      
      
      
      

Materials and Methods

Model

      This study adopted a cross-sectional design (Kothari, 2004), one of the quantitative methods, to investigate the relationships among EL, OC, and WE in schools. These relationships were explored through a structural equation model.
      
      

Sample

      The current study was conducted in Sakarya province in Turkey. The participants were reached through convenience sampling method (Huck, 2012) and 429 teachers (from preschool to high school level) voluntarily responded the scales. Before the data analysis, we carried out normality tests which resulted in 57 outliers. Therefore, the main data analysis was conducted on data from 372 participants which can be deemed enough for a structural equation model (SEM) model according to Kline (2009). Of these participants 232 were women (62.4%) and 140 were men (37.6%). While 316 of the participants had an undergraduate degree (85.0%), 56 of them had a graduate degree (15.0%). As for marital status, 301 participants were married (80.9%) and 71 of them were single (19.1%). Lastly, 32 of the participants were working at primary schools (8.6%), 158 at elementary schools (42.5%), 108 at secondary schools (29.0%), and 74 at high schools (19.9%).
      
      

Data Collection Process and Tools

      Since the data were collected during COVID-19 pandemic, an online data collection procedure was followed. We prepared an online link (Google Forms) and sent it to the school administrators we are acquainted with. The administrators shared the link with teachers through school WhatsApp groups. The data collection procedure took place between June and November, 2020.
      

      To collect data three different scales which are “Organizational Commitment Scale,” “Utrecht Work Engagement Scale,” and “Emotional Labor in Schools Scale” were used in the study. In the following section detailed information about the scales are presented.
      
      

Emotional Labor in Schools Scale

      The scale was developed by Öztürk (2020). The scale has 12 items loading on three dimensions. The first dimension is “emotional effort (7 items),” the second one is “emotional transparency (2 items),” and the last one is “negative emotional transfer (3 items)” which all addresses deep acting of EL. A sample item is as follows: I try to get rid of negative emotions while going to school. The scale is a five-point Likert type scale, and the response range is (1) Totally disagree and (5) Totally agree.
      
      

Organizational Commitment Scale

      The scale was developed by Meyer et al. (1993) and adapted into Turkish by Dağlı et al. (2018) for a teacher sample. The scale has 18 items loading on three dimensions. The first dimension is “affective commitment (6 items),” the second one is “continuance commitment (6 items),” and the last dimension is “normative commitment (6 items).” A sample item is as follows: I regard this school’s problems as mine. This is a five-point Likert type scale in which all items are scored on a range from “(1) Strongly disagree” to “(5) Totally agree.”
      
      

Work Engagement Scale

      To measure WE level of teachers, Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (Schaufeli et al., 2002) was used. The scale was adapted to Turkish by Atilla-Bal (2009). Later, Eser (2018) confirmed the validity of the scale on a teacher sample. It is a tridimensional scale, which are “vigor (6 items),” “dedication (5 items),” and “absorption (6 items).” A sample item is as follows: “When I get up in the morning, I feel like going to work.” The items are responded on a five-point rating scale ranging from “(1) Strongly disagree” to “(5) Totally agree.”
      

      Within the scope of this study, we checked the internal consistency of the scales through Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. The findings showed that it was 0.71 for EL; 0.84 for OC and 0.92 for Work Engagement Scale which were satisfactory (Büyüköztürk, 2011).
      
      

Data Analysis

      First of all, the missing values were detected and there were none of them. Before conducting descriptive analysis and calculating relationships between variables, univariate normality was checked through skewness and kurtosis values. The analysis showed that the data were not normally distributed (Field, 2009). Therefore, we assessed the outliers using boxplots which yielded the exclusion of 57 of them and a normally distributed data (see Table 1). The analysis went on with data from 372 participants. Within the descriptive statistics, we calculated minimum, maximum, mean, and standard deviation of the mean. To reveal the relationships between variables, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated.
      



      Descriptive statistics and normality assumption.
      

      


      
Variable
N
Descriptive
      		
Skewness and kurtosis
      		

      

      


Minimum
Maximum
Mean
SD
Skewness
SE
Kurtosis
SE

      
      


      
(1) EL
372
2.75
5.00
3.88
0.43
0.235
0.126
0.464
0.252

      

      
(2) OC
372
1.61
5.00
3.42
0.61
−0.085

0.021


      

      
(3) WE
372
3.00
5.00
4.14
0.49
0.136

−0.856


      
      

      

EL, emotional labor; OC, organizational commitment; WE, work engagement.

      

      The hypotheses were tested through SEM, which is a statistical technique allowing the analyst to investigate a series of dependence relationships between variables (Ho, 2006). In SEM we followed the steps suggested by Hair et al. (2014). Actually, these include two stages mainly, the evaluation of the measurement and the structural model. One of the issues that should be addressed in SEM is multivariate normality (Ho, 2006). So, we checked multivariate kurtosis and its critical value, which were 405.361 and 65.833 indicating non-normally multivariate distribution (Bentler, 2006). Thus, bootstrapping (sample 5000; 95% confidence interval) was preferred (Zhao et al., 2010). The basic underlying principle of bootstrapping is that it allows the researchers to create multiple subsamples from an original data base and it does not require multivariate normal distribution (Byrne, 2016).
      

      To test whether there is common method bias problem, we employed Harman’s single factor technique. We loaded all observed variables into an exploratory factor analysis with an unrotated factor solution. The analysis resulted in nine factors explaining nearly 64% of the total variance. The first factor, on the other hand, explained only 27% of the variance which indicates that there is not common method variance problem (Podsakoff et al., 2003).
      
      
      

Findings

      In this section, descriptive statistics and correlations between variables are presented.
      

      Table 1 shows the descriptive statistics and the results of normality tests. The mean is M = 3.88 (SD = 0.43) for EL, M = 3.42 (SD = 0.61) for OC and M = 4.14 (SD = 0.49) for WE. Considering these findings, we can say that teachers’ self-perceptions of EL, OC, and WE are above average and relatively high.
      

      Table 2 displays correlations between variables. The relationship between EL and OC is (r = 0.294; p < 0.01); EL and WE (r = 0.482; p < 0.01) and OC and WE (r = 0.479; p < 0.01). These findings indicated statistically significant positive and moderate level relationships between variables.
      



      Correlations between variables.
      

      


      
Variables
EL
OC
WE

      
      


      
EL
1.00



      

      
OC
0.294**
1.00


      

      
WE
0.482**
0.479**
1.00

      
      

      

**p < 0.01.

      

Findings on Measurement and Structural Model

      As stated above we followed a two-step approach in the analysis. First of all, we evaluated the measurement model in which all the observed variables were in the model. In the first analysis, the fit indices of the model did not satisfy the cutoff values in the literature and due to low factor loadings (OC3 = 0.187; OC4 = 0.348; OC5 = 0.371; OC12 = 0.443; EL3 = 0.352; EL12 = 0.415) we discarded some items. We reran the analysis and the fit indices emerged as follows (x2/df = 2.69; p = 0.00; CFI = 0.83; TLI = 0.81; RMSEA; 0.07; SRMR = 0.08). Considering the number of observed variables and the sample size, the fit indices can be deemed satisfactory (Sharma et al., 2005; Hair et al., 2014). Ensuring the validity of the measurement model, we tested the structural relationships between variables. The model is shown in Figure 1 below.
      



      Structural model.
      

      

      The structural relationships between variables are displayed in Figure 1. First of all, we checked the fit indices of the model. They emerged as following (x2/df = 2.69; p = 0.00; CFI = 0.83; TLI = 0.81; RMSEA; 0.07; SRMR = 0.08) which were the same as in the measurement model. The results of bootstrap analysis provided evidence to support all the hypotheses suggested. As can be seen in Table 3 below, EL predicted WE (β = 0.502; p = 0.002) and OC (β = 0.519; p = 0.001) significantly. OC, on the other hand, predicted WE significantly (β = 0.345; p = 0.045). Lastly, the indirect effect of EL on WE through OC was significant (β = 0.179; p = 0.002) and upper-lower bounds did not include “0” (LB = 0.083; UB = 0.222). Both the direct and indirect effects are significant and in the same direction which indicates a complementary mediation (Zhao et al., 2010). On the other hand, the effect size for indirect effect was calculated using the formula ab / (ab + c1) (Miočević et al., 2018) which emerged as 0.261. It can be concluded that it has a medium effect size (Cohen, 1988). The findings are presented below in Table 3.
      



      Standardized direct, indirect, and total effects.
      

      


      
Paths
β
SE
t
Bootstrap 5000 times 95% CI
      		
p
Total effect

      

      




Lower bound
Upper bound



      
      


      
EL→WE (H1)
0.502
0.157
5.001
0.190
0.800
0.002
0.681

      

      
EL→OC (H2)
0.519
0.132
5.715
0.245
0.734
0.001
0.519

      

      
OC→WE (H3)
0.345
0.152
4.042
0.021
0.557
0.045
0.345

      

      
EL→OC →WE (H4)
0.179
0.054
–
0.083
0.222
0.002
0.681

      
      

      

Standardized direct and indirect effects = 95% CI does not include zero.

