Front. Microbiol. Frontiers in Microbiology Front. Microbiol. 1664-302X Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1167353 Microbiology Original Research Shift from flooding to drying enhances the respiration of soil aggregates by changing microbial community composition and keystone taxa Zhu Kai Jia Weitao Mei Yu Wu Shengjun Huang Ping * Key Laboratory of Reservoir Aquatic Environment, Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing, China

Edited by: Yu Luo, Zhejiang University, China

Reviewed by: Dong Wang, Henan University, China; Yuji Jiang, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China

*Correspondence: Ping Huang, huangping@cigit.ac.cn
12 05 2023 2023 14 1167353 16 02 2023 19 04 2023 Copyright © 2023 Zhu, Jia, Mei, Wu and Huang. 2023 Zhu, Jia, Mei, Wu and Huang

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Changes in the water regime are among the crucial factors controlling soil carbon dynamics. However, at the aggregate scale, the microbial mechanisms that regulate soil respiration under flooding and drying conditions are obscure. In this research, we investigated how the shift from flooding to drying changes the microbial respiration of soil aggregates by affecting microbial community composition and their co-occurrence patterns. Soils collected from a riparian zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China, were subjected to a wet-and-dry incubation experiment. Our data illustrated that the shift from flooding to drying substantially enhanced soil respiration for all sizes of aggregate fractions. Moreover, soil respiration declined with aggregate size in both flooding and drying treatments. The keystone taxa in bacterial networks were found to be Acidobacteriales, Gemmatimonadales, Anaerolineales, and Cytophagales during the flooding treatment, and Rhizobiales, Gemmatimonadales, Sphingomonadales, and Solirubrobacterales during the drying treatment. For fungal networks, Hypocreales and Agaricalesin were the keystone taxa in the flooding and drying treatments, respectively. Furthermore, the shift from flooding to drying enhanced the microbial respiration of soil aggregates by changing keystone taxa. Notably, fungal community composition and network properties dominated the changes in the microbial respiration of soil aggregates during the shift from flooding to drying. Thus, our study highlighted that the shift from flooding to drying changes keystone taxa, hence increasing aggregate-scale soil respiration.

soil respiration soil aggregates water regime changes microbial community co-occurrence network keystone taxa section-at-acceptance Terrestrial Microbiology

香京julia种子在线播放

    1. <form id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></form>
      <address id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></nobr></address>

      Introduction

      Soil aggregates, the fundamental building blocks of soil structure, perform a vital function in SOC turnover and nutrient cycling by providing different habitats for microbial activity (Six et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2021). According to the hierarchical model, aggregates are classified as macroaggregates (> 0.25 mm) and microaggregates (< 0.25 mm; Tisdall and Oades, 1982). Different aggregate size classes have distinct roles in soil nutrient supply and retention by influencing soil biological processes and pore characteristics (Mangalassery et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2023), thereby leading to small-scale heterogeneity in SOC mineralization (i.e., soil respiration) (Wang et al., 2019). Macroaggregates generally comprise labile young SOC, predominantly originating from fresh SOC inputs, fungal hyphae, and plant residues (Six et al., 2004). However, the most recalcitrant SOC formed by microbial-induced bonding of clay particles and organometallic complexes is stored in microaggregates (Zhang et al., 2018). Although macroaggregates are considered to have higher soil respiration than microaggregates (Noellemeyer et al., 2008; Fernández et al., 2010; Bandyopadhyay and Lal, 2014), macroaggregates have been shown to reduce soil respiration in contrast to microaggregates in various studies (Drury et al., 2004; Sey et al., 2008) or the same among aggregate size fractions (Razafimbelo et al., 2008; Rabbi et al., 2014). These conflicting results suggest that further research is required on the regulatory mechanisms of aggregate-scale soil respiration.

      Soil respiration is profoundly affected by soil water regimes (Luo and Zhou, 2006; Zhu et al., 2020, 2022a). The changes in water regimes, such as intensive rain after a long drought or drying after intensive flooding, are dominant factor regulating biogeochemical processes in soils (Bodner et al., 2013; Evans and Wallenstein, 2014). These changes have a vital impact on soil aggregate stability, nutrient cycling, and microbial community composition and activity (Denef et al., 2001; Jansson and Hofmockel, 2020). Various microbial communities may colonize a given environment because varied sizes of aggregates provide unique niches for them to thrive in (including aerobic and anaerobic environments, for example) (Trivedi et al., 2017). Microaggregates have a high fungal abundance and a low bacterial abundance (Gupta and Germida, 1988; Jiang et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2021). Microaggregates amass more recalcitrant carbon, which is more favorable to oligotrophs, while macroaggregates contain comparatively much labile carbon, which favors copiotrophs (Trivedi et al., 2017). Increased soil water content generally promotes bacterial abundance, whereas drought decreases bacterial activity (Johan et al., 1986; Meisner et al., 2013). Owing to their thick cell walls, fungi are insufficiently sensitive to changes in soil moisture (Holland and Coleman, 1987; Umair et al., 2020; Dacal et al., 2022). Therefore, soil bacteria and fungi may respond differently to water regime changes at the aggregate scale (Navas et al., 2021), thereby affecting soil respiration. However, at the aggregate scale, our knowledge of how soil microbe communities respond to changes in water availability is still rather restricted.

      Riparian zones, or the transition zones between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, facilitate critical ecological functions, such as supplying corridors for species migration and improving biodiversity (Jones et al., 2010; de Sosa et al., 2018). Water-level fluctuations have a significant impact on riparian ecosystems’ functions (Leira and Cantonati, 2008). These fluctuations are the major drivers of water regime changes (the shift from aerobic to anaerobic environments), which substantially affects soil respiration, soil aggregates and soil microbial community structure (Fierer et al., 2003; Zhu et al., 2022a). Nevertheless, it is not clear how microbial community changes at the aggregate scale due to water regime changes and how these changes affect respiration.

      To date, research on the impacts of water regime changes on soil respiration and its mechanisms have primarily focused on wet–dry cycles (Jarvis et al., 2007), rewetting (i.e., rainfall) after long-term drought (De Nijs et al., 2019), peatland drainage, and water level decline (Silvola et al., 1996; Danevčič et al., 2010). Among these studies, the focus has been on bulk soil. However, little is known about the impact of soil microbes on aggregate-scale soil respiration under water regime changes in the riparian zone. Filling this knowledge gap will improve our understanding of the SOC dynamics in water regime changes, which thus contributing to the realization of riparian ecosystem carbon sequestration and emission reduction targets.

      The riparian zones of the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR) are an excellent location for investigating the influence of soil microbes in soil respiration in the face of extreme shifts in the water regime. The water level of the TGR in China varies from 145 m to 175 m during summer and winter, respectively, due to dam activities, which results in the formation of a new riparian zone that is 349 km2 (Zhu et al., 2020). In the TGR riparian zone, yearly disruption from fluctuating water levels, soil erosion and deposition caused by periodical draining and flooding, and the presence of microorganisms all have the potential to significantly alter soil aggregation (Xiang et al., 2018; Zhu et al., 2022a). She et al. (2022) recently reported that water regime changes result in distinct microbial community compositions and functions between the drainage and flooding periods, thereby controlling CH4 and CO2 emissions in the TGR. Zhu et al. (2022a) reported that in the riparian zone of the TGR, intense wet–dry oscillations reduce the soil’s aggregate stability while simultaneously increasing soil respiration. However, in this zone, the microbial mechanisms of aggregate-scale soil respiration under water regime changes remain unclear.

      This research sought to examine how aggregate-scale soil respiration is regulated by microbial community structure in response to changes in the water regime (i.e., from flooding to drying), with a specific focus on microbiota population, microbial co-occurrence tendencies, and their keystone taxa in networks. Specifically, this study investigates (1) how varying aggregate sizes influence soil respiration, bacterial and fungal community composition, and co-occurrence networks during flooding and drying; (2) how the microbial keystone taxa change during the flooding and drying periods and whether soil respiration is regulated by keystone taxa at the aggregate scale; and (3) how to reveal the regulatory mechanisms of aggregate-scale soil respiration for different flooding and drying treatments. Considering that soil respiration and microbial communities are susceptible to disturbance due to water regime changes, we hypothesized that (1) soil respiration rate and microbial community richness would decline with the decrease in soil aggregate size, and their respiration would increase with the shift from flooding to drying, and (2) the microbial keystone taxa would predominantly regulate soil respiration in both flooding and drying treatments.

      Materials and methods Experimental sites and soil sampling

      In June 2018, soil samples for this research were taken from the Wuyangwan riparian zone (31°11′20″N, 108°27′40″E), which is representative of the riparian zones along the Pengxi River. As a result of the activities of the Three Gorges Dam, the water level of the Pengxi River, which is a secondary branch in the TGR of the Yangtze River, varies between 145 and 175 meters above sea level (m.a.s.l) in the summer and winter, respectively (Figure 1) since the TGR was fully impounded in 2010 (Zhu et al., 2020). With average annual temperatures of 18.2 ° C and average annual precipitation of 1,200 mm, the climate of this region may be described as a humid and mid-subtropical monsoon. The period from April through September, which is considered to be the plant growth season, receives over 60% of the total yearly precipitation (Zhu et al., 2020). Purple soil, formed from purple sandstone, is the dominant zonal soil type (Entisols in the World Reference Base) (Chen et al., 2014) with a texture dominated by silt loam (2.50% clay, 65.41% silt, and 30.09% sand) (Zhu et al., 2022b). Most native trees have died because of periodic flooding. Moreover, tillage is not allowed in the TGR riparian zone owing to environmental concerns. Thus, grasslands are the dominant land-use type, comprising flood-tolerant grasses such as Xanthium sibiricum, Paspalum thunbergii, and Cynodon dactylon (Ye et al., 2019). Since 2010, corn fields have been converted to selected grasslands, which were used as the study sites.

      Water level changes in the Three Gorges Reservoir and sampling frequency in the riparian zone (A); Schematic design and flow chart of the lab incubation experiment (B).

      Based on an S-shaped sampling strategy and using a soil corer (5.7 cm diameter), nine soil samples, weighing approximately 1.5 kg were obtained at random from the grasslands from 0 to 10 cm depths. To avoid any impacts that might break the macroaggregates, we used a wooden mallet to carefully drive the corer into the soil.

      Soil physicochemical properties

      The soil that had been dried in an oven was used in the calculation of the soil bulk density (SBD). After mixing the sample with distilled water at a ratio of 1:2.5 soil to water, the pH of the soil was determined. SOC and TN were determined by the dry combustion method with a CN elemental analyzer (Vario Max CN Macro Elemental Analyzer, Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Hanau, Germany) (Nelson and Sommers, 1996).

      Sieving of soil aggregates

      Bulk soil (BS) samples were broken by hand along the fractures of the peds (> 8 mm). Plant residues, stones, visible fauna, and roots were excluded from the samples. Aggregate fractions were measured using wet sieving as described by Márquez et al. (2004). Briefly, a stack of sieves (2-, 0.25-and 0.053-mm) was used to manually fractionate air-dried samples of soil into four size classes in distilled water for 2 min at a rate of 30 times/min. The bulk soil was broken down into 4 aggregate fractions: > 2 mm (large macroaggregates, LM), 0.25–2 mm (small macroaggregates, SM), 0.053–0.25 mm (microaggregates, MI), and < 0.053 mm (silt and clay, SC). As soon as wet sieving was complete, the aggregates were given a gentle rinse in sterile water.

      Incubation experiment

      The prepared soils were introduced into 1,000 ml incubation jars (equivalent to 200 g of oven-dried soil in each), with three replicate jars of each treatment. In total, 15 glass jars were used for the incubation experiments, including three jars each for BS, LM, SM, MI, and SC. To accomplish soil microbial stability, we pre-incubated all soil samples at 15°C for 7 days with 50% water-filled pore space (Butterly et al., 2010; Jiang et al., 2021).

      To simulate the soil moisture changes in the TGR riparian zone, the experiment was conducted at 15°C with two treatments: (a) flooding at a ratio of 1:2.5 soil to water and (b) drying with a moisture content of 50% field capacity. All incubated samples were placed in a constant-temperature incubator at 15°C, and in case it was deemed essential, deionized water was introduced into the mixture. Following the pre-incubation period, gas samples were withdrawn from the flooding incubation using a syringe on days 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42. Subsequently, the flooding incubation experiment was terminated, and the soil samples were naturally dried to a moisture content of 50% field capacity on the 55th day. Gas samples were extracted on days 56, 63, 70, 77, and 84 of the drying incubation. Twice weekly, the jars were weighed, and water was replenished to prevent excessive evaporation and keep the humidity level consistent. Following the removal of the polyethylene film from the jars, their headspaces were purged with fresh air for approximately 15 min. Gas was collected in the jars after they were hermetically sealed with rubber septum covers. At 0 and 1 h after the jar had been sealed, a gas-tight syringe was used to extract about 30 ml of gas from the headspace. The levels of carbon dioxide in the samples were determined by the use of Gas chromatography (GC-2014, Shimadzu, Japan).

