Edited by: Nicolas Voituron, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, France
Reviewed by: Ginés Viscor, University of Barcelona, Spain; Simon Radford, Harvard University, United States
This article was submitted to Integrative Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
The Chilean workforce has over 200,000 people that are intermittently exposed to altitudes over 4,000 m. In 2012, the Ministry of Health provided a technical guide for high-altitude workers that included a series of actions to mitigate the effects of hypoxia. Previous studies have shown the positive effect of oxygen enrichment at high altitudes. The Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) radiotelescope operates at 5,050 m [Array Operations Site (AOS)] and is the only place in the world where pressure swing adsorption (PSA) and liquid oxygen technologies have been installed at a large scale. These technologies reduce the equivalent altitude by increasing oxygen availability. This study aims to perform a retrospective comparison between the use of both technologies during operation in ALMA at 5,050 m. In each condition, variables such as oxygen (O2), temperature, and humidity were continuously recorded in each AOS rooms, and cardiorespiratory variables were registered. In addition, we compared portable O2 by using continuous or demand flow during outdoor activities at very high altitudes. The outcomes showed no differences between production procedures (PSA or liquid oxygen) in regulating oxygen availability at AOS facilities. As a result, big-scale installations have difficulties reaching the appropriate O2 concentration due to leaks in high mobility areas. In addition, the PSA plant requires adequacy and maintenance to operate at a very high altitude. A continuous flow of 2–3 l/min of portable O2 is recommended at 5,050 m.
香京julia种子在线播放
High altitude is a geographical condition where barometric pressure and inspired partial pressure of oxygen (PiO2) are reduced with altitude. Today, about 140 million people live or work at altitudes above 2,500 m (
The CIHH model of exposure is common in the mining industry in the Andes and the Central Asian regions but is also observed in astronomical observatories and border control personnel (including military, police, and customs) in many high-elevation countries (
One way to avoid the consequences of high-altitude hypoxemia is to reduce the equivalent altitude (altitude that provides the same PiO2 when ambient air with an oxygen concentration of 21% is inhaled) (
Nowadays, it is possible to recognize two different procedures to reduce the equivalent altitude by oxygen enrichment in the air ambient of a workplace at high altitudes (i.e., room dormitories, office): First, an oxygen concentrator, a device that increases oxygen concentration to 90–95%, through a separation process that employs a technology called pressure swing adsorption (PSA). In this system, a non-flammable ceramic material (zeolite) adsorbs N2 more readily than O2, increasing oxygen concentration in the delivered gas mixture (
The Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) is a radiotelescope operating at 5,050 m in the Chajnantor Plateau. The ALMA operation is carried out by near of 400 workers and has two locations: the first is the base camp or Operations Support Facility (OSF), located 16 km from the town of San Pedro de Atacama and situated at 2,900 m, providing all the personnel facilities (residential, food services, and leisure facilities) and the second is the Array Operations Site (AOS), located 30 km from the OSF at an altitude of 5,050 m. The ALMA is the only place in the world where both the technologies (PSA and liquid oxygen) have been installed at a large scale to reduce equivalent altitude by increasing oxygen availability at very high altitudes. In this way, the aim of this study is a retrospective comparison between the use of both technologies for oxygen supplementation during the operation of the ALMA laborers at 5,050 m.
All the evaluated workers lived at a low altitude (<1,000 m) and worked at the ALMA (2,900 and 5,050 m), with a shift pattern of 8 days of work at high altitude followed by 6 days of rest at sea level. All the subjects worked as operators and maintenance crew with CIHH exposure experience for more than 4 years and were free of cardiovascular, pulmonary, hematological, renal, or hepatic diseases. This study complied with the Helsinki guidelines and was previously approved by the Ethics Committee of the Facultad de Medicina of Universidad Catoìlica del Norte and the ALMA Safety Department.
In 2008, the ALMA installed an onsite oxygen generator machine capable of producing oxygen by using PSA technology to satisfy oxygenation requirements in all the AOS rooms at 5,050 m, obtaining an oxygen concentration of 28%, equivalent to an altitude of 2,900 m. The installed oxygen system has two external tanks (2,498 L × 2). The maximum oxygen pressure is 75 psi with a delivery of 850 l/min with 90–95% oxygen purity and 45 psi outlet pressure. The oxygen concentration in the ambient air was controlled by a wide range oxygen sensor (0–50%, accuracy ± 0.05%, Area Safety Monitor, model 221, Advanced Micro Instruments, Costa Mesa, CA, United States) and maintained by a precise servo control system that increased oxygen concentration to 28 ± 0.5%. All the ambient variables (O2, temperature, and humidity) were recorded continuously in the available AOS rooms (corridor, hall, office, and correlator;
The scheme represents a diagram of oxygen enrichment inside Array Operations Site (AOS) facilities at 5,050 m.
In 2015, one liquid oxygen tank was installed with a maximal net volume of 14.75 m3, enabling a 70 normalized m3/h (or Nm3/h) flow rate (installation and liquid oxygen supply was performed by Indura). The ambient oxygen concentration, temperature, and humidity were controlled and maintained, as previously described. Additionally, we evaluated cardiorespiratory parameters routinely at the arrival of 40 workers to AOS rooms and values represent the mean of 1 year of operation. In this case, the evaluation of variables such as HR (bpm) and SpO2 (%) was measured by a nurse or paramedic using a multiparameter monitor (model BM3, Bionet, Tustin, CA, United States).