      
      
      

Results and Discussion

      This study investigated the mediating role of OC on the relationship between teachers’ EL and WE. It also explored the direct relationships among these variables. In this sense, the first hypothesis of the study was that teachers’ EL significantly predicts their WE. The findings confirmed the hypothesis which means that higher levels of EL results in higher levels of WE for teachers. On the other hand, there are inconsistent findings in literature regarding this relationship which was investigated on different samples such as private sector workers (Chan, 2009), customer service employees (Pelosi, 2015), nurses (Mauno et al., 2016; Han S. S. et al., 2018), school foodservice employees (Heo and Lee, 2015), incubation centre managers (Kim et al., 2015), service sector employees (Öngöre, 2019), retail bank and insurance company employees (Yoo, 2016), salespeople (Yoo and Jeong, 2017), and full time workers who participated in a management training course (Wang et al., 2010). There are also studies conducted on teachers (Saleem et al., 2018; Shukla and Pandey, 2019; Çarıkcı, 2020; Košir et al., 2020). While some of these studies show that EL is positively associated with WE (Chan, 2009), some others (Mauno et al., 2016; Saleem et al., 2018; Shukla and Pandey, 2019) show that there is a negative association between them (Mauno et al., 2016; Saleem et al., 2018; Shukla and Pandey, 2019). Considering the relationships in terms of sub-dimensions, some studies (Wang et al., 2010; Heo and Lee, 2015; Kim et al., 2015; Pelosi, 2015; Yoo, 2016; Yoo and Jeong, 2017; Han S. S. et al., 2018; Öngöre, 2019; Košir et al., 2020) indicate that deep acting and naturally felt emotions are positively associated with WE, while according to some others (Wang et al., 2010; Pelosi, 2015; Yoo, 2016; Yoo and Jeong, 2017; Han S. S. et al., 2018; Öngöre, 2019; Çarıkcı, 2020; Košir et al., 2020) surface acting is negatively associated with it. On the other hand, Mróz and Kaleta (2016) found that there is not a significant relationship between these two variables. Based on these, it is can be said that the current study has both consistent and conflicting findings with the previous research. It can also be said that further research is needed on the relationship between teachers’ EL and WE to have a more robust insight into this relationship. In this sense, this study contributed to the existing literature by providing empirical evidence on the effect of teachers’ EL on WE. So, it is suggested that if schools wish more engaged teachers, they should create an atmosphere in which teachers can display EL.
      

      The second hypothesis of the study suggested that there was a positive association between EL and OC which was confirmed by the findings. When teachers can exhibit emotional effort and transparency and transfer their negative emotions, they become more committed to the school. However, there are inconsistent findings in the literature on both teacher (Isenbarger and Zembylas, 2006; Güler, 2018; Deliveli and Kıral, 2020; Ogunsola et al., 2020; Zheng et al., 2020) and other samples such as health employees (Şenel and Aydoğan, 2020), hotel employees (Büyükbeşe and Aslan, 2019), nurses (Yang and Chang, 2008; Han S. S. et al., 2018), and IT workers (Kim and Yang, 2018). While some of these studies suggest a positive association (Isenbarger and Zembylas, 2006; Güler, 2018; Deliveli and Kıral, 2020; Şenel and Aydoğan, 2020), some others reveal that there is a negative relationship between EL and OC (Han S. L. et al., 2018; Büyükbeşe and Aslan, 2019). Considering the relationships in terms of the dimensions, Zheng et al. (2020) suggested that deep acting is positively associated with commitment and surface acting has a negative effect on it, while Ogunsola et al. (2020) found that both surface and deep acting has a negative effect on OC. On the other hand, Yang and Chang (2008) indicated that surface acting has a significantly negative relationship with OC while deep acting does not have a significant effect on it. On the contrary, Kim and Yang (2018) demonstrated that the deep acting has a significant relationship with OC while surface acting is not related to it. As stated above previous literature suggests inconsistent findings regarding the relationship between EL and OC and the studies focusing on teachers are insufficient. Considering this gap, the current study extended the existing literature especially in terms of educational organizations. In this sense, this study shows how educational organizations take care of their teachers’ EL since it affects teachers’ OC. If these organizations ask the teachers to show commitment to them, then they help these teachers to increase their EL. So, the motto is “to have more committed teachers, schools need to help teachers manage their emotions.”
      

      The third hypothesis of the study suggested that teachers’ OC positively predicts their WE. The findings confirmed the hypothesis which means that the higher teachers are committed to their school the higher they will be engaged to their work. The studies conducted on teachers (Çağrı San and Tok, 2017; Pieters and Auanga, 2018) and other samples such as banking employees (Adi and Fithriana, 2020), private and public sector employees (Agyemang and Ofei, 2013), undergraduate students (Babcock-Roberson and Strickland, 2010), airline companies (Li et al., 2010), National Revenue Administration employees (Peplińska et al., 2020), also put forward consistent findings with this study, while food processing plant employees (Gota, 2017) has found that WE is negatively associated with affective commitment. Based on these findings, it can be said that this study contributed to the literature by proving that WE is up to OC. So, if educational organizations can make their teachers more committed to them, then it will be more likely that these teachers will engage their works much more. In brief, to have more engaged teachers, schools should foster teachers’ OC.
      

      The last hypothesis of the study dealt with the indirect effect of EL on WE through OC. The findings indicated that commitment mediated the relationship between EL and engagement. In other words, EL increases OC which in turn has a positive effect on WE of teachers. Although at least in scope of the current study we could not reach a study investigating the relationships among these three variables, there are studies on EL, OC, and some other variables. For example, they were associated with burnout (Hakanen et al., 2006; Lapointe et al., 2012; Yılmaz et al., 2015; Xin et al., 2017; Han S. S. et al., 2018; Yin et al., 2019), self-efficacy, optimism, trust (Agu, 2015; Tösten and Toprak, 2017; Liu and Huang, 2019), compassion, work ethics, leadership (Mauno et al., 2016), organizational support (Xin et al., 2017), job satisfaction (Lin et al., 2020), political skills (Bostancı, 2020), well-being (Rusu and Colomeischi, 2020), and organizational citizenship behavior (Cheung and Lun, 2015). Drawing on the findings of the current study, we can say that OC plays a significant role on the relationship between EL and WE of teachers. For this reason, this study shows that if educational organizations aim to reach WE for their teachers, then they should know that the first step goes through EL, while the second one through OC. For this reason, a three-step roadmap is suggested to educational organizations. Firstly, they should take action to provide their teachers to put in their emotional labol more; secondly, the teachers will show more commitment to their organizations. After all is said and done, the teachers will engage their works much more which is the final destination in this journey.
      

Conclusion and Suggestions

      This study can be the first one which addresses EL, OC, and WE for teachers. In this context, it can be said that it is valuable for both researchers and future studies since the obtained results can contribute new knowledge to the field. In this way, this study extended the literature on EL, OC, and WE. The most significant contribution of the current study is that it provided evidence that OC of teachers can mediate the relationship between their EL and WE. When teachers exert emotional effort, transfer their negative emotions, and exhibit their emotions transparently, they become more committed to school and in turn they become more engaged in their work. This underlines the importance of emotion regulation for teachers. School administrators should be aware of importance of teachers’ emotions and create an environment in which teachers can display their emotions. They should also consider that EL and OC explain WE. In this way, they can know how to proceed for engaging teachers to their works and to implement the practical effect on work life. Besides these points, it is suggested that more studies should be made to use this model on teacher samples. Considering the literature, it can be said that there is a serious need on this suggestion.
      
      

Limitations and Implications for Further Research

      This study is not without some limitations. Firstly, the study employed a cross-sectional design which does not provide cause-effect relationships. Further research may employ longitudinal design to reveal causality. Secondly, the findings of the current study are based on teachers’ self-perceptions which may cause social desirability bias (Rosenman and Tennekoon, 2011). Thirdly, we reached the participants through convenience sampling which may cause the problem of generalizability. However, this is an internal validity study which aims to test a structural model not to generalize the findings to a target population. Fourthly, we tested a simple mediation model. The findings indicated complementary mediation which means an incomplete theoretical framework (Zhao et al., 2010). Fifthly, this study used the EL scale developed by Öztürk (2020) and addressing EL based on deep acting. For this reason, the hypothesis of the study was created accordingly. Further studies can choose a different scale which runs all the theoretical structure of EL. Further studies may consider extending the model integrating new mediators or moderators such as tenure or age. Lastly, the current study was conducted only one city in Turkey. Cross-cultural validation of the model can be considered in further studies.
      
      
      

Data Availability Statement

      The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
      
      

Ethics Statement

      The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Sakarya University Ethics Committee with the decision number E-61923333-050.99 and subject 29/35. Only the volunteered participants participated in this study.
      
      

Author Contributions

      GS-G devised the research idea, developed the research model, performed the results, discussion, recommendations, limitations, revised and improved the introduction and method parts for the manuscript, and arranged the last version of the manuscript. MB ran the data collecting process, wrote the introduction part, and controlled the other parts in terms of language and contextual check for the manuscript. İL wrote the method part, ran the analytic calculations, limitations, and implications, and checked for the literature and discussion part. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
      
      

Conflict of Interest

      The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
      
      



