Front. Nutr. Frontiers in Nutrition Front. Nutr. 2296-861X Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fnut.2021.647365 Nutrition Original Research Food Access Worries, Food Assistance Use, Purchasing Behavior, and Food Insecurity Among New Yorkers During COVID-19 Clay Lauren A. 1 * Rogus Stephanie 2 1Department of Emergency Health Services, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, United States 2Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States

Edited by: Igor Pravst, Institute of Nutrition, Slovenia

Reviewed by: Hollie Raynor, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, United States; Reza Rastmanesh, Independent Researcher, Tehran, Iran

*Correspondence: Lauren A. Clay lclay@umbc.edu

This article was submitted to Eating Behavior, a section of the journal Frontiers in Nutrition

26 08 2021 2021 8 647365 29 12 2020 22 07 2021 Copyright © 2021 Clay and Rogus. 2021 Clay and Rogus

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) disrupted health, economy, and food systems across the United States. This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between food access worries, food assistance use, and purchasing behaviors and food insecurity during COVID-19 among residents of New York State. New Yorkers were recruited to complete a web-based survey through Qualtrics. The survey took place in the summer and fall of 2020 and asked respondents about food access worries, food assistance use, food insecurity, and food purchasing behaviors. Chi-square analysis examined the relationships between food concerns, food assistance use, purchasing behaviors, and demographic characteristics by reported food insecurity, and significant results were analyzed in a series of logistic regression models. Results showed that higher food worries, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) use, reported food assistance and delivery as food sources, and self-reported Hispanic ethnicity were associated with a higher likelihood of experiencing food insecurity. Future research is needed to assess the ongoing impacts of the pandemic on food access and food insecurity, particularly among underserved groups. Measures that provide additional money for food and improved food access can alleviate barriers to accessing enough healthy food at this time.

COVID-19 food security food access food assistance food purchase behavior Natural Hazards Center, University of Colorado Boulder10.13039/100008618

香京julia种子在线播放

    1. <form id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></form>
      <address id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></nobr></address>

      Introduction

      The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) had a major impact on health, social life, and the economy across the globe. Over 71 million infections and 1 million deaths have been reported worldwide, with over 22% of cases and 29% of deaths occurring in the United States (1). Social distancing measures were implemented in order to contain the spread of the disease, which led to employment and food system disruptions. These disruptions resulted in business closures that forced about 22 million Americans into unemployment in April 2020 and increased rates of food insecurity, which includes the ability to consistently acquire nutrient-rich, desirable, and varied foods (27).

      Increases in the volume of food purchased by consumers placed a strain on an inflexible food supply chain that failed to respond to the pandemic (8). Illness among workers in processing facilities due to shared housing and transportation and close proximity of employees in work environments reduced facility capacity (9, 10). This led to many farmers disposing of foods that required further processing (11). Further, food shortages in stores, concerns about food safety (1214), and localized stay-at-home orders changed purchasing behaviors of consumers. Consumers increased their use of online ordering for pick-up and delivery from restaurants and grocery stores, increased their time spent cooking at home, and reduced overall purchases from restaurants (15). At the same time, food supply and work disruptions widened existing disparities in food access (6). Black and Hispanic Americans are more likely to work essential jobs, such as those in retailing, transportation, manufacturing, healthcare, construction, and the food system, which pay lower wages and lack flexibility and paid sick leave (1621). These jobs were more likely lost during the pandemic, which further exacerbated financial issues among groups that were already more likely to suffer from food insecurity prior to the pandemic (22, 23).

      Several studies have examined food access issues during COVID-19, mostly within the context of food insecurity. Studies have reported increased food insecurity since COVID-19 and issues with food access among food-insecure populations (4, 5). Those experiencing food insecurity reported higher levels of worry about food access and challenges related to food access, including the ability to find the types of foods desired, getting enough food through food assistance programs and emergency food organizations, and an inability to afford to stock up on food for 2 weeks as recommended (4, 5). Food-insecure individuals were also less likely to have sick and vacations days and more likely to report that they would lose their job if they missed too much work (4). This study extends the current research area by examining the relationship between food purchasing behaviors and food insecurity.

      In March 2020, when COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the WHO (24), New York became the epicenter of the virus in the United States (25). On March 20, 2020, Governor Cuomo issued the Executive Order New York State on Pause, a stay-at-home order and closure of all non-essential businesses in the state to slow the spread of the virus (26). As of December 2020, there were over 28,000 deaths from COVID-19 in NY State. Deaths disproportionately affected racial and ethnic minorities. Hispanic New Yorkers accounted for 34% of the deaths but only 29% of the state population and Black New Yorkers accounted for 28% of the deaths but only 22% of the population (27). The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between food access concerns, food assistance use, and purchasing behaviors and food insecurity in a sample that oversampled New York State residents who were Black, Hispanic, and low-income or low-education during COVID-19.

      Materials and Methods Study Design and Sample

      A cross-sectional proportional quota sample of 525 New Yorkers was recruited by Qualtrics from their survey panels to complete a web survey. The survey was adapted from a validated food access survey developed by the National Food Access and COVID-19 Research Team (NFACT) (2830). It included open- and closed-ended questions about food sources, food security, purchasing behavior, food assistance, risk factors for COVID-19, and social determinants of health. Quotas were set to recruit 50% Black or African American, 50% Hispanic, and 50% low-income or low-education participants to oversample groups with an increased risk for food insecurity and for adverse consequences related to COVID-19 (19, 20, 31, 32). Individual panel members were classified as eligible to participate if they were age 18 or older and resided in New York State, excluding New York City. Potential study participants were asked about their race, ethnicity, income, education, and age to evaluate fit with the quotas. Potential participants that met the inclusion criteria but fell outside of the quotas needed to fill the sample were classified as ineligible, and the survey was ended. A response rate is not available with quota data collection through Qualtrics panels because the number of people invited to participate in the survey is not reported by Qualtrics.

      Data Collection

      Data from Black or African American and Hispanic participants were collected from July 15 to September 18, 2020, and data from non-Hispanic white participants were collected from December 7–11, 2020. Data on non-Hispanic white participants were collected approximately 3 months after data on Black and Hispanic participants. Case counts were higher during data collection from non-Hispanic white participants; however during both times of data collection, COVID-19 restrictions policies were similar with a regional and clustered approach based on positive rates and hospital capacity and when looking at county level data; during both periods of data collection, there was a significant variation in COVID case counts (33, 34). The median time to complete the survey was 16 min. To ensure quality responses, five quality checks were included within the survey to check for agreement between responses that should have been consistent, for example, an agreement between repeated questions about demographic characteristics. Respondents with a flag for more than two of the quality checks were excluded from the final sample. Surveys completed in faster than half the median time were replaced due to low quality. Finally, survey responses were evaluated to identify poor-quality responses and removed if there was evidence of straight-lining, gibberish, and non-sense answers in accordance with recommended quality review criteria by Qualtrics (35, 36).

      Measures

      The outcome food insecurity was assessed using the United States Department of Agriculture six-item Food Security Survey Module (37). Participants were asked to answer the six-item module about the time period “Since the COVID-19 outbreak (March 1, 2020).” The six-item module was scored (range 0–6) consistent with USDA guidelines (37). Participants scoring 0–1 were classified as having high or marginal food security (food secure), and a score of 2–6 was classified as having low or very low food security (food insecure). The six-item Food Security Survey Module has a sensitivity of 92.0% and a specificity of 99.4% for overall food insecurity (38). Food-related worries were assessed by asking participants if they had worried about a set of eight food-related issues since the COVID-19 pandemic began (yes = 1, no or not applicable = 0), including food becoming more expensive, food becoming unsafe or contaminated, losing access to food assistance programs, not being able to afford enough food, not having enough food in stores, not having enough food stocks to stay home, the country not having enough food to feed everyone, and losing so much income that you cannot afford food. A food worry scale was computed (range 0–8), and high food-related worries were classified as worries above the mean (>4.65). Questions about food access were adopted directly from the NFACT survey, which achieved an alpha value of 0.70 (5). Negative impacts on employment during COVID-19 were used as a proxy for economic instability. Participants were asked if they experienced any employment changes since the pandemic began (lost job, reduced hours or income, furloughed, work from home, increased hours, no job changes, not applicable/do not work). Participants indicating job loss, reduced hours or income, or furlough were classified as having a negative job impact due to COVID-19 (negative job impact = 1, no negative job impact = 0).

      Food assistance program use was assessed by asking participants to check all food assistance programs that their household had used since the pandemic began, including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP); Women, Infant, and Children's Program (WIC); school meal programs (including school lunch, breakfast, or summer meals), a food pantry or food bank; or other assistance programs such as the Commodity Supplemental Food program, Meals on Wheels, or other programs. A variable was created to measure the use of any food assistance program by classifying checking yes for any food assistance program (any/none).