We evaluated efficiency during a period of workers’ activity (changing an antenna). We defined the oxygen flow requirements using two different pieces of equipment: first is a piece of equipment that supplies oxygen by continuous flow (range flow of 0.5–15 l/min, model 108 MF 870, Corpus™ INDURA, Santiago, Chile) and the second the CHAD® Evolution™ Motion Auto-Adjusting Oxygen Conserver (probably model OM-900M; Drive DeVilbiss Healthcare, Somerset, PA, United States), both gaseous medicinal oxygen, compressed in the high-pressure cylinder, were administrated
All the results were expressed as mean ± SD. Variables compiled of AOS rooms O2, temperature, and humidity of PSA or liquid oxygen were analyzed using the paired
A similar oxygenation pattern was observed in both the procedures to increase oxygen concentration (PSA or liquid oxygen) inside AOS rooms.
Conditioning and ambient oxygen (O2) enrichment in the Array Operations Site (AOS) building areas.
O2 enrichment in rooms (%) |
||
PSA | Liquid oxygen | |
Corridor | 26.5 ± 1.0 | 25.5 ± 1.5 |
Hall | 26.5 ± 1.4 | 26.3 ± 1.3 |
Dining room | - | 26.5 ± 1.2 |
Office | 26.6 ± 1.3 | 27.5 ± 0.8 |
Correlator | 27.8 ± 0.5 | 28.0 ± 0.5 |
All AOS | 26.8 ± 1.1 | 26.8 ± 1.1 |
Temperature (°C) | 17.5 ± 1.5 | 18.5 ± 1.2 |
Relative Humidity (%) | 33.2 ± 7.5 | 29.1 ± 3.1 |
Comparison of cardiorespiratory variables in O2-enriched AOS rooms.
Arrive at 5050 m |
||
(Outside AOS) | (Inside AOS + O2) | |
Oxygen saturation (%) | 83.1 ± 2.3 | 92.8 ± 1.2 |
Heart rate (bpm) | 102 ± 13 | 93.1 ± 10.6 |
Oxygen saturation (%) | 82.6 ± 2.8 | 89.5 ± 1.4 |
Heart rate (bpm) | 110.0 ± 9.2 | 78.6 ± 8.6 |
The use of individual oxygen supplementation showed that efficient oxygenation, equivalent to 2,900 m, was obtained using a continuous flow (3 l/min) rather than the demand flow that obtained equivalent values at 5 l/min (
Oxygen saturation dose-response curve vs. inhalatory flow (l/min). Closed circle represents the use of a continuous flow and open circle represents the use of a demand flow. Each circle represents a mean ± SD. *
Our results demonstrate that both the oxygen production procedures (PSA or liquid oxygen) effectively increase the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) at very high altitudes, protecting the health of the workers as noted by the increase in oxygen saturation and reduced HR.
The use of an oxygen concentrator (PSA plant) vs. liquid oxygen for oxygen enrichment produced similar oxygenation patterns at AOS facilities at 5,050 m. These patterns were characterized by a variation in the oxygen concentration within AOS facilities. Even though these facilities have double door access, these oxygen variations could be explained by the movement of personnel, resulting in the doors being constantly opened and closed and promoting a fall in FiO2 to 26.5%. In contrast, offices and correlators have access through doors that are usually maintained shut. In this pilot study, we used a comfortable and mobile module in the AOS facilities at 5,050 m where liquid oxygen was administered to the room air to increase oxygen concentration to 28 ± 0.5%. This oxygen concentration represents an equivalent altitude of 2,900 m (for more detail, see
The PSA plant oxygen concentrator was shut down, even though a series of studies emphasize that oxygen concentrators are low cost in installation and maintenance and only require electrical power support (
Previous studies developed in real conditions at 4,200 m used liquid oxygen to enhance sleep quality (
Our results show that oxygen administration was more efficient when using a continuous flow than a demand flow. This was proven by arterial oxygen saturation, where values of 2–3 l/min for continuous flow reached saturation values over 85%, but 5 l/min was necessary with the demand flow. A similar pattern was observed in a study showing that the administration of low-flow oxygen (1 or 3 l/min)
No differences were observed between both the oxygen production procedures (PSA or liquid oxygen) in regular operations. Big-scale installations have difficulties reaching the oxygen concentration due to leaks in areas of high mobility. However, the PSA plant requires adequacy and maintenance to operate at a very high altitude. At 5,050 m, portable oxygen should operate with a continuous flow of 2–3 l/min. In addition, new equipment for individual oxygen supplementation at 5,050 m must be evaluated, considering ergonomics and autonomy during exposure/operation.
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ethics Committee of the Facultad de Medicina of Universidad Católica del Norte. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
IL and FM were the guarantors and conceived and designed the study. RA, SR, and AM supervised the overall study. RC-J and DS contributed to sample and data collections. RC-J performed the statistical analysis. All authors drafted the report, interpreted the results, critically revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
We are grateful to all the volunteers from the ALMA who participated in this study, the nurses and paramedics who participated in all the evaluations performed at the OSF and AOS rooms, and the facility support by the safety manager, ALMA.