Front. Nutr. Frontiers in Nutrition Front. Nutr. 2296-861X Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fnut.2021.648160 Nutrition Original Research Purchases of Meats and Fish in Great Britain During the COVID-19 Lockdown Period Revoredo-Giha Cesar 1 * Russo Carlo 2 1Rural Economy, Environment and Society Department, Scotland's Rural College, Edinburgh, United Kingdom 2Department of Economics and Law, University of Cassino, Lazio, Italy

Edited by: Igor Pravst, Institute of Nutrition, Slovenia

Reviewed by: Marcia Dutra De Barcellos, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil; Mike Rayner, University of Oxford, United Kingdom

*Correspondence: Cesar Revoredo-Giha cesar.revoredo@sruc.ac.uk

This article was submitted to Eating Behavior, a section of the journal Frontiers in Nutrition

01 06 2021 2021 8 648160 31 12 2020 28 04 2021 Copyright © 2021 Revoredo-Giha and Russo. 2021 Revoredo-Giha and Russo

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

The purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of the purchases of meat and fish in Great Britain during the lockdown period using time series constructed from a unique scanner panel dataset available since 2013 and which is based on information about 30 thousand households. The time series available for the analysis represent the purchases (expenditure and quantities) of all consumers and by income groups were used to compute price and quantity indices all the meats together and for each meat (i.e., beef, lamb, pork, poultry, and other meats) and fish. The changes in expenditure were decomposed into changes in prices, quantities purchased and changes in quality purchased (trading up/down in quality) i.e., whether cheaper meat or fish were purchased. A further extension of the analysis was produced by considering the evolution of calories, saturated fats and sodium per purchased quantity for meat and fish during the period of study. The results indicate that although the shares of quantities remained relatively constant, the calories, saturated fats and sodium from the purchased quantities showed an increasing trend, indicating that most of the incomes groups were lowering the nutritional quality of their meat and fish purchases. This is clearly shown by the fact “other meats” represents on average 39 percent of the calories contributed by meat and fish, 49 per cent of the saturated fats and about 68 of the total sodium in meat and fish during the lockdown period. This result highlights the need to emphasize healthy messages related to the purchases of meat.

UK meat market consumers' response COVID-19 pandemic nutrition quality UK diet Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division10.13039/100011310

香京julia种子在线播放

    1. <form id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></form>
      <address id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></nobr></address>

      Introduction

      There are several reasons why the analysis of the purchases of meat is important. Some of them are from a nutritional point of view and another is from an environmental one. From the nutritional side, according to the NHS (1) meat is a good source of protein, vitamins and minerals in the diet and eating meat can be part of a healthy and balanced diet (2). In fact, a balanced diet can include protein from meat, as well as from non-animal sources such as beans and pulses.

      It is important to note that some meats are high in saturated fat, which can raise blood cholesterol levels. High consumption of red and processed meat has been linked to bowel cancer (1). Processed meat refers to meat that has been preserved by smoking, curing, salting or adding preservatives. This includes sausages, bacon, ham, salami and pâtés. As a reference, 90 g is equivalent to around three thinly cut slices of beef, lamb or pork, where each slice is about the size of half a piece of sliced bread. A cooked breakfast containing two typical British sausages and two rashers of bacon is equivalent to 130 g (1). Thus, the NHS advice is to reduce the cooked weight of red and processed meat a day down to 70 g, which is the average daily consumption in the UK (1).

      Meat consumption has gathered plenty of attention due to the environmental impact of animal production (35). There is an increasing interest in more environmentally friendly food production as shown by the report from the Assembly Citizens (6) chapter 6 about the food we eat and how we use the land. The report indicated that members of the assembly were willing to lower meat and dairy consumption by 20–40 percent by 2050.

      The COVID-19 period, i.e., since March 2020, is interesting one to analyse consumption because (at least at the beginning) households shifted toward supermarket purchases due to the food service closure and also because literature has indicated changes in consumption habits [e.g., (7, 8)]. Using the latest figures from UK Department of Food, Environment and Rural Affairs (Defra) Family Food annual report (9), if the lockdown would have been perfect, and all the meals had been taken at home (i.e., all the money is still spent on food), it would have implied a maximum average increase in demand for household supplies of around 44 percent; this is, of course, an average figure with the first income decile (i.e., the least affluent group) being able to spend 24 percent more on their household food items and the last decile (i.e., the most affluent group) 66 percent (10).

      The purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of the meat purchases during the COVID-19 period (i.e., March to June 2020) using time series derived from a large panel dataset, the Kantar Worldpanel dataset. In particular, the study is interested to study the evolution of different meats and their nutritional contribution considering the purchases of households of different income groups.

      The underlying dataset, from where the available time series used in this analysis come from, comprises grocery purchases for about 30,000 households in Great Britain (the dataset does not contain information for Northern Ireland). The time series, which were available since 2013, were constructed using about gross up weights at the level of purchases and also households classification by income groups. It is important to highlight that the Kantar's information (as well as Defra's) refer to food purchases and not to actual consumption although it is common to call them by both names given the close association between them.

      The structure of the paper is as follows: it starts with a review of the purchases of meat and fish in the UK based on the publicly available dataset [e.g., Defra's Family Food, (9)], which provides annual information by food categories from 1974 until 2018; next, the methodology and data are presented, followed by the results and discussion.

      Purchases of Meat and Fish in the UK

      According to United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) data (11), the biggest meat consumers in the world are those in the U.S. where 98.6 kg was consumed per person in 2017. Britain's meat consumption at 61.4 kg per person per year is similar to other European countries such as Ireland, France and Germany.

      Due to its importance for the food sector, several papers have addressed the demand for meats in the UK focusing on the importance of price, income and household variables (1214). Additionally, other papers have modeled meat and fish demand as part of the demand for food [e.g., (15)]. However, the purpose of these studies has been to study the response of meats to changes in prices and income and not the evolution of the purchases of different meats and their contribution to nutrients due to a massive exogenous shock such as COVID-19.

      Defra's Family Food (Defra's, 2020) provides time series information about the average per capita quantities purchased per week from 1974 to 2018-19. This information is collected from the Living Costs and Food Survey (former Expenditure and Food Survey). This is a survey conducted by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) which collects data about private household expenditure and quantity purchased in the United Kingdom from a sample of about 5–6 thousand households. Figure 1 presents the purchases of all meat and fish together over time.

      United Kingdom—Per capita meat and fish quantities purchased, 1974 to 2018-19. Source: Defra's family food.

      Figure 1 shows there are no single trends on the series, but it can be broken by periods. Thus, there is an increase in the purchases of meat from 1974 to 1980, followed by a decreasing trend from 1980 until 1999, where the purchases decreased from about 1,300–1,100 g. After a short period of non-linear increase up to 2005-06, the series decreased to 1,082 g to finally present an increasing trend. Since as shown in the introduction not all the meat has the same nutritional contribution, it is important to break them down into the different types of meats. These are presented in Figure 2.

      Per capita quantities purchased of meat and fish, 1974 to 2018-19. Source: Defra's family food. Note: Other meat also includes takeways and ready meals that contain meat.

      The first fact shown in the figure is the importance of other meats on the total purchases. This group includes burgers, sausages, offals, meat takeaways. This processed meat group is an important contributor of calories and saturated fats (unfortunately Defra's data only presents information about the nutritional content of the entire purchases and not the contribution of each component).

      The second fact in Figure 2 is the increasing trend on the consumption of poultry (particularly chicken) from 133 g in 1974 to 258 according to the 2018-19 survey. By contrast sheep-meat (mostly lamb) consumption has seen a gradual decline. According to Savills Co (16) this is likely due to limited cooking versatility and a perceived higher price point. The trends on beef and pork consumption, as shown in Figure 2, are similar to that observed for lamb. It is possible that these negative trends on red meat are associated to changes in consumption patterns due to healthy messages.

      The third fact is that the per capita consumption of fish, as shown in Figure 2, has remained relatively constant over time, representing an average of 146 g per week.

      Note that the alternative protein sector (plant-based meat substitutes) is not considered here due to the fact that despite the increase in its market it still represents <1 percent of the meat market (16).

      The other source of information on the UK consumption is the National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS). The NDNS rolling programme is a continuous, cross-sectional survey. It is designed to collect detailed, quantitative information on the food consumption, nutrient intake and nutritional status of the general population aged 1.5 years and over living in private households in the UK (17). The survey covers a representative sample of around 1,000 people per year. Fieldwork began in 2008. It is important to note that NDNS statistics refer to food consumption in contrast with Defra's Family Food, which refers to food purchases.

      According to the NDNS, the intake of red and processed meat is continuing to fall. For teenagers, there was a decrease of 15 g a day over the 9-year period. However, the average consumption for adult men remains above the recommended maximum of 70 g a day.

      Materials and Methods Data

      The data used in the analysis were time series from the Kantar Worldpanel dataset for Great Britain for the period 2013 to 2020. The underlying dataset, i.e., from which the time series were constructed collects information about purchases at the level of actual products by about 30 thousand households. The data exclude food for out-of-household consumption. The time series were constructed by Kantar using gross up weights that allow to compute country-level- time series.