References
Adi A. Fithriana N. (2020). How the workplace spirituality influences work engagement through organizational commitment: evidence from banking industry. Manag. Sci. Lett. 10 3375–3386. 10.5267/j.msl.2020.5.041
Agu O. L. (2015). Work engagement, organizational commitment, self-efficacy and organizational growth: a literature review. Inf. Impact J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. 6 14–29.
Agyemang C. B. Ofei S. B. (2013). Employee work engagement and organizational commitment: a comparative study of private and public sector organizations in Ghana. Eur. J. Bus. Innov. Res. 1 20–33.
Akdemir Ö. A. (2019). The effect of teacher burnout on organizational commitment in Turkish context. J. Educ. Train. Stud. 7 171–179. 10.11114/jets.v7i4.4067
Akhtar R. Boustani L. Tsivrikos D. Chamorro-Premuzic T. (2015). The engageable personality: personality and trait EI as predictors of work engagement. Pers. Individ. Differ. 73 44–49. 10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.040
Akın U. (2021). Exploring the relationship between emotional labor and organizational commitment levels of teachers. Eur. J. Educ. Res. 91 61–82.
Akın U. Aydın İ Erdoğan Ç Demirkasımoğlu N. (2014). Emotional labor and burnout among Turkish primary school teachers. Aust. Educ. Res. 41 155–169. 10.1007/s13384-013-0138-4
Albdour A. A. Altarawneh I. I. (2014). Employee engagement and organizational commitment: evidence from Jordan. Int. J. Bus. 19 192–212.
Albrecht S. L. (2012). The influence of job, team and organizational level resources on employee well-being, engagement, commitment and extra-role performance: test of a model. Int. J. Manp. 33 840–853. 10.1108/01437721211268357
Ariani D. W. (2013). The relationship between employee engagement, organizational citizenship behavior, and counterproductive work behavior. Int. J. Bus. Adm. 4:46.
Ashforth B. E. Humphrey R. H. (1993). Emotional labor in service roles: the influence of identity. Acad. Manag. Rev. 18 88–115. 10.2307/258824
Atilla-Bal E. (2009). Self-Efficacy, Contextual Factors and Well-being: the Impact of Work Engagement. Doctoral Dissertation. Istanbul: Marmara University.
Babcock-Roberson M. E. Strickland O. J. (2010). The relationship between charismatic leadership, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behaviors. J. Psychol. 144 313–326. 10.1080/00223981003648336 20461933
Bakker A. B. (2005). Flow among music teachers and their students: the crossover between peak experiences. J. Vocat. Behav. 66 26–44. 10.1016/j.jvb.2003.11.001
Bakker A. B. Bal M. P. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: a study among starting teachers. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 83 189–206. 10.1348/096317909x402596
Bakker A. B. Demerouti E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Dev. Int. 13 209–223. 10.1108/13620430810870476
Bakker A. B. Schaufeli W. B. (2008). Positive organizational behavior: engaged employees in flourishing organizations. J. Organ. Behav. 29 147–154. 10.1002/job.515
Bakker A. B. Demerouti E. de Boer E. Schaufeli W. B. (2003). Job demands and job resources as predictors of absence duration and frequency. J. Vocat. Behav. 62 341–356. 10.1016/s0001-8791(02)00030-1
Balay R. (2014). Yönetici ve Öğretmenlerde Örgütsel Bağlılık. (Organizational Commitment in Administrators and Teachers). Ankara: Pegem Press.
Barnes D. C. Collier J. E. (2013). Investigating work engagement in the service environment. J. Serv. Mark. 27 485–499. 10.1108/jsm-01-2012-0021
Bateman T. Strasser S. (1984). A longitudinal analysis of the antecedents of organizational commitment. Acad. Manag. J. 21 95–112. 10.2307/255959
Bentler P. M. (2006). EQS 6, Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.
Berkovich I. Eyal O. (2017). Emotional reframing as a mediator of the relationships between transformational school leadership and teachers’ motivation and commitment. J. Educ. Adm. 55 450–468. 10.1108/jea-07-2016-0072
Berquam J. (2020). The Relationship Between Job-Person Fit and Use of Emotional Labor in Teachers. Doctoral dissertation. Arizona: Grand Canyon University.
Bolton S. C. (2010). Old Ambiguities and New Developments: Exploring the Emotional Labour Process in Working Life: Renewing Labour Process Analysis. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bostancı A. B. (2020). The relationship between teachers’ political skills and work engagement. Int. J. Educ. Lit. Stud. 8 53–63. 10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.8n.4p.53
Breevaart K. Bakker A. B. Demerouti E. Derks D. (2015). Who takes the lead? a multi-source diary study on leadership, work engagement, and job performance. J. Oragn. Behav. 37 309–325. 10.1002/job.2041
Brown E. L. Horner C. G. Kerr M. M. Scanlon C. L. (2014). United States teachers’ emotional labor and professional identities. Kedi J. Educ. Policy 11 205–225.
Buchanan B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: the socialization of managers in work organizations. Adm. Sci. Q. 19 533–546. 10.2307/2391809
Butakor P. K. Guo Q. Adebanji A. O. (2020). Using structural equation modeling to examine the relationship between Ghanaian teachers’ emotional intelligence, job satisfaction, professional identity, and work engagement. Psychol. Schl. 58 534–552. 10.1002/pits.22462
Büyükbeşe T. Aslan H. (2019). Psikolojik sermaye ve duygusal emeğin örgütsel bağlılık üzerindeki etkisi. ÝŞlet. AraŞ. Der. 11 949–963.
Büyüköztürk Ş (2011). Sosyal Bilimler Için Veri Analizi El Kitabi. Ankara: PegemA Akademi.
Byrne B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Routledge.
Çağrı San B. Tok T. N. (2017). The relationship between teachers’ work engagement and organizational commitment. Pamukkale Univer. J. Soc. Sci. 26 355–370. 10.5505/pausbed.2017.37232
Çarıkcı E. (2020). Lise öğretmenlerinin duygusal emek davranişlari ile işle bütünleşmeleri arasindaki ilişki. Al Far. Ulusl. Sos. Bil. Der. 5 37–50.
Casper W. J. Harris C. Taylor-Bianco A. Wayne J. H. (2011). Work-family conflict, perceived supervisor support and organizational commitment among Brazilian professionals. J. Vocat. Behav. 79 640–652. 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.04.011
Chan H. W. W. (2009). The Positive Side of Emotional Labor: its Effect on Work Engagement and Job Performance. Doctoral dissertation. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Chan W. Y. Lau S. Nie Y. Lim S. Hogan D. (2008). Organizational and personal predictors of teacher commitment: the mediating role of teacher efficacy and identification with school. Am. Educ. Res. J. 45 597–630. 10.3102/0002831208318259
Chen S. (2018). Cross-level effects of high-commitment work systems on work engagement: the mediating role of psychological capital. Asia Pac. J. Hum. Res. 56 384–401. 10.1111/1744-7941.12144
Cheung F. Y. Lun V. M.-C. (2015). Relation between emotional labour and organizational citizenship behaviour: an investigation among Chinese teaching professionals. J. Gen. Psychol. 142 253–272. 10.1080/00221309.2015.1091764 26649924
Chew J. (2004). Managing MNC expatriates through crises: a challenge for international human resource management. Res. Pract. Hum. Res. Manag. 12 1–30. 10.4135/9781506374475.n1 33782627
Choi S. B. Tran T. B. H. Park B. I. (2015). Inclusive leadership and work engagement: mediating roles of affective organizational commitment and creativity. Soc. Behav. Pers. 43 931–944. 10.2224/sbp.2015.43.6.931
Cohen J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Dağlı A. Elçiçek Z. Han B. (2018). Adaptation of the “organizational commitment scale” into Turkish: validity and reliability study. El. J. Soc. Sci. 17 1765–1777.
Dee J. R. Henkin A. B. Singleton C. A. (2006). Organizational commitment of teachers in urban schools: examining the effects of team structures. Urban Educ. 41 603–627. 10.1177/0042085906292512
Deliveli K. Kıral E. (2020). The relationship between emotional labor and organizational commitment. Educ. Policy Annu. Strategic Res. 15 78–103. 10.29329/epasr.2020.251.5
Demerouti E. Bakker A. B. Gevers J. M. (2015). Job crafting and extra-role behavior: the role of work engagement and flourishing. J. Vocat. Behav. 91 87–96. 10.1016/j.jvb.2015.09.001
Diefendorff J. M. Croyle M. H. Gosserand R. H. (2005). The dimensionality and antecedents of emotional labor strategies. J. Vocat. Behav. 66 339–357. 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.02.001
Diefendorff J. M. Richard E. M. Croyle M. H. (2006). Are emotional display rules formal job requirements? examination of employee and supervisor perceptions. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 79 273–298. 10.1348/096317905x68484
Dilekçi Ü Limon İ (2020). The mediator role of teachers’ subjective well-being in the relationship between principals’ instructional leadership and teachers’ professional engagement. Educ. Adm. Theory Pract. 26 743–798.
Eser Ý (2018). Öğretmenlerin Etik Liderlik Algisinin Işle Bütünleşme ile Olan Ilişkisinde Pozitif Psikolojik Sermayenin Aracilik Etkisi. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. Gaziantep: Gaziantep University.
Field A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Fishbein M. Ajzen I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fresko B. Kfir D. Nasser F. (1997). Predicting teacher commitment. Teach. Teach. Educ. 13 429–438. 10.1016/s0742-051x(96)00037-6
Genç N. (2004). Yönetim ve Organizasyon: ÇağdaŞ Sistemler ve YaklaŞımlar [Administration and Organization: Modern Systems and Approaches]. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
Gota G. (2017). The Relationship Between Psychological Capital, Work Engagement and Organizational Commitment Amongst Employees at a Selected Food Processing Plant in the Western Cape. Master’s thesis. Cape Town: University of the Western Cape.
Grandey A. A. (2000). Emotional regulation in the workplace: a new way to conceptualize emotional labor. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 5 95–110. 10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.95 10658889
Gross J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2:271. 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
Güler H. N. (2018). KiŞilik, Örgütsel Güven ve Bağliliğin Duygusal Emeğe Etkileri ile IŞten Ayrilma Niyeti Arasindaki IliŞkinin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir AraŞtirma. Doctoral dissertation. Istanbul: Aydın University.
Hair J. F. Black W. C. Babin B. J. Anderson R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. Essex: Pearson.