      Microbial community analysis

      Following the guidelines provided by the manufacturer of the MoBio PowerSoil DNA extraction kit, total DNA was extracted from 0.25 g of soil. Following amplification with fungal primers, ITS1F/ITS2R (Adams et al., 2013) and bacterial primers, 338\u00B0F/806R (Lee et al., 2012), samples were sent to the Novogene Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) for sequencing via Illumina® MiSeq. To extract the valid data (clean data) after sequencing, the raw data were first demultiplexed and then subjected to quality filtering using the Trimmomatic program (Magoč and Salzberg, 2011). A table of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) was created by clustering the sequences. Using the UPARSE program (UPARSE v7.0.10011; Edgar, 2013) Sequences from bacteria and fungi with a similarity of ≥97% were placed in the same OTU. BLAST was employed to search the UNITE (fungi) and RDP (bacteria) databases for matching sequences, and then representatives of each OTU were chosen for taxonomic annotation (Wang et al., 2007; Kõljalg et al., 2013). There were a total of 17,115 16S OTUs and 5,033 ITS OTUs discovered across all samples. Bacterial and fungal raw sequencing data were jointly submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database under BioProject accession number PRJNA844584.

      Calculations and statistical analysis

      The soil microbial respiration was calculated according to the following formula (Wang et al., 2014):

      F=ρvapp0t0tdCtdt

      Whereby, F denotes the CO2 flux (mg m−2 h−1); ρ (kg m−3) represents the CO2 density under normal circumstances; the effective volume is denoted by v (m3) while the bottom of the incubation jar is denoted by (m2); t0 represents the absolute temperature when circumstances are normalized; t signifies the absolute temperature within the jar; and dCtdt is the shift in the level of CO2 (m3 m−3) that occurred within the jar throughout the sampling duration (h).

      R software (version 4.1.0) was used for every computation along with the data analyzes. The Levene’s and Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests were completed to correspondingly ensure the homogeneity of variances and the normality of the data before proceeding with the analysis. If the conditions were not met, a log or square-root transformation was applied. Soil aggregate fractions were separated into four groups, and their individual attributes were compared via analysis of variance (ANOVA). Soil respiration variations between aggregate fractions were analyzed through repeated-measure ANOVA. Also, an independent sample t-test was conducted to contrast the impacts of flooding and drying treatments on the aforementioned characteristics at the same aggregate scale. Two-way ANOVA was executed to determine the different moisture treatments, soil aggregate sizes, and their interactions with soil respiration.

      Using the cmdscale function in the vegan package, principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was utilized to investigate the differences in bacterial and fungal community architectures across the various treatments and aggregate fractions. To show the connections between microbial populations and to compute their topological features, we adopted the co-occurrence network inference (CoNet) in Gephi 0.9.2. Keystone species were identified as OTUs exhibiting a high degree, high eigenvector centrality, and high closeness/betweenness centrality (Wang et al., 2021). The highest average degree was considered a complex microbial network (Wagg et al., 2019). Soil respiration and keystone species abundance were also subjected to regression analyzes (Banerjee et al., 2016).

      To determine how various predictor factors may be influencing soil respiration, partial least squares path modeling (PLS-PM) was carried out using the plspm program (Sanchez, 2013). Fourteen manifest variables [SOC, C/N ratio, pH, soil respiration, positive to negative edges (P/N) of the overall network (BPN), bacterial P/N related to keystone taxa (BKPN), bacterial average clustering coefficients (BACC), bacterial richness (BR), bacterial first dominant eigengenes BFDE, fungi richness (FR), fungal first dominant eigengenes (FFDE), fungal P/N of the overall network (FPN), fungal P/N related to keystone taxa (FKPN), and fungal average clustering coefficients (FACC)] and four latent variables (bacterial network, bacterial community composition, fungal network, and fungal community composition) were condensed for use in the PLS-PM. There were two or three manifest variables associated with each latent variable. The bacterial networks encompassed BPN, BKPN, and BACC. The bacterial community composition comprised BR and BFDE. Fungal networks included FR, FFDE, and FPN. The fungal community composition included FR and FFDE. We then computed the models’ path coefficients, which describe the direction and intensity of the linear correlations between the variables, as well as the explained variability (R2). Based on this information, we determined the overall influence (both direct and indirect) that each variable had on soil respiration. The path coefficients represent the direct impacts, while the indirect effects may be calculated by multiplying the direct effects by the indirect path’s path coefficients. The model’s overall prediction accuracy was measured by calculating its goodness of fit. Before running PLS-PM, we used a car package to ensure there wasn’t any multicollinearity between our chosen independent variables. In this investigation, we conducted regression random forest analysis with the rfPermute program to determine the most important soil variables for soil respiration. Variables with low levels of intercorrelation, a variance inflation factor of <10, significance levels of <0.05, and greater levels of mean squared error (MSE percent) were retained (Liaw and Wiener, 2002). Consequently, the proportion of soil aggregates, TN, and SBD was excluded (Supplementary Figure S1).

      Results Soil characteristics and microbial respiration

      Flooding and drying influenced soil properties (Table 1). Flooding to drying generally decreased SOC and TN contents but slightly increased soil pH in all aggregate fractions. The SOC and TN contents of >2 mm aggregate fractions were substantially elevated relative to those of the other aggregate fractions in both the flooding and drying treatments. The SBD decreased as the aggregate size increased in both the flooding and drying treatments (i.e., LM < SM < MI < SC).

      Main soil properties under drying and drying treatments.

      SOC (g kg−1) TN (g kg−1) C:N (−) pH SBD PSA
      Flooding Drying Flooding Drying Flooding Drying Flooding Drying Flooding Drying
      BS 21.1bA 16.2bB 1.9aA 1.5bB 11.11bA 10.80bA 6.41aA 7.01aA 1.16abA 1.17abA -
      LM 27aA 24.2aA 1.6bA 1.6aA 16.88aA 15.13aA 6.53aA 6.92aA 1.07cA 1.09cA 38.97a
      SM 17.3bA 16.3bA 1.4bA 1.3bA 12.36bA 12.54bA 6.75aA 6.92aA 1.13bA 1.13bA 30.56a
      MI 12.1cA 10.4cA 1cA 0.9cA 12.10bA 11.56bA 6.88aA 6.99aA 1.18aA 1.19aA 14.33b
      SC 12.1cA 11.7cA 1.3bA 1.2bA 9.31bA 9.75bA 6.94aA 6.79aA 1.21aA 1.23aA 16.33b

      BS, bulk soil; LM, >2 mm aggregate fractions; SM, 0.25–2 mm aggregate fractions; MI, 0.053–0.25 mm aggregate fractions; SC, <0.053 mm aggregate fractions; SOC, soil organic carbon; TN, soil total nitrogen; C:N, soil carbon to nitrogen ratio; SBD, soil bulk density; PSA, percentage of the aggregate size fractions. Significant deviations among various aggregate size fractions within the same column are denoted by small letters; Significant variations (p < 0.05) between soil moisture treatments within the same row are denoted by capital letters.

      The soil CO2 flux (i.e., soil respiration) slightly increased with incubation time during the flooding phase (Figure 2). In contrast, soil respiration slightly decreased with increasing incubation time during the drying phase (Figure 2). Mean soil respiration dropped as the aggregate size became smaller in both the flooding and drying treatments (i.e., LM > SM > MI > SC). Notably, flooding to drying substantially enhanced the mean soil respiration (p < 0.05; Figure 3).

      Flux of CO2 among soil aggregates in flooding and drying status. BS, bulk soil; LM, large macroaggregate, > 2 mm; SM, small macroaggregate, 0.25–2 mm; MI, microaggregate, 0.053–0.25 mm; SC, silt and clay, < 0.053 mm.

      Mean soil respiration of different aggregate sizes in flooding and drying treatments during the incubation period. BS, bulk soil; LM, large macroaggregate, > 2 mm; SM, small macroaggregate, 0.25–2 mm; MI, microaggregate, 0.053–0.25 mm; SC, silt and clay, < 0.053 mm. A significant difference in soil respiration across aggregate sizes (p 0.05) in both the flooded and dried conditions is shown by the bars designated with capital letters and lowercase letters, correspondingly.

      Abundance and composition of the microbial population

      The soil microbial community richness is presented in Supplementary Table S1. The bacterial richness considerably decreased in response to the shift from flooding to drying. In contrast, the fungal richness substantially increased in response to the shift from flooding to drying. The maximum bacterial richness among the aggregate fractions in the flooding and drying conditions were MI (i.e., 5139.00 ± 38.73) and SC (i.e., 4290.67 ± 152.78), respectively. The minimum bacterial richness among the aggregate fractions in the flooding and drying conditions were SC (i.e., 4617.00 ± 107.41) and MI (i.e., 3671.33 ± 93.38), respectively. The maximum fungal richness among the aggregate fractions in the flooding and drying conditions were SM (i.e., 611.00 ± 22.15) and SC (i.e., 723.33 ± 86.33), respectively. The minimum fungal richness among the aggregate fractions in the flooding and drying conditions were MI (i.e., 512.67 ± 61.06) and SM (i.e., 663.67 ± 27.28), respectively. Nevertheless, no significant variance in fungal richness was discovered among the aggregate fractions under the drying treatment. Moreover, the shift from flooding to drying reduced the bacteria-to-fungi ratio in all the aggregate fractions.

      The relative abundance of the dominant bacterial and fungal phyla in soil aggregates under flooding and drying treatments are shown in Figure 4. The bacterial communities in soil aggregates predominately comprised Proteobacteria (34.6–43.3%), Acidobacteria (11.4–16.3%), Actinobacteria (6.8–12.1%), Firmicutes (3.6–7.7%), and Planctomycetes (1.9–2.2%). Compared with the flooding, the drying treatment resulted in an increase of 38.4–57.5% in the relative abundance of actinobacteria. The bacterial communities primarily included Ascomycota (9.3–36.5%), Basidiomycota (1.9–26.5%), Rozellomycota (0.1–5.2%), and Chytridiomycota (0.1–4.1%). Compared with the flooding treatment, the drying treatment generally enhanced the relative abundance of Basidiomycota and Ascomycota in soil aggregates.

      Aggregate size fractions during flooding and drying conditions and the relative abundance of key phyla within fungi and bacteria communities.

      The PCoA revealed that both bacterial and fungal community compositions were distinct among the aggregate fractions and treatments (Figure 5). Three samples from the same moisture conditions were grouped, regardless of the aggregate size. Moreover, the samples from different moisture conditions were completely separated from each other. The first two principal coordinates together explained 34.29 and 29.24% of the differences in soil bacteria and fungi community compositions, correspondingly.

      The impacts of moisture status and aggregate fractions on bacterial (A) and fungal (B) populations are shown using principal coordinate analysis predicated on the Bray-Curtis distances. Symbols of varying hues depict various aggregate fractions, each corresponding to a certain treatment of soil moisture. FBS, bulk soil in the flooding treatment; FLM, large macroaggregates in the flooding treatment; FSM, small macroaggregates in the flooding treatment; FMI, microaggregates in the flooding treatment; FSC, silt and clay in the flooding treatment; DBS, bulk soil in the drying treatment; DLM, large macroaggregates in the drying treatment; DSM, small macroaggregates in the drying treatment; DMI, microaggregates in the drying treatment; DSC, silt, and clay in the drying treatment.

      Soil microbial co-occurrence networks

      To evaluate differences in network features between individual treatments and for every aggregate fraction, we generated 20 subnetworks from the bacterial and fungal populations. Supplementary Table S3 displays the results of the ANOVA. Both bacteria and fungi community compositions exhibited modified co-occurrence patterns in response to the varying soil moisture treatments (Figure 6). The changes in the soil moisture conditions substantially affected the dynamics of the microbial and fungal populations’ interplay. The shift from flooding to drying increased the ratio of positive to negative edges (P/N), average degree, and average clustering coefficient in all bacteria and fungi networks and most subnetworks (Table 2; Supplementary Tables S2, S3).

