Edited by: Luca Giacomelli, Polistudium srl, Italy
Reviewed by: Cheng-Rong Yu, National Eye Institute (NIH), United States
George Simeakis, 401 General Military Hospital of Athens, Greece
*Correspondence: Hui-Lin Li,
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
To evaluate the global burden of thyroid cancer (TC) among adolescents and young adults (AYA) aged 15-39 years from 1990 to 2021, with projections to 2050, and identify demographic and regional disparities.
Using Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 data, we analyzed incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) across 204 countries. Time-series projections to 2050 were generated using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models.
Global thyroid cancer incidence among AYA increased by 150% from 19,268 cases in 1990 to 48,203 in 2021, with persistent gender disparities: females exhibited a 2021 incidence rate of 2.38 per 100,000, threefold higher than males (0.88 per 100,000). Regional analysis revealed the highest burden in the Middle East and North Africa (2.49 per 100,000 in 2021). Projections indicate that by 2050, global prevalence will reach 103.62 per million, accompanied by an incidence rate of 11.41 per 100,000 and a DALYs burden of 34.41 per million, reflecting an 18% increase from 2021. Mortality rates show a modest rise from 0.37 per million in 1990 to a projected 0.42 per million in 2050. Socioeconomic disparities are pronounced: lower-Sociodemographic Index (SDI) regions face a projected 23% incidence increase by 2050, contrasting with a 12% decline in high-SDI regions, highlighting widening healthcare inequities.
The growing burden of thyroid cancer among AYA populations demonstrates critical gender and geographic disparities, disproportionately affecting females and lower-resource regions. Mitigation requires enhanced early detection protocols, optimized treatment pathways, and targeted resource allocation to vulnerable populations.
香京julia种子在线播放
The global burden of thyroid cancer (TC) is rising, with significant economic and clinical impacts (
TC is influenced by multiple risk factors, including genetic predisposition, exposure to radiation, and endocrine disruption, and is therefore a multifactorial disease with a significant impact on morbidity, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) (
In 2021, the global incidence, mortality, and DALYs for TC were 249,538, 44,799, and 646,741, respectively, showing an increase from 233,846 new cases and 45,575 deaths in 2019 (
Our study will use the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) database to explore male-female differences in TC incidence and mortality in this age group, revealing gender-specific risk factors and outcomes. In addition, we will use autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models to predict future trends in TC up to 2050.
The data for this study were sourced from the GBD 2021 database, which provides comprehensive epidemiological information on the incidence, prevalence, mortality, and DALYs for various diseases and risk factors across 204 countries and territories (
The indicator of estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) is a summary and widely used measure of mortality trends over a specific interval, calculated from a regression model fitted to the natural logarithm of mortality, i.e. ln (rate) = α + β × (calendar year) + ϵ, with the EAPC defined as 100 × (exp (β)-1). Its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) is also obtained from the linear regression model (
In this study, autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model pairs of time series models were used to forecast future trends in incidence, prevalence, mortality, and DALYs. The ARIMA (p, d, q) model consists of three components: p represents the autoregressive term reflecting the relationship between current and past values; d is the number of differences applied to the data to make them stationary; and q is the moving average term used to smooth out random fluctuations (
All estimates were accompanied by 95% uncertainty intervals (95% UI), calculated from the 2nd and 97.5th percentiles of 1,000 samples drawn from uncertainty distributions. The data analysis and trend estimation were performed using R software (Institute for Statistics and Mathematics) and STATA (Stata Corp LLC). Statistical significance was determined with a p-value threshold of less than 0.05.
In 2021, there were 48,203 newly diagnosed TC cases, corresponding to an age-standardized incidence rate of 1.62 per 100,000 (
Age-standardized and age-specific incidence rate (per 100 000) and number of cases of thyroid cancer by sex, national development index, 1990 and 2021.