      It should be noted that Kantar data use months of 4 weeks (i.e., a year is made of 13 months), therefore, the dataset starts in 2013 (week commencing the 6th of January) and end in 2020 (week commencing the 12th of July) comprised 98 observations. For the analysis defined five periods of interest were defined. The pandemic outbreak was from February 24 to March 22, 2020 (the first death from Coronavirus in the UK was confirmed on March 5). For easy of reference, this period is defined as period t. The first lockdown period (or period t+1) was from March 23 to April 19, as the UK government enforced restrictive measures starting March 20. The second lockdown period (or period t+2) was from April 20 to May 17 (as the UK government started easing restrictive measures at the very end of this period). The first and the second post-lockdown periods went were from May 18 to June 14 (period t+3) and from June 15 to July 12 (period t+4), respectively.

      The household data contain information about their income ranges (i.e., £0–29,999, £30,000–39,999, £40,000–49,999, £50,000–59,999, £60,000 - over) and it was used to estimate purchases time series by income group in per capita terms. The income ranges were provided by Kantar.

      The meat products were aggregated based on Kantar World panel categories. Thus, beef refers to fresh and frozen beef cuts (it also includes chilled burgers, unlike Defra's survey in Figure 2; frozen burgers, which is a marginal category was classified as part of other meats); lamb (fresh and frozen lamb meat); pork (fresh and frozen pig meat); poultry (fresh and frozen poultry meat); fish (fresh and frozen fish) and other meats (made of the remaining meats, which are mostly sausages, bacon, and offal). In contrast with Defra's data it does not include takeaways because Kantar does not collect that information. The dataset also includes nutritional information at the level of product (in contrast to food category as in the case of Defra's Family Food). This is collected from the back or side of packaging nutrition information. Therefore, the available nutrients in the dataset were calories, proteins, carbohydrates, sugar, fats, saturates, fiber and sodium. In this study, the focus was on calories, saturated fats and sodium.

      Methods

      The methods start with the evolution of the expenditure, prices and quantities purchased of meats and fish. It is followed by the decomposition of expenditure during the COVID-19 period, and finally, a trend analysis is carried out to test whether the purchase of calories, saturated fats and sodium during the COVID-19 emergency period was different to the ones from previous periods.

      Price and Quantity Index Numbers

      The methodology consisted of constructing time series for the period 2013 to 2020 for meats (beef, lamb, pork, and poultry) by income group. As expenditure shares change over time Tornqvist-Theil-Divisia (TTD, hereafter) price and quantity indices (18) were produced. These indices are a weighted geometric average of the price and quantity relatives using arithmetic averages of the value shares in the two periods as weights, in other terms, they have the advantage to capture changes in the composition of the purchased basket. The TTD indices for prices and quantity are given by (1) and (2):

      PtPt1=i=1n(pi,tpi,t1)12[pi,t1qi,t1j=1n(pj,t1qj,t1)+pi,tqi,tj=1n(pj,tqj,t)] QtQt1=i=1n(qi,tqi,t1)12[pi,t1qi,t1j=1n(pj,t1qj,t1)+pi,tqi,tj=1n(pj,tqj,t)]

      Where PtPt-1 in (1) is the price index representing the average change in prices for the group in question (e.g., meat) from period t-1 to t; pi,tpi,t-1 is the price index of product i (e.g., Aberdeen Angus beef steak price index, within the beef price calculation). qi,t−1 is the quantity of product i in period t-1; pi,t-1qi,t-1j=1n(pj,t-1qj,t-1) and pi,tqi,tj=1n(pj,tqj,t) are the expenditure shares of the product i (e.g., Aberdeen Angus beef steak) in the total expenditure of category (e.g., beef) in period t-1 and t. The formula in (2) is similar to (1) but in terms of quantities, where QtQt-1 is the quantity index.

      Purchases Decomposition

      The construction of the indices was followed by analyzing the income groups response to changes in prices (Pt), by changes in the expenditure (Eit), in the quantities purchased (Qit) and in the quality purchased (vitPt i.e., trading up and down in quality), where vit is a unit value (EitQit) (19, 20). For income group i in time period t, identity (3) was used to analyse the meat and fish purchase data:

      Eit=Pt×Qit×(vitPt)

      Writing (3) in terms of indices that show the changes from period of t-1 to t one obtains (4):

      EitEit1=P¯tP¯t1×QitQit1×(vitP¯t)(vit1P¯t1)

      Expressing (4) in terms of rates of change we get (4')

      (1+Eit^)=(1+P¯^t)×(1+Qit^)×(1+vitP¯t^)

      Where the ‘’ indicates the rate of change of the variable with respect to a previous period (e.g., xtxt-1-1). As explained by McKelvey (20), vitP¯t is a measure of the quality of the group purchase. A higher expression means that the chosen Qit is more expensive per unit of group consumption and this is interpreted as buying a higher quality (21).

      The expression vitP¯t can be further broken down as in expression (5), which multiplies the nutrient per quantity by the price of the nutrient in real terms. For this paper, the nutrient per quantity purchased is of particular interest because it is a measure of the nutritional quality of the purchased products. Note that this differs from the approach followed by Fousekis and Revell (13) where their notion of quality does not represent nutrition just meat substitutions.

      vitP¯t=(NitQit)×(EitP¯tNit)

      Where:

      Eit = All meats expenditure in period t by group i

      P¯t = Average price of meat in period t (i.e., over all groups)

      Qit = Total purchased quantity of meat in period t by group i

      Nit = Total nutrient (e.g., calories) in period t by group i

      Trend Analysis

      The nutrient per quantity purchased was subject to a trend analysis. For this, the both the calories, saturated fats and sodium per quantity, were first seasonally adjusted before estimating the trends. This was done to avoid confuse any change during the COVID-19 period with a seasonal component. Based on the observed data graphs model (6) was estimated:

      NitQit =α0+ β0×t + α1×d1+ β1×d1× t + α2×d2+ β2               × d2×t

      Where:

      αi = Intercept of the trend regression for the full period (i = 0,1,2)

      βi = Slope of the trend regression for the full period (i = 0,1,2)

      t = Trend (defined as 0, 1, 2….)

      d1 = binary variable that takes the value of 1 for the period 2018-01 to 2020-02

      d2 = binary variable that takes the value of 1 for the period 2020-03 to 2020-07

      Note that if α2 is statistically different than zero (using a t-test and 95 percent significance level), it means that the COVID-19 intercept of the trend regression line is equal to (α02). Similarly, the slope of the regression line if β2 is statistically different than zero is equal to (β02).

      Results Evolution of Aggregated Meat Expenditure, Prices and Purchased Quantities

      The pandemic emergency was associated with a sharp increase in expenditure for meat and fish products. Figure 3 shows that after the pandemic outbreak (early March 2020), the Great Britain expenditure for at-home purchase of meat and fish, instead of declining to the usual low-season level, jumped to a level that was comparable to the previous Christmas peak and slowly decreased thereafter.

      Great Britain—Evolution of the per capita meat expenditure 2013–2020. Source: Own elaboration based on Kantar Worldpanel data. Note: The dotted line represents the start of the lockdown in March 2020.

      During the outbreak period, when the purchasing surge was at its peak, a moderate price decrease was detected (0.74 percent). Prices of meat and fish were two percent higher than before the outbreak were observed starting from the t+1 period. This result is roughly consistent with the EU food inflation estimate by Akter (22) but much lower than the data by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (23) reporting a 10.3 percent increase in the consumer price index in the meats, poultry, fish, and eggs category between March and June 2020.

      Figure 4 shows the meat and fish aggregated price and quantity indices; the pandemic outbreak was associated with a rapid surge in quantity at the outbreak (22.4-point index increase) quickly reverting to the long-term average and with a much slower but persistent increase in prices (2.9-point index increase over the entire pandemic period). The result is consistent with the observed price rigidity in the pre-pandemic periods, when the variability in prices over time was much smaller than the one in quantities.

      Great Britain—Evolution of the price and per capita meat quantity 2013–2020. Source: Own elaboration based on Kantar Worldpanel data. Note: The dotted line represents the start of the lockdown in March 2020.

      Decomposition of Meat and Fish Expenditure

      Using the Deaton (19) and McKelvey's (20) method the change in meat and fish expenditure with respect to the pre-emergency 2013-2020 average was decomposed into three components: price, quantity and quality (trading up or down). Figure 5 presents the results.

      Great Britain—Decomposition of meat and fish expenditure after the pandemic outbreak. Note: Computed using the Deaton-McKelvey decomposition of meat and fish expenditure increase after the pandemic outbreak in the UK. All changes are computed with respect to the pre-emergency average meat and fish expenditure in Great Britain.

      Figure 5 shows a major surge in meat and fish expenditure (22 percent) during the outbreak period, even before restrictive measures and lockdown were imposed. A possible explanation for this behavior is a stockpiling effect due to consumers' concerns for future shortage as well as shift toward home consumption due to the closure of the food service (7, 10). In this period, the overall increase was determined by the increase in purchase quantity (22.6 percent), while average prices decreased slightly (0.6 percent). The trade up/down effect was almost negligible (0.05 percent).