Hakanen J. J. Bakker A. B. Schaufeli W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. J. Schl. Psychol. 43 495–513. 10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001
Halbesleben J. R. B. (2010). “A meta-analysis of work engagement: relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences,” in Work Engagement: a Handbook of Essential Theory and Research, eds Bakker A. B. Leiter M. P. (New York: Psychology Press), 102–117.
Han S. L. Shim H. S. Choi W. J. (2018). The effect of emotional labor of college administrative service workers on job attitudes: mediating effect of emotional labor on trust and organizational commitment. Front. Psychol. 9:2473.
Han S. S. Han J. W. Kim Y. H. (2018). Effect of nurses’ emotional labor on customer orientation and service delivery: the mediating effects of work engagement and burnout. Saf. Health Work 9 441–446. 10.1016/j.shaw.2017.12.001 30559993
Heo C. G. Lee K. A. (2015). Contribution of emotional labor to burnout and work engagement of school foodservice employees in Daegu and Gyeongbuk province. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 44 610–618. 10.3746/jkfn.2015.44.4.610
Ho R. (2006). Handbook of Univariate and Multivariate Data Analysis and Interpretation with SPSS. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis Group.
Hochschild A. R. (1983). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Hong Y. Matsko K. K. (2019). Looking inside and outside of mentoring: effects on new teachers’ organizational commitment. Am. Educ. Res. J. 56 2368–2407. 10.3102/0002831219843657
Hoole C. Bonneman J. (2015). Work engagement and meaningful work across generational cohorts. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 13 1–11.
Hu Q. Schaufeli W. B. (2011). Job insecurity and remuneration in Chinese family-owned business workers. Career Dev. Int. 16 6–19. 10.1108/13620431111107784
Huck S. W. (2012). Reading Statistics and Research. Boston: Pearson.
Iqbal T. Khan K. Iqbal N. (2012). Job stress and employee engagement. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. 28 109–118.
Isenbarger L. Zembylas M. (2006). The emotional labor of caring in teaching. Teach. Teacher Educ. 22 120–134. 10.1016/j.tate.2005.07.002
Karatepe O. M. (2013). Perceptions of organizational politics and hotel employee outcomes: the mediating role of work engagement. Int. J. Contemporary Hosp. Manag. 25 82–104. 10.1108/09596111311290237
Kim H. J. (2008). Hotel service providers’ emotional labor: the antecedents and effects on burnout. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 27 151–161. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.07.019
Kim H. J. Shin K. H. Swanger N. (2009). Burnout and engagement: a comparative analysis using the big five personality dimensions. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 28 96–104. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2008.06.001
Kim J. H. Yang M. H. (2018). The moderating effect of informal learning on the relationship between emotional labor, organizational commitment, and psychological empowerment. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 118 2467–2483.
Kim N. G. Jeon K. H. Lee J. G. (2015). The influence of emotional labor on turnover intention and customer orientation mediated by burnout and work engagement: the moderating effect of reward on manager at support centers for startup. Asia Pac. J. Bus. Ventur. Entrerpreneurship 10 153–165. 10.16972/apjbve.10.1.201502.153
Kim W. Kim J. Woo H. Park J. Jo J. Park S. H. (2017). The relationship between work engagement and organizational commitment: proposing research agendas through a review of empirical literature. Hum. Res. Dev. Rev. 16 350–376. 10.1177/1534484317725967
Kirkpatrick G. (2009). The corporate governance lessons from the financial crisis. OECD J. Finance Mark. Trends 1 61–87.
Klassen R. M. Aldhafri S. Mansfield C. F. Purwanto E. Siu A. F. Y. Wong M. W. (2012). Teachers’ engagement at work: an international validation study. J. Exp. Educ. 80 317–337.
Kline R. B. (2009). Becoming a Behavioral Science Researcher: a Guide to Producing Research that Matters. New York: The Guilford Press.
Košir K. Tement S. Horvat M. (2020). Perceived job characteristics and emotional labor as factors of teachers’ work engagement. Horizons Psychol. 29 107–116.
Kothari C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers.
Kotzé M. Nel P. (2020). The influence of job resources on platinum mineworkers’ work engagement and organisational commitment: an explorative study. Extr. Ind. Soc. 7 146–152. 10.1016/j.exis.2020.01.009
Lapointe E. Morin A. Coursy F. Boilard A. Payette D. (2012). Workplace affective commitment, emotional labor and burnout: a multiple mediator model. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 7 3–21.
Lavelle J. J. Rupp D. E. Brockner J. (2007). Taking a multifoci approach to the study of justice, social exchange, and citizenship behavior: the target similarity model. J. Manag. 33 841–866. 10.1177/0149206307307635
Lavy S. Eshet R. (2018). Spiral effects of teachers’ emotions and emotion regulation strategies: evidence from a daily diary study. Teach. Teacher Educ. 73 151–161. 10.1016/j.tate.2018.04.001
Lazanyi K. (2011). Organizational consequences of emotional labor in management. Appl. Stud. Agric. Comerce 5 125–130.
Li S. Li X. Shi K. (2010). “The influence of procedure justice on work engagement: the mediating role of organizational commitment,” in Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE 2nd Symposium on Web Society, (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE).
Li Y. (2014). Building affective commitment to organization among Chinese university teachers: the roles of organizational justice and job burnout. Educ. Assess. Eval. Accout. 26 135–152. 10.1007/s11092-014-9192-3
Lin X. Lam L. W. Zhang L. L. (2020). The curvilinear relationship between job satisfaction and employee voice: speaking up for the organization and the self. Asia. Paci. J. Manag. 37 587–607. 10.1007/s10490-018-9622-8
Lindqvist H. Weurlander M. Wernerson A. Thornberg R. (2019). Boundaries as a coping strategy: emotional labour and relationship maintenance in distressing teacher education situations. Eur. J. Teac. Educ. 42 634–649. 10.1080/02619768.2019.1652904
Liu J. Cho S. Putra E. D. (2017). The moderating effect of self-efficacy and gender on work engagement for restaurant employees in the United States. Int. J. Contemporary Hosp. Manag. 29 624–642. 10.1108/ijchm-10-2015-0539
Liu Q. Huang J. Q. (2019). A comparative study on the investment level of preschool education between China and OECD countries. China Econ. Educ. Rev. 4 72–86.
Loh C. E. Liew W. M. (2016). Voices from the ground: the emotional labour of English teachers’ work. Teach. Teach. Educ. 55 267–278. 10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.016
Lu X. Guy M. E. (2014). How emotional labor and ethical leadership affect job engagement for Chinese public servants. Public Pers. Manag. 43 3–24. 10.1177/0091026013512278
Mache S. Vitzthum K. Wanke E. Groneberg D. Klapp B. Danzer G. (2014). Exploring the impact of resilience, self-efficacy, optimism and organizational resources on work engagement. Work 47 491–500.
Markos S. Sridevi M. S. (2010). Employee engagement: the key to improving performance. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 5 89–96.
Mauno S. Kinnunen U. Ruokolainen M. (2007). Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: a longitudinal study. J. Vocat. Behav. 70 149–171. 10.1016/j.jvb.2006.09.002
Mauno S. Ruokolainen M. Kinnunen U. De Bloom J. (2016). Emotional labour and work engagement among nurses: examining perceived compassion, leadership and work ethic as stress buffers. J. Adv. Nurs. 72 1169–1181. 10.1111/jan.12906 26841277
Meyer J. P. Allen N. J. (1997). Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Meyer J. P. Allen N. J. Smith C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. J. Appl. Psychol. 78 538–551. 10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538
Meyer J. P. Morin A. J. S. Stanley L. J. Maltin E. R. (2019). Teachers’ dual commitment to the organization and occupation: A person-centered investigation. Teach. Teach. Educ. 77, 100–111. 10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.009
Miočević M. O’Rourke H. P. MacKinnon D. P. Brown H. C. (2018). Statistical properties of four effect-size measures for mediation models. Behav. Res. 50 285–301. 10.3758/s13428-017-0870-1 28342072
Mowday R. T. Steers R. M. Porter L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. J. Vocat. Behav. 14 224–247.
Mróz J. Kaleta K. (2016). Relationships between personality, emotional labor, work engagement and job satisfaction in service professions. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 29 767–782. 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00578 27518886
Nehmeh R. (2009). What is organizational commitment, why should managers want it in their workforce, and is there any cost-effective way to secure it. Swiss Manag. Center 5 45–46.
Ogbonna E. Harris L. C. (2004). Work intensification and emotional labour among UK university lecturers: an exploratory study. Organ. Stud. 25 1185–1203. 10.1177/0170840604046315
Ogunsola K. O. Fontaine R. A. H. Jan M. T. (2020). Impact of surface acting and deep acting techniques on teachers’ organizational commitment. PSU Res. Rev. 10.1108/PRR-10-2019-0031 ahead-of-print.
Öngöre Ö (2019). Determining the effect of emotional labor on work engagement: service-sector employees in private enterprises. Is Ahlakı Der. 12 126–134.
Othman N. Nasurdin A. M. (2012). Social support and work engagement: a study of Malaysian nurses. J. Nurs. Manag. 21 1083–1090. 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01448.x 23409702
Öztürk E. (2020). Duygu Yönetim Becerileri ile Duygusal Emek Davranişlarinin Okulun Duygusal Iklimi Üzerindeki Etkileri. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. Elazığ: Fırat University.
Park I. (2015). Teacher commitment and its effects on student achievement in American high schools. Educ. Res. Eval. 11 461–485. 10.1080/13803610500146269
Paulík K. (2020). Some psychological factors related to work engagement in teachers. New Educ. Rev. 59 203–213.
Pelosi E. M. (2015). Staying Engaged When You’re on Stage: the Effects of Emotional Labor, Competence, and Relatedness on Work Engagement. Doctoral dissertation. Seattle: Seattle Pacific University.