      To assess purchasing behavior, participants were asked whether they bought more, the same amount, or less of a set of goods, including fresh produce, frozen produce, snack foods, juice or soda, and frozen dinners. Five variables were created to capture increased purchasing since the pandemic (more = 1, the same or less = 0). The food source was assessed by asking participants where they purchased food since the pandemic began (grocery, convenience, or specialty store; grocery, meal kit, or Meals on Wheels delivery; restaurant take-out or dine-in; food pantry, school food, or meals served in a group setting; market of farmers, community-supported agriculture, or gardening). Five variables were created to capture food sources; if participants selected purchasing from any source within each category (store, delivery, restaurant, food assistance, or local), they were classified as purchasing food from that source.

      Finally, demographic characteristics collected on the sample included income in 2019 (< $13,000, $13,000–24,999, $25,000–49,999, $50,000–74,999, $75,000+), gender (male, female, transgender, non-binary), education (high school or less, some college, 2-year degree, 4-year degree, graduate studies), and age (18–24, 25–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, 65+).

      Data Analysis

      Food security, food worries, food sources, food assistance use, purchasing behaviors, and demographics were described for the total sample. A chi-square analysis was performed to evaluate differences in the outcome food insecurity. To evaluate differences across data collection time points, food insecurity by race and ethnicity adjusting for the county of residence was examined in a logistic regression analysis. Using a model-building approach, factors independently associated with the outcome food insecurity were included in a set of logistic regression models (39). The first model examined individual worries related to food and negative job impacts, the second model added food sources, the third model added food assistance program use, the fourth model added purchasing behavior, and the final model added sample demographic characteristics. The log-likelihood, Akaike's information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) were used to evaluate the model fit (39, 40). Analyses were performed in Stata version 16.1 (41).

      Results

      The sample (n = 525) was 47% Black or African American, 42% Hispanic, and 11% non-Hispanic white and 62% female (Table 1). Over 30% of participants reported an income below $25,000 in 2019, a quarter of the sample (27%) reported an income between $25,000 and $50,000, 17% reported an income between $50,000 and $75,000, and the remaining 22% reported an income >$75,000. Approximately half of the sample reported less than a college degree with 28% reporting high school or less and 23% reporting some college but not graduating with a degree. Over 40% of participants were aged 18–34 years, about one-third of the sample was in the middle-age groups of 35–54, and the remaining quarter of respondents were aged 55 years and older.

      Demographic characteristics and food worries, food security, food assistance use, and purchasing behaviors of the sample, counts, and frequencies (n = 525).

      Count Percent
      Race/ethnicity
         Non-Hispanic White 60 10.8
         Black or African American 260 46.9
         Hispanic 234 42.2
      Income
          < $13,000 100 18.1
         $13,000–24,999 84 15.2
         $25,000–49,999 150 27.1
         $50,000–74.999 96 17.3
         $75,000+ 124 22.4
      Gender
         Male 203 36.6
         Female 346 62.5
         Transgender 1 0.2
         Non-binary 4 0.7
      Education
         High school or less 155 28.0
         Some college 130 23.5
         2-year degree 104 18.8
         4-year degree 119 21.5
         Graduate studies 46 8.3
      Age
         18–24 98 17.7
         25–34 137 24.7
         35–44 110 19.9
         45–54 78 14.1
         55–64 73 13.2
         65+ 58 10.5
      High food worries 306 55.2
      Food insecure since COVID-19 246 45.8
      Negative job impact due to COVID-19 205 37.0
      Food source: store 527 95.1
      Food source: delivery 226 40.8
      Food source: restaurant 406 73.3
      Food source: food assistance 137 24.7
      Food source: local food sources 180 32.5
      Used any food assistance since COVID-19 273 49.3
         Used SNAP since COVID-19 200 36.1
         Used WIC since COVID-19 37 6.7
         Used school meals since COVID-19 54 9.8
         Used a food Bank since COVID-19 85 15.3
         Used other food assistance since COVID-19 5 0.9
      Purchased more fresh produce since COVID-19 209 37.7
      Purchased more frozen produce since COVID-19 191 34.5
      Purchased more snack foods since COVID-19 176 31.8
      Purchased more juice/soda since COVID-19 155 28
      Purchased more frozen dinners since COVID-19 150 27.1

      Nearly half of the study participants (46%) reported experiencing food insecurity and 55% expressed a high level of food-related worries (Table 1). Over one-third of the sample (37%) reported a negative job impact during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most participants reported getting food from grocery stores (95%) and restaurants (73%). One-third of the participants (33%) reported using local food sources such as farmers' markets or community-supported agriculture, and 41% reported using delivery services to obtain food. One-quarter of the participants (25%) reported using food assistance programs for food supplies. Half of the study participants reported using any food assistance program (49%). More than one-third reported using SNAP (36%), 7% used WIC, 10% used a school meal program, and 15% used a food bank.

      When looking at food purchasing (Table 1), 38% reported buying more fresh produce and 34% reported buying more frozen produce since the COVID-19 pandemic. When looking at purchasing less healthful foods, 32% of the participants reported buying more snack foods, 28% reported buying more sugar-sweetened beverages, and 27% reported buying more frozen dinners.

      Bivariate analysis of high food-related worries, food sources, food assistance programs, and purchasing behavior by food security status since the COVID-19 pandemic showed that there were statistically significant differences between food-secure and food-insecure participants for high food-related worries, all food sources except for restaurants, all food assistance programs, and all purchasing behaviors (Table 2). Food-related worries were greater among participants reporting food insecurity (69%) than those reporting food security (44%). Negative job impacts were reported by a greater proportion of participants experiencing food insecurity since the pandemic (51%) compared to 25% of food-secure participants. Food-insecure participants reported using delivery (55%), food assistance (37%), and local food sources (40%) more frequently than food-secure participants (30, 14, and 26%, respectively). Participants experiencing food insecurity since the COVID-19 pandemic reported using all food assistance programs and purchasing more of all types of food more frequently than participants not experiencing food insecurity. The greatest difference in food assistance program use between the two groups was observed for the use of SNAP with 23% of food-secure participants and 51% of food-insecure participants reporting using the SNAP program (28-point difference). The greatest difference in food purchasing between the two groups was observed for frozen produce with 28% of food-secure participants and 43% of food-insecure participants reporting buying more frozen produce during the pandemic (15-point difference).

      Factors independently associated with food security since the pandemic, chi-square analysis (n = 525).

      Food secure Food insecure
      Count % Count % p diff*
      High food worries 128 44.0 170 69.1 p < 0.001
      Negative job impact due to COVID-19 73 25.1 127 51.6 p < 0.001
      Food source: store 282 96.9 229 93.1 p < 0.05
      Food source: delivery 89 30.6 135 54.9 p < 0.001
      Food source: restaurant 210 72.2 186 75.6 0.366
      Food source: food assistance 42 14.4 92 37.4 p < 0.001
      Food source: local food source 77 26.5 99 40.2 p < 0.01
      Used SNAP since COVID-19 67 23.0 126 51.2 p < 0.001
      Used WIC since COVID-19 7 2.4 30 12.2 p < 0.001
      Used school meals since COVID-19 13 4.5 41 16.7 p < 0.001
      Used food bank since COVID-19 27 9.3 57 23.2 p < 0.001
      Used other food assistance since COVID-19 3 1.0 2 0.8 0.793
      Used any food assistance since COVID-19 95 32.7 171 69.5 p < 0.001
      Purchased more fresh produce since COVID-19 94 32.3 111 45.1 p < 0.01
      Purchased more frozen produce since COVID-19 81 27.8 7 43.5 p < 0.001
      Purchased more snack foods since COVID-19 76 26.1 94 38.2 p < 0.01
      Purchased more juice/soda since COVID-19 67 23.0 83 33.7 p < 0.01
      Purchased more frozen dinners since COVID-19 62 21.3 85 34.6 p < 0.01
      Race/ethnicity
         Non-Hispanic White 45 15.5 15 6.1 p < 0.001
         Black or African American 146 50.2 104 42.3
         Hispanic 100 34.4 127 51.6
      Income
          < $13,000 43 14.8 49 19.9 p < 0.01
         $13,000–24,999 36 12.4 46 18.7
         $25,000–49,999 72 24.7 74 30.1
         $50,000–74.999 59 10.3 36 14.6
         $75,000+ 81 27.8 41 16.7
      Gender
         Male 115 39.5 84 34.2 0.199
         Female, transgender, non-binary 176 60.5 162 65.9
      Education
         High school or less 76 26.1 71 28.9 p < 0.05
         Some college 60 20.6 65 26.4
         2-year degree 48 16.5 53 21.5
         4-year degree 78 26.8 40 16.3
         Graduate studies 29 10.0 17 6.9
      Age
         18–24 39 13.4 54 22 p < 0.001
         25–34 51 17.5 82 33.3
         35–44 62 21.3 45 18.3
         45–54 48 16.5 29 11.8
         55–64 44 15.1 26 10.6
         65+ 47 16.2 10 4.1

      p difference from chi-square analysis.

      To evaluate the differences across data collection time points, the outcome food insecurity was examined by race and ethnicity adjusting for the county of residence as a proxy for disease burden variation across the two time points. For example, on August 15, 2020, there were zero cases in Delaware county and 50 cases in Erie county. On December 15, 2020, there were five cases in Delaware county and 396 cases in Erie county (34). Race and ethnicity were statistically significantly associated with the outcome food insecurity [odds ratio (OR) 1.88, 95% CI 1.44, 2.47], and the county was not significant in explaining variance in the outcome.