Case number | Incidence rate | EAPC (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1990 (95%UI) | 2021 (95%UI) | 1990 (95%UI) | 2021 (95%UI) | 1990-2021 (95%UI) | |
|
19268 (17499-21851) | 48203 (40896-56747) | 0.88 (0.8-1) | 1.62 (1.37-1.91) | 2.08 (1.98-2.17) |
Gender | |||||
Female | 14580 (12692-16860) | 34940 (28623-43505) | 1.35 (1.17-1.56) | 2.38 (1.95-2.97) | 1.9 (1.79-2.01) |
Male | 4688 (4382-5130) | 13264 (11196-14867) | 0.42 (0.4-0.46) | 0.88 (0.74-0.98) | 2.62 (2.52-2.71) |
SDI region | |||||
High-middle SDI | 4451 (3991-4874) | 7879 (6951-9359) | 0.98 (0.88-1.08) | 1.79 (1.58-2.13) | 2.19 (1.96-2.42) |
High SDI | 5654 (5421-5921) | 8502 (7935-9241) | 1.63 (1.56-1.71) | 2.41 (2.25-2.62) | 1.49 (1.27-1.72) |
Low-middle SDI | 2878 (2348-3871) | 10741 (8540-14519) | 0.63 (0.52-0.85) | 1.34 (1.06-1.81) | 2.4 (2.32-2.47) |
Low SDI | 1289 (986-1626) | 5206 (3927-7512) | 0.7 (0.53-0.88) | 1.16 (0.87-1.67) | 1.56 (1.5-1.62) |
Middle SDI | 4975 (4244-5866) | 15844 (12557-18493) | 0.66 (0.56-0.78) | 1.71 (1.35-1.99) | 3.15 (3.09-3.2) |
Age | |||||
15-19 years | 1514 (1346-1780) | 2848 (2301-3808) | 0.29 (0.26-0.34) | 0.46 (0.37-0.61) | 1.56% (1.19-1.97) |
20-24 years | 2337 (2040-2734) | 5231 (4272-6995) | 0.47 (0.41-0.56) | 0.88 (0.72-1.17) | 2.15% (1.89-2.49) |
25-29 years | 3469 (3055-4168) | 8424 (7047-10459) | 0.78 (0.69-0.94) | 1.43 (1.2-1.78) | 2.06% (1.86-2.15) |
30-34 years | 5022 (4526-5718) | 13747 (11566-16484) | 1.3 (1.17-1.48) | 2.27 (1.91-2.73) | 1.87% (1.64-2.07) |
35-39 years | 6926 (6278-7658) | 17954 (15591-20607) | 1.97 (1.78-2.17) | 3.2 (2.78-3.67) | 1.63% (1.50-1.76) |
Age-standardized and age-specific prevalence rate (per 100 000) and number of cases of thyroid cancer by sex, national development index, 1990 and 2021.