      During the lockdown periods, the meat and fish expenditure was still higher than the pre-pandemic levels, but lower than during the outbreak period. The changes were +16 percent in period t+1 and +15.9 percent in period t+2. Quantity was the main driver of the change still (+15.9 in t+1 and +15.7 in t+2), yet a moderate average price increase was detected (+0.7 and +1.8 percent, respectively). In these periods, a small trade down effect was observed (−0.6 and −0.7 percent, respectively).

      A possible explanation of the increase with respect to pre-pandemic level is consumer replacement of away-from-home food for food to consume at home while the decrease with respect to the outbreak period might be explained with the lower concerns about future shortage as consumers became aware of the stable food supply despite the pandemic.

      In the post-lockdown periods, decreases in the expenditure for meat and fish were observed. The level was still higher than the pre-emergency average (+14.1 percent in t+3 and +8.7 in t+4), but lower than during the lockdown periods. The main driver was still the increased consumption, yet the average price levels were higher than in the pre-emergency period (+2.1 percent and +2.2 percent, respectively), and a moderate trade up effect was detected in period t+4 (+0.9 percent). The data from first 2 months after lockdown suggested a consumption trend slowly reverting to pre-pandemic behavior, and a persistence in a price increase of ~2 percent.

      The changes in meat and fish expenditure were the result of heterogeneous trends in the consumption of different types of product. Table 1 reports the decomposition of expenditure for six product categories: beef, lamb, pork, poultry, other meat and fish. Poultry was the fastest category to revert to pre-emergency consumption level and registered the smallest variation in prices. On the other hand, fish exhibited a remarkable price surge starting in period t+1, a relatively small increase in consumption and a distinctive persistence of the change in consumer behavior. Pork and other meat categories exhibited fluctuating trends.

      Great Britain—Decomposition of the change in expenditure by meat and fish (%).

      Product Outbreak period
      ΔP ΔE ΔQ T
      Beef −2.27 24.77 27.67 0.00
      Lamb 0.03 20.39 20.29 0.04
      Pork −0.87 27.21 28.28 0.04
      Poultry 0.31 19.14 18.74 0.03
      Fish −1.11 16.28 17.56 0.02
      Other meats 0.35 27.29 26.63 0.18
      Product Lockdown period 1 Lockdown period 2
      ΔP ΔE ΔQ T ΔP ΔE ΔQ T
      Beef −3.69 17.95 22.36 0.09 0.84 20.32 19.21 0.09
      Lamb −2.39 64.82 68.58 0.16 1.87 8.99 6.83 0.14
      Pork 2.97 20.68 17.13 0.07 3.06 27.87 24.08 0.00
      Poultry 0.69 17.71 16.64 0.24 −0.79 12.58 13.21 0.24
      Fish 3.15 −1.38 −4.70 0.32 4.95 9.90 4.49 0.21
      Other meats 2.36 18.12 14.97 0.38 1.50 23.25 20.97 0.39
      Product Post-lockdown period 1 Post-lockdown period 2
      ΔP ΔE ΔQ T ΔP ΔE ΔQ T
      Beef 0.06 12.37 12.15 0.13 2.89 9.63 6.44 0.10
      Lamb 2.76 11.58 8.43 0.13 3.40 16.58 12.71 0.03
      Pork 5.50 27.33 20.60 0.08 2.19 17.71 15.15 0.04
      Poultry −0.16 7.33 7.24 0.25 −0.35 −0.79 −0.65 0.22
      Fish 5.61 14.96 8.62 0.21 5.34 11.16 5.39 0.12
      Other meats 0.85 18.79 17.34 0.38 0.33 10.71 10.01 0.30

      Source: Own elaboration based on Deaton and McKelvey.

      ΔE stands for the change in expenditure, ΔP is the change in price, ΔQ is the change in quantity and T is trading up/down effect by product after the pandemic outbreak in the UK. All changes are computed with respect to the pre-emergency averages in the UK.

      The analysis of quality trade-up/down found a moderate trade down when the entire (aggregated) category of meat and fish was considered (Figure 5). Instead, when specific types of products were considered, no trade-down effect was detected and a limited (0.38 at most) trade-up was found (Table 1). The results might be explained by cross-product substitution. Consumers willing to reduce expenditure bought cheaper types of meat (e.g., moving from fish to poultry) instead of buying cheaper cuts of the same meat.

      Figure 6 reports the quantity shares of each type of meat in the aggregated consumer basket. The Figure shows very small changes during the lockdown periods with the shares remaining mostly constant, with changes at most of two percent points compared to the pre-pandemic composition.

      Great Britain—Composition of the meat and fish purchased quantities. Source: Own elaboration based on Kantar Worldpanel data.

      Figure 6 does not show the impact of the composition of the meat and fish basket on nutrition. In order to illustrate this effect, Figure 7 reports calories and saturated fat in the consumer meat and fish basket.

      Great Britain—Calories, saturated fat and sodium content per kilogram of purchased meat and fish. Source: Own elaboration based on Kantar Worldpanel data. Note: The thin dotted line represents the start of the lockdown in March 2020. The thick dotted lines represent trends.

      Figure 7 shows three potential periods, namely: 2013-01 to 2017-13, 2018-01 to 2020-02 and 2020-03 onwards. The data indicate during lockdown, the substitution of fish and poultry toward other meat products determined a shift toward less healthy meat consumption (+2.0 percent, +5.5 percent +2.5 percent in a month for saturated fats, energy and sodium, respectively). However, the effect is attenuated in the post-lockdown periods, suggesting a transitory effect and a possible reversion to the long-run trend after the pandemic.

      Analysis by Income Group

      In this section the effects of the pandemic shocks are investigated by computing the decomposition of the change in meat and fish expenditure by household income group. Table 2 reports the results of the analysis, showing remarkable differences in behavior.

      Great Britain—Decomposition of the change in expenditure for meat and fish by income group (%).

      Income group Outbreak period (t)
      ΔP ΔE ΔQ T
      <£ 30,000 −0.63 19.99 19.74 0.85
      £30,000–39,999 −0.63 24.06 25.74 −0.70
      £40,000–49,999 −0.63 24.01 24.74 0.02
      £50,000–59,999 −0.63 22.29 22.03 0.86
      Over £60,000 −0.63 20.62 23.08 −1.37
      Income group Lockdown period 1 (t+1) Lockdown period 2 (t+2)
      ΔP ΔE ΔQ T ΔP ΔE ΔQ T
      <£ 30,000 0.70 8.48 7.46 0.24 1.83 9.37 6.71 0.65
      £30,000–39,999 0.70 11.18 12.26 −1.65 1.83 14.64 14.43 −1.61
      £40,000–49,999 0.70 23.00 24.00 −1.53 1.83 23.26 22.46 −1.18
      £50,000–59,999 0.70 26.07 25.29 −0.08 1.83 26.07 24.93 −0.90
      Over £60,000 0.70 29.38 29.36 −0.68 1.83 26.04 24.87 −0.87
      Income group Post-lockdown period 1 (t+3) Post-lockdown period 2 (t+4)
      ΔP ΔE ΔQ T ΔP ΔE ΔQ T
      <£ 30,000 2.02 6.75 3.34 1.25 2.18 1.74 −2.11 1.71
      £30,000–39,999 2.02 12.90 10.73 −0.06 2.18 6.43 3.03 1.09
      £40,000–49,999 2.02 20.41 18.61 −0.52 2.18 12.27 8.14 1.57
      £50,000–59,999 2.02 19.45 18.32 −1.05 2.18 15.18 11.96 0.68
      Over £60,000 2.02 25.81 23.45 −0.10 2.18 17.78 13.77 1.32

      Source: Own elaboration based on Deaton and McKelvey.

      ΔE stands for the change in expenditure, ΔP is the change in price, ΔQ is the change in quantity and T is trading up/down effect by product after the pandemic outbreak in the UK. All changes are computed with respect to the pre-emergency averages in the UK.

      Although all group exhibited similar reactions during the outbreak period, the behavior during and after the lockdown diverged. Starting from period t+1, consumers in the lowest income group (<£30,000 per year) exhibited a moderate increase in consumption and a trading-up effect. Instead, households in the highest income groups (over £ 50,000) increased their consumption by 25 percent in period t+1, slowly declining to a +14 percent in period t+4. They exhibited a limited trading-down effect, which was compensated in part by trading-up in period t+4. Middle class groups (between £30,000 and 49,999) were characterized by the deepest trading-down effect.

      The decomposition showed that the change in expenditure for meat and fish was explained mainly by variations in quantity, while price and trading-up or down effects were limited. The main differences across income groups concerned the magnitude of the quantity adjustments and the direction of the trading-up/down effects. As expected, lower income groups exhibited higher price sensitivity. Households in the <£-30,000 income group increased consumption largely during the outbreak period, when prices were lower than the pre-emergency average and the stockpiling effect was at its peak. In the following periods, as prices increased, consumption decreased. Finally, in period t+4, the group consumption fell below the pre-emergency average quantity. The consumption of high-income groups (£ 50,000 and above) did not exhibit such direct association with prices. Instead, it was driven by the movement restrictions. It increased during the outbreak period, peaked during the lockdown and slowly declined afterward as movement restrictions were eased and the fear of contagion. Noticeably, the impact on quantity for high-income groups seems to be associated with the psychological pressure of the contagion, while the additional effect of the restrictions was limited (10).