      Factors independently associated with the outcome food insecurity were included in the multivariate analysis (Table 3). In model one, food-related worries and negative job impact due to COVID-19 were examined with the outcome food insecurity. Participants with high food-related worries were more than two and a half times more likely to report food insecurity since the pandemic (OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.80, 3.75). Participants reporting a negative job impact due to COVID-19 were nearly three times more likely to report food insecurity since the pandemic compared to participants with no impact or an increase in income or hours (OR 2.92, CI 2.01, 4.25).

      Factors associated with food security since the pandemic, logistic regression (n = 525).

      Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5
      OR* 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
      High food worries 2.60 1.80, 3.75 3.21 2.14, 4.82 2.74 1.81, 4.16 2.58 1.69, 3.96 2.82 1.81, 4.40
      Negative job impact due to COVID-19 2.92 2.01, 4.25 2.34 1.57, 3.48 2.41 1.58, 3.66 2.34 1.53, 3.56 2.20 1.42, 3.42
      Food source: store 0.38 0.15, 0.97 0.39 0.15, 1.03 0.39 0.15, 1.04
      Food source: delivery 2.22 1.49, 3.30 2.35 1.54, 3.59 2.21 1.43, 3.40 2.31 1.46, 3.65
      Food source: food assistance 2.59 1.62, 4.16 2.06 1.22, 3.48 1.97 1.16, 3.34 1.97 1.16, 3.34
      Food source: local food source 1.53 0.99, 2.39
      Used SNAP since COVID-19 3.19 2.09, 4.88 3.19 2.08, 4.90 3.21 1.98, 5.21
      Used WIC since COVID-19 3.11 1.21, 7.99 3.16 1.22, 8.14 2.39 0.89, 6.39
      Used school meals since COVID-19 2.00 0.94, 4.27 2.01 0.93, 4.32
      Used food bank since COVID-19 1.33 0.72, 2.46 1.35 0.73, 2.50
      Purchased more fresh produce since COVID-19 1.17 0.76, 1.83
      Purchased more frozen produce since COVID-19 1.31 0.83, 2.07
      Purchased more snack foods since COVID-19 1.09 0.66, 1.78
      Purchased more juice/soda since COVID-19 0.96 0.58, 1.58
      Purchased more frozen dinners since COVID-19 1.01 0.60, 1.70
      Race/ethnicity
       Non-Hispanic White ref
       Black or African American 1.26 0.57, 2.80
       Hispanic 2.40 1.07, 5.40
      Income
        < $13,000 ref
       $13,000–24,999 1.29 0.62, 2.69
       $25,000–49,999 1.12 0.58, 2.16
       $50,000–74.999 0.65 0.31, 1.37
       $75,000+ 0.71 0.33, 1.52
      Education
       High school or less ref
       Some college 1.16 0.64, 2.12
       2-year degree 1.26 0.65, 2.44
       4-year degree 0.77 0.40, 1.49
       Graduate studies 1.21 0.49, 2.98
      Age
       18–24 ref
       25–34 0.74 0.39, 1.42
       35–44 0.52 0.26, 1.02
       45–54 0.45 0.21, 0.97
       55–64 0.55 0.25, 1.19
       65+ 0.35 0.14, 0.91
       Log likelihood −336.76 −308.34 −287.40 −285.97 −274.38
       AIC 679.53 630.67 594.80 601.94 594.75
       BIC 692.39 660.67 637.66 666.23 693.33

      Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals reported from the logistic regression analysis.

      Bolded numbers indicate a statistically significant finding.

      In model two (Table 3), food sources were examined. High food-related worries (OR 3.21, CI 2.14, 4.82), negative job impact due to COVID-19 (OR 2.34, CI 1.57, 3.48), using delivery (OR 2.22, CI 1.49, 3.30), and using food assistance (OR 2.59, CI 1.62, 4.16) increased the likelihood of food insecurity, and getting food from grocery stores (OR 0.38, CI 0.15, 0.97) decreased the likelihood of food insecurity. In post-testing, the use of local foods did not strengthen the model and therefore, was dropped from the subsequent analysis.

      In model three (Table 3), food assistance programs were added. High food-related worries (OR 2.74, CI 1.81, 4.16), negative job impact (OR 2.41, CI 1.58, 3.66), use of delivery (OR 2.35, CI 1.54, 3.59), and use of food assistance (OR 2.06, CI 1.22, 3.48) persist in explaining the variance in the outcome food insecurity and grocery store use is explained away with the addition of food assistance measures. SNAP (OR 3.19, CI 2.09, 4.88) and WIC use (OR 3.11, CI 1.21, 7.99) increased the odds of food insecurity.

      In model four (Table 3), purchasing behaviors were added to the model. Purchasing behaviors were not statistically significant in explaining the variance in the outcome food security. Food-related worries (OR 2.58, CI 1.69, 3.96), job disruption (OR 2.34, CI 1.53, 3.56), delivery (OR 2.21, CI 1.43, 3.40), food assistance use (OR 1.97, CI 1.16, 3.34), SNAP (OR 3.19, CI 2.08, 4.90), and WIC use (OR 3.16, CI 1.22, 8.14) persist as accounting for the variance in the outcome. In post-testing, the use of school meals and food banks and purchasing behaviors did not strengthen the model. These measures were dropped from the subsequent modeling.

      The final model (Table 3) added sample demographic characteristics. After accounting for sample characteristics, high food-related worries, job disruption due to COVID-19, food assistance, SNAP use, and Hispanic ethnicity were associated with greater odds of food insecurity since the COVID-19 pandemic and older age was associated with decreased odds of food insecurity. Participants with a high level or food-related worries were 2.82 times more likely (OR 2.82, CI 1.81, 4.40) to report food insecurity since the pandemic. Participants reporting a negative job impact during the pandemic were more than twice as likely to report food insecurity than participants without a job disruption or an increase in hours or income (OR 2.20, CI 1.42, 3.42). Participants reporting getting food through delivery services were more than twice as likely (OR 2.31, CI 1.46, 3.65) to report food insecurity. SNAP users in the sample were more than three times more likely (OR 3.21, CI 1.98, 5.21) to report food insecurity compared to non-SNAP users. Hispanic participants were nearly two and a half times more likely (OR 2.40, CI 1.07, 5.40) to report food insecurity compared to non-Hispanic white participants. Participants aged 65 or older were 65% less likely (OR 0.35, CI 0.14, 0.91) to report food insecurity compared to younger participants (aged 18–24 years). Evaluation of AIC and BIC indicated that with the addition of each set of food-related variables, model fit improved with the exception of model 4 (40, 42).

      Discussion

      This study examined factors associated with food insecurity among New York State residents that oversampled for Black, Hispanic, and low-income and education. After accounting for other factors, higher food worries, a negative job impact, SNAP use, self-reported Hispanic ethnicity, and reported food assistance and delivery as food sources were associated with a higher likelihood of experiencing food insecurity.

      Research on food insecurity during COVID-19 at the national and local levels and among high-risk populations, such as low-income, low education, and Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC), are emerging throughout the United States. Studies have commonly reported or projected increased rates of food insecurity during COVID-19 (47, 4347). National studies examining food insecurity, challenges, and worry have reported increased rates of food insecurity among low-income households (43, 47), households with low education (6, 43), BIPOC households (6, 43, 44, 47), households with children (6, 44, 47), those experiencing employment disruption (6, 43, 44), and SNAP participants (6). A nationally representative study on low-income adults found that they were less able to comply with recommendations to stock up on 2 weeks of groceries and more likely to need extra money for food and bills (6). Food-insecure households experienced more fear and worry about COVID-19 in general (44) and about food during COVID-19 in particular (45).

      Similar findings were reported in studies in specific states or localities. A study of emerging adults in Minnesota found that food-insecure adults reported eating less and expressed food-related concerns, such as worry about the safety of going to stores (46). A longitudinal study in Pittsburgh in two low-income, predominantly African American neighborhoods found that COVID-19 led to increased rates of food insecurity (48). Food bank and SNAP participation remained unchanged in these communities during the pandemic, suggesting that the existing safety nets were failing to reach those with emerging needs. Dubowitz et al. (48) also found that psychological distress, loss of work, and concerns about leaving home to buy food contributed to food insecurity. Lastly, a study in Vermont found higher rates of food insecurity among respondents experiencing job disruption, households with children, and among respondents with low income and education (5). Food-insecure respondents were more likely to experience challenges with food access and to express higher food-related worry (5). Although, national and local studies conducted to date on food access and insecurity during COVID-19 report similar findings, the variation in state response to the pandemic (i.e., stay at home order timing and length and food assistance program waiver requests) and projected impacts of the pandemic on food insecurity by state and locality (7) warrant examinations of food insecurity and food access challenges and worry at the state and local levels.