      Networks showing the co-occurrence of bacterial (A,B) and fungal (C,D) populations under flooding and drying, respectively. A connection represents a statistically significant (p < 0.005) relationship between two OTUs. In a network, a node’s size is equivalent to the number of its connections (i.e., degree), and the Pearson correlation coefficients are used to determine the thickness of the edges connecting the nodes. Positive and negative interactions are denoted by the red and green edges, correspondingly.

      Topological properties of bacterial and fungal subnetworks.

      Bulk/Aggregate soil Treatments P/N of the whole network P/N associated with keystone taxa Average degree Average clustering coefficient
      Bacterial networks Bulk soil Flooding 1.891 9.000 2.220 0.234
      Drying 2.616 4.000 3.359 0.301
      >2 mm Flooding 0.127 0.095 2.987 0.213
      Drying 1.459 0.125 3.488 0.322
      0.25–2 mm Flooding 0.134 0.167 2.920 0.224
      Drying 1.462 3.000 4.014 0.276
      0.053–0.25 mm Flooding 0.186 0.170 3.593 0.247
      Drying 1.531 1.750 3.754 0.300
      <0.053 mm Flooding 2.262 4.167 3.618 0.324
      Drying 3.718 13.500 5.531 0.320
      Fungal networks Bulk soil Flooding 0.495 0.100 8.179 0.288
      Drying 0.300 15.000 5.337 0.264
      >2 mm Flooding 0.530 1.375 6.248 0.342
      Drying 0.712 15.500 7.538 0.381
      0.25–2 mm Flooding 0.722 0.444 4.656 0.303
      Drying 0.793 3.714 8.803 0.336
      0.053–0.25 mm Flooding 0.526 1.500 4.360 0.258
      Drying 0.713 2.000 5.930 0.299
      <0.053 mm Flooding 0.946 13.000 8.041 0.335
      Drying 1.002 1.000 10.271 0.362

      The changes in soil moisture conditions changed the keystone taxa (Table 3). For bacterial networks, Acidobacteria (unclassified Acidobacteria at the order level), Acidobacteria (Acidobacteriales), Gemmatimonadetes (Gemmatimonadales), Chloroflexi (Anaerolineales), and Bacteroidetes (Cytophagales) were the keystone taxa in the flooding treatment, whereas, in the drying treatment, the keystone taxa were Proteobacteria (unclassified), Proteobacteria (Rhizobiales), Gemmatimonadetes (Gemmatimonadales), Proteobacteria (Sphingomonadales), and Actinobacteria (Solirubrobacterales). For fungal networks, the keystone taxa in the flooding and drying treatments were Ascomycota (Hypocreales) and Basidiomycota (Agaricales), respectively.

      The keystone taxa in the bacterial and fungal networks in flooding and drying treatments.

      ID Phylum Order Degree Eigen centrality Closeness centrality Betweeness centrality Treatment
      OTU326 Acidobacteria Unclassified 32 0.97 0.50 621.44
      OTU110 Acidobacteria Acidobacteriales 37 1 0.38 448.98
      OTU88 Proteobacteria Unclassified 31 0.96 0.40 215.48 Flooding
      OTU1276 Chloroflexi Anaerolineales 37 0.92 0.38 525.64
      OTU714 Bacteroidetes Cytophagales 32 0.74 0.38 411.07
      OTU89 Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadales 36 1 0.42 353.45
      OTU162 Proteobacteria Rhizobiales 34 0.98 0.41 386.78
      OTU88 Proteobacteria Unclassified 32 0.96 0.41 341.53 Drying
      OTU13562 Proteobacteria Sphingomonadales 37 0.91 0.42 386.78
      OTU144 Actinobacteria Solirubrobacterales 34 0.90 0.40 370.63
      OTU13 Unclassified NA 9 1 0.71 37
      OTU12 Ascomycota Hypocreales 8 0.73 0.57 16
      OTU21 Ascomycota NA 8 0.72 0.63 31.5 Flooding
      OTU2732 Ascomycota Hypocreales 7 0.75 0.38 15
      OTU15 Unclassified Unclassified 7 0.80 0.57 7
      OTU12 Ascomycota Hypocreales 17 0.92 0.49 134.65
      OTU11 Basidiomycota Agaricales 16 1 0.48 16.07
      OTU222 Basidiomycota Agaricales 15 0.96 0.52 121.19 Drying
      OTU3 Basidiomycota Agaricales 15 0.99 0.47 41.81
      OTU477 Unclassified Unclassified 15 0.89 0.47 786.78

      Variation in the keystone taxa was observed across soil moisture manipulations (Supplementary Table S3). Bacterial subnetworks showed changes in their keystone taxa in response to manipulations of soil moisture and particle size distributions. P/N was solely influenced by soil moisture treatments for fungal subnetworks, whereas the average clustering coefficient was influenced by the interplay of aggregate sizes and soil moisture treatments.

      Keystone taxa regulated soil respiration

      The keystone taxa abundance was shown to have a strong correlation with soil respiration in regression analyzes (Figure 7). For bacteria, soil respiration was positively influenced by OTU88 (Proteobacteria; R2 = 0.75, p < 0.01) under flooding treatment. Under drying treatment, soil respiration was positively influenced by OTU88 (i.e., Proteobacteria; R2 = 0.32, p < 0.01), OTU89 (Gemmatimonadetes; R2 = 0.88, p < 0.01), OUT144 (Actinobacteria; R2 = 0.95, p < 0.01), OTU162 (Actinobacteria; R2 = 0.60, p < 0.01), and OTU13562 (Actinobacteria; R2 = 0.21, p < 0.05). For fungi, soil respiration was positively influenced by OTU2732 (Ascomycota; R2 = 0.29, p < 0.05) under flooding treatment. Under flooding treatment, soil respiration was negatively influenced by OTU13 (unclassified fungus; R2 = 0.68, p < 0.01). Moreover, under drying treatment soil respiration was positively influenced by OTU11 (Basidiomycota; R2 = 0.32, p < 0.01), OTU12 (Ascomycota; R2 = 0.88, p < 0.01), OTU3 (Basidiomycota; R2 = 0.95, p < 0.01), OTU222 (Basidiomycota; R2 = 0.60, p < 0.01), and OTU477 (unclassified fungus; R2 = 0.21, p < 0.05).

      The relationships of soil respiration with the richness of key bacterial (A,C) and fungal members (B,D).

      The influence of soil characteristics and microbial community on soil respiration

      A regression random forest analysis was showed that the key soil parameters that were linked to soil respiration were SOC, C/N ratio, and pH (Supplementary Figure S1). Soil respiration was also significantly influenced by the make-up of the microbial population (as measured by the first dominant eigengenes, FDE) and the features of the microbial network (as measured by the P/N ratio related to keystone taxa and the mean cluster coefficients).

      In both the flooded and dried soils, PLS-PM analysis showed causative links between soil respiration, soil microbial network, soil microbial community composition, and environmental factors (Figure 8). In the flooding treatment, SOC, bacterial network, and fungal community composition exhibited a remarkable direct effect on soil respiration, with path coefficients of 0.71, 0.21, and 0.26, correspondingly (p < 0.05). Additionally, the SOC and C/N ratios both exhibited substantial indirect effects on soil respiration through fungal community composition, with path coefficients of 0.15 and-0.20, correspondingly (p < 0.05). Consequently, SOC had a strong beneficial effect on soil respiration, as measured by a path coefficient of 0.86. Bacterial networks predominantly and significantly relied on BPN and BACC with loading coefficients of 0.40 and 0.56, correspondingly (p < 0.05). Fungal community composition dominantly relied on their FFDE with a loading coefficient of 0.85 (p < 0.05).

      Soil respiration derived from different sizes of aggregates after exposure to flooding (A) and drying (B) treatments were modeled using a partial least squares path model of the impacts of soil characteristics, microbial population structure, and microbial network topological parameters (B). Positive paths (p < 0.05) are denoted by solid arrows, while insignificant paths (p > 0.05) are illustrated by the dotted arrows. The goodness-of-fit (GoF) statistic was employed to evaluate the model. SOC, soil organic carbon; C:N, the ratios of total carbon and nitrogen; BPN, P/N of the entire network; BKPN, P/N of the bacterial network related to keystone taxa; BACC, average clustering coefficients of the whole network; BR, the relative abundance of bacteria; BFDE, first dominant eigengenes of the bacterial community composition; FPN, P/N of the entire network; FKPN, P/N of the bacterial network related to keystone taxa; FACC, average clustering coefficients of the fungal network; FR, the relative abundance of fungi; FFDE, first dominant eigengenes of fungal community composition.

      In the drying treatment, SOC, bacterial network, fungal community composition, and the fungal network exhibited substantial direct effects on soil respiration, as indicated by path coefficients of 0.57, 0.32, 0.25, and 0.56, correspondingly (p < 0.05). Moreover, the SOC and pH exhibited substantial indirect effects on soil respiration through fungal community composition, as illustrated by coefficients of 0.14 and 0.11, correspondingly (p < 0.05). By way of the microbial community, the C/N ratio strongly influenced soil respiration (path coefficient = −0.19) (p < 0.05). Furthermore, SOC had a path coefficient of 0.71, indicating that it considerably and positively influenced soil respiration. The bacterial network dominantly and significantly relied on BKPN with a loading coefficient of 0.61 (p < 0.05). Moreover, fungal community composition predominantly relied on FR with a loading coefficient of 0.94 (p < 0.05). The fungal network predominantly relied on FACC with a loading coefficient of 0.79 (p < 0.05).

      Discussion Soil respiration impacted by flooding and drying conditions at the aggregate scale

      Soil respiration reflects short-term dynamics of SOC, which are primarily affected by several biotic and abiotic factors, like microorganisms, substrate availability, and water content (Luo and Zhou, 2006; Wang et al., 2020). In this study, the respiration of different-sized soil aggregates slightly increased with the incubation time during the flooding phase, whereas it slightly decreased with incubation time during the drying phase (Figure 2). These differences may be caused by the discrepancy between the labile and recalcitrant carbon fractions used by microbes (Rusalimova and Barsukov, 2006). Generally, labile organic carbon is preferentially decomposed by soil microorganisms during the early stages of incubation. However, microorganisms began to use the recalcitrant organic carbon fraction which is more difficult to decompose in the late stage of incubation (Hao et al., 2008; Rabbi et al., 2014; Bimüller et al., 2016). In addition, the soil respiration rate fluctuated during the incubation process, which was likely because of soil disturbance caused by the pretreatment process, such as the collection of soil samples (Hao et al., 2008).

      The variations in soil respiration at different aggregate sizes reflect the dominant roles of carbon and nitrogen contents and microbial activity within the aggregates under relatively uniform incubation conditions (Gupta and Germida, 1988; Kan et al., 2020). Our results showed that significant differences in the respiration of different size fractions of soil aggregates were observed under the same incubation conditions, and the mean soil respiration rate generally increased with the soil aggregate size-classes. These results support our first hypothesis, conforming to the conclusions drawn by Noellemeyer et al. (2008). The reasons for this are as follows. First, in the absence of plant roots, soil respiration is primarily derived from the decomposition of organic carbon by soil microorganisms (Ontl and Schulte, 2012). Further, the activities of microorganisms responded to the discrepancy in the amount and stability of organic carbon in different soil aggregate sizes, thereby leading to variations in soil respiration among different aggregate size-classes (Trivedi et al., 2017). Second, macroaggregate-associated carbon primarily derives from labile organic carbon (e.g., fresh plant residues) that easily decomposes, whereas microaggregate-associated carbon primarily comprises humus that is difficult to decompose and use (Six et al., 1999). Moreover, because the pore necks in microaggregates are <0.2 μm in width, the pores in these structures are impenetrable to bacteria, thereby inhibiting biological activity (Erktan et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2022b).

      The mean soil respiration of all aggregate size fractions in the drying treatment was substantially elevated in contrast to the flooding treatment under a constant temperature (Figure 3). The results primarily showed the inhibition of organic matter decomposition, as soil pore spaces are occupied by water in the flooding treatment (Gorham, 1995); Additionally, during the drying treatment, 50% field water retention capacity was maintained in the soil samples since it is suitable for microbial activity, particularly in the early stage of measurement (Manzoni et al., 2012).