Peplińska A. Kawalec K. Godlewska-Werner D. Połomski P. (2020). Work engagement, organizational commitment and the work satisfaction of tax administration employees: the intermediary role of organizational climate and silence in the organizations. Hum. Res. Manag. 134–142 127–144. 10.5604/01.3001.0014.1678
Pieters W. R. Auanga N. (2018). Enhancing work engagement of teachers through organizational commitment, organizational justice and psychological conditions in Namibia. J. Stud. Hum. Soc. Sci. 7 140–167.
Podsakoff P. M. MacKenzie S. B. Lee J.-Y. Podsakoff N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88 879–903. 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 14516251
Rafaeli A. Sutton R. I. (1987). Expression of emotion as part of the work role. Acad Manag. Rev. 12:23e37.
Richards J. M. Gross J. J. (2000). Emotion regulation and memory: the cognitive costs of keeping one’s cool. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79 410–424. 10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.410 10981843
Rivkin W. Diestel S. Schmidt K. H. (2016). Which daily experiences can foster wellbeing at work? a diary study on the interplay between flow experiences, affective commitment, and self-control demands. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 16 99–111. 10.1037/ocp0000039 27101337
Rosenman R. Tennekoon V. (2011). Measuring bias in self-reported data. Int. J. Behav. Health Res. 2 320–332. 10.1504/ijbhr.2011.043414 25383095
Roth G. Assor A. Kanat-Maymon Y. Kaplan H. (2007). Autonomous motivation for teaching: how self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 99 761–774. 10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.761
Rusu P. P. Colomeischi A. A. (2020). Positivity ratio and well-being among teachers. the mediating role of work engagement. Front. Psychol. 11:1608.
Saks A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. J. Manag. Psychol. 21 600–619. 10.1108/02683940610690169
Salanova M. Agut S. Peiro J. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: the mediation of service climate. J. Appl. Psychol. 90 1217–1227. 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1217 16316275
Saleem A. Iqbal J. Sandhu M. A. Amin S. (2018). Impact of empowerment and emotional labor on teacher’s work engagement: a moderating role of job experience. Rev. Econ. Dev. Stud. 4 237–245. 10.26710/reads.v4i2.408
Santos A. Chambel M. J. Castanheira F. (2016). Relational job characteristics and nurses’ affective organizational commitment: the mediating role of work engagement. J. Adv. Nurs. 72 294–305. 10.1111/jan.12834 26467032
Schaufeli W. B. (2013). “What is engagement?,” in Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice, eds Truss C. Alfes K. Delbridge R. Shantz A. Soane E. (London: Routledge).
Schaufeli W. B. Bakker A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. J. Organ. Behav. 25 293–315. 10.1002/job.248
Schaufeli W. B. Salanova M. Gonzalez-Rom V. Bakker A. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J. Happiness Stud. 3 71–92.
Schaufeli W. B. Taris T. L. Blanc P. Peeters M. Bakker A. (2001). Can work produce health? the quest for the engaged worker. Psychology 36 422–428.
Şenel G. Aydoğan E. (2020). Örgütsel bağlılığın duygusal emek üzerine etkisi: sağlık sektörü çalışanları üzerinde bir araştırma. Yorum Yön. Yönt. Uluslararası Yön. Ek. Fel. Der. 8 125–134.
Sezen G. (2014). Examination of Relationship between Teachers’ Work Engagement and Loneliness at Work Levels (Öğretmenlerin Işle Bütünleşme ve Iş Yaşaminda Yalnizlik Düzeyleri Arasindaki Ilişkinin Incelenmesi. Master’s thesis. Sakarya: Sakarya Üniversitesi.
Sezgin F. (2009). Relationships between teacher organizational commitment, psychological hardiness and some demographic variables in Turkish primary schools. J. Educ. Adm. 47 630–651. 10.1108/09578230910981099
Sharma S. Mukherjee S. Kumar A. Dillon W. R. (2005). A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. J. Bus. Res. 58 935–943. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.007
Shirbagi N. (2007). Exploring organizational commitment and leadership frames within Indian and Iranian higher education institutions. Bull. Educ. Res. 29 17–32.
Shukla A. Pandey S. (2019). Study of organizational commitment in relation to emotional labour. Int. J. Manag. Stud. 7 33–41. 10.18843/ijms/v6i1(7)/04
Sloan M. M. (2004). The effects of occupational characteristics on the experience and expression of anger in the workplace. Work Occup. 31 38–72. 10.1177/0730888403260734
Song Z. Chon K. Ding G. Gu C. (2015). Impact of organizational socialization tactics on newcomer job satisfaction and engagement: core self-evaluations as moderators. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 46 180–189. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.02.006
Taris T. W. Ybema J. F. van Beek I. (2017). Burnout and engagement: identical twins or just close relatives? Burn. Res. 5 3–11. 10.1016/j.burn.2017.05.002
Taxer J. L. Frenzel A. C. (2015). Facets of teachers’ emotional lives: a quantitative investigation of teachers’ genuine, faked, and hidden emotions. Teach. Teach. Educ. 49 78–88. 10.1016/j.tate.2015.03.003
Taylor A. (2020). The effect of emotional labour on English teachers in Japan. Iss. Educ. Res. 30 1539–1557.
Töre E. (2020). Effects of intrinsic motivation on teacher emotional labor: mediating role of affective commitment. Int. J. Prog. Educ. 16 390–403. 10.29329/ijpe.2020.277.24
Tösten R. Toprak M. (2017). Positive psychological capital and emotional labor: a study in educational organizations. Cogn. Educ. 4:1301012. 10.1080/2331186x.2017.1301012
Towers Watson (2014). Global Workforce Study. Available Online at: https://www.willistowerswatson.com/assets/gfs2017/Employee_Value_Proposition_and_Total_Rewards_Modernize_or_Risk_Irrelevance.pdf (accessed November 18, 2020)
Tsui K. T. Cheng Y. C. (1999). School organizational health and teacher commitment: a contingency study with multi-level analysis. Educ. Res. Eval. 5 249–268. 10.1076/edre.5.3.249.3883
Walker J. (2001). Control and the Psychology of Health. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Wang P. Chu P. Wang J. Pan R. Sun Y. Yan M. (2020). Association between job stress and organizational commitment in three types of Chinese university teachers: mediating effects of job burnout and job satisfaction. Front. Psychol. 11:576768.
Wang Z. Li X. Shi K. (2010). “The relationship among transformational leadership, work engagement, and emotional labor strategy,” in Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE 2nd Symposium on Web Society, (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE).
Wilson B. L. Corcoran T. B. (1988). Successful Secondary Schools: Visions of Excellence in American Public Education. New York: Falmer.
Winograd K. (2003). The functions of teacher emotions: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Teach. Coll. Rec. 105 1641–1673. 10.1046/j.1467-9620.2003.00304.x
Wong C. S. Law K. S. (2017). “The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study,” in Leadership Perspectives (Routledge), 97–128.
Wood J. Oh J. Park J. Kim W. (2020). The relationship between work engagement and work–life balance in organizations: a review of the empirical research. Hum. Res. Dev. Rev. 19 240–262. 10.1177/1534484320917560
Wragg E. C. Wragg C. M. (1998). Classroom Management Research in the United Kingdom. Eric Document, Number: 418971. Available Online at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED418971.pdf (accessed November 18, 2020).
Xanthopoulou D. Bakker A. B. Fischbach A. (2013). Work engagement among employees facing emotional demands: the role of personal resources. J. Pers. Psychol. 12 74–84. 10.1027/1866-5888/a000085
Xin W. Tong L. Yiwen C. (2017). “Influence of emotional labor on organizational commitment in government logistics personnel: the mediating effect of job burnout and the moderating effect of perceived organizational support,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 19th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Heathcom), (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE).
Yang F. H. Chang C. C. (2008). Emotional labour, job satisfaction and organizational commitment amongst clinical nurses: a questionnaire survey. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 45 879–887. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.02.001 17391673
Yılmaz K. Altınkurt Y. Güner M. Şen B. (2015). The relationship between teachers’ emotional labor and burnout level. Eur. J. Educ. Res. 59 75–90.
Yin H. (2015). The effect of teachers’ emotional labour on teaching satisfaction: moderation of emotional intelligence. Teach. Teach. 21 789–810. 10.1080/13540602.2014.995482
Yin H. (2016). Knife-like mouth and tofu-like heart: emotion regulation by Chinese teachers in classroom teaching. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 19 1–22. 10.1007/s11218-015-9319-5
Yin H. Huang S. Chen G. (2019). The relationships between teachers’ emotional labor and their burnout and satisfaction: a meta-analytic review. Educ. Res. Rev. 28 1–18.
Yoo J. (2016). Perceived customer participation and work engagement: the path through emotional labor. Int. J. Bank Mark. 34 1009–1024. 10.1108/ijbm-09-2015-0139
Yoo J. J. Arnold T. J. (2014). Customer orientation, engagement, and developing positive emotional labor. Serv. Ind. J. 34 1272–1288. 10.1080/02642069.2014.942653
Yoo J. Jeong J. (2017). The effects of emotional labor on work engagement and boundary spanner creativity. Asia Paci. J. Innov. Entr. 11 214–232. 10.1108/apjie-08-2017-028
Zhang J. C. Ling W. Q. Zhang Z. Y. Xie J. (2015). Organizational commitment, work engagement, person–supervisor fit, and turnover intention: a total effect moderation model. Soc. Behav. Pers. 43 1657–1666. 10.2224/sbp.2015.43.10.1657
Zhang L. Yu S. Jiang L. (2020). Chinese preschool teachers’ emotional labor and regulation strategies. Teach. Teach. Educ. 92:103024. 10.1016/j.tate.2020.103024
Zhang Q. Zhu W. (2008). Exploring emotion in teaching: emotional labor, burnout, and satisfaction in Chinese higher education. Comm. Educ. 57 105–112. 10.1080/03634520701586310
Zhao X. Lynch J. G. Chen Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. J. Consum. Res. 37 197–206. 10.1086/651257
Zheng X. Shi X. Liu Y. (2020). Leading teachers’ emotions like parents: relationships between paternalistic leadership, emotional labor and teacher commitment in China. Front. Psychol. 11:519.