      The results of this study align with much of the work that has been conducted on food access and insecurity during COVID-19. Participants indicating a high level of pandemic food-related worries were more likely to be food-insecure since the pandemic. The high level of pandemic food worries among food-insecure study participants may be related to the high level of economic, health, and social disruption created by the pandemic (12, 14). Food supply fluctuations created by the COVID-19 pandemic may be contributing to worries about there being enough food in the food supply or securing sufficient food supplies for their household (4, 5, 8). Hispanic participants had an increased likelihood of food insecurity compared to non-Hispanic white participants in this sample. This aligns with the greater burden of food insecurity experienced by Hispanic-headed households in non-pandemic times with a prevalence of 15.6% in 2019 compared to 7.9% among non-Hispanic white households (23). It also aligns with a greater burden of COVID-19 impacts falling on minority individuals (17, 19, 49). Job loss or disruption since the pandemic was associated with higher odds of experiencing food insecurity. The pandemic resulted in the loss or disruption of millions of jobs; in the United States, the unemployment rate increased from 3.5% in February 2020 to a high of 14.8% in April 2020, marking the highest unemployment rate since the Current Population Survey began collecting data (50). Loss of income has been linked to food insecurity both before and since the pandemic (5, 51).

      Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program use was associated with an increased likelihood of food insecurity. The SNAP program was designed to increase access to healthy food for eligible low-income households and consequently improve food security (52, 53). There are documented challenges with measuring food insecurity among SNAP participants due to the self-selection bias—people that are food-insecure are more likely to seek food assistance (53). However, studies of food insecurity among SNAP users accounting for the self-selection effect have found a reduction in food insecurity among new SNAP participants that persists into program usage (5355). Given the documented food insecurity prevalence among SNAP users, we posit that the increased likelihood of food insecurity may be related to unmet needs during the pandemic among study participants or due to greater anxiety or concern related to uncertainty and the economic and health impacts of the pandemic. If the association between SNAP use is related to unmet needs, this may highlight the importance of greater funding levels for SNAP participants. Additional research on food insecurity among SNAP users during the pandemic with monthly data would shed additional light on the food insecurity burden among SNAP participants.

      No studies have reported on the relationship between food purchasing behaviors and food insecurity during COVID-19. The only purchasing behaviors that were significant in this analysis were reported food sources. The rationale behind including specific food types (healthy and less healthy) was to examine if participants purchasing less healthy foods were more likely to experience food insecurity, and it appears that food source (food assistance use and delivery) is more indicative of food insecurity than purchasing any specific food category. In developing new interventions for supporting families and food access, food delivery and food assistance programs may be useful avenues for increasing food distribution or outreach to target populations. Further, amid uncertainty and food chain disruptions, emphasizing healthy food availability through these channels may better support food-insecure families than other outlets.

      This study has several limitations to bear in mind when considering the results. The study design was cross-sectional; therefore, analyses are not able to determine causal relationships. To mitigate this limitation, survey questions asked respondents specifically about purchasing behavior, food sources, food worries, and food assistance in relation to COVID-19. The purposive quota sampling frame intentionally oversampled minority and low-income New Yorkers to recruit a sufficient sample size of groups with an increased risk for COVID-19 infection and complications, as well as with an increased risk for food insecurity. With COVID-19 disparities, understanding the experiences of individuals with greater risk was prioritized over representativeness. As a result of purposive quota sampling, generalizations cannot be made about New Yorkers. Data on non-Hispanic white participants were collected ~3 months after data on Black and Hispanic participants. The economic impacts of the pandemic were ongoing during this time; enhanced unemployment insurance benefits had expired and a second economic relief bill had not yet been passed. Further, with a greater disease burden in December compared to the summer months when data were collected from Black and Hispanic participants, we would expect disparities to be underestimated rather than overestimated. Regional variation in case counts, which remained over time, posed an additional limitation on the analysis. County residence as a proxy for different disease burden between time points adjusted for race and ethnicity was not significant in explaining the variance in the outcome. The survey was administered through a web-based platform; therefore, only individuals with internet access were able to participate in the study. Most Americans (89% overall, 88% of Hispanics, and 87% of Black Americans) have access to the internet; however with economic disruption, there may be increased accessibility challenges (56). Given the widespread impact of the pandemic in New York State, a web survey was selected to facilitate timely completion of data collection and provides an important snapshot of the lived experiences of many New Yorkers during the pandemic.

      Future research are needed to assess the ongoing impacts of the pandemic on food access and food insecurity, particularly among underserved groups. Concerns about food during this time may be important factors related to reduced food security and policy efforts to address these concerns may be necessary. Measures that provide additional money for food, support price reductions for food delivery, and support the provision of healthy foods through food assistance programs may alleviate barriers to accessing enough healthy food. Making current expansions in food assistance program benefits permanent may improve food access as the United States recovers from COVID-19 and in the long term, as we know that food assistance take-up rates decline as benefits decline (57). Focusing on food assistance, however, may not be enough. The causes of food insecurity extend beyond low-income to include physical and mental health, family structure, and access to child care, to name a few, so policy efforts that expand access to health care and child care may provide additional support for families to meet their basic needs, including food. In particular, policies that streamline the process to apply for SNAP benefits across states, improve access to mental health services, incentivize or require the adoption of Medicaid expansion, and increase funding for child care may help families access food in the future and during times of crisis.

      Data Availability Statement

      The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

      Ethics Statement

      The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by D'Youville College IRB. The patients/participants provided their Written Informed Consent To Participate In This Study.

      Author Contributions

      LC was involved in conceptualization, methodology, and funding acquisition. LC and SR were involved in analysis, writing the original draft preparation, and writing the review and editing. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

      Conflict of Interest

      The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

      Publisher's Note

      All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

      This research is conducted as part of the NFACT. NFACT is a national collaboration of researchers committed to rigorous, comparative, and timely food access research during the time of COVID-19. To learn more visit: www.nfactresearch.org.