      Microorganisms in soil aggregates under flooding and drying treatments

      Soil aggregates act as heterogeneous microhabitats for highly spatially organized microorganism communities (Upton et al., 2019). In this study, the maximum bacterial abundances among the aggregate fractions under flooding and drying conditions were MI and SC, respectively. SM had the maximum fungal abundance under flooded conditions. These findings were comparable to those obtained in earlier investigations which revealed that the bacterial and fungal abundances are maximum in <0.25 mm and > 0.25 mm aggregates, correspondingly (Zhang et al., 2014; Bach et al., 2018; Wilpiszeski et al., 2019). The presence of protected habitats in microaggregates may facilitate niche creation for bacteria by excluding their predators (protozoa) and competing with fungi, since predation serves as a crucial structuring force for bacterial communities (Zhang et al., 2014). Additionally, due to the narrow gaps that exist between microaggregates, silt, and clay fractions, it is physically impossible for fungi to penetrate the interior of these habitats (Zhang et al., 2014; Erktan et al., 2020).

      Soil water regimes, which are associated with most soil properties and processes, have a profound influence on the structure and function of the soil microbial population in the soil (Brockett et al., 2012; Schimel, 2018). In this study, the shift from flooding to drying decreased the bacteria–fungi ratio in all aggregate size fractions. Notably, fungi are heterotrophic and essentially aerobic with limited anaerobic capabilities (McGinnis and Tyring, 1996). The shift from flooding to drying changed the soil microenvironment and improved the exchange of air and heat, which was conducive to soil fungal aeration. Fungal communities are generally more resistant to environmental alterations than bacterial communities (Lin et al., 2019). Consequently, fungi rapidly reproduce, thereby improving their diversity (Zhang, 2010). In addition, soil bacteria might adjust their expression of certain metabolic processes (e.g., resulting in the synthesis of compounds with osmoprotective properties) in response to the stress environment and maintain their growth during flooding (Chowdhury et al., 2019). For bacteria, Proteobacteria were the dominant taxa in both flooding and drying treatments. Acidobacteria and Bacteroidetes were the subdominant groups in the flooding and drying treatments, respectively. Among fungi, the dominant taxa were Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes. However, the shift from flooding to drying considerably increased the relative abundance of Basidiomycetes. These results were in line with those found in earlier investigations, which revealed that the microbial communities Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Ascomycetes, and Basidiomycetes are abundant in wetland soils which are frequently anaerobic (Tait et al., 2007; Peralta et al., 2013). Moreover, the relative abundance of dominant microbial taxa generally decreased with an increase in aggregate size, which might be related to the nutrient strategy of the microbial community (Fierer et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2016) where macroaggregates tend to be nutrient-rich, whereas microaggregates are relatively barren (Fonte et al., 2014).

      The co-occurrence patterns of soil microbes could be revealed by using network analysis, which is conducive to acquiring a more comprehensive knowledge of the structure of microbial communities and the biological principles that guide community formation (Barberán et al., 2012). Herein, in both the flooding and drying conditions, Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria predominated in the bacterial network, while Ascomycota predominated in the fungus network, indicating that these phyla could be the most influential in determining the overall architecture of microbiomes. This is likely because Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Ascomycota can resist external pressure and disturbances (Zhou et al., 2020; Faitová, 2021). This finding aligns with the conclusions drawn by Ye et al. (2021) in their study of co-occurrence patterns in the soil microbial network within the riparian zone of the TGR. In addition, the fungal network exhibited higher average degrees, and more nodes and edges in the drying treatment than in the flooding treatment, suggesting that the shift from flooding to drying enhanced the connectivity and complexity of the fungal network (Wagg et al., 2019; Ye et al., 2021). These results are in agreement with those of earlier research showing that flooding drastically decreases the complexity of co-occurrence networks (Zhang et al., 2019; Gao et al., 2021) owing to resource limitations and environmental stresses, such as severe flooding stress, reduced water, and availability of nutrients (Malik et al., 2020; Qiu et al., 2021). In addition, positive linkages in the bacterial network, especially those linked to keystone taxa, rose as flooding duration reduced, whereas negative ones dropped as a result of the shift from flooding to drying (i.e., the P/N of the overall network and that related to keystone taxa) (Table 2). This indicates that the shift from flooding to drying increased niche breadths by eliminating flooding stress and reactivating aerobic microbes to enhance the availability of organic materials (Malik et al., 2020), thereby mitigating competition (Banerjee et al., 2016) and exhibiting favorable co-occurrence patterns with selected copiotrophic keystone taxa (Wang et al., 2021).

      Soil respiration regulated by keystone taxa at the aggregate scale

      Soil respiration is determined by the richness of certain taxa (Banerjee et al., 2016). Confirming our second hypothesis, both bacterial and fungal keystone taxa were found using the network analysis, and they were shown to have substantial ties to soil respiration (Figure 7). The abundance of Proteobacteria in bacteria and Ascomycota (Hypocreales) in fungi exhibited remarkably favorable impact on soil respiration during flooding treatment. Proteobacteria, Proteobacteria (Rhizobiales), Gemmatimonadetes (Gemmatimonadales), Proteobacteria (Sphingomonadales), and Actinobacteria (Solirubrobacterales) in bacteria and Ascomycota (Hypocreales), Basidiomycota (Agaricales), an unclassified taxon, in fungi, exhibited strong positive effects on soil respiration in the drying treatment. Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria have been found to decompose plant polymers by releasing soil enzymes like xylanases and β-glucosidase (Wang et al., 2010; Tiwari et al., 2016; Zheng et al., 2018). Earlier literature has shown that the families of α-Proteobacteria are decomposers of both fresh and soil organic matter (Bernard et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2021). Herein, both Rhizobiales and Sphingomonadales belong to α-Proteobacteria, which positively affected soil respiration. Actinobacteria are an essential bacterium class that participates in many activities throughout ecosystems, including the breakdown of organic molecules, which can mineralize fused aromatic C-ring structures (Faitová, 2021). Gemmatimonadetes are typically abundant and active in low-moisture soils, playing a vital role in driving soil carbon cycling processes (He et al., 2020; Fan et al., 2021). Thus, our findings illustrated that Gemmatimonadetes positively affected soil respiration during the drying treatment rather than during the flooding treatment. In addition, an unclassified keystone fungus exhibited a considerable negative impact on soil respiration in the flooding treatment, which could explain why negative rates of soil respiration were detected during the drying treatment. Agaricales, an order of Basidiomycota, is an extremely common soft-rot fungus that aids in decomposing dead wood and litter and may generate a spectrum of hydrolytic enzymes capable of breaking down humic and lignin acids (Voříšková and Baldrian, 2013). During decomposition, the prevalent and persistent ascomycetous fungi (Hypocreales) are the endophytes of a wide variety of plants and also include extracellular fungi that produce enzymes (Voříšková and Baldrian, 2013; Herzog et al., 2019). However, the keystone taxa Rhizobiales, Gemmatimonadales, Sphingomonadales, and Solirubrobacterales, Hypocreales, Agaricales are uncultured bacterial or fungal orders. Therefore, further studies are required to determine how they affect the composition and function of soil microbes (Wang et al., 2021). Additionally, keystone taxa should be selectively excluded in future studies to verify the changes in species interactions affecting soil respiration (Zheng et al., 2021).

      Regulating mechanisms of soil respiration at the aggregate scale in flooding and drying treatments

      Microbial community structure and network properties assume critical roles in the dynamics of SOC (Banerjee et al., 2016; Zheng et al., 2021). In both flooding and drying treatments, aggregate fractions remarkably modified the composition of microbial communities and microbial networks, primarily by altering their associated SOC levels (Cookson et al., 2005). In addition, SOC was the dominant regulator of soil respiration, with a path coefficient of 0.86 in the flooding treatment and 0.71 in the drying treatment (Figure 8), suggesting that substrate supply was the major factor affecting CO2 release in this study (Luo and Zhou, 2006). Furthermore, the mechanisms regulating soil respiration were distinct between the flooding and drying treatments (Figure 8).

      In the flooding treatment, except for SOC, soil respiration was principally modulated by the ACC and P/N of the entire network and FFDE. However, in the drying treatment, soil respiration was predominantly modulated by FR, FACC, and P/N associated with the bacterial keystone taxa. These results show that the shift from flooding to drying changed the regulatory mechanisms of soil respiration, particularly the fungal network. Archived literatures illustrates that decreasing competitive interactions with keystone taxa enhances soil respiration (Wang et al., 2021), whereas soil respiration diminishes when competitive interactions increase among keystone taxa (Chen et al., 2019). The shift from flooding to drying relieved water stress, thereby alleviating interactions that are competitive with the co-occurrence networks’ keystone taxa. Moreover, C mineralization is less energy-efficient during anaerobic degradation (Wang et al., 2021). Therefore, the shift from flooding to drying increased the average soil respiration rate (Figure 3). Notably, the relieved water stress increases oxygen availability, which creates copiotrophic environments for fungi that prefer aerobic conditions (McGinnis and Tyring, 1996) and interacts with other species by using both labile and recalcitrant carbon fractions (Bian et al., 2022). Also, the effect of the bacterial network on soil respiration increased from a path coefficient of 0.21 to 0.32 (Figure 8), which revealed that the dominant bacterial network with positive interaction in aerobic conditions facilitated the utilization of carbon sources by microorganisms, thereby stimulating soil respiration (Wang et al., 2021).

      Conclusion

      Our study reveals that the shift from flooding to drying changes the microbial community composition and keystone taxa, thereby enhancing the microbial respiration of soil aggregates. Specifically, soil respiration decreases with a decrease in aggregate size in both flooding and drying treatments. Additionally, the microbial respiration of soil aggregates is substantially higher in the drying treatments than in the flooding treatment as a result of the changes in keystone taxa. Notably, the fungal community composition and network properties dominate the changes in microbial respiration of soil aggregates during the flooding to the drying process. This study reveals the crucial roles of fungal community composition and co-occurrence network properties in regulating soil respiration during the shift from flooding to drying conditions. Moreover, this analysis offers valuable knowledge of the mechanisms of soil respiration changes at the aggregate scale under different water regimes.

      Data availability statement

      The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

      Author contributions

      KZ: conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, writing–original draft, visualization, and funding acquisition. WJ: writing–review and editing. YM: investigation and data curation. SW: methodology and funding acquisition. PH: conceptualization, resources, writing–review and editing, supervision, and project administration. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

      Funding

      This study was sponsored by Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China (2022NSCQ-MSX1111), “Through Train” for Doctors in Chongqing (sl202100000124), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41771266), the Three Gorges’ follow-up scientific research project from Chongqing Municipal Bureau of Water Resources (No. 5000002021BF40001). PH is also supported by the “Light of West China” Program funded by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M703137), Chongqing Postdoctoral Science Foundation (cstc2021jcyj-bsh0080).

      Conflict of interest

      The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

      Publisher’s note

      All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

      Supplementary material

      The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: /articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1167353/full#supplementary-material