      The change in consumption behavior had an impact on nutrition. Figures 810 compare the calories, saturated fat and sodium per kilogram of meat and fish by income group, respectively. The pandemic emergency was associated with an increase in calories, saturated fat showing that all groups moved to more caloric and less healthy meat and fish purchases. On average, both calories and saturated fat per kilogram have been growing at a monthly rate of 0.37 percent from 2013 to 2020. Figure 10 shows that the amount of sodium per kilogram also increased over time (it grew 0.48 percent per month from 2013 to 2020). Particularly interesting is that the most affluent group (over £60,000) purchased meat and fish with more sodium per kilogram (~30 percent more than the average of the other income groups).

      Great Britain—Calories per quantity of meat and fish. Source: Own elaboration based on Kantar Worldpanel data. Note: The dotted line represents the start of the lockdown in March 2020. Group 1 = <£30,000, Group 2 = £30,000–39,999, Group 3 = £40,000–49,999, Group 4 = £50,000–59,999, and Group 5 = over £60,000.

      Great Britain—Saturated fats per quantity of meat and fish. Source: Own elaboration based on Kantar Worldpanel data. Note: The dotted line represents the start of the lockdown in March 2020. Group 1 = <£30,000, Group 2 = £30,000–39,999, Group 3 = £40,000–49,999, Group 4 = £50,000–59,999, and Group 5 = over £60,000.

      Great Britain—Sodium per quantity of meat and fish. Source: Own elaboration based on Kantar Worldpanel data. Note: The dotted line represents the start of the lockdown in March 2020. Group 1 = <£30,000, Group 2 = £30,000–39,999, Group 3 = £40,000–49,999, Group 4 = £50,000–59,999, and Group 5 = over £60,000.

      Table 3 reports the percentage change in the average calories, saturated fat per kilogram and sodium of meat and fish in the emergency periods with respect to the same periods in 2019, in order to account for seasonality in consumption.

      Great Britain—Calories, saturated fats and sodium per kilogram of meat and fish (12-month percent change).

      Income group Per-kg average calories
      Outbreak Lockdown 1 Lockdown 2 Post-lockdown 1 Post-lockdown 2
      <£ 30,000 −0.14 4.07 2.52 3.43 2.30
      £30,000–39,999 −0.87 2.74 3.14 3.19 2.89
      £40,000–49,999 0.59 1.84 4.24 3.60 0.94
      £50,000–59,999 1.30 2.61 4.10 2.45 0.43
      Over £60,000 1.46 1.56 6.28 3.46 1.69
      Income group Per-kg saturated fats
      Outbreak Lockdown 1 Lockdown 2 Post-lockdown 1 Post-lockdown 2
      <£ 30,000 0.06 7.32 4.94 5.80 4.28
      £30,000–39,999 −0.57 6.50 7.21 4.85 4.19
      £40,000–49,999 1.32 4.75 10.32 6.50 3.03
      £50,000–59,999 3.25 6.27 8.02 5.69 1.29
      Over £60,000 2.55 4.26 12.37 7.55 5.06
      Income group Per-kg sodium
      Outbreak Lockdown 1 Lockdown 2 Post-lockdown 1 Post-lockdown 2
      <£ 30,000 −3.06 0.95 1.32 2.88 2.10
      £30,000–39,999 −2.99 4.27 6.08 5.15 6.51
      £40,000–49,999 0.29 −0.92 5.26 0.66 4.80
      £50,000–59,999 −0.94 −2.09 4.65 4.31 −1.34
      Over £60,000 −2.10 −1.20 6.65 2.92 5.81

      Source: Own elaboration based on Kantar Worldpanel data.

      The data highlight differences between the lowest income group and the other ones. The former exhibited a sharp surge in the variables during the first lockdown period and a moderate increase compared to previous year afterwards. Households with income equal or higher than £30,000 registered the peak increase during the second lockdown period and a slow decline afterwards in the rate of change. Noticeably, the higher income groups seem to be faster in reverting to the previous year nutrition behavior than lower income groups (with a partial exception for households with income over £60,000).

      The results suggest that nutrition consequences of the lockdown were more severe for higher income groups than other ones, as far home meat and fish consumption was concerned. These households registered high increase in consumption of saturated fat and calories from those categories. This result is consistent with the large increase in meat purchases during the pandemic emergency that was observed for these groups.

      Trend Analysis of Calories and Saturated Fats per Quantity of Meat and Fish Purchased

      Table 4 presents the results of the trend analysis of calories, saturated fats and sodium per quantity by income group. Recall that the purpose of this analysis is to explore whether the trend during the COVID-19 period (i.e., since 2020-03) was different to the trend considering the full period.

      Great Britain—Trend regression analysis of calories and saturated fats per purchased kilogram for all meats and fish.

      Full sample 2018–2020-02 Covid R2
      Intercept Trend Intercept Trend Intercept Trend
      < £ 30,000
      Calories −298.5 6.5 389.5 −5.5 437.7 −5.8 0.98
      −48.9* 39.5* 8.4* −9.0* 0.6 −0.7
      Saturated fats 2/ −5.5 0.1 7.2 −0.1 9.7 −0.1 0.97
      −41.6* 33.7* 7.1* −7.8* 0.6 −0.7
      Sodium 2/ −2.7 0.1 4.6 −0.1 0.5 0.0 0.96
      −38.4* 31.2* 8.6* −9.1* 0.1 −0.2
      £30,000–39,999
      Calories −309.1 6.8 442.5 −6.3 171.6 −3.2 0.98
      −53.5* 43.7* 10.1* −10.9* 0.2 −0.4
      Saturated fats 2/ −5.7 0.1 7.4 −0.1 0.4 0.0 0.97
      −42.2* 34.8* 7.2* −8.1* 0.0 −0.1
      Sodium 2/ −2.6 0.1 5.1 −0.1 −3.3 0.0 0.97
      −40.4* 33.0* 10.3* −10.9* −0.4 0.3
      £40,000–49,999
      Calories −328.3 7.1 455.0 −6.3 587.3 −7.5 0.98
      −46.4* 37.4* 8.5* −9.0* 0.7 −0.8
      Saturated fats 2/ −6.1 0.1 9.4 −0.1 2.2 0.0 0.96
      −38.7* 31.7* 7.8* −8.5* 0.1 −0.2
      Sodium 2/ −2.7 0.1 4.4 −0.1 −3.0 0.0 0.96
      −34.9* 28.1* 7.6* −7.9* −0.3 0.2
      £50,000–59,999
      Calories −321.7 7.1 467.6 −6.6 1551.3 −17.9 0.98
      −47.8* 39.1* 9.2* −9.9* 1.9 −2.1*
      Saturated fats 2/ −5.9 0.1 7.6 −0.1 38.6 −0.4 0.96
      −36.8* 30.2* 6.3* −7.1* 2.0 −2.1*
      Sodium 2/ −2.6 0.1 4.9 −0.1 6.3 −0.1 0.96
      −35.6* 28.6* 8.8* −9.0* 0.7 −0.8
      Over £60,000
      Calories −314.6 7.0 453.0 −6.5 935.0 −11.3 0.98
      −53.6* 44.2* 10.2* −11.2* 1.3 −1.5
      Saturated fats 2/ −5.7 0.1 8.2 −0.1 17.3 −0.2 0.96
      −39.5* 33.5* 7.5* −8.9* 1.0 −1.1
      Sodium 2/ −3.3 0.1 5.7 −0.1 −0.7 0.0 0.97
      −40.6* 33.4* 9.3* −10.0* −0.1 −0.1

      1/ First rows are the coefficients and the second rows are the standard error of the coefficients. *indicates that the coefficient is statistically different from zero at 95% significance.

      2/ Coefficient multiplied by 1,000. Second row are t statistics. *indicates that the coefficient is statistically different from zero at 95% significance.

      As shown in the Table, excepting in the case of the £50,000–59,999 group, which show a decreasing trend both in terms of calories and saturated fats (with statistically significant t statistics), all the other income groups show that the estimated trend using the full sample is appropriate for the COVID-19 period. Also note that this is not the case for the 2018-01 to 2020-02, which showed a line almost flat (i.e., no trend) as shown in Figure 7 for all the meats together.

      The trend analysis of Table 4 is reflected in the composition of calories, saturated fats and sodium by meat and fish and income group presented in Figure 11. As shown in the figure, “other meats” has a significant contribution to calories, saturated fats and particularly to sodium for all the income groups. In the case of calories, the ‘other meats’ represent on average 39 percent of the total calories, 49 percent of the total saturated fats and 64 percent of the total sodium coming from meat and fish purchases.

      Great Britain—Average contribution of meat and fish to calories, saturated fats and sodium by income group during the COVID-19 period (2020-03 to 2020-07). Source: Own elaboration based on Kantar Worldpanel data.

      Discussion

      The purpose of this study has been to study consumers reaction in terms of their purchases of meat and fish during the COVID-19 period using time series constructed from a scanner panel dataset for Great Britain by income groups.