      References WHO. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. (2020). Available online at: https://covid19.who.int/ (accessed December 22, 2020). Laborde D Martin W Vos R. Poverty and food insecurity could grow dramatically as COVID-19 spreads. In: COVID-19 & Global Food Security. Washington, DC: International Food Research Institute. (2020). Available online at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343267777_Poverty_and_food_insecurity_could_grow_dramatically_as_COVID-19_spreads. Laborde D Martin W Swinnen J Vos R. COVID-19 risks to global food security. Science. (2020) 369:5002. 10.1126/science.abc476532732407 Wolfson JA Leung CW. Food insecurity and COVID-19: disparities in early effects for US adults. Nutrients. (2020) 12:1648. 10.3390/nu1206164832498323 Niles M Bertmann F Belarmino E Wentworth T Biehl E Neff R. The early food insecurity impacts of COVID-19. Nutrients. (2020) 12:2096. 10.3390/nu1207209632679788 Wolfson JA Leung CW. Food insecurity during COVID-19: an acute crisis with long-term health implications. Am J Public Health. (2020) 110:17635. 10.2105/AJPH.2020.30595332970451 Gundersen C Hake M Dewey A Engelhard E. Food insecurity during COVID-19. Appl Econ Perspect policy. (2020) 43:15361. 10.1002/aepp.1310033042509 Chenarides L Manfredo M Richards TJ. COVID-19 and food supply chains. Appl Econ Perspect Policy. (2020) 43:2709. 10.1002/aepp.13085 Ramos AK Lowe AE Herstein JJ Schwedhelm S Dineen KK Lowe JJ. Invisible no more: The impact of COVID-19 on essential food production workers. J Agromedicine. (2020) 25:37882. 10.1080/1059924X.2020.181492532945241 Waltenburg MA Victoroff T Rose CE Butterfield M Jervis RH Fedak KM . Update: COVID-19 among workers in meat and poultry processing facilities—United States, April–May (2020). Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. (2020) 69:88792. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6918e332644986 Gunther A. COVID-19: fight or flight. Agric Hum Values. (2020) 37:5912. 10.1007/s10460-020-10101-032412535 Pressman P Naidu AS Clemens R. COVID-19 and food safety: risk management and future considerations. Nutr Today. (2020) 55:1258. 10.1097/NT.0000000000000415 Olaimat AN Shahbaz HM Fatima N Munir S Holley RA. Food safety during and after the era of Covid-19 pandemic. Front Microbiol. (2020) 11:1854. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.0185432849446 Shahidi F. Does COVID-19 affect food safety and security? J Food Bioact. (2020) 9:13. 10.31665/JFB.2020.9212 Leone LA Fleischhacker S Anderson-Steeves B Harper K Winkler M Racine E . Healthy food retail during the COVID-19 pandemic: challenges and future directions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:7397. 10.3390/ijerph1720739733050600 O'Hara S Toussaint EC. Food access in crisis: food security and COVID-19. Ecol Econ. (2020) 180:106859. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106859 Montenovo L Jiang X Rojas F Schmutte I Simon K Weinberg B . Determinants of disparities in covid-19 job losses. Nat Bureau Econ Res. (2020) 27132. 10.3386/wcc Parks CA Nugent NB Fleischhacker SE Yaroch AL. Food system workers are the unexpected but under protected COVID heroes. J Nutr. (2020) 150:20068. 10.1093/jn/nxaa17332584977 Rogers TN Rogers CR VanSant-Webb E Gu LY Yan B Qeadan F. Racial disparities in COVID-19 mortality among essential workers in the United States. World Med Heal policy. (2020) 12:31127. 10.1002/wmh3.35832837779 Selden TM Berdahl TA. COVID-19 and racial/ethnic disparities in health risk, employment, and household composition: study examines potential explanations for racial-ethnic disparities in COVID-19 hospitalizations and mortality. Health Aff. (2020) 39:162432. 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.0089732663045 van Dorn A Cooney RE Sabin ML. COVID-19 exacerbating inequalities in the US. Lancet. (2020) 395:1243. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30893-X32305087 Belanger MJ Hill MA Angelidi AM Dalamaga M Sowers JR Mantzoros CS. Covid-19 and disparities in nutrition and obesity. N Engl J Med. (2020) 383:e69. 10.1056/NEJMp202126432668105 Coleman-Jensen A Rabbitt M Singh A. Household food security in the United States in 2019. Econ Res Rep. (2020) 47. AJMC Staff. A Timeline of COVID-19 Developments in 2020. AJMC (2020). Available online at: https://www.ajmc.com/view/a-timeline-of-covid19-developments-in-2020 (accessed December 22, 2020). McKinley J. New York City Region is Now an Epicenter of the Coronavirus Pandemic. The New York Times (2020). p. A1. Available online at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/22/nyregion/Coronavirus-new-York-epicenter.html (accessed december 22, 2020). Cuomo A. The “New York State on Pause” Executive Order. Albany (2020). Available online at: https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/2020-03-20-Notice-New-York-on-Pause-Order.pdf (accessed October 14, 2020). NY State Department of Health. Workbook: NYS-COVID19-Tracker. New York State Department of Health COVID-19 Tracker (2020). Available online at: https://covid19tracker.health.ny.gov/views/NYS-COVID19-Tracker/NYSDOHCOVID-19Tracker-Fatalities?%3Aembed=yes&%3Atoolbar=no&%3Atabs=n (accessed October 14, 2020). National Food Access COVID Research Team. (2020). Available online at: https://www.nfactresearch.org/ (accessed November 20, 2020). Niles MT Belarmino EH Bertmann F Biehl E Acciai F Josephson AL . Food insecurity during COVID-19: a multi-state research collaborative. medRxiv [preprint]. (2020). 10.1101/2020.12.01.20242024 Niles M Neff R Biehl E Bertmann F Morgan E Wentworth T. Food Access and Security During Coronavirus Survey- Version 1.0. Cambridge: Harvard Dataverse. (2020) Gonzalez D Karpman M Kenney G. Families Struggling to Provide for Families During COVID-19. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (2020). Available online at: https://www.rwjf.org/en/library/research/2020/05/parents-are-struggling-to-provide-for-their-families-during-the-pandemic.html (accessed July 14, 2020). Schanzenbach D. Food insecurity during COVID-19: evidence from the census pulse and COVID impact survey. In: HER NOPREN Ad hoc Joint Working Group COVID-19 School Nutrition Implications. San Francisco, CA: NOPREN (2020). Cuomo A. Past Coronavirus Briefings. New York State Department of Health (2020). Available online at: https://coronavirus.health.ny.gov/past-coronavirus-briefings (accessed December 22, 2020). Allen J Almukhtar S Aufrichtig A Barnard A Bloch M Cahalan S . Coronavirus in the U.S.: Latest Map and Case Count. The New York Times (2020). Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/coronavirus-us-cases.html (accessed August 30, 2020). Miller C Guidry J Dahman B Thomson M. A tale of two diverse qualtrics samples: information for online survey researchers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. (2020) 29:7315. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-084632066616 Qualtrics. Response Quality - Qualtrics Support. Available online at: https://www.qualtrics.com/support/survey-platform/survey-module/survey-checker/response-quality/ (accessed November 5, 2020). United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module: Six-Item Short Form Guide. (2012). Available online at: https://www.ers.usda.gov/media/8282/short2012.pdf (accessed November 18, 2020). Blumberg S Bialostosky K Hamilton W Briefel R. The effectiveness of a short form of the household food security scale. Am J Public Health. (1999) 89:12314. 10.2105/AJPH.89.8.123110432912 Hosmer D Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons (2004). 10.1002/0470011815.b2a10030 Burnham KP Anderson DR. Multimodel inference understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res. (2004) 33:261304. 10.1177/0049124104268644 StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC (2019). Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. Autom Control IEEE Trans. (1974) 19:71623. 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 Adams EL Caccavale LJ Smith D Bean MK. Food insecurity, the home food environment, and parent feeding practices in the era of COVID-19. Obesity. (2020) 28:205663. 10.1002/oby.2299632762129 Fitzpatrick KM Harris C Drawve G Willis DE. Assessing food insecurity among US adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Hunger Environ Nutr. (2021) 16:118. 10.1080/19320248.2020.1830221 Morales DX Morales SA Beltran TF. Racial/ethnic disparities in household food insecurity during the covid-19 pandemic: a nationally representative study. J Racial Ethn Heal Disparities. (2020) 10.1007/s40615-020-00892-7. [Epub ahead of print].33057998 Larson N Slaughter-Acey J Alexander T Berge J Harnack L Neumark-Sztainer D. Emerging adults' intersecting experiences of food insecurity, unsafe neighbourhoods and discrimination during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. Public Health Nutr. (2021). 24:51930. 10.1017/S136898002000422X33092665 Lauren BN Silver ER Faye AS Rogers AM Baidal JAW Ozanne EM . Predictors of households at risk for food insecurity in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health Nutr. (2021). 10.1017/S1368980021000355. [Epub ahead of print].33500018 Dubowitz T Dastidar MG Troxel WM Beckman R Nugroho A Siddiqi S . Food insecurity in a low-income, predominantly African American cohort following the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Public Health. (2021) 111:4947. 10.2105/AJPH.2020.30604133476228 Abedi V Olulana O Avula V Chaudhary D Khan A Shahjouei S . Racial, economic, and health inequality and COVID-19 infection in the United States. J Racial Ethn Heal Disparit. 8:73242. (2021). 10.1101/2020.04.26.2007975632875535 Congressional Research Service. Unemployment Rates During the COVID-19 Pandemic: In Brief. (2021). Available online at: https://crsreports.congress.gov (accessed May 5, 2021). Heflin C. Family instability and material hardship: results from the 2008. Survey of Income and Program Participation. J Fam Econ Issues. (2016) 37:35972. 10.1007/s10834-016-9503-6 Nestle M. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): history, politics, and public health implications. Am J Public Health. (2019) 109:16315. 10.2105/AJPH.2019.30536131693415 Nord M Golla AM. Does SNAP Decrease Food Insecurity? Untangling the Self-Selection Effect. (2009). Available online at: http://ers.usda.gov/Briefing/FoodNutritionAssistance/ (accessed December 22, 2020). Ratcliffe C McKernan S-M Zhang S. How much does the supplemental nutrition assistance program reduce food insecurity? Am J Agric Econ. (2011) 93:108298. 10.1093/ajae/aar02625197100 Nord M. How much does the supplemental nutrition assistance program alleviate food insecurity? Evidence from recent programme leavers. Public Health Nutr. (2012) 15:8117. 10.1017/S136898001100270922015063 Pew Research Center. Demographics of Internet and Home Broadband Usage in the United States. Internet and Technology. (2019). Available online at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/ (accessed December 6, 2020). Gundersen C Ziliak JP. Childhood food insecurity in the US: trends, causes, and policy options. Futur Child. (2014) 24:119. 10.1353/foc.2014.0007

      Funding. This research was funded by the Natural Hazards Center, Quick Response Grant. The Quick Response program is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation (Award #1635593). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF or the Natural Hazards Center.