      References Adams R. I. Miletto M. Taylor J. W. Bruns T. D. (2013). Dispersal in microbes: fungi in indoor air are dominated by outdoor air and show dispersal limitation at short distances. ISME J. 7, 12621273. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.28, PMID: 23426013 Bach E. M. Williams R. J. Hargreaves S. K. Yang F. Hofmockel K. S. (2018). Greatest soil microbial diversity found in micro-habitats. Soil Biol. Biochem. 118, 217226. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.12.018 Bandyopadhyay K. K. Lal R. (2014). Effect of land use management on greenhouse gas emissions from water stable aggregates. Geoderma 232-234, 363372. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.05.025 Banerjee S. Kirkby C. A. Schmutter D. Bissett A. Kirkegaard J. A. Richardson A. E. (2016). Network analysis reveals functional redundancy and keystone taxa amongst bacterial and fungal communities during organic matter decomposition in an arable soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 97, 188198. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.03.017 Barberán A. Bates S. T. Casamayor E. O. Fierer N. (2012). Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities. ISME J. 6, 343351. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.119, PMID: 21900968 Bernard L. Chapuis-Lardy L. Razafimbelo T. Razafindrakoto M. Pablo A.-L. Legname E. . (2012). Endogeic earthworms shape bacterial functional communities and affect organic matter mineralization in a tropical soil. ISME J. 6, 213222. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.87, PMID: 21753801 Bian Q. Wang X. Bao X. Zhu L. Xie Z. Che Z. . (2022). Exogenous substrate quality determines the dominant keystone taxa linked to carbon mineralization: evidence from a 30-year experiment. Soil Biol. Biochem. 169:108683. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108683 Bimüller C. Kreyling O. Kölbl A. von Lützow M. Kögel-Knabner I. (2016). Carbon and nitrogen mineralization in hierarchically structured aggregates of different size. Soil Tillage Res. 160, 2333. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2015.12.011 Bodner G. Scholl P. Kaul H. P. (2013). Field quantification of wetting-drying cycles to predict temporal changes of soil pore size distribution. Soil Tillage Res. 133, 19. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2013.05.006, PMID: 26766881 Brockett B. F. T. Prescott C. E. Grayston S. J. (2012). Soil moisture is the major factor influencing microbial community structure and enzyme activities across seven biogeoclimatic zones in western Canada. Soil Biol. Biochem. 44, 920. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.09.003 Butterly C. R. Marschner P. McNeill A. M. Baldock J. A. (2010). Rewetting CO2 pulses in Australian agricultural soils and the influence of soil properties. Biol. Fertil. Soils 46, 739753. doi: 10.1007/s00374-010-0481-9 Chen L. Jiang Y. Liang C. Luo Y. Xu Q. Han C. . (2019). Competitive interaction with keystone taxa induced negative priming under biochar amendments. Microbiome 7:77. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0693-7, PMID: 31109381 Chen C. Meurk C. Chen J. Lv M. Wen Z. Jiang Y. . (2014). Restoration design for three gorges reservoir shorelands, combining Chinese traditional agro-ecological knowledge with landscape ecological analysis. Ecol. Eng. 71, 584597. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.07.008 Chen J. Zhang Y. Kuzyakov Y. Wang D. Olesen J. E. (2023). Challenges in upscaling laboratory studies to ecosystems in soil microbiology research. Glob. Chang. Biol. 29, 569574. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16537, PMID: 36443278 Chowdhury T. R. Lee J.-Y. Bottos E. M. Brislawn C. J. White R. A. Bramer L. M. . (2019). Metaphenomic responses of a native prairie soil microbiome to moisture perturbations. mSystems 4, e00061e00019. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00061-19, PMID: 31186334 Cookson W. R. Abaye D. A. Marschner P. Murphy D. V. Stockdale E. A. Goulding K. W. T. (2005). The contribution of soil organic matter fractions to carbon and nitrogen mineralization and microbial community size and structure. Soil Biol. Biochem. 37, 17261737. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.02.007 Dacal M. García-Palacios P. Asensio S. Wang J. Singh B. K. Maestre F. T. (2022). Climate change legacies contrastingly affect the resistance and resilience of soil microbial communities and multifunctionality to extreme drought. Funct. Ecol. 36, 908920. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.14000 Danevčič T. Mandic-Mulec I. Stres B. Stopar D. Hacin J. (2010). Emissions of CO2, CH4 and N2O from southern European peatlands. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 14371446. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.05.004 De Nijs E. A. Hicks L. C. Leizeaga A. Tietema A. Rousk J. (2019). Soil microbial moisture dependences and responses to drying–rewetting: the legacy of 18 years drought. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25, 10051015. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14508, PMID: 30387912 de Sosa L. L. Glanville H. C. Marshall M. R. Prysor Williams A. Jones D. L. (2018). Quantifying the contribution of riparian soils to the provision of ecosystem services. Sci. Total Environ. 624, 807819. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.179, PMID: 29272849 Denef K. Six J. Bossuyt H. Frey S. D. Elliott E. T. Merckx R. . (2001). Influence of dry–wet cycles on the interrelationship between aggregate, particulate organic matter, and microbial community dynamics. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 15991611. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00076-1 Drury C. F. Yang X. M. Reynolds W. D. Tan C. S. (2004). Influence of crop rotation and aggregate size on carbon dioxide production and denitrification. Soil Tillage Res. 79, 87100. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2004.03.020 Edgar R. C. (2013). UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 10, 996998. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2604, PMID: 23955772 Erktan A. Or D. Scheu S. (2020). The physical structure of soil: determinant and consequence of trophic interactions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 148:107876. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107876 Evans S. E. Wallenstein M. D. (2014). Climate change alters ecological strategies of soil bacteria. Ecol. Lett. 17, 155164. doi: 10.1111/ele.12206, PMID: 24261594 Faitová A.. (2021). Actinobacteria communities in natural and anthropogenic environments. Univerzita Karlova, Prague. Fan J. Jin H. Zhang C. Zheng J. Zhang J. Han G. (2021). Grazing intensity induced alternations of soil microbial community composition in aggregates drive soil organic carbon turnover in a desert steppe. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 313:107387. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107387 Fernández R. Quiroga A. Zorati C. Noellemeyer E. (2010). Carbon contents and respiration rates of aggregate size fractions under no-till and conventional tillage. Soil Tillage Res. 109, 103109. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2010.05.002 Fierer N. Bradford M. A. Jackson R. B. (2007). Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88, 13541364. doi: 10.1890/05-1839 Fierer N. Schimel J. P. Holden P. A. (2003). Influence of drying–rewetting frequency on soil bacterial community structure. Microb. Ecol. 45, 6371. doi: 10.1007/s00248-002-1007-2, PMID: 12469245 Fonte S. J. Nesper M. Hegglin D. Velásquez J. E. Ramirez B. Rao I. M. . (2014). Pasture degradation impacts soil phosphorus storage via changes to aggregate-associated soil organic matter in highly weathered tropical soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 68, 150157. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.09.025 Gao G.-F. Peng D. Zhang Y. Li Y. Fan K. Tripathi B. M. . (2021). Dramatic change of bacterial assembly process and co-occurrence pattern in Spartina alterniflora salt marsh along an inundation frequency gradient. Sci. Total Environ. 755:142546. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142546, PMID: 33035970 Gorham E. (1995). “The biogeochemistry of northern peatlands and its possible responses to global warming” in Biotic feedbacks in the global climate system: will the warming feed the warming. eds. Woodwell G. M. MacKenzie F. T. (New York: Oxford University), 169187. Gupta V. V. S. R. Germida J. J. (1988). Distribution of microbial biomass and its activity in different soil aggregate size classes as affected by cultivation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 20, 777786. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(88)90082-X Hao R. J. Li Z. P. Che Y. P. Fang H. L. (2008). Organic carbon mineralization in various size aggregates of paddy soil under aerobic and submerged conditions. Ying. Yong. Sheng. Xue Bao 19, 19441950. PMID: 19102307 He H. Miao Y. Gan Y. Wei S. Tan S. Rask K. A. . (2020). Soil bacterial community response to long-term land use conversion in Yellow River Delta. Appl. Soil Ecol. 156:103709. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103709 Herzog C. Hartmann M. Frey B. Stierli B. Rumpel C. Buchmann N. . (2019). Microbial succession on decomposing root litter in a drought-prone scots pine forest. ISME J. 13, 23462362. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0436-6, PMID: 31123321 Holland E. A. Coleman D. C. (1987). Litter placement effects on microbial and organic matter dynamics in an agroecosystem. Ecology 68, 425433. doi: 10.2307/1939274 Jansson J. K. Hofmockel K. S. (2020). Soil microbiomes and climate change. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 3546. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0265-7 Jarvis P. Rey A. Petsikos C. Wingate L. Rayment M. Pereira J. . (2007). Drying and wetting of Mediterranean soils stimulates decomposition and carbon dioxide emission: the birch effect†. Tree Physiol. 27, 929940. doi: 10.1093/treephys/27.7.929, PMID: 17403645 Jiang Y. Qian H. Wang X. Chen L. Liu M. Li H. . (2018). Nematodes and microbial community affect the sizes and turnover rates of organic carbon pools in soil aggregates. Soil Biol. Biochem. 119, 2231. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.001 Jiang M. Yang N. Zhao J. Shaaban M. Hu R. (2021). Crop straw incorporation mediates the impacts of soil aggregate size on greenhouse gas emissions. Geoderma 401:115342. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115342 Johan S. Clarholm M. Sven B. Rosswall T. (1986). Effects of moisture on soil microorganisms and nematodes: a field experiment. Microb. Ecol. 12, 217230. doi: 10.1007/BF02011206, PMID: 24212539 Jones K. B. Slonecker E. T. Nash M. S. Neale A. C. Wade T. G. Hamann S. (2010). Riparian habitat changes across the continental United States (1972–2003) and potential implications for sustaining ecosystem services. Landsc. Ecol. 25, 12611275. doi: 10.1007/s10980-010-9510-1 Kan Z. R. Ma S. T. Liu Q. Y. Liu B. Y. Virk A. L. Qi J. Y. . (2020). Carbon sequestration and mineralization in soil aggregates under long-term conservation tillage in the North China plain. Catena 188:104428. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2019.104428 Kõljalg U. Nilsson R. H. Abarenkov K. Tedersoo L. Taylor A. F. S. Bahram M. . (2013). Towards a unified paradigm for sequence-based identification of fungi. Mol. Ecol. 22, 52715277. doi: 10.1111/mec.12481, PMID: 24112409 Lee C. K. Barbier B. A. Bottos E. M. McDonald I. R. Cary S. C. (2012). The inter-valley soil comparative survey: the ecology of dry valley edaphic microbial communities. ISME J. 6, 10461057. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.170, PMID: 22170424 Leira M. Cantonati M. (2008). Effects of water-level fluctuations on lakes: an annotated bibliography. Hydrobiologia 613, 171184. doi: 10.1007/s10750-008-9465-2 Liaw A. Wiener M. (2002). Classification and regression by random Forest. R News 2, 1822. Lin Y. Ye G. Kuzyakov Y. Liu D. Fan J. Ding W. (2019). Long-term manure application increases soil organic matter and aggregation, and alters microbial community structure and keystone taxa. Soil Biol. Biochem. 134, 187196. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.03.030 Liu X. J. A. Hayer M. Mau R. L. Schwartz E. Dijkstra P. Hungate B. A. (2021). Substrate stoichiometric regulation of microbial respiration and community dynamics across four different ecosystems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 163:108458. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108458 Luo Y. Zhou X.. (2006). Soil respiration and the environment. Elsevier, San Diego. Magoč T. Salzberg S. L. (2011). FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27, 29572963. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507, PMID: 21903629 Malik A. A. Martiny J. B. H. Brodie E. L. Martiny A. C. Treseder K. K. Allison S. D. (2020). Defining trait-based microbial strategies with consequences for soil carbon cycling under climate change. ISME J. 14, 19. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0510-0, PMID: 31554911 Mangalassery S. Sjögersten S. Sparkes D. L. Sturrock C. J. Mooney S. J. (2013). The effect of soil aggregate size on pore structure and its consequence on emission of greenhouse gases. Soil Tillage Res. 132, 3946. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2013.05.003 Manzoni S. Schimel J. P. Porporato A. (2012). Responses of soil microbial communities to water stress: results from a meta-analysis. Ecology 93, 930938. doi: 10.1890/11-0026.1, PMID: 22690643 Márquez C. O. Garcia V. J. Cambardella C. A. Schultz R. C. Isenhart T. M. (2004). Aggregate-size stability distribution and soil stability. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68, 725735. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2004.7250 McGinnis M. R. Tyring S. K.. (1996). Introduction to mycology. Medical microbiology. 4th Edn. Galveston, TX: University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston. Meisner A. Bååth E. Rousk J. (2013). Microbial growth responses upon rewetting soil dried for four days or one year. Soil Biol. Biochem. 66, 188192. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.07.014 Navas M. Martín-Lammerding D. Hontoria C. Ulcuango K. Mariscal-Sancho I. (2021). The distinct responses of bacteria and fungi in different-sized soil aggregates under different management practices. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 72, 11771189. doi: 10.1111/ejss.12997 Nelson D. W. Sommers L. E. (1996). “Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter” in Methods of soil analysis. eds. Sparks D. L. Page A. L. Helmke P. A. Loeppert R. H. Soltanpour P. N. Tabatabai M. A. (Madison: SSSA Book Series), 9611010. Noellemeyer E. Frank F. Alvarez C. Morazzo G. Quiroga A. (2008). Carbon contents and aggregation related to soil physical and biological properties under a land-use sequence in the semiarid region of Central Argentina. Soil Tillage Res. 99, 179190. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2008.02.003 Ontl T. A. Schulte L. A. (2012). Soil carbon storage. Nat. Educ. Knowl. 3:35. Peralta R. M. Ahn C. Gillevet P. M. (2013). Characterization of soil bacterial community structure and physicochemical properties in created and natural wetlands. Sci. Total Environ. 443, 725732. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.052, PMID: 23228718 Qiu L. Zhang Q. Zhu H. Reich P. B. Banerjee S. van der Heijden M. G. A. . (2021). Erosion reduces soil microbial diversity, network complexity and multifunctionality. ISME J. 15, 24742489. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-00913-1, PMID: 33712698 Rabbi S. M. F. Wilson B. R. Lockwood P. V. Daniel H. Young I. M. (2014). Soil organic carbon mineralization rates in aggregates under contrasting land uses. Geoderma 216, 1018. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.10.023 Razafimbelo T. M. Albrecht A. Oliver R. Chevallier T. Chapuis-Lardy L. Feller C. (2008). Aggregate associated-C and physical protection in a tropical clayey soil under Malagasy conventional and no-tillage systems. Soil Tillage Res. 98, 140149. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2007.10.012 Rusalimova O. Barsukov P. (2006). “Decomposition of labile and recalcitrant soil organic matter of Gleyic Cryosols in permafrost region of Siberia” in Symptom of environmental change in Siberian permafrost region. eds. Hatano R. Guggenberger G. (Sapporo: Hokkaido University Press), 93102. Sanchez G.. (2013). PLS path modeling with R. Berkeley: Trowchez Editions 383, 551. Schimel J. P. (2018). Life in dry soils: effects of drought on soil microbial communities and processes. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 49, 409432. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062614 Sey B. K. Manceur A. M. Whalen J. K. Gregorich E. G. Rochette P. (2008). Small-scale heterogeneity in carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and methane production from aggregates of a cultivated sandy-loam soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40, 24682473. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.012 She W. Yang J. Wu G. Jiang H. (2022). The synergy of environmental and microbial variations caused by hydrologic management affects the carbon emission in the three gorges reservoir. Sci. Total Environ. 821:153446. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153446, PMID: 35092771 Silvola J. Alm J. Ahlholm U. Nykanen H. Martikainen P. J. (1996). CO2 fluxes from peat in boreal mires under varying temperature and moisture conditions. J. Ecol. 84, 219228. doi: 10.2307/2261357 Six J. Bossuyt H. Degryze S. Denef K. (2004). A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Tillage Res. 79, 731. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2004.03.008 Six J. Elliott E. T. Paustian K. (1999). Aggregate and soil organic matter dynamics under conventional and no-tillage systems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63, 13501358. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1999.6351350x Tait E. Carman M. Sievert S. M. (2007). Phylogenetic diversity of bacteria associated with ascidians in eel pond (woods hole, Massachusetts, USA). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 342, 138146. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2006.10.024 Tisdall J. M. Oades J. M. (1982). Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils. J. Soil Sci. 33, 141163. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x Tiwari R. Kumar K. Singh S. Nain L. Shukla P. (2016). Molecular detection and environment-specific diversity of Glycosyl hydrolase family 1 β-Glucosidase in different habitats. Front. Microbiol. 7:1597. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01597, PMID: 27790196 Trivedi P. Delgado-Baquerizo M. Jeffries T. C. Trivedi C. Anderson I. C. Lai K. . (2017). Soil aggregation and associated microbial communities modify the impact of agricultural management on carbon content. Environ. Microbiol. 19, 30703086. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13779, PMID: 28447378 Umair M. Sun N. Du H. Hui N. Altaf M. Du B. . (2020). Bacterial communities are more sensitive to water addition than fungal communities due to higher soil K and Na in a degraded karst ecosystem of southwestern China. Front. Microbiol. 11:562546. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.562546, PMID: 33240226 Upton R. N. Bach E. M. Hofmockel K. S. (2019). Spatio-temporal microbial community dynamics within soil aggregates. Soil Biol. Biochem. 132, 5868. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.01.016 Voříšková J. Baldrian P. (2013). Fungal community on decomposing leaf litter undergoes rapid successional changes. ISME J. 7, 477486. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.116 Wagg C. Schlaeppi K. Banerjee S. Kuramae E. E. van der Heijden M. G. A. (2019). Fungal-bacterial diversity and microbiome complexity predict ecosystem functioning. Nat. Commun. 10:4841. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12798-y, PMID: 31649246 Wang X. Bian Q. Jiang Y. Zhu L. Chen Y. Liang Y. . (2021). Organic amendments drive shifts in microbial community structure and keystone taxa which increase C mineralization across aggregate size classes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 153:108062. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.108062 Wang B. Brewer P. E. Shugart H. H. Lerdau M. T. Allison S. D. (2019). Soil aggregates as biogeochemical reactors and implications for soil–atmosphere exchange of greenhouse gases–a concept. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25, 373385. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14515, PMID: 30412646 Wang D. Chi Z. Yue B. Huang X. Zhao J. Song H. . (2020). Effects of mowing and nitrogen addition on the ecosystem C and N pools in a temperate steppe: a case study from northern China. Catena 185:104332. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2019.104332 Wang Q. Garrity G. M. Tiedje J. M. Cole J. R. (2007). Naïve Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 52615267. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00062-07, PMID: 17586664 Wang Z. Li Y. Chang S. X. Zhang J. Jiang P. Zhou G. . (2014). Contrasting effects of bamboo leaf and its biochar on soil CO2 efflux and labile organic carbon in an intensively managed Chinese chestnut plantation. Biol. Fertil. Soils 50, 11091119. doi: 10.1007/s00374-014-0933-8 Wang G. Wang Y. Yang P. Luo H. Huang H. Shi P. . (2010). Molecular detection and diversity of xylanase genes in alpine tundra soil. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 87, 13831393. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2564-9, PMID: 20393704 Wilpiszeski R. L. Aufrecht J. A. Retterer S. T. Sullivan M. B. Graham D. E. Pierce E. M. . (2019). Soil aggregate microbial communities: towards understanding microbiome interactions at biologically relevant scales. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85, e00324e00319. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00324-19 Xiang Y. Wang Y. Zhang C. Shen H. Wang D. (2018). Water level fluctuations influence microbial communities and mercury methylation in soils in the three gorges reservoir, China. J. Environ. Sci. 68, 206217. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2018.03.009, PMID: 29908740 Ye F. Ma M. H. Wu S. J. Jiang Y. Zhu G. B. Zhang H. . (2019). Soil properties and distribution in the riparian zone: the effects of fluctuations in water and anthropogenic disturbances. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 70, 664673. doi: 10.1111/ejss.12756 Ye F. Wang X. Wang Y. Wu S. Wu J. Hong Y. (2021). Different pioneer plant species have similar rhizosphere microbial communities. Plant Soil 464, 165181. doi: 10.1007/s11104-021-04952-7 Zhang G. (2010). Changes of soil labile organic carbon in different land uses in Sanjiang plain, Heilongjiang Province. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 20, 139143. doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0139-4 Zhang L. Adams J. M. Dumont M. G. Li Y. Shi Y. He D. . (2019). Distinct methanotrophic communities exist in habitats with different soil water contents. Soil Biol. Biochem. 132, 143152. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.02.007 Zhang H. Ding W. He X. Yu H. Fan J. Liu D. (2014). Influence of 20–year organic and inorganic fertilization on organic carbon accumulation and microbial community structure of aggregates in an intensively cultivated sandy loam soil. PLoS One 9:e92733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092733, PMID: 24667543 Zhang C. Liu G. Xue S. Wang G. (2016). Soil bacterial community dynamics reflect changes in plant community and soil properties during the secondary succession of abandoned farmland in the loess plateau. Soil Biol. Biochem. 97, 4049. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.02.013 Zhang Q. Shao M. A. Jia X. Zhang C. (2018). Understory vegetation and drought effects on soil aggregate stability and aggregate-associated carbon on the loess plateau in China. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 82, 106114. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2017.05.0145 Zheng H. Yang T. Bao Y. He P. Yang K. Mei X. . (2021). Network analysis and subsequent culturing reveal keystone taxa involved in microbial litter decomposition dynamics. Soil Biol. Biochem. 157:108230. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108230 Zheng W. Zhao Z. Gong Q. Zhai B. Li Z. (2018). Effects of cover crop in an apple orchard on microbial community composition, networks, and potential genes involved with degradation of crop residues in soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 54, 743759. doi: 10.1007/s00374-018-1298-1 Zhou H. Gao Y. Jia X. Wang M. Ding J. Cheng L. . (2020). Network analysis reveals the strengthening of microbial interaction in biological soil crust development in the mu us Sandy land, northwestern China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 144:107782. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107782 Zhu K. Li W. Yang S. Ran Y. Lei X. Ma M. . (2022a). Intense wet-dry cycles weakened the carbon sequestration of soil aggregates in the riparian zone. Catena 212:106117. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106117 Zhu K. Ma M. Ran Y. Liu Z. Wu S. Huang P. (2020). In mitigating CO2 emission in the reservoir riparian: the influences of land use and the dam-triggered flooding on soil respiration. Soil Tillage Res. 197:104522. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2019.104522 Zhu K. Ran Y. Ma M. Li W. Mir Y. Ran J. . (2022b). Ameliorating soil structure for the reservoir riparian: the influences of land use and dam-triggered flooding on soil aggregates. Soil Tillage Res. 216:105263. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2021.105263