      ‘Oh, my dear Thomas, you haven’t heard the terrible news then?’ she said. ‘I thought you would be sure to have seen it placarded somewhere. Alice went straight to her room, and I haven’t seen her since, though I repeatedly knocked at the door, which she has locked on the inside, and I’m sure it’s most unnatural of her not to let her own mother comfort her. It all happened in a moment: I have always said those great motor-cars shouldn’t be allowed to career about the streets, especially when they are all paved with cobbles as they are at Easton Haven, which are{331} so slippery when it’s wet. He slipped, and it went over him in a moment.’    My thanks were few and awkward, for there still hung to the missive a basting thread, and it was as warm as a nestling bird. I bent low--everybody was emotional in those days--kissed the fragrant thing, thrust it into my bosom, and blushed worse than Camille.  "What, the Corner House victim? Is that really a fact?" "My dear child, I don't look upon it in that light at all. The child gave our picturesque friend a certain distinction--'My husband is dead, and this is my only child,' and all that sort of thing. It pays in society." leave them on the steps of a foundling asylum in order to insure   [See larger version]    Interoffice guff says you're planning definite moves on your own, J. O., and against some opposition. Is the Colonel so poor or so grasping—or what? Albert could not speak, for he felt as if his brains and teeth were rattling about inside his head. The rest of[Pg 188] the family hunched together by the door, the boys gaping idiotically, the girls in tears. "Now you're married." The host was called in, and unlocked a drawer in which they were deposited. The galleyman, with visible reluctance, arrayed himself in the garments, and he was observed to shudder more than once during the investiture of the dead man's apparel. HoME香京julia种子在线播放
ENTER NUMBET 0016www.lvtop.com.cn
      