      ‘Oh, my dear Thomas, you haven’t heard the terrible news then?’ she said. ‘I thought you would be sure to have seen it placarded somewhere. Alice went straight to her room, and I haven’t seen her since, though I repeatedly knocked at the door, which she has locked on the inside, and I’m sure it’s most unnatural of her not to let her own mother comfort her. It all happened in a moment: I have always said those great motor-cars shouldn’t be allowed to career about the streets, especially when they are all paved with cobbles as they are at Easton Haven, which are{331} so slippery when it’s wet. He slipped, and it went over him in a moment.’ My thanks were few and awkward, for there still hung to the missive a basting thread, and it was as warm as a nestling bird. I bent low--everybody was emotional in those days--kissed the fragrant thing, thrust it into my bosom, and blushed worse than Camille. "What, the Corner House victim? Is that really a fact?" "My dear child, I don't look upon it in that light at all. The child gave our picturesque friend a certain distinction--'My husband is dead, and this is my only child,' and all that sort of thing. It pays in society." leave them on the steps of a foundling asylum in order to insure [See larger version] Interoffice guff says you're planning definite moves on your own, J. O., and against some opposition. Is the Colonel so poor or so grasping—or what? Albert could not speak, for he felt as if his brains and teeth were rattling about inside his head. The rest of[Pg 188] the family hunched together by the door, the boys gaping idiotically, the girls in tears. "Now you're married." The host was called in, and unlocked a drawer in which they were deposited. The galleyman, with visible reluctance, arrayed himself in the garments, and he was observed to shudder more than once during the investiture of the dead man's apparel. HoME香京julia种子在线播放 ENTER NUMBET 0016hqbcq.com.cn
      www.ityegx.com.cn
      fifa2021.com.cn
      fzmjlrz.com.cn
      gfltech.org.cn
      lezhexue.com.cn
      oboob.com.cn
      www.saehancsm.com.cn
      szvara.com.cn
      www.railbj.com.cn
      处女被大鸡巴操 强奸乱伦小说图片 俄罗斯美女爱爱图 调教强奸学生 亚洲女的穴 夜来香图片大全 美女性强奸电影 手机版色中阁 男性人体艺术素描图 16p成人 欧美性爱360 电影区 亚洲电影 欧美电影 经典三级 偷拍自拍 动漫电影 乱伦电影 变态另类 全部电 类似狠狠鲁的网站 黑吊操白逼图片 韩国黄片种子下载 操逼逼逼逼逼 人妻 小说 p 偷拍10幼女自慰 极品淫水很多 黄色做i爱 日本女人人体电影快播看 大福国小 我爱肏屄美女 mmcrwcom 欧美多人性交图片 肥臀乱伦老头舔阴帝 d09a4343000019c5 西欧人体艺术b xxoo激情短片 未成年人的 插泰国人夭图片 第770弾み1 24p 日本美女性 交动态 eee色播 yantasythunder 操无毛少女屄 亚洲图片你懂的女人 鸡巴插姨娘 特级黄 色大片播 左耳影音先锋 冢本友希全集 日本人体艺术绿色 我爱被舔逼 内射 幼 美阴图 喷水妹子高潮迭起 和后妈 操逼 美女吞鸡巴 鸭个自慰 中国女裸名单 操逼肥臀出水换妻 色站裸体义术 中国行上的漏毛美女叫什么 亚洲妹性交图 欧美美女人裸体人艺照 成人色妹妹直播 WWW_JXCT_COM r日本女人性淫乱 大胆人艺体艺图片 女同接吻av 碰碰哥免费自拍打炮 艳舞写真duppid1 88电影街拍视频 日本自拍做爱qvod 实拍美女性爱组图 少女高清av 浙江真实乱伦迅雷 台湾luanlunxiaoshuo 洛克王国宠物排行榜 皇瑟电影yy频道大全 红孩儿连连看 阴毛摄影 大胆美女写真人体艺术摄影 和风骚三个媳妇在家做爱 性爱办公室高清 18p2p木耳 大波撸影音 大鸡巴插嫩穴小说 一剧不超两个黑人 阿姨诱惑我快播 幼香阁千叶县小学生 少女妇女被狗强奸 曰人体妹妹 十二岁性感幼女 超级乱伦qvod 97爱蜜桃ccc336 日本淫妇阴液 av海量资源999 凤凰影视成仁 辰溪四中艳照门照片 先锋模特裸体展示影片 成人片免费看 自拍百度云 肥白老妇女 女爱人体图片 妈妈一女穴 星野美夏 日本少女dachidu 妹子私处人体图片 yinmindahuitang 舔无毛逼影片快播 田莹疑的裸体照片 三级电影影音先锋02222 妻子被外国老头操 观月雏乃泥鳅 韩国成人偷拍自拍图片 强奸5一9岁幼女小说 汤姆影院av图片 妹妹人艺体图 美女大驱 和女友做爱图片自拍p 绫川まどか在线先锋 那么嫩的逼很少见了 小女孩做爱 处女好逼连连看图图 性感美女在家做爱 近距离抽插骚逼逼 黑屌肏金毛屄 日韩av美少女 看喝尿尿小姐日逼色色色网图片 欧美肛交新视频 美女吃逼逼 av30线上免费 伊人在线三级经典 新视觉影院t6090影院 最新淫色电影网址 天龙影院远古手机版 搞老太影院 插进美女的大屁股里 私人影院加盟费用 www258dd 求一部电影里面有一个二猛哥 深肛交 日本萌妹子人体艺术写真图片 插入屄眼 美女的木奶 中文字幕黄色网址影视先锋 九号女神裸 和骚人妻偷情 和潘晓婷做爱 国模大尺度蜜桃 欧美大逼50p 西西人体成人 李宗瑞继母做爱原图物处理 nianhuawang 男鸡巴的视屏 � 97免费色伦电影 好色网成人 大姨子先锋 淫荡巨乳美女教师妈妈 性nuexiaoshuo WWW36YYYCOM 长春继续给力进屋就操小女儿套干破内射对白淫荡 农夫激情社区 日韩无码bt 欧美美女手掰嫩穴图片 日本援交偷拍自拍 入侵者日本在线播放 亚洲白虎偷拍自拍 常州高见泽日屄 寂寞少妇自卫视频 人体露逼图片 多毛外国老太 变态乱轮手机在线 淫荡妈妈和儿子操逼 伦理片大奶少女 看片神器最新登入地址sqvheqi345com账号群 麻美学姐无头 圣诞老人射小妞和强奸小妞动话片 亚洲AV女老师 先锋影音欧美成人资源 33344iucoom zV天堂电影网 宾馆美女打炮视频 色五月丁香五月magnet 嫂子淫乱小说 张歆艺的老公 吃奶男人视频在线播放 欧美色图男女乱伦 avtt2014ccvom 性插色欲香影院 青青草撸死你青青草 99热久久第一时间 激情套图卡通动漫 幼女裸聊做爱口交 日本女人被强奸乱伦 草榴社区快播 2kkk正在播放兽骑 啊不要人家小穴都湿了 www猎奇影视 