      1http://drive5.com/uparse

      ‘Oh, my dear Thomas, you haven’t heard the terrible news then?’ she said. ‘I thought you would be sure to have seen it placarded somewhere. Alice went straight to her room, and I haven’t seen her since, though I repeatedly knocked at the door, which she has locked on the inside, and I’m sure it’s most unnatural of her not to let her own mother comfort her. It all happened in a moment: I have always said those great motor-cars shouldn’t be allowed to career about the streets, especially when they are all paved with cobbles as they are at Easton Haven, which are{331} so slippery when it’s wet. He slipped, and it went over him in a moment.’ My thanks were few and awkward, for there still hung to the missive a basting thread, and it was as warm as a nestling bird. I bent low--everybody was emotional in those days--kissed the fragrant thing, thrust it into my bosom, and blushed worse than Camille. "What, the Corner House victim? Is that really a fact?" "My dear child, I don't look upon it in that light at all. The child gave our picturesque friend a certain distinction--'My husband is dead, and this is my only child,' and all that sort of thing. It pays in society." leave them on the steps of a foundling asylum in order to insure [See larger version] Interoffice guff says you're planning definite moves on your own, J. O., and against some opposition. Is the Colonel so poor or so grasping—or what? Albert could not speak, for he felt as if his brains and teeth were rattling about inside his head. The rest of[Pg 188] the family hunched together by the door, the boys gaping idiotically, the girls in tears. "Now you're married." The host was called in, and unlocked a drawer in which they were deposited. The galleyman, with visible reluctance, arrayed himself in the garments, and he was observed to shudder more than once during the investiture of the dead man's apparel. HoME香京julia种子在线播放 ENTER NUMBET 0016www.hlcitq.com.cn
      mfchain.com.cn
      www.likemei.net.cn
      www.fmlpjs.com.cn
      www.edwpyp.com.cn
      sjmqwk.com.cn
      mjdfgx.com.cn
      sme3g.com.cn
      tyssdk.org.cn
      www.woobuy.com.cn
      处女被大鸡巴操 强奸乱伦小说图片 俄罗斯美女爱爱图 调教强奸学生 亚洲女的穴 夜来香图片大全 美女性强奸电影 手机版色中阁 男性人体艺术素描图 16p成人 欧美性爱360 电影区 亚洲电影 欧美电影 经典三级 偷拍自拍 动漫电影 乱伦电影 变态另类 全部电 类似狠狠鲁的网站 黑吊操白逼图片 韩国黄片种子下载 操逼逼逼逼逼 人妻 小说 p 偷拍10幼女自慰 极品淫水很多 黄色做i爱 日本女人人体电影快播看 大福国小 我爱肏屄美女 mmcrwcom 欧美多人性交图片 肥臀乱伦老头舔阴帝 d09a4343000019c5 西欧人体艺术b xxoo激情短片 未成年人的 插泰国人夭图片 第770弾み1 24p 日本美女性 交动态 eee色播 yantasythunder 操无毛少女屄 亚洲图片你懂的女人 鸡巴插姨娘 特级黄 色大片播 左耳影音先锋 冢本友希全集 日本人体艺术绿色 我爱被舔逼 内射 幼 美阴图 喷水妹子高潮迭起 和后妈 操逼 美女吞鸡巴 鸭个自慰 中国女裸名单 操逼肥臀出水换妻 色站裸体义术 中国行上的漏毛美女叫什么 亚洲妹性交图 欧美美女人裸体人艺照 成人色妹妹直播 WWW_JXCT_COM r日本女人性淫乱 大胆人艺体艺图片 女同接吻av 碰碰哥免费自拍打炮 艳舞写真duppid1 88电影街拍视频 日本自拍做爱qvod 实拍美女性爱组图 少女高清av 浙江真实乱伦迅雷 台湾luanlunxiaoshuo 洛克王国宠物排行榜 皇瑟电影yy频道大全 红孩儿连连看 阴毛摄影 大胆美女写真人体艺术摄影 和风骚三个媳妇在家做爱 性爱办公室高清 18p2p木耳 大波撸影音 大鸡巴插嫩穴小说 一剧不超两个黑人 阿姨诱惑我快播 幼香阁千叶县小学生 少女妇女被狗强奸 曰人体妹妹 十二岁性感幼女 超级乱伦qvod 97爱蜜桃ccc336 日本淫妇阴液 av海量资源999 凤凰影视成仁 辰溪四中艳照门照片 先锋模特裸体展示影片 成人片免费看 自拍百度云 肥白老妇女 女爱人体图片 妈妈一女穴 星野美夏 日本少女dachidu 妹子私处人体图片 yinmindahuitang 舔无毛逼影片快播 田莹疑的裸体照片 三级电影影音先锋02222 妻子被外国老头操 观月雏乃泥鳅 韩国成人偷拍自拍图片 强奸5一9岁幼女小说 汤姆影院av图片 妹妹人艺体图 美女大驱 和女友做爱图片自拍p 绫川まどか在线先锋 那么嫩的逼很少见了 小女孩做爱 处女好逼连连看图图 性感美女在家做爱 近距离抽插骚逼逼 黑屌肏金毛屄 日韩av美少女 看喝尿尿小姐日逼色色色网图片 欧美肛交新视频 美女吃逼逼 av30线上免费 伊人在线三级经典 新视觉影院t6090影院 最新淫色电影网址 天龙影院远古手机版 搞老太影院 插进美女的大屁股里 私人影院加盟费用 www258dd 求一部电影里面有一个二猛哥 深肛交 日本萌妹子人体艺术写真图片 插入屄眼 美女的木奶 中文字幕黄色网址影视先锋 九号女神裸 和骚人妻偷情 和潘晓婷做爱 国模大尺度蜜桃 欧美大逼50p 西西人体成人 李宗瑞继母做爱原图物处理 nianhuawang 男鸡巴的视屏 � 97免费色伦电影 好色网成人 大姨子先锋 淫荡巨乳美女教师妈妈 性nuexiaoshuo WWW36YYYCOM 长春继续给力进屋就操小女儿套干破内射对白淫荡 农夫激情社区 日韩无码bt 欧美美女手掰嫩穴图片 日本援交偷拍自拍 入侵者日本在线播放 亚洲白虎偷拍自拍 常州高见泽日屄 寂寞少妇自卫视频 人体露逼图片 多毛外国老太 变态乱轮手机在线 淫荡妈妈和儿子操逼 伦理片大奶少女 看片神器最新登入地址sqvheqi345com账号群 麻美学姐无头 圣诞老人射小妞和强奸小妞动话片 亚洲AV女老师 先锋影音欧美成人资源 33344iucoom zV天堂电影网 宾馆美女打炮视频 色五月丁香五月magnet 嫂子淫乱小说 张歆艺的老公 吃奶男人视频在线播放 欧美色图男女乱伦 avtt2014ccvom 性插色欲香影院 青青草撸死你青青草 99热久久第一时间 激情套图卡通动漫 幼女裸聊做爱口交 日本女人被强奸乱伦 草榴社区快播 2kkk正在播放兽骑 啊不要人家小穴都湿了 www猎奇影视 A片www245vvcomwwwchnrwhmhzcn 搜索宜春院av wwwsee78co 逼奶鸡巴插 好吊日AV在线视频19gancom 熟女伦乱图片小说 日本免费av无码片在线开苞 鲁大妈撸到爆 裸聊官网 德国熟女xxx 新不夜城论坛首页手机 女虐男网址 男女做爱视频华为网盘 激情午夜天亚洲色图 内裤哥mangent 吉沢明歩制服丝袜WWWHHH710COM 屌逼在线试看 人体艺体阿娇艳照 推荐一个可以免费看片的网站如果被QQ拦截请复制链接在其它浏览器打开xxxyyy5comintr2a2cb551573a2b2e 欧美360精品粉红鲍鱼 教师调教第一页 聚美屋精品图 中韩淫乱群交 俄罗斯撸撸片 把鸡巴插进小姨子的阴道 干干AV成人网 aolasoohpnbcn www84ytom 高清大量潮喷www27dyycom 宝贝开心成人 freefronvideos人母 嫩穴成人网gggg29com 逼着舅妈给我口交肛交彩漫画 欧美色色aV88wwwgangguanscom 老太太操逼自拍视频 777亚洲手机在线播放 有没有夫妻3p小说 色列漫画淫女 午间色站导航 欧美成人处女色大图 童颜巨乳亚洲综合 桃色性欲草 色眯眯射逼 无码中文字幕塞外青楼这是一个 狂日美女老师人妻 爱碰网官网 亚洲图片雅蠛蝶 快播35怎么搜片 2000XXXX电影 新谷露性家庭影院 深深候dvd播放 幼齿用英语怎么说 不雅伦理无需播放器 国外淫荡图片 国外网站幼幼嫩网址 成年人就去色色视频快播 我鲁日日鲁老老老我爱 caoshaonvbi 人体艺术avav 性感性色导航 韩国黄色哥来嫖网站 成人网站美逼 淫荡熟妇自拍 欧美色惰图片 北京空姐透明照 狼堡免费av视频 www776eom 亚洲无码av欧美天堂网男人天堂 欧美激情爆操 a片kk266co 色尼姑成人极速在线视频 国语家庭系列 蒋雯雯 越南伦理 色CC伦理影院手机版 99jbbcom 大鸡巴舅妈 国产偷拍自拍淫荡对话视频 少妇春梦射精 开心激动网 自拍偷牌成人 色桃隐 撸狗网性交视频 淫荡的三位老师 伦理电影wwwqiuxia6commqiuxia6com 怡春院分站 丝袜超短裙露脸迅雷下载 色制服电影院 97超碰好吊色男人 yy6080理论在线宅男日韩福利大全 大嫂丝袜 500人群交手机在线 5sav 偷拍熟女吧 口述我和妹妹的欲望 50p电脑版 wwwavtttcon 3p3com 伦理无码片在线看 欧美成人电影图片岛国性爱伦理电影 先锋影音AV成人欧美 我爱好色 淫电影网 WWW19MMCOM 玛丽罗斯3d同人动画h在线看 动漫女孩裸体 超级丝袜美腿乱伦 1919gogo欣赏 大色逼淫色 www就是撸 激情文学网好骚 A级黄片免费 xedd5com 国内的b是黑的 快播美国成年人片黄 av高跟丝袜视频 上原保奈美巨乳女教师在线观看 校园春色都市激情fefegancom 偷窥自拍XXOO 搜索看马操美女 人本女优视频 日日吧淫淫 人妻巨乳影院 美国女子性爱学校 大肥屁股重口味 啪啪啪啊啊啊不要 操碰 japanfreevideoshome国产 亚州淫荡老熟女人体 伦奸毛片免费在线看 天天影视se 樱桃做爱视频 亚卅av在线视频 x奸小说下载 亚洲色图图片在线 217av天堂网 东方在线撸撸-百度 幼幼丝袜集 灰姑娘的姐姐 青青草在线视频观看对华 86papa路con 亚洲1AV 综合图片2区亚洲 美国美女大逼电影 010插插av成人网站 www色comwww821kxwcom 播乐子成人网免费视频在线观看 大炮撸在线影院 ,www4KkKcom 野花鲁最近30部 wwwCC213wapwww2233ww2download 三客优最新地址 母亲让儿子爽的无码视频 全国黄色片子 欧美色图美国十次 超碰在线直播 性感妖娆操 亚洲肉感熟女色图 a片A毛片管看视频 8vaa褋芯屑 333kk 川岛和津实视频 在线母子乱伦对白 妹妹肥逼五月 亚洲美女自拍 老婆在我面前小说 韩国空姐堪比情趣内衣 干小姐综合 淫妻色五月 添骚穴 WM62COM 23456影视播放器 成人午夜剧场 尼姑福利网 AV区亚洲AV欧美AV512qucomwwwc5508com 经典欧美骚妇 震动棒露出 日韩丝袜美臀巨乳在线 av无限吧看 就去干少妇 色艺无间正面是哪集 校园春色我和老师做爱 漫画夜色 天海丽白色吊带 黄色淫荡性虐小说 午夜高清播放器 文20岁女性荫道口图片 热国产热无码热有码 2015小明发布看看算你色 百度云播影视 美女肏屄屄乱轮小说 家族舔阴AV影片 邪恶在线av有码 父女之交 