Case number (10^4) | Prevalence rate | EAPC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1990 (95%UI) | 2021 (95%UI) | 1990 (95%UI) | 2021 (95%UI) | 1990-2021 (95%UI) | |
|
17.23 (15.65-19.52) | 43.61 (37.01-51.28) | 7.86 (7.14-8.91) | 14.66 (12.44-17.24) | 2.12 (2.03-2.22) |
Gender | |||||
Female | 13.10 (11.42-15.13) | 31.71 (26.00-39.48) | 12.09 (10.54-13.96) | 21.64 (17.75-26.95) | 1.94 (1.83-2.05) |
Male | 4.13 (3.86-4.51) | 11.90 (10.05-13.34) | 3.73 (3.48-4.07) | 7.89 (6.66-8.84) | 2.69 (2.59-2.78) |
SDI region | |||||
High-middle SDI | 4.02 (3.60-4.40) | 7.18 (6.34-8.54) | 8.87 (7.96-9.72) | 16.32 (14.39-19.4) | 2.23 (1.99-2.46) |
High SDI | 5.15 (4.94-5.40) | 7.77 (7.26-8.45) | 14.84 (14.23-15.55) | 22.01 (20.54-23.93) | 1.5 (1.28-1.73) |
Low-middle SDI | 2.51 (2.05-3.38) | 9.62 (7.65-13.02) | 5.54 (4.51-7.45) | 11.99 (9.53-16.23) | 2.49 (2.42-2.56) |
Low SDI | 1.10 (0.84-1.40) | 4.63 (3.49-6.70) | 5.98 (4.57-7.58) | 10.31 (7.78-14.92) | 1.71 (1.65-1.77) |
Middle SDI | 4.43 (3.77-5.23) | 14.38 (11.39-16.79) | 5.88 (5.01-6.94) | 15.5 (12.28-18.1) | 3.21 (3.16-3.27) |
Age | |||||
15-19 years | 1.34 (1.19-1.58) | 2.57 (2.07-3.43) | 2.59 (2.3-3.04) | 4.11 (3.32-5.49) | 1.56% (1.24-2.00) |
20-24 years | 2.07 (1.80-2.41) | 4.70 (3.85-6.29) | 4.2 (3.67-4.9) | 7.88 (6.44-10.53) | 2.13% (1.87-2.57) |
25-29 years | 3.10 (2.74-3.72) | 7.63 (6.38-9.47) | 7.01 (6.18-8.41) | 12.96 (10.84-16.09) | 2.08% (1.88-2.18) |
30-34 years | 4.51 (4.06-5.12) | 12.46 (10.48-14.95) | 11.69 (10.55-13.29) | 20.61 (17.34-24.73) | 1.90% (1.66-2.09) |
35-39 years | 6.21 (5.63-6.86) | 16.26 (14.12-18.66) | 17.62 (15.99-19.47) | 28.99 (25.17-33.27) | 1.73 (1.63-1.82) |
Age-standardized and age-specific mortality (per 100 000) and number of cases of thyroid cancer by sex, national development index, 1990 and 2021.
Case number | mortality | EAPC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1990 (95%UI) | 2021 (95%UI) | 1990 (95%UI) | 2021 (95%UI) | 1990-2021 (95%UI) | |
|
1738 (1521-2049) | 2652 (2212-3251) | 0.08 (0.07-0.09) | 0.09 (0.07-0.11) | 0.35 (0.31-0.39) |
Gender | |||||
Female | 1166 (963-1457) | 1686 (1331-2243) | 0.11 (0.09-0.13) | 0.12 (0.09-0.15) | 0.11 (0.05-0.18) |
Male | 572 (521-656) | 966 (777-1124) | 0.05 (0.05-0.06) | 0.06 (0.05-0.07) | 0.81 (0.77-0.85) |
SDI region | |||||
High-middle SDI | 298 (260-328) | 223 (198-255) | 0.07 (0.06-0.07) | 0.05 (0.04-0.06) | -0.9 (-1–0.8) |
High SDI | 185 (178-193) | 143 (133-157) | 0.05 (0.05-0.06) | 0.04 (0.04-0.04) | -0.72 (-0.8–0.63) |
Low-middle SDI | 462 (380-613) | 951 (761-1259) | 0.1 (0.08-0.14) | 0.12 (0.09-0.16) | 0.46 (0.34-0.59) |
Low SDI | 267 (207-331) | 605 (457-859) | 0.14 (0.11-0.18) | 0.13 (0.1-0.19) | -0.36 (-0.41–0.3) |
Middle SDI | 525 (455-610) | 728 (604-820) | 0.07 (0.06-0.08) | 0.08 (0.07-0.09) | 0.39 (0.36-0.43) |
Age | |||||
15-19 years | 177 (156-214) | 220 (173-302) | 0.03 (0.03-0.04) | 0.04 (0.03-0.05) | 0.93 (0.54-1.32) |
20-24 years | 278 (236-332) | 399 (312-544) | 0.06 (0.05-0.07) | 0.07 (0.05-0.09) | 0.50 (0.25-0.75) |
25-29 years | 367 (310-461) | 562 (456-720) | 0.08 (0.07-0.1) | 0.1 (0.08-0.12) | 0.00 (-0.32-0.30) |
30-34 years | 388 (338-462) | 645 (537-788) | 0.1 (0.09-0.12) | 0.11 (0.09-0.13) | 0.31 (0.02-0.61) |
35-39 years | 529 (466-603) | 825 (701-961) | 0.15 (0.13-0.17) | 0.15 (0.12-0.17) | -0.01 (-0.07-0.05) |
Age-standardized and age-specific DALYs rate (per 100 000) and number of cases of thyroid cancer by sex, national development index, 1990 and 2021.