      It is important to note that the increase in the demand for particular meat cuts (e.g., mincemeat), the lack of demand from the food service and mild supply issues due to workers in processing plants contracting the Covid-19 virus created a temporary problem for the industry affecting the carcass balance, the demand for high quality meat and labor shortage, respectively. However, these now appear to have been solved as the industry has responded increasing the volumes delivered to supermarkets and recruiting additional labor force (24).

      In aggregated terms, results indicated that consumers reacted initially to the lockdown by increasing their expenditure on at-home consumption of meat and fish, which was derived from a significant increase of the purchased quantities (10). This is consistent with previous demand analyses that indicated that meats had positive income elasticities [e.g., (13)]. Prices, in contrast, remained almost unchanged despite the demand pressure. Even more, the shares (computed from quantities) of the different meat and fish products remained very similar over time.

      The results of the decomposition show the reaction of the UK meat and fish chain to an unexpected shock of unprecedented magnitude. The pandemic outbreak was associated to an immediate surge in meat and fish purchases. The increase might be explained by three effects: movement restriction, reduction of social interaction and stockpiling. Movement restrictions and spontaneous reduction of social interaction determined the substitution of food services (such as restaurants and catering) with at-home consumption. Also, uncertainty fear of shortage might trigger stockpiling behavior (10, 25). Nicola et al. (26) reported that “panic-buying has resulted in an increase of £1bn worth of food in UK homes.”

      The combination of the three effects might explain the surge in home consumption during the outbreak period, and the declining trends thereafter. In the outbreak period stockpiling and voluntary reduction of social interaction took place, resulting in the largest increase in purchase. In the lockdown period the stockpiling effect faded, as home stocks were full and the perceived risk of food supply disruption declined, but movement restriction sustained home consumption as a substitute for away-from-home meals. In the post-lockdown periods, only the voluntary reduction of social interaction remained, and consumption trends slowly were reverting to pre-emergency levels.

      It is important to note that the industry reacted quickly to the effects created by the lockdown (e.g., demand for cheaper meat cuts, lack of demand of the food service industry) by expanding the supply to supermarkets and also improving labor safety in the workplace (10). The price time series reflects this trend.

      The evolution of the nutrients per quantity purchased (using calories and saturated fats as the chosen nutrients), which can be considered a measure of the nutritional quality of the purchases, indicated an increasing trend, which is consistent with the COVID-19 period. This contrasts with the period 2018 to 2020 before the lockdown, where there was almost no trend. Moreover, the quality of the meat and fish purchases is represented by the fact that the group “other meats” represented on average 39 percent of the calories contributed by meat and fish and 49 percent of the saturated fats during the period lockdown period.

      The above results highlight the importance of emphasizing consumers' education and information as regards meat purchases. In this sense, NHS (1) recommendations pointing out at choosing lean cuts; if buying pre-packed meat to check the nutrition label to see the level of fat content, to purchase turkey and chicken without the skin as these are lower in fat (or remove the skin before cooking) and to limit processed meat products (other meats in the studied dataset) such as sausages, salami, pâté are very important.

      Data Availability Statement

      The data used in the paper may be available upon request to the author.

      Author Contributions

      CR-G: conceptualization, data preparation, investigation, visualization, formal analysis, writing—original draft, writing—review, and editing. CR: conceptualization, investigation, writing—review, and editing. Both authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

      Conflict of Interest

      The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

      References National Health Service (NHS). Meat in Your Diet. (2018). Available online at: https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/eat-well/meat-nutrition/ (accessed December 21, 2020). De Smet S Vossen E. Meat: the balance between nutrition and health. A review. Meat Sci. (2016) 120:14556. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.00827107745 Bryant CJ. We can't keep meating like this: attitudes towards vegetarian and vegan diets in the United Kingdom. Sustainability. (2019) 11:6844. 10.3390/su11236844 Sanchez-Sabate R Sabaté J. Consumer attitudes towards environmental concerns of meat consumption: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2019) 16:1220. 10.3390/ijerph1607122030959755 Macdiarmid JI Douglas F Campbell J. Eating like there's no tomorrow: Public awareness of the environmental impact of food and reluctance to eat less meat as part of a sustainable diet. Appetite. (2016) 96:48793. 10.1016/j.appet.2015.10.01126476397 Assembly Citizens. What We Eat and How We Use the Land. (2020). Available online at: https://www.climateassembly.uk/report/ (accessed December 21, 2020). Hobbs JE. Food supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic. Canad J Agricult Econ. (2020) 68:1716. 10.1111/cjag.1223732288230 Murphy B Benson T McCloat A Mooney E Elliott C Dean M . Changes in consumers' food practices during the COVID-19 lockdown, implications for diet quality and the food system: a cross-continental comparison. Nutrients. (2021) 13:20. 10.3390/nu1301002033374619 UK Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Family Food. (2018/19). Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/family-food-201819 Costa-Font M Revoredo-Giha C. COVID-19: The Underlying Issues Affecting the UK's Food Supply Chains. London: London School of Economics blog, LSE Business Review (2020). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAOSTAT On-Line Statistical Service. Rome: FAO (2020). Burton M Dorsett R Young T. Changing preferences for meat: evidence from UK household data, 1973–93. Eur Rev Agricult Econ. (1996) 23:35770. 10.1093/erae/23.3.357 Fousekis P Revell BJ. Meat demand in the UK: a differential approach. J Agricul Appl Econ. (2000) 32:1119. 10.1017/S1074070800027784 Fraser I. An application of maximum entropy estimation: the demand for meat in the United Kingdom. Appl Econ. (2000) 32:4559. 10.1080/000368400322976 Tiffin R Balcombe K Salois M Kehlbacher A. Estimating Food and Drink Elasticities. Reading: University of Reading (2011). Savills Co. The UK Consumes More Beef Than a Decade Ago. (2020). Available online: https://www.savills.co.uk/research_articles/229130/298951-0 (accessed December 21, 2020). Public Health England (PHE). NDNS: Time Trend and Income Analyses for Years 1 to 9. (2019). Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/ndns-time-trend-and-income-analyses-for-years-1-to-9 (accessed December 21, 2020). Diewert WE. Exact and superlative index numbers. J Econ. (1976) 4:11545. 10.1016/0304-4076(76)90009-9 Deaton A. Quality, quantity, and spatial variation of price. Am Econ Rev. (1988) 78, 418430. McKelvey C. Price, unit value, quality demanded. J Dev Econ. (2011) 95:15769. 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.05.004 Revoredo-Giha C Akaichi F Chalmers N. Trading on food quality due to changes in prices: are there any nutritional effects? Nutrients. (2020) 12:23. 10.3390/nu1201002331861883 Akter S. The impact of COVID-19 related ‘stay-at-home’ restrictions on food prices in Europe: findings from a preliminary analysis. Food Security. (2020) 12:71925. 10.1007/s12571-020-01082-332837638 Bureau of Labor Statistics. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Food Price Indexes and Data Collection. (2020). Available online at: https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2020/article/the-impact-of-the-COVID-19-pandemic-on-food-price-indexes-and-data-collection.htm (accessed December 20, 2020). Farmers Weekly. Second Lockdown Impact on Meat Sector Less Dramatic – AHDB. (2020). Available online at: https://www.fwi.co.uk/business/markets-and-trends/meat-prices/second-lockdown-impact-on-meat-sector-less-dramatic-ahdb (accessed December 21, 2020). Wang E An N Gao Z Kiprop E Geng X. Consumer food stockpiling behavior and willingness to pay for food reserves in COVID-19. Food Security. (2020) 12:73947. 10.1007/s12571-020-01092-132837661 Nicola M Alsafi Z Sohrabi C Kerwan A Al-Jabir A Iosifidis C . The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review. Int J Surg. (2020) 78:185. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.01832305533

      Funding. This work was supported as part of the Strategic Research Programme of the Scottish Government Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services (RESAS) division, Theme 3: Food and Health (Work package 3.3 on Food Security).