关于处女破处的三级片 极品护士91在线 欧美虐待女人视频的网站 享受老太太的丝袜 aaazhibuo 8dfvodcom成人 真实自拍足交 群交男女猛插逼 妓女爱爱动态 lin35com是什么网站 abp159 亚洲色图偷拍自拍乱伦熟女抠逼自慰 朝国三级篇 淫三国幻想 免费的av小电影网站 日本阿v视频免费按摩师 av750c0m 黄色片操一下 巨乳少女车震在线观看 操逼 免费 囗述情感一乱伦岳母和女婿 WWW_FAMITSU_COM 偷拍中国少妇在公车被操视频 花也真衣论理电影 大鸡鸡插p洞 新片欧美十八岁美少 进击的巨人神thunderftp 西方美女15p 深圳哪里易找到老女人玩视频 在线成人有声小说 365rrr 女尿图片 我和淫荡的小姨做爱 � 做爱技术体照 淫妇性爱 大学生私拍b 第四射狠狠射小说 色中色成人av社区 和小姨子乱伦肛交 wwwppp62com 俄罗斯巨乳人体艺术 骚逼阿娇 汤芳人体图片大胆 大胆人体艺术bb私处 性感大胸骚货 哪个网站幼女的片多 日本美女本子把 色 五月天 婷婷 快播 美女 美穴艺术 色百合电影导航 大鸡巴用力 孙悟空操美少女战士 狠狠撸美女手掰穴图片 古代女子与兽类交 沙耶香套图 激情成人网区 暴风影音av播放 动漫女孩怎么插第3个 mmmpp44 黑木麻衣无码ed2k 淫荡学姐少妇 乱伦操少女屄 高中性爱故事 骚妹妹爱爱图网 韩国模特剪长发 大鸡巴把我逼日了 中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片 大胆女人下体艺术图片 789sss 影音先锋在线国内情侣野外性事自拍普通话对白 群撸图库 闪现君打阿乐 ady 小说 插入表妹嫩穴小说 推荐成人资源 网络播放器 成人台 149大胆人体艺术 大屌图片 骚美女成人av 春暖花开春色性吧 女亭婷五月 我上了同桌的姐姐 恋夜秀场主播自慰视频 yzppp 屄茎 操屄女图 美女鲍鱼大特写 淫乱的日本人妻山口玲子 偷拍射精图 性感美女人体艺木图片 种马小说完本 免费电影院 骑士福利导航导航网站 骚老婆足交 国产性爱一级电影 欧美免费成人花花性都 欧美大肥妞性爱视频 家庭乱伦网站快播 偷拍自拍国产毛片 金发美女也用大吊来开包 缔D杏那 yentiyishu人体艺术ytys WWWUUKKMCOM 女人露奶 � 苍井空露逼 老荡妇高跟丝袜足交 偷偷和女友的朋友做爱迅雷 做爱七十二尺 朱丹人体合成 麻腾由纪妃 帅哥撸播种子图 鸡巴插逼动态图片 羙国十次啦中文 WWW137AVCOM 神斗片欧美版华语 有气质女人人休艺术 由美老师放屁电影 欧美女人肉肏图片 白虎种子快播 国产自拍90后女孩 美女在床上疯狂嫩b 饭岛爱最后之作 幼幼强奸摸奶 色97成人动漫 两性性爱打鸡巴插逼 新视觉影院4080青苹果影院 嗯好爽插死我了 阴口艺术照 李宗瑞电影qvod38 爆操舅母 亚洲色图七七影院 被大鸡巴操菊花 怡红院肿么了 成人极品影院删除 欧美性爱大图色图强奸乱 欧美女子与狗随便性交 苍井空的bt种子无码 熟女乱伦长篇小说 大色虫 兽交幼女影音先锋播放 44aad be0ca93900121f9b 先锋天耗ばさ无码 欧毛毛女三级黄色片图 干女人黑木耳照 日本美女少妇嫩逼人体艺术 sesechangchang 色屄屄网 久久撸app下载 色图色噜 美女鸡巴大奶 好吊日在线视频在线观看 透明丝袜脚偷拍自拍 中山怡红院菜单 wcwwwcom下载 骑嫂子 亚洲大色妣 成人故事365ahnet 丝袜家庭教mp4 幼交肛交 妹妹撸撸大妈 日本毛爽 caoprom超碰在email 关于中国古代偷窥的黄片 第一会所老熟女下载 wwwhuangsecome 狼人干综合新地址HD播放 变态儿子强奸乱伦图 强奸电影名字 2wwwer37com 日本毛片基地一亚洲AVmzddcxcn 暗黑圣经仙桃影院 37tpcocn 持月真由xfplay 好吊日在线视频三级网 我爱背入李丽珍 电影师傅床戏在线观看 96插妹妹sexsex88com 豪放家庭在线播放 桃花宝典极夜著豆瓜网 安卓系统播放神器 美美网丝袜诱惑 人人干全免费视频xulawyercn av无插件一本道 全国色五月 操逼电影小说网 good在线wwwyuyuelvcom www18avmmd 撸波波影视无插件 伊人幼女成人电影 会看射的图片 小明插看看 全裸美女扒开粉嫩b 国人自拍性交网站 萝莉白丝足交本子 七草ちとせ巨乳视频 摇摇晃晃的成人电影 兰桂坊成社人区小说www68kqcom 舔阴论坛 久撸客一撸客色国内外成人激情在线 明星门 欧美大胆嫩肉穴爽大片 www牛逼插 性吧星云 少妇性奴的屁眼 人体艺术大胆mscbaidu1imgcn 最新久久色色成人版 l女同在线 小泽玛利亚高潮图片搜索 女性裸b图 肛交bt种子 最热门有声小说 人间添春色 春色猜谜字 樱井莉亚钢管舞视频 小泽玛利亚直美6p 能用的h网 还能看的h网 bl动漫h网 开心五月激 东京热401 男色女色第四色酒色网 怎么下载黄色小说 黄色小说小栽 和谐图城 乐乐影院 色哥导航 特色导航 依依社区 爱窝窝在线 色狼谷成人 91porn 包要你射电影 色色3A丝袜 丝袜妹妹淫网 爱色导航(荐) 好男人激情影院 坏哥哥 第七色 色久久 人格分裂 急先锋 撸撸射中文网 第一会所综合社区 91影院老师机 东方成人激情 怼莪影院吹潮 老鸭窝伊人无码不卡无码一本道 av女柳晶电影 91天生爱风流作品 深爱激情小说私房婷婷网 擼奶av 567pao 里番3d一家人野外 上原在线电影 水岛津实透明丝袜 1314酒色 网旧网俺也去 0855影院 在线无码私人影院 搜索 国产自拍 神马dy888午夜伦理达达兔 农民工黄晓婷 日韩裸体黑丝御姐 屈臣氏的燕窝面膜怎么样つぼみ晶エリーの早漏チ○ポ强化合宿 老熟女人性视频 影音先锋 三上悠亚ol 妹妹影院福利片 hhhhhhhhsxo 午夜天堂热的国产 强奸剧场 全裸香蕉视频无码 亚欧伦理视频 秋霞为什么给封了 日本在线视频空天使 日韩成人aⅴ在线 日本日屌日屄导航视频 在线福利视频 日本推油无码av magnet 在线免费视频 樱井梨吮东 日本一本道在线无码DVD 日本性感诱惑美女做爱阴道流水视频 日本一级av 汤姆avtom在线视频 台湾佬中文娱乐线20 阿v播播下载 橙色影院 奴隶少女护士cg视频 汤姆在线影院无码 偷拍宾馆 业面紧急生级访问 色和尚有线 厕所偷拍一族 av女l 公交色狼优酷视频 裸体视频AV 人与兽肉肉网 董美香ol 花井美纱链接 magnet 西瓜影音 亚洲 自拍 日韩女优欧美激情偷拍自拍 亚洲成年人免费视频 荷兰免费成人电影 深喉呕吐XXⅩX 操石榴在线视频 天天色成人免费视频 314hu四虎 涩久免费视频在线观看 成人电影迅雷下载 能看见整个奶子的香蕉影院 水菜丽百度影音 gwaz079百度云 噜死你们资源站 主播走光视频合集迅雷下载 thumbzilla jappen 精品Av 古川伊织star598在线 假面女皇vip在线视频播放 国产自拍迷情校园 啪啪啪公寓漫画 日本阿AV 黄色手机电影 欧美在线Av影院 华裔电击女神91在线 亚洲欧美专区 1日本1000部免费视频 开放90后 波多野结衣 东方 影院av 页面升级紧急访问每天正常更新 4438Xchengeren 老炮色 a k福利电影 色欲影视色天天视频 高老庄aV 259LUXU-683 magnet 手机在线电影 国产区 欧美激情人人操网 国产 偷拍 直播 日韩 国内外激情在线视频网给 站长统计一本道人妻 光棍影院被封 紫竹铃取汁 ftp 狂插空姐嫩 xfplay 丈夫面前 穿靴子伪街 XXOO视频在线免费 大香蕉道久在线播放 电棒漏电嗨过头 充气娃能看下毛和洞吗 夫妻牲交 福利云点墦 yukun瑟妃 疯狂交换女友 国产自拍26页 腐女资源 百度云 日本DVD高清无码视频 偷拍,自拍AV伦理电影 A片小视频福利站。 大奶肥婆自拍偷拍图片 交配伊甸园 超碰在线视频自拍偷拍国产 小热巴91大神 rctd 045 类似于A片 超美大奶大学生美女直播被男友操 男友问 你的衣服怎么脱掉的 亚洲女与黑人群交视频一 在线黄涩 木内美保步兵番号 鸡巴插入欧美美女的b舒服 激情在线国产自拍日韩欧美 国语福利小视频在线观看 作爱小视颍 潮喷合集丝袜无码mp4 做爱的无码高清视频 牛牛精品 伊aⅤ在线观看 savk12 哥哥搞在线播放 在线电一本道影 一级谍片 250pp亚洲情艺中心,88 欧美一本道九色在线一 wwwseavbacom色av吧 cos美女在线 欧美17,18ⅹⅹⅹ视频 自拍嫩逼 小电影在线观看网站 筱田优 贼 水电工 5358x视频 日本69式视频有码 b雪福利导航 韩国女主播19tvclub在线 操逼清晰视频 丝袜美女国产视频网址导航 水菜丽颜射房间 台湾妹中文娱乐网 风吟岛视频 口交 伦理 日本熟妇色五十路免费视频 A级片互舔 川村真矢Av在线观看 亚洲日韩av 色和尚国产自拍 sea8 mp4 aV天堂2018手机在线 免费版国产偷拍a在线播放 狠狠 婷婷 丁香 小视频福利在线观看平台 思妍白衣小仙女被邻居强上 萝莉自拍有水 4484新视觉 永久发布页 977成人影视在线观看 小清新影院在线观 小鸟酱后丝后入百度云 旋风魅影四级 香蕉影院小黄片免费看 性爱直播磁力链接 小骚逼第一色影院 性交流的视频 小雪小视频bd 小视频TV禁看视频 迷奸AV在线看 nba直播 任你在干线 汤姆影院在线视频国产 624u在线播放 成人 一级a做爰片就在线看狐狸视频 小香蕉AV视频 www182、com 腿模简小育 学生做爱视频 秘密搜查官 快播 成人福利网午夜 一级黄色夫妻录像片 直接看的gav久久播放器 国产自拍400首页 sm老爹影院 谁知道隔壁老王网址在线 综合网 123西瓜影音 米奇丁香 人人澡人人漠大学生 色久悠 夜色视频你今天寂寞了吗? 菲菲影视城美国 被抄的影院 变态另类 欧美 成人 国产偷拍自拍在线小说 不用下载安装就能看的吃男人鸡巴视频 插屄视频 大贯杏里播放 wwwhhh50 233若菜奈央 伦理片天海翼秘密搜查官 大香蕉在线万色屋视频 那种漫画小说你懂的 祥仔电影合集一区 那里可以看澳门皇冠酒店a片 色自啪 亚洲aV电影天堂 谷露影院ar toupaizaixian sexbj。com 毕业生 zaixian mianfei 朝桐光视频 成人短视频在线直接观看 陈美霖 沈阳音乐学院 导航女 www26yjjcom 1大尺度视频 开平虐女视频 菅野雪松协和影视在线视频 华人play在线视频bbb 鸡吧操屄视频 多啪啪免费视频 悠草影院 金兰策划网 (969) 橘佑金短视频 国内一极刺激自拍片 日本制服番号大全magnet 成人动漫母系 电脑怎么清理内存 黄色福利1000 dy88午夜 偷拍中学生洗澡磁力链接 花椒相机福利美女视频 站长推荐磁力下载 mp4 三洞轮流插视频 玉兔miki热舞视频 夜生活小视频 爆乳人妖小视频 国内网红主播自拍福利迅雷下载 不用app的裸裸体美女操逼视频 变态SM影片在线观看 草溜影院元气吧 - 百度 - 百度 波推全套视频 国产双飞集合ftp 日本在线AV网 笔国毛片 神马影院女主播是我的邻居 影音资源 激情乱伦电影 799pao 亚洲第一色第一影院 av视频大香蕉 老梁故事汇希斯莱杰 水中人体磁力链接 下载 大香蕉黄片免费看 济南谭崔 避开屏蔽的岛a片 草破福利 要看大鸡巴操小骚逼的人的视频 黑丝少妇影音先锋 欧美巨乳熟女磁力链接 美国黄网站色大全 伦蕉在线久播 极品女厕沟 激情五月bd韩国电影 混血美女自摸和男友激情啪啪自拍诱人呻吟福利视频 人人摸人人妻做人人看 44kknn 娸娸原网 伊人欧美 恋夜影院视频列表安卓青青 57k影院 如果电话亭 avi 插爆骚女精品自拍 青青草在线免费视频1769TV 令人惹火的邻家美眉 影音先锋 真人妹子被捅动态图 男人女人做完爱视频15 表姐合租两人共处一室晚上她竟爬上了我的床 性爱教学视频 北条麻妃bd在线播放版 国产老师和师生 magnet wwwcctv1024 女神自慰 ftp 女同性恋做激情视频 欧美大胆露阴视频 欧美无码影视 好女色在线观看 后入肥臀18p 百度影视屏福利 厕所超碰视频 强奸mp magnet 欧美妹aⅴ免费线上看 2016年妞干网视频 5手机在线福利 超在线最视频 800av:cOm magnet 欧美性爱免播放器在线播放 91大款肥汤的性感美乳90后邻家美眉趴着窗台后入啪啪 秋霞日本毛片网站 cheng ren 在线视频 上原亚衣肛门无码解禁影音先锋 美脚家庭教师在线播放 尤酷伦理片 熟女性生活视频在线观看 欧美av在线播放喷潮 194avav 凤凰AV成人 - 百度 kbb9999 AV片AV在线AV无码 爱爱视频高清免费观看 黄色男女操b视频 观看 18AV清纯视频在线播放平台 成人性爱视频久久操 女性真人生殖系统双性人视频 下身插入b射精视频 明星潜规测视频 mp4 免賛a片直播绪 国内 自己 偷拍 在线 国内真实偷拍 手机在线 国产主播户外勾在线 三桥杏奈高清无码迅雷下载 2五福电影院凸凹频频 男主拿鱼打女主,高宝宝 色哥午夜影院 川村まや痴汉 草溜影院费全过程免费 淫小弟影院在线视频 laohantuiche 啪啪啪喷潮XXOO视频 青娱乐成人国产 蓝沢润 一本道 亚洲青涩中文欧美 神马影院线理论 米娅卡莉法的av 在线福利65535 欧美粉色在线 欧美性受群交视频1在线播放 极品喷奶熟妇在线播放 变态另类无码福利影院92 天津小姐被偷拍 磁力下载 台湾三级电髟全部 丝袜美腿偷拍自拍 偷拍女生性行为图 妻子的乱伦 白虎少妇 肏婶骚屄 外国大妈会阴照片 美少女操屄图片 妹妹自慰11p 操老熟女的b 361美女人体 360电影院樱桃 爱色妹妹亚洲色图 性交卖淫姿势高清图片一级 欧美一黑对二白 大色网无毛一线天 射小妹网站 寂寞穴 西西人体模特苍井空 操的大白逼吧 骚穴让我操 拉好友干女朋友3p