Case number (10^4) | DALYs rate | EAPC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1990 (95%UI) | 2021 (95%UI) | 1990 (95%UI) | 2021 (95%UI) | 1990-2021 (95%UI) | |
|
11.47 (9.97-13.46) | 18.35 (15.15-22.86) | 5.23 (4.55-6.14) | 6.17 (5.09-7.68) | 0.52 (0.48-0.56) |
Gender | |||||
Female | 7.78 (6.35-9.66) | 11.93 (9.47-15.92) | 7.19 (5.86-8.92) | 8.14 (6.47-10.87) | 0.32 (0.26-0.39) |
Male | 3.69 (3.35-4.20) | 6.42 (5.11-7.43) | 3.33 (3.03-3.79) | 4.25 (3.39-4.92) | 0.92 (0.88-0.97) |
SDI region | |||||
High-middle SDI | 1.99 (1.74-2.23) | 1.69 (1.46-2.00) | 4.4 (3.85-4.93) | 3.84 (3.31-4.54) | -0.41 (-0.53–0.3) |
High SDI | 1.37 (1.27-1.51) | 1.26 (1.09-1.46) | 3.96 (3.66-4.34) | 3.56 (3.09-4.14) | -0.12 (-0.21–0.02) |
Low-middle SDI | 2.98 (2.47-3.96) | 6.30 (4.99-8.51) | 6.57 (5.44-8.73) | 7.85 (6.22-10.6) | 0.54 (0.42-0.67) |
Low SDI | 1.71 (1.33-2.12) | 3.99 (3.00-5.74) | 9.27 (7.23-11.52) | 8.88 (6.68-12.79) | -0.28 (-0.34–0.22) |
Middle SDI | 3.41 (2.95-3.95) | 5.10 (4.20-5.86) | 4.53 (3.92-5.24) | 5.5 (4.53-6.31) | 0.65 (0.61-0.69) |
Age | |||||
15-19 years | 1.369 (1.20-1.63) | 1.74 (1.38-2.39) | 2.62 (2.31-3.14) | 2.8 (2.22-3.82) | 0.22 (-0.13-0.66) |
20-24 years | 2.00 (1.69-2.38) | 2.97 (2.32-4.08) | 4.07 (3.44-4.85) | 4.97 (3.89-6.83) | 0.67 (0.41-1.14) |
25-29 years | 2.48 (2.094-3.07) | 3.95 (3.22-5.09) | 5.6 (4.73-6.94) | 6.72 (5.47-8.65) | 0.61 (0.48-0.73) |
30-34 years | 2.49 (2.18-2.98) | 4.42 (3.67-5.47) | 6.47 (5.65-7.72) | 7.31 (6.07-9.06) | 0.41 (0.24-0.54) |
35-39 years | 3.1400 (2.75-3.63) | 5.26 (4.40-6.20) | 8.91 (7.82-10.29) | 9.39 (7.84-11.06) | 0.23 (0.17-0.29) |
Thyroid cancer case numbers and incidence rates
The GBD database reveals substantial regional variations in the burden of TC among AYA populations. In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), the highest incidence and prevalence rates were observed, with 2.49 (95% UI: 1.79-3.12) per 100,000 and 22.74 (95% UI: 16.34-28.53) per 100,000, respectively. MENA also exhibited the highest EPAC at 3.96 (95% UI: 3.74-4.17), while Central Europe had the lowest EPAC at -0.55 (95% UI: -0.86 to -0.25), followed by Central Asia with -0.22 (95% UI: -1.05 to 0.62). North America recorded similarly high incidence and prevalence rates, at 2.35 (95% UI: 2.23-2.47) and 21.48 (95% UI: 20.41-22.59) per 100,000, respectively. Asia dominated in total new and cumulative cases, with East Asia and the Pacific reporting 14,573 new cases and 13,267,673 cumulative cases in 2021, while South Asia followed closely with 14,177 new cases and 132,673 cumulative cases. In contrast, Western Sub-Saharan Africa had the lowest incidence and prevalence rates. As shown in