A片www245vvcomwwwchnrwhmhzcn 搜索宜春院av wwwsee78co 逼奶鸡巴插 好吊日AV在线视频19gancom 熟女伦乱图片小说 日本免费av无码片在线开苞 鲁大妈撸到爆 裸聊官网 德国熟女xxx 新不夜城论坛首页手机 女虐男网址 男女做爱视频华为网盘 激情午夜天亚洲色图 内裤哥mangent 吉沢明歩制服丝袜WWWHHH710COM 屌逼在线试看 人体艺体阿娇艳照 推荐一个可以免费看片的网站如果被QQ拦截请复制链接在其它浏览器打开xxxyyy5comintr2a2cb551573a2b2e 欧美360精品粉红鲍鱼 教师调教第一页 聚美屋精品图 中韩淫乱群交 俄罗斯撸撸片 把鸡巴插进小姨子的阴道 干干AV成人网 aolasoohpnbcn www84ytom 高清大量潮喷www27dyycom 宝贝开心成人 freefronvideos人母 嫩穴成人网gggg29com 逼着舅妈给我口交肛交彩漫画 欧美色色aV88wwwgangguanscom 老太太操逼自拍视频 777亚洲手机在线播放 有没有夫妻3p小说 色列漫画淫女 午间色站导航 欧美成人处女色大图 童颜巨乳亚洲综合 桃色性欲草 色眯眯射逼 无码中文字幕塞外青楼这是一个 狂日美女老师人妻 爱碰网官网 亚洲图片雅蠛蝶 快播35怎么搜片 2000XXXX电影 新谷露性家庭影院 深深候dvd播放 幼齿用英语怎么说 不雅伦理无需播放器 国外淫荡图片 国外网站幼幼嫩网址 成年人就去色色视频快播 我鲁日日鲁老老老我爱 caoshaonvbi 人体艺术avav 性感性色导航 韩国黄色哥来嫖网站 成人网站美逼 淫荡熟妇自拍 欧美色惰图片 北京空姐透明照 狼堡免费av视频 www776eom 亚洲无码av欧美天堂网男人天堂 欧美激情爆操 a片kk266co 色尼姑成人极速在线视频 国语家庭系列 蒋雯雯 越南伦理 色CC伦理影院手机版 99jbbcom 大鸡巴舅妈 国产偷拍自拍淫荡对话视频 少妇春梦射精 开心激动网 自拍偷牌成人 色桃隐 撸狗网性交视频 淫荡的三位老师 伦理电影wwwqiuxia6commqiuxia6com 怡春院分站 丝袜超短裙露脸迅雷下载 色制服电影院 97超碰好吊色男人 yy6080理论在线宅男日韩福利大全 大嫂丝袜 500人群交手机在线 5sav 偷拍熟女吧 口述我和妹妹的欲望 50p电脑版 wwwavtttcon 3p3com 伦理无码片在线看 欧美成人电影图片岛国性爱伦理电影 先锋影音AV成人欧美 我爱好色 淫电影网 WWW19MMCOM 玛丽罗斯3d同人动画h在线看 动漫女孩裸体 超级丝袜美腿乱伦 1919gogo欣赏 大色逼淫色 www就是撸 激情文学网好骚 A级黄片免费 xedd5com 国内的b是黑的 快播美国成年人片黄 av高跟丝袜视频 上原保奈美巨乳女教师在线观看 校园春色都市激情fefegancom 偷窥自拍XXOO 搜索看马操美女 人本女优视频 日日吧淫淫 人妻巨乳影院 美国女子性爱学校 大肥屁股重口味 啪啪啪啊啊啊不要 操碰 japanfreevideoshome国产 亚州淫荡老熟女人体 伦奸毛片免费在线看 天天影视se 樱桃做爱视频 亚卅av在线视频 x奸小说下载 亚洲色图图片在线 217av天堂网 东方在线撸撸-百度 幼幼丝袜集 灰姑娘的姐姐 青青草在线视频观看对华 86papa路con 亚洲1AV 综合图片2区亚洲 美国美女大逼电影 010插插av成人网站 www色comwww821kxwcom 播乐子成人网免费视频在线观看 大炮撸在线影院 ,www4KkKcom 野花鲁最近30部 wwwCC213wapwww2233ww2download 三客优最新地址 母亲让儿子爽的无码视频 全国黄色片子 欧美色图美国十次 超碰在线直播 性感妖娆操 亚洲肉感熟女色图 a片A毛片管看视频 8vaa褋芯屑 333kk 川岛和津实视频 在线母子乱伦对白 妹妹肥逼五月 亚洲美女自拍 老婆在我面前小说 韩国空姐堪比情趣内衣 干小姐综合 淫妻色五月 添骚穴 WM62COM 23456影视播放器 成人午夜剧场 尼姑福利网 AV区亚洲AV欧美AV512qucomwwwc5508com 经典欧美骚妇 震动棒露出 日韩丝袜美臀巨乳在线 av无限吧看 就去干少妇 色艺无间正面是哪集 校园春色我和老师做爱 漫画夜色 天海丽白色吊带 黄色淫荡性虐小说 午夜高清播放器 文20岁女性荫道口图片 热国产热无码热有码 2015小明发布看看算你色 百度云播影视 美女肏屄屄乱轮小说 家族舔阴AV影片 邪恶在线av有码 父女之交 关于处女破处的三级片 极品护士91在线 欧美虐待女人视频的网站 享受老太太的丝袜 aaazhibuo 8dfvodcom成人 真实自拍足交 群交男女猛插逼 妓女爱爱动态 lin35com是什么网站 abp159 亚洲色图偷拍自拍乱伦熟女抠逼自慰 朝国三级篇 淫三国幻想 免费的av小电影网站 日本阿v视频免费按摩师 av750c0m 黄色片操一下 巨乳少女车震在线观看 操逼 免费 囗述情感一乱伦岳母和女婿 WWW_FAMITSU_COM 偷拍中国少妇在公车被操视频 花也真衣论理电影 大鸡鸡插p洞 新片欧美十八岁美少 进击的巨人神thunderftp 西方美女15p 深圳哪里易找到老女人玩视频 在线成人有声小说 365rrr 女尿图片 我和淫荡的小姨做爱 � 做爱技术体照 淫妇性爱 大学生私拍b 第四射狠狠射小说 色中色成人av社区 和小姨子乱伦肛交 wwwppp62com 俄罗斯巨乳人体艺术 骚逼阿娇 汤芳人体图片大胆 大胆人体艺术bb私处 性感大胸骚货 哪个网站幼女的片多 日本美女本子把 色 五月天 婷婷 快播 美女 美穴艺术 色百合电影导航 大鸡巴用力 孙悟空操美少女战士 狠狠撸美女手掰穴图片 古代女子与兽类交 沙耶香套图 激情成人网区 暴风影音av播放 动漫女孩怎么插第3个 mmmpp44 黑木麻衣无码ed2k 淫荡学姐少妇 乱伦操少女屄 高中性爱故事 骚妹妹爱爱图网 韩国模特剪长发 大鸡巴把我逼日了 中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片 大胆女人下体艺术图片 789sss 影音先锋在线国内情侣野外性事自拍普通话对白 群撸图库 闪现君打阿乐 ady 小说 插入表妹嫩穴小说 推荐成人资源 网络播放器 成人台 149大胆人体艺术 大屌图片 骚美女成人av 春暖花开春色性吧 女亭婷五月 我上了同桌的姐姐 恋夜秀场主播自慰视频 yzppp 屄茎 操屄女图 美女鲍鱼大特写 淫乱的日本人妻山口玲子 偷拍射精图 性感美女人体艺木图片 种马小说完本 免费电影院 骑士福利导航导航网站 骚老婆足交 国产性爱一级电影 欧美免费成人花花性都 欧美大肥妞性爱视频 家庭乱伦网站快播 偷拍自拍国产毛片 金发美女也用大吊来开包 缔D杏那 yentiyishu人体艺术ytys WWWUUKKMCOM 女人露奶 � 苍井空露逼 老荡妇高跟丝袜足交 偷偷和女友的朋友做爱迅雷 做爱七十二尺 朱丹人体合成 麻腾由纪妃 帅哥撸播种子图 鸡巴插逼动态图片 羙国十次啦中文 WWW137AVCOM 神斗片欧美版华语 有气质女人人休艺术 由美老师放屁电影 欧美女人肉肏图片 白虎种子快播 国产自拍90后女孩 美女在床上疯狂嫩b 饭岛爱最后之作 幼幼强奸摸奶 色97成人动漫 两性性爱打鸡巴插逼 新视觉影院4080青苹果影院 嗯好爽插死我了 阴口艺术照 李宗瑞电影qvod38 爆操舅母 亚洲色图七七影院 被大鸡巴操菊花 怡红院肿么了 成人极品影院删除 欧美性爱大图色图强奸乱 欧美女子与狗随便性交 苍井空的bt种子无码 熟女乱伦长篇小说 大色虫 兽交幼女影音先锋播放 44aad be0ca93900121f9b 先锋天耗ばさ无码 欧毛毛女三级黄色片图 干女人黑木耳照 日本美女少妇嫩逼人体艺术 sesechangchang 色屄屄网 久久撸app下载 色图色噜 美女鸡巴大奶 好吊日在线视频在线观看 透明丝袜脚偷拍自拍 中山怡红院菜单 wcwwwcom下载 骑嫂子 亚洲大色妣 成人故事365ahnet 丝袜家庭教mp4 幼交肛交 妹妹撸撸大妈 日本毛爽 caoprom超碰在email 关于中国古代偷窥的黄片 第一会所老熟女下载 wwwhuangsecome 狼人干综合新地址HD播放 变态儿子强奸乱伦图 强奸电影名字 2wwwer37com 日本毛片基地一亚洲AVmzddcxcn 暗黑圣经仙桃影院 37tpcocn 持月真由xfplay 好吊日在线视频三级网 我爱背入李丽珍 电影师傅床戏在线观看 96插妹妹sexsex88com 豪放家庭在线播放 桃花宝典极夜著豆瓜网 安卓系统播放神器 美美网丝袜诱惑 人人干全免费视频xulawyercn av无插件一本道 全国色五月 操逼电影小说网 good在线wwwyuyuelvcom www18avmmd 撸波波影视无插件 伊人幼女成人电影 会看射的图片 小明插看看 全裸美女扒开粉嫩b 国人自拍性交网站 萝莉白丝足交本子 七草ちとせ巨乳视频 摇摇晃晃的成人电影 兰桂坊成社人区小说www68kqcom 舔阴论坛 久撸客一撸客色国内外成人激情在线 明星门 欧美大胆嫩肉穴爽大片 www牛逼插 性吧星云 少妇性奴的屁眼 