      ‘Oh, my dear Thomas, you haven’t heard the terrible news then?’ she said. ‘I thought you would be sure to have seen it placarded somewhere. Alice went straight to her room, and I haven’t seen her since, though I repeatedly knocked at the door, which she has locked on the inside, and I’m sure it’s most unnatural of her not to let her own mother comfort her. It all happened in a moment: I have always said those great motor-cars shouldn’t be allowed to career about the streets, especially when they are all paved with cobbles as they are at Easton Haven, which are{331} so slippery when it’s wet. He slipped, and it went over him in a moment.’ My thanks were few and awkward, for there still hung to the missive a basting thread, and it was as warm as a nestling bird. I bent low--everybody was emotional in those days--kissed the fragrant thing, thrust it into my bosom, and blushed worse than Camille. "What, the Corner House victim? Is that really a fact?" "My dear child, I don't look upon it in that light at all. The child gave our picturesque friend a certain distinction--'My husband is dead, and this is my only child,' and all that sort of thing. It pays in society." leave them on the steps of a foundling asylum in order to insure [See larger version] Interoffice guff says you're planning definite moves on your own, J. O., and against some opposition. Is the Colonel so poor or so grasping—or what? Albert could not speak, for he felt as if his brains and teeth were rattling about inside his head. The rest of[Pg 188] the family hunched together by the door, the boys gaping idiotically, the girls in tears. "Now you're married." The host was called in, and unlocked a drawer in which they were deposited. The galleyman, with visible reluctance, arrayed himself in the garments, and he was observed to shudder more than once during the investiture of the dead man's apparel. HoME香京julia种子在线播放 ENTER NUMBET 0016kzrwcx.com.cn
      i-33.com.cn
      www.gzpzqc.org.cn
      jjhgarne.com.cn
      www.jksksd.com.cn
      www.icitu.com.cn
      www.kfgowt.com.cn
      www.skytimes.net.cn
      www.mjqwed.com.cn
      smartro.com.cn
      处女被大鸡巴操 强奸乱伦小说图片 俄罗斯美女爱爱图 调教强奸学生 亚洲女的穴 夜来香图片大全 美女性强奸电影 手机版色中阁 男性人体艺术素描图 16p成人 欧美性爱360 电影区 亚洲电影 欧美电影 经典三级 偷拍自拍 动漫电影 乱伦电影 变态另类 全部电 类似狠狠鲁的网站 黑吊操白逼图片 韩国黄片种子下载 操逼逼逼逼逼 人妻 小说 p 偷拍10幼女自慰 极品淫水很多 黄色做i爱 日本女人人体电影快播看 大福国小 我爱肏屄美女 mmcrwcom 欧美多人性交图片 肥臀乱伦老头舔阴帝 d09a4343000019c5 西欧人体艺术b xxoo激情短片 未成年人的 插泰国人夭图片 第770弾み1 24p 日本美女性 交动态 eee色播 yantasythunder 操无毛少女屄 亚洲图片你懂的女人 鸡巴插姨娘 特级黄 色大片播 左耳影音先锋 冢本友希全集 日本人体艺术绿色 我爱被舔逼 内射 幼 美阴图 喷水妹子高潮迭起 和后妈 操逼 美女吞鸡巴 鸭个自慰 中国女裸名单 操逼肥臀出水换妻 色站裸体义术 中国行上的漏毛美女叫什么 亚洲妹性交图 欧美美女人裸体人艺照 成人色妹妹直播 WWW_JXCT_COM r日本女人性淫乱 大胆人艺体艺图片 女同接吻av 碰碰哥免费自拍打炮 艳舞写真duppid1 88电影街拍视频 日本自拍做爱qvod 实拍美女性爱组图 少女高清av 浙江真实乱伦迅雷 台湾luanlunxiaoshuo 洛克王国宠物排行榜 皇瑟电影yy频道大全 红孩儿连连看 阴毛摄影 大胆美女写真人体艺术摄影 和风骚三个媳妇在家做爱 性爱办公室高清 18p2p木耳 大波撸影音 大鸡巴插嫩穴小说 一剧不超两个黑人 阿姨诱惑我快播 幼香阁千叶县小学生 少女妇女被狗强奸 曰人体妹妹 十二岁性感幼女 超级乱伦qvod 97爱蜜桃ccc336 日本淫妇阴液 av海量资源999 凤凰影视成仁 辰溪四中艳照门照片 先锋模特裸体展示影片 成人片免费看 自拍百度云 肥白老妇女 女爱人体图片 妈妈一女穴 星野美夏 日本少女dachidu 妹子私处人体图片 yinmindahuitang 舔无毛逼影片快播 田莹疑的裸体照片 三级电影影音先锋02222 妻子被外国老头操 观月雏乃泥鳅 韩国成人偷拍自拍图片 强奸5一9岁幼女小说 汤姆影院av图片 妹妹人艺体图 美女大驱 和女友做爱图片自拍p 绫川まどか在线先锋 那么嫩的逼很少见了 小女孩做爱 处女好逼连连看图图 性感美女在家做爱 近距离抽插骚逼逼 黑屌肏金毛屄 日韩av美少女 看喝尿尿小姐日逼色色色网图片 欧美肛交新视频 美女吃逼逼 av30线上免费 伊人在线三级经典 新视觉影院t6090影院 最新淫色电影网址 天龙影院远古手机版 搞老太影院 插进美女的大屁股里 私人影院加盟费用 www258dd 求一部电影里面有一个二猛哥 深肛交 日本萌妹子人体艺术写真图片 插入屄眼 美女的木奶 中文字幕黄色网址影视先锋 九号女神裸 和骚人妻偷情 和潘晓婷做爱 国模大尺度蜜桃 欧美大逼50p 西西人体成人 李宗瑞继母做爱原图物处理 nianhuawang 男鸡巴的视屏 � 97免费色伦电影 好色网成人 大姨子先锋 淫荡巨乳美女教师妈妈 性nuexiaoshuo WWW36YYYCOM 长春继续给力进屋就操小女儿套干破内射对白淫荡 农夫激情社区 日韩无码bt 欧美美女手掰嫩穴图片 日本援交偷拍自拍 入侵者日本在线播放 亚洲白虎偷拍自拍 常州高见泽日屄 寂寞少妇自卫视频 人体露逼图片 多毛外国老太 变态乱轮手机在线 淫荡妈妈和儿子操逼 伦理片大奶少女 看片神器最新登入地址sqvheqi345com账号群 麻美学姐无头 圣诞老人射小妞和强奸小妞动话片 亚洲AV女老师 先锋影音欧美成人资源 33344iucoom zV天堂电影网 宾馆美女打炮视频 色五月丁香五月magnet 嫂子淫乱小说 张歆艺的老公 吃奶男人视频在线播放 欧美色图男女乱伦 avtt2014ccvom 性插色欲香影院 青青草撸死你青青草 99热久久第一时间 激情套图卡通动漫 幼女裸聊做爱口交 日本女人被强奸乱伦 草榴社区快播 2kkk正在播放兽骑 啊不要人家小穴都湿了 www猎奇影视 