www.jjhgcme.com.cn
      
www.hhblsf.com.cn
      
www.wangpiying.com.cn
      
q-ballet.com.cn
      
tarland.com.cn
      
www.pinlaser.com.cn
      
www.mqurhg.com.cn
      
nic360.com.cn
      
www.txyu.com.cn
      
   

      

 
      

      
      

      

      

 
      
处女被大鸡巴操 强奸乱伦小说图片 俄罗斯美女爱爱图 调教强奸学生 亚洲女的穴 夜来香图片大全 美女性强奸电影 手机版色中阁 男性人体艺术素描图 16p成人 欧美性爱360 电影区 亚洲电影 欧美电影 经典三级 偷拍自拍 动漫电影 乱伦电影 变态另类 全部电 类似狠狠鲁的网站 黑吊操白逼图片 韩国黄片种子下载 操逼逼逼逼逼 人妻 小说 p 偷拍10幼女自慰 极品淫水很多 黄色做i爱 日本女人人体电影快播看 大福国小 我爱肏屄美女 mmcrwcom 欧美多人性交图片 肥臀乱伦老头舔阴帝 d09a4343000019c5 西欧人体艺术b xxoo激情短片  未成年人的 插泰国人夭图片 第770弾み1 24p 日本美女性 交动态 eee色播 yantasythunder 操无毛少女屄 亚洲图片你懂的女人 鸡巴插姨娘 特级黄 色大片播 左耳影音先锋 冢本友希全集 日本人体艺术绿色 我爱被舔逼 内射 幼 美阴图 喷水妹子高潮迭起 和后妈 操逼 美女吞鸡巴 鸭个自慰 中国女裸名单 操逼肥臀出水换妻 色站裸体义术 中国行上的漏毛美女叫什么 亚洲妹性交图 欧美美女人裸体人艺照 成人色妹妹直播 WWW_JXCT_COM r日本女人性淫乱 大胆人艺体艺图片 女同接吻av 碰碰哥免费自拍打炮 艳舞写真duppid1 88电影街拍视频 日本自拍做爱qvod 实拍美女性爱组图 少女高清av 浙江真实乱伦迅雷 台湾luanlunxiaoshuo 洛克王国宠物排行榜 皇瑟电影yy频道大全 红孩儿连连看 阴毛摄影 大胆美女写真人体艺术摄影 和风骚三个媳妇在家做爱 性爱办公室高清 18p2p木耳 大波撸影音 大鸡巴插嫩穴小说 一剧不超两个黑人 阿姨诱惑我快播 幼香阁千叶县小学生 少女妇女被狗强奸 曰人体妹妹 十二岁性感幼女 超级乱伦qvod 97爱蜜桃ccc336 日本淫妇阴液 av海量资源999 凤凰影视成仁 辰溪四中艳照门照片 先锋模特裸体展示影片 成人片免费看 自拍百度云 肥白老妇女 女爱人体图片 妈妈一女穴 星野美夏 日本少女dachidu 妹子私处人体图片 yinmindahuitang 舔无毛逼影片快播 田莹疑的裸体照片 三级电影影音先锋02222 妻子被外国老头操 观月雏乃泥鳅 韩国成人偷拍自拍图片 强奸5一9岁幼女小说 汤姆影院av图片 妹妹人艺体图 美女大驱 和女友做爱图片自拍p 绫川まどか在线先锋 那么嫩的逼很少见了 小女孩做爱 处女好逼连连看图图 性感美女在家做爱 近距离抽插骚逼逼 黑屌肏金毛屄 日韩av美少女 看喝尿尿小姐日逼色色色网图片 欧美肛交新视频 美女吃逼逼 av30线上免费 伊人在线三级经典 新视觉影院t6090影院 最新淫色电影网址 天龙影院远古手机版 搞老太影院 插进美女的大屁股里 私人影院加盟费用 www258dd 求一部电影里面有一个二猛哥 深肛交 日本萌妹子人体艺术写真图片 插入屄眼 美女的木奶 中文字幕黄色网址影视先锋 九号女神裸 和骚人妻偷情 和潘晓婷做爱 国模大尺度蜜桃 欧美大逼50p 西西人体成人 李宗瑞继母做爱原图物处理 nianhuawang 男鸡巴的视屏 � 97免费色伦电影 好色网成人 大姨子先锋 淫荡巨乳美女教师妈妈 性nuexiaoshuo WWW36YYYCOM 长春继续给力进屋就操小女儿套干破内射对白淫荡 农夫激情社区 日韩无码bt 欧美美女手掰嫩穴图片 日本援交偷拍自拍 入侵者日本在线播放 亚洲白虎偷拍自拍 常州高见泽日屄 寂寞少妇自卫视频 人体露逼图片 多毛外国老太 变态乱轮手机在线 淫荡妈妈和儿子操逼 伦理片大奶少女 看片神器最新登入地址sqvheqi345com账号群 麻美学姐无头 圣诞老人射小妞和强奸小妞动话片 亚洲AV女老师 先锋影音欧美成人资源 33344iucoom zV天堂电影网 宾馆美女打炮视频 色五月丁香五月magnet 嫂子淫乱小说 张歆艺的老公 吃奶男人视频在线播放 欧美色图男女乱伦 avtt2014ccvom 性插色欲香影院 青青草撸死你青青草 99热久久第一时间 激情套图卡通动漫 幼女裸聊做爱口交 日本女人被强奸乱伦 草榴社区快播 2kkk正在播放兽骑 啊不要人家小穴都湿了 www猎奇影视 A片www245vvcomwwwchnrwhmhzcn 搜索宜春院av wwwsee78co 逼奶鸡巴插 好吊日AV在线视频19gancom 熟女伦乱图片小说 日本免费av无码片在线开苞 鲁大妈撸到爆 裸聊官网 德国熟女xxx 新不夜城论坛首页手机 女虐男网址 男女做爱视频华为网盘 激情午夜天亚洲色图 内裤哥mangent 吉沢明歩制服丝袜WWWHHH710COM 屌逼在线试看 人体艺体阿娇艳照 推荐一个可以免费看片的网站如果被QQ拦截请复制链接在其它浏览器打开xxxyyy5comintr2a2cb551573a2b2e 欧美360精品粉红鲍鱼 教师调教第一页 聚美屋精品图 中韩淫乱群交 俄罗斯撸撸片 把鸡巴插进小姨子的阴道 干干AV成人网 aolasoohpnbcn www84ytom 高清大量潮喷www27dyycom 宝贝开心成人 freefronvideos人母 嫩穴成人网gggg29com 逼着舅妈给我口交肛交彩漫画 欧美色色aV88wwwgangguanscom 老太太操逼自拍视频 777亚洲手机在线播放 有没有夫妻3p小说 色列漫画淫女 午间色站导航 欧美成人处女色大图 童颜巨乳亚洲综合 桃色性欲草 色眯眯射逼 无码中文字幕塞外青楼这是一个 狂日美女老师人妻 爱碰网官网 亚洲图片雅蠛蝶 快播35怎么搜片 2000XXXX电影 新谷露性家庭影院 深深候dvd播放 幼齿用英语怎么说 不雅伦理无需播放器 国外淫荡图片 国外网站幼幼嫩网址 成年人就去色色视频快播 我鲁日日鲁老老老我爱 caoshaonvbi 人体艺术avav 性感性色导航 韩国黄色哥来嫖网站 成人网站美逼 淫荡熟妇自拍 欧美色惰图片 北京空姐透明照 狼堡免费av视频 www776eom 亚洲无码av欧美天堂网男人天堂 欧美激情爆操 a片kk266co 色尼姑成人极速在线视频 国语家庭系列 蒋雯雯 越南伦理 色CC伦理影院手机版 99jbbcom 大鸡巴舅妈 国产偷拍自拍淫荡对话视频 少妇春梦射精 开心激动网 自拍偷牌成人 色桃隐 撸狗网性交视频 淫荡的三位老师 伦理电影wwwqiuxia6commqiuxia6com 怡春院分站 丝袜超短裙露脸迅雷下载 色制服电影院 97超碰好吊色男人 yy6080理论在线宅男日韩福利大全 大嫂丝袜 500人群交手机在线 5sav 偷拍熟女吧 口述我和妹妹的欲望 50p电脑版 wwwavtttcon 3p3com 伦理无码片在线看 欧美成人电影图片岛国性爱伦理电影 先锋影音AV成人欧美 我爱好色 淫电影网 WWW19MMCOM 玛丽罗斯3d同人动画h在线看 动漫女孩裸体 超级丝袜美腿乱伦 1919gogo欣赏 大色逼淫色 www就是撸 激情文学网好骚 A级黄片免费 xedd5com 国内的b是黑的 快播美国成年人片黄 av高跟丝袜视频 上原保奈美巨乳女教师在线观看 校园春色都市激情fefegancom 偷窥自拍XXOO 搜索看马操美女 人本女优视频 日日吧淫淫 人妻巨乳影院 美国女子性爱学校 大肥屁股重口味 啪啪啪啊啊啊不要 操碰 japanfreevideoshome国产 亚州淫荡老熟女人体 伦奸毛片免费在线看 天天影视se 樱桃做爱视频 亚卅av在线视频 x奸小说下载 亚洲色图图片在线 217av天堂网 东方在线撸撸-百度 幼幼丝袜集 灰姑娘的姐姐 青青草在线视频观看对华 86papa路con 亚洲1AV 综合图片2区亚洲 美国美女大逼电影 010插插av成人网站 www色comwww821kxwcom 播乐子成人网免费视频在线观看 大炮撸在线影院 ，www4KkKcom 野花鲁最近30部 wwwCC213wapwww2233ww2download 三客优最新地址 母亲让儿子爽的无码视频 全国黄色片子 欧美色图美国十次 超碰在线直播 性感妖娆操 亚洲肉感熟女色图 a片A毛片管看视频 8vaa褋芯屑 333kk 川岛和津实视频 在线母子乱伦对白 妹妹肥逼五月 亚洲美女自拍 老婆在我面前小说 韩国空姐堪比情趣内衣 干小姐综合 淫妻色五月 添骚穴 WM62COM 23456影视播放器 成人午夜剧场 尼姑福利网 AV区亚洲AV欧美AV512qucomwwwc5508com 经典欧美骚妇 震动棒露出 日韩丝袜美臀巨乳在线 av无限吧看 就去干少妇 色艺无间正面是哪集 校园春色我和老师做爱 漫画夜色 天海丽白色吊带 黄色淫荡性虐小说 午夜高清播放器 文20岁女性荫道口图片 热国产热无码热有码 2015小明发布看看算你色 百度云播影视 美女肏屄屄乱轮小说 家族舔阴AV影片 邪恶在线av有码 父女之交 关于处女破处的三级片 极品护士91在线 欧美虐待女人视频的网站 享受老太太的丝袜 aaazhibuo 8dfvodcom成人 真实自拍足交 群交男女猛插逼 妓女爱爱动态 lin35com是什么网站 abp159 亚洲色图偷拍自拍乱伦熟女抠逼自慰 朝国三级篇 淫三国幻想 免费的av小电影网站 日本阿v视频免费按摩师 av750c0m 黄色片操一下 巨乳少女车震在线观看 操逼 免费 囗述情感一乱伦岳母和女婿 WWW_FAMITSU_COM  偷拍中国少妇在公车被操视频 花也真衣论理电影 大鸡鸡插p洞 新片欧美十八岁美少 进击的巨人神thunderftp 西方美女15p 深圳哪里易找到老女人玩视频 在线成人有声小说 365rrr 女尿图片 我和淫荡的小姨做爱 � 做爱技术体照 淫妇性爱 大学生私拍b 第四射狠狠射小说 色中色成人av社区 和小姨子乱伦肛交 wwwppp62com 俄罗斯巨乳人体艺术 骚逼阿娇 汤芳人体图片大胆 大胆人体艺术bb私处 性感大胸骚货 哪个网站幼女的片多 日本美女本子把 色 五月天 婷婷 快播 美女  美穴艺术 色百合电影导航 大鸡巴用力 孙悟空操美少女战士 狠狠撸美女手掰穴图片 古代女子与兽类交 沙耶香套图 激情成人网区 暴风影音av播放 动漫女孩怎么插第3个 mmmpp44 黑木麻衣无码ed2k 淫荡学姐少妇 乱伦操少女屄 高中性爱故事 骚妹妹爱爱图网 韩国模特剪长发 大鸡巴把我逼日了 中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片 大胆女人下体艺术图片 789sss 影音先锋在线国内情侣野外性事自拍普通话对白 群撸图库 闪现君打阿乐 ady 小说 插入表妹嫩穴小说 推荐成人资源 网络播放器 成人台 149大胆人体艺术 大屌图片 骚美女成人av 春暖花开春色性吧 女亭婷五月 我上了同桌的姐姐 恋夜秀场主播自慰视频 yzppp 屄茎 操屄女图 美女鲍鱼大特写 淫乱的日本人妻山口玲子 偷拍射精图 性感美女人体艺木图片 种马小说完本 免费电影院 骑士福利导航导航网站 骚老婆足交 国产性爱一级电影 欧美免费成人花花性都 欧美大肥妞性爱视频 家庭乱伦网站快播 偷拍自拍国产毛片 金发美女也用大吊来开包 