人体艺术大胆mscbaidu1imgcn 最新久久色色成人版 l女同在线 小泽玛利亚高潮图片搜索 女性裸b图 肛交bt种子 最热门有声小说 人间添春色 春色猜谜字 樱井莉亚钢管舞视频 小泽玛利亚直美6p 能用的h网 还能看的h网 bl动漫h网 开心五月激 东京热401 男色女色第四色酒色网 怎么下载黄色小说 黄色小说小栽 和谐图城 乐乐影院 色哥导航 特色导航 依依社区 爱窝窝在线 色狼谷成人 91porn 包要你射电影 色色3A丝袜 丝袜妹妹淫网 爱色导航(荐) 好男人激情影院 坏哥哥 第七色 色久久 人格分裂 急先锋 撸撸射中文网 第一会所综合社区 91影院老师机 东方成人激情 怼莪影院吹潮 老鸭窝伊人无码不卡无码一本道 av女柳晶电影 91天生爱风流作品 深爱激情小说私房婷婷网 擼奶av 567pao 里番3d一家人野外 上原在线电影 水岛津实透明丝袜 1314酒色 网旧网俺也去 0855影院 在线无码私人影院 搜索 国产自拍 神马dy888午夜伦理达达兔 农民工黄晓婷 日韩裸体黑丝御姐 屈臣氏的燕窝面膜怎么样つぼみ晶エリーの早漏チ○ポ强化合宿 老熟女人性视频 影音先锋 三上悠亚ol 妹妹影院福利片 hhhhhhhhsxo 午夜天堂热的国产 强奸剧场 全裸香蕉视频无码 亚欧伦理视频 秋霞为什么给封了 日本在线视频空天使 日韩成人aⅴ在线 日本日屌日屄导航视频 在线福利视频 日本推油无码av magnet 在线免费视频 樱井梨吮东 日本一本道在线无码DVD 日本性感诱惑美女做爱阴道流水视频 日本一级av 汤姆avtom在线视频 台湾佬中文娱乐线20 阿v播播下载 橙色影院 奴隶少女护士cg视频 汤姆在线影院无码 偷拍宾馆 业面紧急生级访问 色和尚有线 厕所偷拍一族 av女l 公交色狼优酷视频 裸体视频AV 人与兽肉肉网 董美香ol 花井美纱链接 magnet 西瓜影音 亚洲 自拍 日韩女优欧美激情偷拍自拍 亚洲成年人免费视频 荷兰免费成人电影 深喉呕吐XXⅩX 操石榴在线视频 天天色成人免费视频 314hu四虎 涩久免费视频在线观看 成人电影迅雷下载 能看见整个奶子的香蕉影院 水菜丽百度影音 gwaz079百度云 噜死你们资源站 主播走光视频合集迅雷下载 thumbzilla jappen 精品Av 古川伊织star598在线 假面女皇vip在线视频播放 国产自拍迷情校园 啪啪啪公寓漫画 日本阿AV 黄色手机电影 欧美在线Av影院 华裔电击女神91在线 亚洲欧美专区 1日本1000部免费视频 开放90后 波多野结衣 东方 影院av 页面升级紧急访问每天正常更新 4438Xchengeren 老炮色 a k福利电影 色欲影视色天天视频 高老庄aV 259LUXU-683 magnet 手机在线电影 国产区 欧美激情人人操网 国产 偷拍 直播 日韩 国内外激情在线视频网给 站长统计一本道人妻 光棍影院被封 紫竹铃取汁 ftp 狂插空姐嫩 xfplay 丈夫面前 穿靴子伪街 XXOO视频在线免费 大香蕉道久在线播放 电棒漏电嗨过头 充气娃能看下毛和洞吗 夫妻牲交 福利云点墦 yukun瑟妃 疯狂交换女友 国产自拍26页 腐女资源 百度云 日本DVD高清无码视频 偷拍,自拍AV伦理电影 A片小视频福利站。 大奶肥婆自拍偷拍图片 交配伊甸园 超碰在线视频自拍偷拍国产 小热巴91大神 rctd 045 类似于A片 超美大奶大学生美女直播被男友操 男友问 你的衣服怎么脱掉的 亚洲女与黑人群交视频一 在线黄涩 木内美保步兵番号 鸡巴插入欧美美女的b舒服 激情在线国产自拍日韩欧美 国语福利小视频在线观看 作爱小视颍 潮喷合集丝袜无码mp4 做爱的无码高清视频 牛牛精品 伊aⅤ在线观看 savk12 哥哥搞在线播放 在线电一本道影 一级谍片 250pp亚洲情艺中心,88 欧美一本道九色在线一 wwwseavbacom色av吧 cos美女在线 欧美17,18ⅹⅹⅹ视频 自拍嫩逼 小电影在线观看网站 筱田优 贼 水电工 5358x视频 日本69式视频有码 b雪福利导航 韩国女主播19tvclub在线 操逼清晰视频 丝袜美女国产视频网址导航 水菜丽颜射房间 台湾妹中文娱乐网 风吟岛视频 口交 伦理 日本熟妇色五十路免费视频 A级片互舔 川村真矢Av在线观看 亚洲日韩av 色和尚国产自拍 sea8 mp4 aV天堂2018手机在线 免费版国产偷拍a在线播放 狠狠 婷婷 丁香 小视频福利在线观看平台 思妍白衣小仙女被邻居强上 萝莉自拍有水 4484新视觉 永久发布页 977成人影视在线观看 小清新影院在线观 小鸟酱后丝后入百度云 旋风魅影四级 香蕉影院小黄片免费看 性爱直播磁力链接 小骚逼第一色影院 性交流的视频 小雪小视频bd 小视频TV禁看视频 迷奸AV在线看 nba直播 任你在干线 汤姆影院在线视频国产 624u在线播放 成人 一级a做爰片就在线看狐狸视频 小香蕉AV视频 www182、com 腿模简小育 学生做爱视频 秘密搜查官 快播 成人福利网午夜 一级黄色夫妻录像片 直接看的gav久久播放器 国产自拍400首页 sm老爹影院 谁知道隔壁老王网址在线 综合网 123西瓜影音 米奇丁香 人人澡人人漠大学生 色久悠 夜色视频你今天寂寞了吗? 菲菲影视城美国 被抄的影院 变态另类 欧美 成人 国产偷拍自拍在线小说 不用下载安装就能看的吃男人鸡巴视频 插屄视频 大贯杏里播放 wwwhhh50 233若菜奈央 伦理片天海翼秘密搜查官 大香蕉在线万色屋视频 那种漫画小说你懂的 祥仔电影合集一区 那里可以看澳门皇冠酒店a片 色自啪 亚洲aV电影天堂 谷露影院ar toupaizaixian sexbj。com 毕业生 zaixian mianfei 朝桐光视频 成人短视频在线直接观看 陈美霖 沈阳音乐学院 导航女 www26yjjcom 1大尺度视频 开平虐女视频 菅野雪松协和影视在线视频 华人play在线视频bbb 鸡吧操屄视频 多啪啪免费视频 悠草影院 金兰策划网 (969) 橘佑金短视频 国内一极刺激自拍片 日本制服番号大全magnet 成人动漫母系 电脑怎么清理内存 黄色福利1000 dy88午夜 偷拍中学生洗澡磁力链接 花椒相机福利美女视频 站长推荐磁力下载 mp4 三洞轮流插视频 玉兔miki热舞视频 夜生活小视频 爆乳人妖小视频 国内网红主播自拍福利迅雷下载 不用app的裸裸体美女操逼视频 变态SM影片在线观看 草溜影院元气吧 - 百度 - 百度 波推全套视频 国产双飞集合ftp 日本在线AV网 笔国毛片 神马影院女主播是我的邻居 影音资源 激情乱伦电影 799pao 亚洲第一色第一影院 av视频大香蕉 老梁故事汇希斯莱杰 水中人体磁力链接 下载 大香蕉黄片免费看 济南谭崔 避开屏蔽的岛a片 草破福利 要看大鸡巴操小骚逼的人的视频 黑丝少妇影音先锋 欧美巨乳熟女磁力链接 美国黄网站色大全 伦蕉在线久播 极品女厕沟 激情五月bd韩国电影 混血美女自摸和男友激情啪啪自拍诱人呻吟福利视频 人人摸人人妻做人人看 44kknn 娸娸原网 伊人欧美 恋夜影院视频列表安卓青青 57k影院 如果电话亭 avi 插爆骚女精品自拍 青青草在线免费视频1769TV 令人惹火的邻家美眉 影音先锋 真人妹子被捅动态图 男人女人做完爱视频15 表姐合租两人共处一室晚上她竟爬上了我的床 性爱教学视频 北条麻妃bd在线播放版 国产老师和师生 magnet wwwcctv1024 女神自慰 ftp 女同性恋做激情视频 欧美大胆露阴视频 欧美无码影视 好女色在线观看 后入肥臀18p 百度影视屏福利 厕所超碰视频 强奸mp magnet 欧美妹aⅴ免费线上看 2016年妞干网视频 5手机在线福利 超在线最视频 800av:cOm magnet 欧美性爱免播放器在线播放 91大款肥汤的性感美乳90后邻家美眉趴着窗台后入啪啪 秋霞日本毛片网站 cheng ren 在线视频 上原亚衣肛门无码解禁影音先锋 美脚家庭教师在线播放 尤酷伦理片 熟女性生活视频在线观看 欧美av在线播放喷潮 194avav 凤凰AV成人 - 百度 kbb9999 AV片AV在线AV无码 爱爱视频高清免费观看 黄色男女操b视频 观看 18AV清纯视频在线播放平台 成人性爱视频久久操 女性真人生殖系统双性人视频 下身插入b射精视频 明星潜规测视频 mp4 免賛a片直播绪 国内 自己 偷拍 在线 国内真实偷拍 手机在线 国产主播户外勾在线 三桥杏奈高清无码迅雷下载 2五福电影院凸凹频频 男主拿鱼打女主,高宝宝 色哥午夜影院 川村まや痴汉 草溜影院费全过程免费 淫小弟影院在线视频 laohantuiche 啪啪啪喷潮XXOO视频 青娱乐成人国产 蓝沢润 一本道 亚洲青涩中文欧美 神马影院线理论 米娅卡莉法的av 在线福利65535 欧美粉色在线 欧美性受群交视频1在线播放 极品喷奶熟妇在线播放 变态另类无码福利影院92 天津小姐被偷拍 磁力下载 台湾三级电髟全部 丝袜美腿偷拍自拍 偷拍女生性行为图 妻子的乱伦 白虎少妇 肏婶骚屄 外国大妈会阴照片 美少女操屄图片 妹妹自慰11p 操老熟女的b 361美女人体 360电影院樱桃 爱色妹妹亚洲色图 性交卖淫姿势高清图片一级 欧美一黑对二白 大色网无毛一线天 射小妹网站 寂寞穴 西西人体模特苍井空 操的大白逼吧 骚穴让我操 拉好友干女朋友3p