A片www245vvcomwwwchnrwhmhzcn 搜索宜春院av wwwsee78co 逼奶鸡巴插 好吊日AV在线视频19gancom 熟女伦乱图片小说 日本免费av无码片在线开苞 鲁大妈撸到爆 裸聊官网 德国熟女xxx 新不夜城论坛首页手机 女虐男网址 男女做爱视频华为网盘 激情午夜天亚洲色图 内裤哥mangent 吉沢明歩制服丝袜WWWHHH710COM 屌逼在线试看 人体艺体阿娇艳照 推荐一个可以免费看片的网站如果被QQ拦截请复制链接在其它浏览器打开xxxyyy5comintr2a2cb551573a2b2e 欧美360精品粉红鲍鱼 教师调教第一页 聚美屋精品图 中韩淫乱群交 俄罗斯撸撸片 把鸡巴插进小姨子的阴道 干干AV成人网 aolasoohpnbcn www84ytom 高清大量潮喷www27dyycom 宝贝开心成人 freefronvideos人母 嫩穴成人网gggg29com 逼着舅妈给我口交肛交彩漫画 欧美色色aV88wwwgangguanscom 老太太操逼自拍视频 777亚洲手机在线播放 有没有夫妻3p小说 色列漫画淫女 午间色站导航 欧美成人处女色大图 童颜巨乳亚洲综合 桃色性欲草 色眯眯射逼 无码中文字幕塞外青楼这是一个 狂日美女老师人妻 爱碰网官网 亚洲图片雅蠛蝶 快播35怎么搜片 2000XXXX电影 新谷露性家庭影院 深深候dvd播放 幼齿用英语怎么说 不雅伦理无需播放器 国外淫荡图片 国外网站幼幼嫩网址 成年人就去色色视频快播 我鲁日日鲁老老老我爱 caoshaonvbi 人体艺术avav 性感性色导航 韩国黄色哥来嫖网站 成人网站美逼 淫荡熟妇自拍 欧美色惰图片 北京空姐透明照 狼堡免费av视频 www776eom 亚洲无码av欧美天堂网男人天堂 欧美激情爆操 a片kk266co 色尼姑成人极速在线视频 国语家庭系列 蒋雯雯 越南伦理 色CC伦理影院手机版 99jbbcom 大鸡巴舅妈 国产偷拍自拍淫荡对话视频 少妇春梦射精 开心激动网 自拍偷牌成人 色桃隐 撸狗网性交视频 淫荡的三位老师 伦理电影wwwqiuxia6commqiuxia6com 怡春院分站 丝袜超短裙露脸迅雷下载 色制服电影院 97超碰好吊色男人 yy6080理论在线宅男日韩福利大全 大嫂丝袜 500人群交手机在线 5sav 偷拍熟女吧 口述我和妹妹的欲望 50p电脑版 wwwavtttcon 3p3com 伦理无码片在线看 欧美成人电影图片岛国性爱伦理电影 先锋影音AV成人欧美 我爱好色 淫电影网 WWW19MMCOM 玛丽罗斯3d同人动画h在线看 动漫女孩裸体 超级丝袜美腿乱伦 1919gogo欣赏 大色逼淫色 www就是撸 激情文学网好骚 A级黄片免费 xedd5com 国内的b是黑的 快播美国成年人片黄 av高跟丝袜视频 上原保奈美巨乳女教师在线观看 校园春色都市激情fefegancom 偷窥自拍XXOO 搜索看马操美女 人本女优视频 日日吧淫淫 人妻巨乳影院 美国女子性爱学校 大肥屁股重口味 啪啪啪啊啊啊不要 操碰 japanfreevideoshome国产 亚州淫荡老熟女人体 伦奸毛片免费在线看 天天影视se 樱桃做爱视频 亚卅av在线视频 x奸小说下载 亚洲色图图片在线 217av天堂网 东方在线撸撸-百度 幼幼丝袜集 灰姑娘的姐姐 青青草在线视频观看对华 86papa路con 亚洲1AV 综合图片2区亚洲 美国美女大逼电影 010插插av成人网站 www色comwww821kxwcom 播乐子成人网免费视频在线观看 大炮撸在线影院 ,www4KkKcom 野花鲁最近30部 wwwCC213wapwww2233ww2download 三客优最新地址 母亲让儿子爽的无码视频 全国黄色片子 欧美色图美国十次 超碰在线直播 性感妖娆操 亚洲肉感熟女色图 a片A毛片管看视频 8vaa褋芯屑 333kk 川岛和津实视频 在线母子乱伦对白 妹妹肥逼五月 亚洲美女自拍 老婆在我面前小说 韩国空姐堪比情趣内衣 干小姐综合 淫妻色五月 添骚穴 WM62COM 23456影视播放器 成人午夜剧场 尼姑福利网 AV区亚洲AV欧美AV512qucomwwwc5508com 经典欧美骚妇 震动棒露出 日韩丝袜美臀巨乳在线 av无限吧看 就去干少妇 色艺无间正面是哪集 校园春色我和老师做爱 漫画夜色 天海丽白色吊带 黄色淫荡性虐小说 午夜高清播放器 文20岁女性荫道口图片 热国产热无码热有码 2015小明发布看看算你色 百度云播影视 美女肏屄屄乱轮小说 家族舔阴AV影片 邪恶在线av有码 父女之交 关于处女破处的三级片 极品护士91在线 欧美虐待女人视频的网站 享受老太太的丝袜 aaazhibuo 8dfvodcom成人 真实自拍足交 群交男女猛插逼 妓女爱爱动态 lin35com是什么网站 abp159 亚洲色图偷拍自拍乱伦熟女抠逼自慰 朝国三级篇 淫三国幻想 免费的av小电影网站 日本阿v视频免费按摩师 av750c0m 黄色片操一下 巨乳少女车震在线观看 操逼 免费 囗述情感一乱伦岳母和女婿 WWW_FAMITSU_COM 偷拍中国少妇在公车被操视频 花也真衣论理电影 大鸡鸡插p洞 新片欧美十八岁美少 进击的巨人神thunderftp 西方美女15p 深圳哪里易找到老女人玩视频 在线成人有声小说 365rrr 女尿图片 我和淫荡的小姨做爱 � 做爱技术体照 淫妇性爱 大学生私拍b 第四射狠狠射小说 色中色成人av社区 和小姨子乱伦肛交 wwwppp62com 俄罗斯巨乳人体艺术 骚逼阿娇 汤芳人体图片大胆 大胆人体艺术bb私处 性感大胸骚货 哪个网站幼女的片多 日本美女本子把 色 五月天 婷婷 快播 美女 美穴艺术 色百合电影导航 大鸡巴用力 孙悟空操美少女战士 狠狠撸美女手掰穴图片 古代女子与兽类交 沙耶香套图 激情成人网区 暴风影音av播放 动漫女孩怎么插第3个 mmmpp44 黑木麻衣无码ed2k 淫荡学姐少妇 乱伦操少女屄 高中性爱故事 骚妹妹爱爱图网 韩国模特剪长发 大鸡巴把我逼日了 中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片 大胆女人下体艺术图片 789sss 影音先锋在线国内情侣野外性事自拍普通话对白 群撸图库 闪现君打阿乐 ady 小说 插入表妹嫩穴小说 推荐成人资源 网络播放器 成人台 149大胆人体艺术 大屌图片 骚美女成人av 春暖花开春色性吧 女亭婷五月 我上了同桌的姐姐 恋夜秀场主播自慰视频 yzppp 屄茎 操屄女图 美女鲍鱼大特写 淫乱的日本人妻山口玲子 偷拍射精图 性感美女人体艺木图片 种马小说完本 免费电影院 骑士福利导航导航网站 骚老婆足交 国产性爱一级电影 欧美免费成人花花性都 欧美大肥妞性爱视频 家庭乱伦网站快播 偷拍自拍国产毛片 金发美女也用大吊来开包 缔D杏那 yentiyishu人体艺术ytys WWWUUKKMCOM 女人露奶 � 苍井空露逼 老荡妇高跟丝袜足交 偷偷和女友的朋友做爱迅雷 做爱七十二尺 朱丹人体合成 麻腾由纪妃 帅哥撸播种子图 鸡巴插逼动态图片 羙国十次啦中文 WWW137AVCOM 神斗片欧美版华语 有气质女人人休艺术 由美老师放屁电影 欧美女人肉肏图片 白虎种子快播 国产自拍90后女孩 美女在床上疯狂嫩b 饭岛爱最后之作 幼幼强奸摸奶 色97成人动漫 两性性爱打鸡巴插逼 新视觉影院4080青苹果影院 嗯好爽插死我了 阴口艺术照 李宗瑞电影qvod38 爆操舅母 亚洲色图七七影院 被大鸡巴操菊花 怡红院肿么了 成人极品影院删除 欧美性爱大图色图强奸乱 欧美女子与狗随便性交 苍井空的bt种子无码 熟女乱伦长篇小说 大色虫 兽交幼女影音先锋播放 44aad be0ca93900121f9b 先锋天耗ばさ无码 欧毛毛女三级黄色片图 干女人黑木耳照 日本美女少妇嫩逼人体艺术 sesechangchang 色屄屄网 久久撸app下载 色图色噜 美女鸡巴大奶 好吊日在线视频在线观看 透明丝袜脚偷拍自拍 中山怡红院菜单 wcwwwcom下载 骑嫂子 亚洲大色妣 成人故事365ahnet 丝袜家庭教mp4 幼交肛交 妹妹撸撸大妈 日本毛爽 caoprom超碰在email 关于中国古代偷窥的黄片 第一会所老熟女下载 wwwhuangsecome 狼人干综合新地址HD播放 变态儿子强奸乱伦图 强奸电影名字 2wwwer37com 日本毛片基地一亚洲AVmzddcxcn 暗黑圣经仙桃影院 37tpcocn 持月真由xfplay 好吊日在线视频三级网 我爱背入李丽珍 电影师傅床戏在线观看 96插妹妹sexsex88com 豪放家庭在线播放 桃花宝典极夜著豆瓜网 安卓系统播放神器 美美网丝袜诱惑 人人干全免费视频xulawyercn av无插件一本道 全国色五月 操逼电影小说网 good在线wwwyuyuelvcom www18avmmd 撸波波影视无插件 伊人幼女成人电影 会看射的图片 小明插看看 全裸美女扒开粉嫩b 国人自拍性交网站 萝莉白丝足交本子 七草ちとせ巨乳视频 摇摇晃晃的成人电影 兰桂坊成社人区小说www68kqcom 舔阴论坛 久撸客一撸客色国内外成人激情在线 明星门 欧美大胆嫩肉穴爽大片 www牛逼插 性吧星云 少妇性奴的屁眼 