Mortality patterns also varied, with Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa reporting the highest TC mortality rate at 0.21 (95% CI: 0.15-0.33) and Western Sub-Saharan Africa showing the lowest at 0.02 (95% CI: 0.01-0.03). Asia accounted for 1,826 TC-related deaths, with South Asia contributing 1,226 of these. Europe saw notable decreases in mortality, particularly in Central and Western Europe, with EAPC of -3.15 (95% CI: -3.59 to -2.71) and -2.24 (95% CI: -2.45 to -2.03), respectively, while the Eastern Mediterranean Region and Southern Africa exhibited increasing trends with an EAPC of 1.24. Furthermore, Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa had the highest DALY rate at 14.11 (95% CI: 9.96-22.14) per 100,000, followed by South Asia at 10.29 (95% CI: 8.08-13.54), with Central Africa reporting the lowest DALY rate at 2.39 (95% CI: 1.56-3.49). Asia contributed the highest number of total DALYs, with South Asia leading at 81,363 (95% CI: 63,915-107,109), while Central Europe and Central Asia experienced the most significant changes in EPAC. It is important to note that these EAPC values reflect trends over the period from 1990 to 2021 (
Incidence, prevalence, death and disability adjusted life year (DALY) rates and numbers of thyroid cancer disease incidence, prevalence, death and disability adjusted life year (DALY) rates
In the AYA 2021 TC population, distinct regional variations in disease burden were observed. Libya, in Northern Africa, recorded the highest global DALY rate, while countries in Western Europe showed a significantly higher negative EAPC for DALY rates compared to other regions. In Sub-Saharan Africa, Ethiopia had the highest mortality rate at 0.33 (0.22-0.57) per 100,000. In contrast, developed countries such as Switzerland and Singapore reported the lowest mortality rates at 0.02 (0.01-0.02) per 100,000. South Asia, particularly India, registered the highest number of deaths (815), as well as significant counts in deaths and morbidity, with 87,637 and 9,749, respectively. In terms of prevalence, Libya, Viet Nam (Southeast Asia), and Taiwan (East Asia) exhibited the highest rates, all exceeding 40 per million, with Libya’s figures standing at 5.04 (2.75-7.75), Viet Nam at 4.66 (2.16-7.08), and Taiwan at 4.55 (3.6-5.65) (
Global thyroid cancer incidence by country in 2021.
The clustering results of thyroid cancer in the AYA (Adolescent and Young Adult) population highlight distinct global trends in disease burden and health system responses (
Cluster analysis.