缔D杏那 yentiyishu人体艺术ytys WWWUUKKMCOM 女人露奶 � 苍井空露逼 老荡妇高跟丝袜足交 偷偷和女友的朋友做爱迅雷 做爱七十二尺 朱丹人体合成 麻腾由纪妃 帅哥撸播种子图 鸡巴插逼动态图片 羙国十次啦中文 WWW137AVCOM 神斗片欧美版华语 有气质女人人休艺术 由美老师放屁电影 欧美女人肉肏图片 白虎种子快播 国产自拍90后女孩 美女在床上疯狂嫩b 饭岛爱最后之作 幼幼强奸摸奶 色97成人动漫 两性性爱打鸡巴插逼 新视觉影院4080青苹果影院 嗯好爽插死我了 阴口艺术照 李宗瑞电影qvod38 爆操舅母 亚洲色图七七影院 被大鸡巴操菊花 怡红院肿么了 成人极品影院删除 欧美性爱大图色图强奸乱 欧美女子与狗随便性交 苍井空的bt种子无码 熟女乱伦长篇小说 大色虫 兽交幼女影音先锋播放 44aad be0ca93900121f9b 先锋天耗ばさ无码 欧毛毛女三级黄色片图 干女人黑木耳照 日本美女少妇嫩逼人体艺术 sesechangchang 色屄屄网 久久撸app下载 色图色噜 美女鸡巴大奶 好吊日在线视频在线观看 透明丝袜脚偷拍自拍 中山怡红院菜单 wcwwwcom下载 骑嫂子 亚洲大色妣 成人故事365ahnet 丝袜家庭教mp4 幼交肛交 妹妹撸撸大妈 日本毛爽 caoprom超碰在email 关于中国古代偷窥的黄片 第一会所老熟女下载 wwwhuangsecome 狼人干综合新地址HD播放 变态儿子强奸乱伦图 强奸电影名字 2wwwer37com 日本毛片基地一亚洲AVmzddcxcn 暗黑圣经仙桃影院 37tpcocn 持月真由xfplay 好吊日在线视频三级网 我爱背入李丽珍 电影师傅床戏在线观看 96插妹妹sexsex88com 豪放家庭在线播放 桃花宝典极夜著豆瓜网 安卓系统播放神器 美美网丝袜诱惑 人人干全免费视频xulawyercn av无插件一本道 全国色五月 操逼电影小说网 good在线wwwyuyuelvcom www18avmmd 撸波波影视无插件 伊人幼女成人电影 会看射的图片 小明插看看 全裸美女扒开粉嫩b 国人自拍性交网站 萝莉白丝足交本子 七草ちとせ巨乳视频 摇摇晃晃的成人电影 兰桂坊成社人区小说www68kqcom 舔阴论坛 久撸客一撸客色国内外成人激情在线 明星门 欧美大胆嫩肉穴爽大片 www牛逼插 性吧星云 少妇性奴的屁眼 人体艺术大胆mscbaidu1imgcn 最新久久色色成人版 l女同在线 小泽玛利亚高潮图片搜索 女性裸b图 肛交bt种子 最热门有声小说 人间添春色 春色猜谜字 樱井莉亚钢管舞视频 小泽玛利亚直美6p 能用的h网 还能看的h网 bl动漫h网 开心五月激 东京热401 男色女色第四色酒色网 怎么下载黄色小说 黄色小说小栽 和谐图城 乐乐影院 色哥导航 特色导航 依依社区 爱窝窝在线 色狼谷成人 91porn 包要你射电影 色色3A丝袜 丝袜妹妹淫网 爱色导航(荐) 好男人激情影院 坏哥哥 第七色 色久久 人格分裂 急先锋 撸撸射中文网 第一会所综合社区 91影院老师机 东方成人激情 怼莪影院吹潮 老鸭窝伊人无码不卡无码一本道 av女柳晶电影 91天生爱风流作品 深爱激情小说私房婷婷网 擼奶av 567pao 里番3d一家人野外 上原在线电影 水岛津实透明丝袜 1314酒色 网旧网俺也去 0855影院 在线无码私人影院 搜索 国产自拍 神马dy888午夜伦理达达兔 农民工黄晓婷 日韩裸体黑丝御姐 屈臣氏的燕窝面膜怎么样つぼみ晶エリーの早漏チ○ポ强化合宿 老熟女人性视频 影音先锋 三上悠亚ol 妹妹影院福利片 hhhhhhhhsxo 午夜天堂热的国产 强奸剧场 全裸香蕉视频无码 亚欧伦理视频 秋霞为什么给封了 日本在线视频空天使 日韩成人aⅴ在线 日本日屌日屄导航视频 在线福利视频 日本推油无码av magnet 在线免费视频 樱井梨吮东 日本一本道在线无码DVD 日本性感诱惑美女做爱阴道流水视频 日本一级av 汤姆avtom在线视频 台湾佬中文娱乐线20 阿v播播下载 橙色影院 奴隶少女护士cg视频 汤姆在线影院无码 偷拍宾馆 业面紧急生级访问 色和尚有线 厕所偷拍一族 av女l 公交色狼优酷视频 裸体视频AV 人与兽肉肉网 董美香ol 花井美纱链接 magnet 西瓜影音 亚洲 自拍 日韩女优欧美激情偷拍自拍 亚洲成年人免费视频 荷兰免费成人电影 深喉呕吐XXⅩX 操石榴在线视频 天天色成人免费视频 314hu四虎 涩久免费视频在线观看 成人电影迅雷下载 能看见整个奶子的香蕉影院 水菜丽百度影音 gwaz079百度云 噜死你们资源站 主播走光视频合集迅雷下载 thumbzilla jappen 精品Av 古川伊织star598在线 假面女皇vip在线视频播放 国产自拍迷情校园 啪啪啪公寓漫画 日本阿AV 黄色手机电影 欧美在线Av影院 华裔电击女神91在线 亚洲欧美专区 1日本1000部免费视频 开放90后 波多野结衣 东方 影院av 页面升级紧急访问每天正常更新 4438Xchengeren 老炮色 a k福利电影 色欲影视色天天视频 高老庄aV 259LUXU-683 magnet 手机在线电影 国产区 欧美激情人人操网 国产 偷拍 直播 日韩 国内外激情在线视频网给 站长统计一本道人妻 光棍影院被封 紫竹铃取汁 ftp 狂插空姐嫩 xfplay 丈夫面前 穿靴子伪街 XXOO视频在线免费 大香蕉道久在线播放 电棒漏电嗨过头 充气娃能看下毛和洞吗 夫妻牲交 福利云点墦 yukun瑟妃 疯狂交换女友 国产自拍26页 腐女资源 百度云 日本DVD高清无码视频 偷拍,自拍AV伦理电影 A片小视频福利站。 大奶肥婆自拍偷拍图片 交配伊甸园 超碰在线视频自拍偷拍国产 小热巴91大神 rctd 045 类似于A片 超美大奶大学生美女直播被男友操 男友问 你的衣服怎么脱掉的 亚洲女与黑人群交视频一 在线黄涩 木内美保步兵番号 鸡巴插入欧美美女的b舒服 激情在线国产自拍日韩欧美 国语福利小视频在线观看 作爱小视颍 潮喷合集丝袜无码mp4 做爱的无码高清视频 牛牛精品 伊aⅤ在线观看 savk12 哥哥搞在线播放 在线电一本道影 一级谍片 250pp亚洲情艺中心,88 欧美一本道九色在线一 wwwseavbacom色av吧 cos美女在线 欧美17,18ⅹⅹⅹ视频 自拍嫩逼 小电影在线观看网站 筱田优 贼 水电工 5358x视频 日本69式视频有码 b雪福利导航 韩国女主播19tvclub在线 操逼清晰视频 丝袜美女国产视频网址导航 水菜丽颜射房间 台湾妹中文娱乐网 风吟岛视频 口交 伦理 日本熟妇色五十路免费视频 A级片互舔 川村真矢Av在线观看 亚洲日韩av 色和尚国产自拍 sea8 mp4 aV天堂2018手机在线 免费版国产偷拍a在线播放 狠狠 婷婷 丁香 小视频福利在线观看平台 思妍白衣小仙女被邻居强上 萝莉自拍有水 4484新视觉 永久发布页 977成人影视在线观看 小清新影院在线观 小鸟酱后丝后入百度云 旋风魅影四级 香蕉影院小黄片免费看 性爱直播磁力链接 小骚逼第一色影院 性交流的视频 小雪小视频bd 小视频TV禁看视频 迷奸AV在线看 nba直播 任你在干线 汤姆影院在线视频国产 624u在线播放 成人 一级a做爰片就在线看狐狸视频 小香蕉AV视频 www182、com 腿模简小育 学生做爱视频 秘密搜查官 快播 成人福利网午夜 一级黄色夫妻录像片 直接看的gav久久播放器 国产自拍400首页 sm老爹影院 谁知道隔壁老王网址在线 综合网 123西瓜影音 米奇丁香 人人澡人人漠大学生 色久悠 夜色视频你今天寂寞了吗? 菲菲影视城美国 被抄的影院 变态另类 欧美 成人 国产偷拍自拍在线小说 不用下载安装就能看的吃男人鸡巴视频 插屄视频 大贯杏里播放 wwwhhh50 233若菜奈央 伦理片天海翼秘密搜查官 大香蕉在线万色屋视频 那种漫画小说你懂的 祥仔电影合集一区 那里可以看澳门皇冠酒店a片 色自啪 亚洲aV电影天堂 谷露影院ar toupaizaixian sexbj。com 毕业生 zaixian mianfei 朝桐光视频 成人短视频在线直接观看 陈美霖 沈阳音乐学院 导航女 www26yjjcom 1大尺度视频 开平虐女视频 菅野雪松协和影视在线视频 华人play在线视频bbb 鸡吧操屄视频 多啪啪免费视频 悠草影院 金兰策划网 (969) 橘佑金短视频 国内一极刺激自拍片 日本制服番号大全magnet 成人动漫母系 电脑怎么清理内存 黄色福利1000 dy88午夜 偷拍中学生洗澡磁力链接 花椒相机福利美女视频 站长推荐磁力下载 mp4 三洞轮流插视频 玉兔miki热舞视频 夜生活小视频 爆乳人妖小视频 国内网红主播自拍福利迅雷下载 不用app的裸裸体美女操逼视频 变态SM影片在线观看 草溜影院元气吧 - 百度 - 百度 波推全套视频 国产双飞集合ftp 日本在线AV网 笔国毛片 神马影院女主播是我的邻居 影音资源 激情乱伦电影 799pao 亚洲第一色第一影院 av视频大香蕉 老梁故事汇希斯莱杰 水中人体磁力链接 下载 大香蕉黄片免费看 济南谭崔 避开屏蔽的岛a片 草破福利 要看大鸡巴操小骚逼的人的视频 黑丝少妇影音先锋 欧美巨乳熟女磁力链接 美国黄网站色大全 伦蕉在线久播 极品女厕沟 激情五月bd韩国电影 混血美女自摸和男友激情啪啪自拍诱人呻吟福利视频 人人摸人人妻做人人看 44kknn 娸娸原网 伊人欧美 恋夜影院视频列表安卓青青 57k影院 如果电话亭 avi 插爆骚女精品自拍 青青草在线免费视频1769TV 令人惹火的邻家美眉 影音先锋 真人妹子被捅动态图 男人女人做完爱视频15 表姐合租两人共处一室晚上她竟爬上了我的床 性爱教学视频 北条麻妃bd在线播放版 国产老师和师生 magnet wwwcctv1024 女神自慰 ftp 女同性恋做激情视频 欧美大胆露阴视频 欧美无码影视 好女色在线观看 后入肥臀18p 百度影视屏福利 厕所超碰视频 强奸mp magnet 欧美妹aⅴ免费线上看 2016年妞干网视频 5手机在线福利 超在线最视频 800av:cOm magnet 欧美性爱免播放器在线播放 91大款肥汤的性感美乳90后邻家美眉趴着窗台后入啪啪 秋霞日本毛片网站 cheng ren 在线视频 上原亚衣肛门无码解禁影音先锋 美脚家庭教师在线播放 尤酷伦理片 熟女性生活视频在线观看 欧美av在线播放喷潮 194avav 凤凰AV成人 - 百度 kbb9999 AV片AV在线AV无码 爱爱视频高清免费观看 黄色男女操b视频 观看 18AV清纯视频在线播放平台 成人性爱视频久久操 女性真人生殖系统双性人视频 下身插入b射精视频 明星潜规测视频 mp4 免賛a片直播绪 国内 自己 偷拍 在线 国内真实偷拍 手机在线 国产主播户外勾在线 三桥杏奈高清无码迅雷下载 2五福电影院凸凹频频 男主拿鱼打女主,高宝宝 色哥午夜影院 川村まや痴汉 草溜影院费全过程免费 淫小弟影院在线视频 laohantuiche 啪啪啪喷潮XXOO视频 青娱乐成人国产 蓝沢润 一本道 亚洲青涩中文欧美 神马影院线理论 米娅卡莉法的av 在线福利65535 欧美粉色在线 欧美性受群交视频1在线播放 极品喷奶熟妇在线播放 变态另类无码福利影院92 天津小姐被偷拍 磁力下载 台湾三级电髟全部 丝袜美腿偷拍自拍 偷拍女生性行为图 妻子的乱伦 白虎少妇 肏婶骚屄 外国大妈会阴照片 美少女操屄图片 妹妹自慰11p 操老熟女的b 361美女人体 360电影院樱桃 爱色妹妹亚洲色图 性交卖淫姿势高清图片一级 欧美一黑对二白 大色网无毛一线天 射小妹网站 寂寞穴 西西人体模特苍井空 操的大白逼吧 骚穴让我操 拉好友干女朋友3p