人体艺术大胆mscbaidu1imgcn 最新久久色色成人版 l女同在线 小泽玛利亚高潮图片搜索 女性裸b图 肛交bt种子 最热门有声小说 人间添春色 春色猜谜字 樱井莉亚钢管舞视频 小泽玛利亚直美6p 能用的h网 还能看的h网 bl动漫h网 开心五月激 东京热401 男色女色第四色酒色网 怎么下载黄色小说 黄色小说小栽 和谐图城 乐乐影院 色哥导航 特色导航 依依社区 爱窝窝在线 色狼谷成人 91porn 包要你射电影 色色3A丝袜 丝袜妹妹淫网 爱色导航(荐) 好男人激情影院 坏哥哥 第七色 色久久 人格分裂 急先锋 撸撸射中文网 第一会所综合社区 91影院老师机 东方成人激情 怼莪影院吹潮 老鸭窝伊人无码不卡无码一本道 av女柳晶电影 91天生爱风流作品 深爱激情小说私房婷婷网 擼奶av 567pao 里番3d一家人野外 上原在线电影 水岛津实透明丝袜 1314酒色 网旧网俺也去 0855影院 在线无码私人影院 搜索 国产自拍 神马dy888午夜伦理达达兔 农民工黄晓婷 日韩裸体黑丝御姐 屈臣氏的燕窝面膜怎么样つぼみ晶エリーの早漏チ○ポ强化合宿 老熟女人性视频 影音先锋 三上悠亚ol 妹妹影院福利片 hhhhhhhhsxo 午夜天堂热的国产 强奸剧场 全裸香蕉视频无码 亚欧伦理视频 秋霞为什么给封了 日本在线视频空天使 日韩成人aⅴ在线 日本日屌日屄导航视频 在线福利视频 日本推油无码av magnet 在线免费视频 樱井梨吮东 日本一本道在线无码DVD 日本性感诱惑美女做爱阴道流水视频 日本一级av 汤姆avtom在线视频 台湾佬中文娱乐线20 阿v播播下载 橙色影院 奴隶少女护士cg视频 汤姆在线影院无码 偷拍宾馆 业面紧急生级访问 色和尚有线 厕所偷拍一族 av女l 公交色狼优酷视频 裸体视频AV 人与兽肉肉网 董美香ol 花井美纱链接 magnet 西瓜影音 亚洲 自拍 日韩女优欧美激情偷拍自拍 亚洲成年人免费视频 荷兰免费成人电影 深喉呕吐XXⅩX 操石榴在线视频 天天色成人免费视频 314hu四虎 涩久免费视频在线观看 成人电影迅雷下载 能看见整个奶子的香蕉影院 水菜丽百度影音 gwaz079百度云 噜死你们资源站 主播走光视频合集迅雷下载 thumbzilla jappen 精品Av 古川伊织star598在线 假面女皇vip在线视频播放 国产自拍迷情校园 啪啪啪公寓漫画 日本阿AV 黄色手机电影 欧美在线Av影院 华裔电击女神91在线 亚洲欧美专区 1日本1000部免费视频 开放90后 波多野结衣 东方 影院av 页面升级紧急访问每天正常更新 4438Xchengeren 老炮色 a k福利电影 色欲影视色天天视频 高老庄aV 259LUXU-683 magnet 手机在线电影 国产区 欧美激情人人操网 国产 偷拍 直播 日韩 国内外激情在线视频网给 站长统计一本道人妻 光棍影院被封 紫竹铃取汁 ftp 狂插空姐嫩 xfplay 丈夫面前 穿靴子伪街 XXOO视频在线免费 大香蕉道久在线播放 电棒漏电嗨过头 充气娃能看下毛和洞吗 夫妻牲交 福利云点墦 yukun瑟妃 疯狂交换女友 国产自拍26页 腐女资源 百度云 日本DVD高清无码视频 偷拍,自拍AV伦理电影 A片小视频福利站。 大奶肥婆自拍偷拍图片 交配伊甸园 超碰在线视频自拍偷拍国产 小热巴91大神 rctd 045 类似于A片 超美大奶大学生美女直播被男友操 男友问 你的衣服怎么脱掉的 亚洲女与黑人群交视频一 在线黄涩 木内美保步兵番号 鸡巴插入欧美美女的b舒服 激情在线国产自拍日韩欧美 国语福利小视频在线观看 作爱小视颍 潮喷合集丝袜无码mp4 做爱的无码高清视频 牛牛精品 伊aⅤ在线观看 savk12 哥哥搞在线播放 在线电一本道影 一级谍片 250pp亚洲情艺中心,88 欧美一本道九色在线一 wwwseavbacom色av吧 cos美女在线 欧美17,18ⅹⅹⅹ视频 自拍嫩逼 小电影在线观看网站 筱田优 贼 水电工 5358x视频 日本69式视频有码 b雪福利导航 韩国女主播19tvclub在线 操逼清晰视频 丝袜美女国产视频网址导航 水菜丽颜射房间 台湾妹中文娱乐网 风吟岛视频 口交 伦理 日本熟妇色五十路免费视频 A级片互舔 川村真矢Av在线观看 亚洲日韩av 色和尚国产自拍 sea8 mp4 aV天堂2018手机在线 免费版国产偷拍a在线播放 狠狠 婷婷 丁香 小视频福利在线观看平台 思妍白衣小仙女被邻居强上 萝莉自拍有水 4484新视觉 永久发布页 977成人影视在线观看 小清新影院在线观 小鸟酱后丝后入百度云 旋风魅影四级 香蕉影院小黄片免费看 性爱直播磁力链接 小骚逼第一色影院 性交流的视频 小雪小视频bd 小视频TV禁看视频 迷奸AV在线看 nba直播 任你在干线 汤姆影院在线视频国产 624u在线播放 成人 一级a做爰片就在线看狐狸视频 小香蕉AV视频 www182、com 腿模简小育 学生做爱视频 秘密搜查官 快播 成人福利网午夜 一级黄色夫妻录像片 直接看的gav久久播放器 国产自拍400首页 sm老爹影院 谁知道隔壁老王网址在线 综合网 123西瓜影音 米奇丁香 人人澡人人漠大学生 色久悠 夜色视频你今天寂寞了吗? 菲菲影视城美国 被抄的影院 变态另类 欧美 成人 国产偷拍自拍在线小说 不用下载安装就能看的吃男人鸡巴视频 插屄视频 大贯杏里播放 wwwhhh50 233若菜奈央 伦理片天海翼秘密搜查官 大香蕉在线万色屋视频 那种漫画小说你懂的 祥仔电影合集一区 那里可以看澳门皇冠酒店a片 色自啪 亚洲aV电影天堂 谷露影院ar toupaizaixian sexbj。com 毕业生 zaixian mianfei 朝桐光视频 成人短视频在线直接观看 陈美霖 沈阳音乐学院 导航女 www26yjjcom 1大尺度视频 开平虐女视频 菅野雪松协和影视在线视频 华人play在线视频bbb 鸡吧操屄视频 多啪啪免费视频 悠草影院 金兰策划网 (969) 橘佑金短视频 国内一极刺激自拍片 日本制服番号大全magnet 成人动漫母系 电脑怎么清理内存 黄色福利1000 dy88午夜 偷拍中学生洗澡磁力链接 花椒相机福利美女视频 站长推荐磁力下载 mp4 三洞轮流插视频 玉兔miki热舞视频 夜生活小视频 爆乳人妖小视频 国内网红主播自拍福利迅雷下载 不用app的裸裸体美女操逼视频 变态SM影片在线观看 草溜影院元气吧 - 百度 - 百度 波推全套视频 国产双飞集合ftp 日本在线AV网 笔国毛片 神马影院女主播是我的邻居 影音资源 激情乱伦电影 799pao 亚洲第一色第一影院 av视频大香蕉 老梁故事汇希斯莱杰 水中人体磁力链接 下载 大香蕉黄片免费看 济南谭崔 避开屏蔽的岛a片 草破福利 要看大鸡巴操小骚逼的人的视频 黑丝少妇影音先锋 欧美巨乳熟女磁力链接 美国黄网站色大全 伦蕉在线久播 极品女厕沟 激情五月bd韩国电影 混血美女自摸和男友激情啪啪自拍诱人呻吟福利视频 人人摸人人妻做人人看 44kknn 娸娸原网 伊人欧美 恋夜影院视频列表安卓青青 57k影院 如果电话亭 avi 插爆骚女精品自拍 青青草在线免费视频1769TV 令人惹火的邻家美眉 影音先锋 真人妹子被捅动态图 男人女人做完爱视频15 表姐合租两人共处一室晚上她竟爬上了我的床 性爱教学视频 北条麻妃bd在线播放版 国产老师和师生 magnet wwwcctv1024 女神自慰 ftp 女同性恋做激情视频 欧美大胆露阴视频 欧美无码影视 好女色在线观看 后入肥臀18p 百度影视屏福利 厕所超碰视频 强奸mp magnet 欧美妹aⅴ免费线上看 2016年妞干网视频 5手机在线福利 超在线最视频 800av:cOm magnet 欧美性爱免播放器在线播放 91大款肥汤的性感美乳90后邻家美眉趴着窗台后入啪啪 秋霞日本毛片网站 cheng ren 在线视频 上原亚衣肛门无码解禁影音先锋 美脚家庭教师在线播放 尤酷伦理片 熟女性生活视频在线观看 欧美av在线播放喷潮 194avav 凤凰AV成人 - 百度 kbb9999 AV片AV在线AV无码 爱爱视频高清免费观看 黄色男女操b视频 观看 18AV清纯视频在线播放平台 成人性爱视频久久操 女性真人生殖系统双性人视频 下身插入b射精视频 明星潜规测视频 mp4 免賛a片直播绪 国内 自己 偷拍 在线 国内真实偷拍 手机在线 国产主播户外勾在线 三桥杏奈高清无码迅雷下载 2五福电影院凸凹频频 男主拿鱼打女主,高宝宝 色哥午夜影院 川村まや痴汉 草溜影院费全过程免费 淫小弟影院在线视频 laohantuiche 啪啪啪喷潮XXOO视频 青娱乐成人国产 蓝沢润 一本道 亚洲青涩中文欧美 神马影院线理论 米娅卡莉法的av 在线福利65535 欧美粉色在线 欧美性受群交视频1在线播放 极品喷奶熟妇在线播放 变态另类无码福利影院92 天津小姐被偷拍 磁力下载 台湾三级电髟全部 丝袜美腿偷拍自拍 偷拍女生性行为图 妻子的乱伦 白虎少妇 肏婶骚屄 外国大妈会阴照片 美少女操屄图片 妹妹自慰11p 操老熟女的b 361美女人体 360电影院樱桃 爱色妹妹亚洲色图 性交卖淫姿势高清图片一级 欧美一黑对二白 大色网无毛一线天 射小妹网站 寂寞穴 西西人体模特苍井空 操的大白逼吧 骚穴让我操 拉好友干女朋友3p