The projected trends for thyroid cancer through 2050 show significant increases across multiple indicators. The overall prevalence is projected to reach 103.62 per million (95% CI: 91.85-115.40) by 2050 (
Total 1999-2021 and 2022-2050 actual and projected rates for AYA thyroid cancer patients [
The results indicate a substantial projected increase in the thyroid cancer burden between 2022 and 2050, particularly among females, older age groups (30-39 years), and lower-SDI regions. Females are expected to account for significantly higher numbers of prevalent cases, incidents, and deaths compared to males, with a widening gap over time (
Actual 1999-2021 and projected 2022-2050 numbers in the AYA thyroid cancer population, by gender [
Actual rate of thyroid cancer in adolescents, 1999-2021, and predicted rate, 2022-2050, by Age group [
Actual rate of thyroid cancer in adolescents, 1999-2021, and predicted rate, 2022-2050, by SDI group [
TC has emerged as a significant global health concern, with its age-standardised incidence rate (ASIR) rising consistently between 1990 and 2019 (
Based on EAPC trends from 1990 to 2021, the EAPC for the AYA population (15-39 years) decreases with increasing age group, but the EAPC for disease, morbidity, and DALYs peaks for the 20-24 age group. This peak can be attributed to several key factors. Enhanced diagnostic sensitivity and the potential for overdiagnosis have likely played a significant role, as improved medical technologies and increased health screenings during early adulthood have led to the detection of subclinical thyroid cancers, which may not have caused symptoms or mortality otherwise (
The substantial regional variations in the incidence and prevalence of TC among AYA populations, as revealed by the GBD database, can be attributed to several factors (
Mortality and DALY patterns also show stark contrasts across regions (
Libya reports the highest global DALY rate, underscoring the significant disease burden in North Africa. Furthermore, Libya also exhibits one of the highest morbidity rates, with a prevalence exceeding 40 per 100,000. Despite these figures, there is a relative scarcity of reports specifically addressing thyroid-related diseases in the country, suggesting a gap in focused research or reporting on this condition (
The incidence, prevalence, mortality and peak DALYS of thyroid cancer in the AYA female population coincide with the time when women experience major hormonal fluctuations such as puberty and pregnancy. One potential causative factor is premature oestrogen exposure, and exposure to higher levels of oestrogen during the reproductive years may increase the risk of TC (
Many studies explored the seasonal variations in thyroid function among women of reproductive age, with a focus on thyrotropin (TSH), free triiodothyronine (FT3), free thyroxine (FT4), and the TSH index (TSHI) (
The rationale for using both Exponential Smoothing and ARIMA to forecast TC incidence lies in their complementary strengths for different forecasting horizons and data behaviours. Exponential Smoothing is ideal for short-term forecasts as it quickly adapts to recent trends, making it suitable for predicting incidence rates driven by current healthcare policies and detection practices (e.g., 2021 to 2025) (
This study presents several strengths and limitations that warrant discussion. One of the main strengths is its focus on the adolescent and young adult (AYA) population, a group that is often underrepresented in cancer research despite having distinct patterns of thyroid cancer incidence and outcomes. This focus addresses a critical gap and provides valuable insights into thyroid cancer dynamics in this age group. Additionally, the use of advanced predictive modelling techniques, including ARIMA and Exponential Smoothing models, enhances the study by offering both short- and long-term forecasts, providing a nuanced understanding of future trends in thyroid cancer burden. However, the study also has limitations. For example, the ARIMA model generated negative predictions for the 20-24 age group, highlighting the model’s limitations in handling small and volatile datasets without non-negativity constraints. This suggests caution in interpreting predictions for this age group. Furthermore, the study did not account for lifestyle risk factors or exposure to environmental toxins, such as smoking or endocrine-disrupting chemicals, which are known to influence thyroid cancer risk. This omission may limit the comprehensiveness of the analysis, as these factors play a crucial role in shaping thyroid cancer outcomes in different populations.
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
As this study uses publicly available data, no approval is required.
M-JJ: Formal analysis, Resources, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SW: Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YL: Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft. X-NL: Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing. FJ: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. H-LL: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Guangxi Science and Technology Base and Talent Special Project (grant number: Gui Ke AD22035165), the Guangxi Major Science and Technology Project under the 14th Five-Year Plan (grant number: Gui Ke AA2209602), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 82274419), and Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (No.SZZYSM202411016). The Funding section has removed this:the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 82260901).
The work of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021 collaborators is highly appreciated.
The authors declare that there are no commercial or financial relationships that could be considered as potential conflicts of interest in the course of the research.
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.