Front. Agron. Frontiers in Agronomy Front. Agron. 2673-3218 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fagro.2024.1401478 Agronomy Original Research Mapping the vulnerability of banana production landscapes in Uganda to banana bunchy top disease Ocimati Walter 1 * Ogwal Geofrey 1 Tazuba Anthony Fredrick 1 Kubiriba Jerome 2 Tugume Joab 3 Erima Rockefeller 2 Okurut Wilson 2 Mahuku George 4 Kutunga David 3 Blomme Guy 5 1 Pest and Disease Suppressive and Enhanced Production Systems, Alliance of Bioversity International and Center for International Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Kampala, Uganda 2 Banana Programme, National Agricultural Research Organization, Kampala, Uganda 3 Crop Inspection and Protection, Ministry of Agriculture Animal Industry and Fisheries, Entebbe, Uganda 4 Plant Pathology, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Kampala, Uganda 5 Pest and Disease Suppressive and Enhanced Production Systems, Alliance of Bioversity International and Center for International Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Edited by: Giovanni Bubici, National Research Council (CNR), Italy

Reviewed by: Renata Retkute, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

Naitong Yu, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, China

A/Prof. Thomas, University of Queensland, Australia

*Correspondence: Walter Ocimati, w.ocimati@cgiar.org

12 09 2024 2024 6 1401478 15 03 2024 15 08 2024 Copyright © 2024 Ocimati, Ogwal, Tazuba, Kubiriba, Tugume, Erima, Okurut, Mahuku, Kutunga and Blomme 2024 Ocimati, Ogwal, Tazuba, Kubiriba, Tugume, Erima, Okurut, Mahuku, Kutunga and Blomme

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Introduction

Banana bunchy top disease (BBTD) caused by banana bunchy top virus (BBTV) poses a significant threat to Uganda’s food and income security.

Methods

To map BBTD spread and inform its management, a delimiting survey was undertaken covering the high-risk zones bordering the Democratic Republic of Congo (DR Congo) in the west, Rwanda and Tanzania in the south, and South Sudan in the north. BBTD is endemic in the DR Congo and present in Tanzania and Rwanda. The survey and environmental data were then used to map the vulnerability of Uganda’s banana landscapes.

Results and discussion

BBTD was only confirmed on 9% of sampled farms in north- and midwestern Uganda, with yield losses of 75% to 100%. Farmers observed BBTD over a 0.5–4.4-year period, suggesting a delayed detection. Suckers were the predominate planting materials used, increasing the risk of disease spread. Landscape suitability for BBTD was influenced by precipitation of the driest month, banana presence in 2016, land surface temperature difference (LSTD), the interaction between wind speed and LSTD, isothermality, wind speed, and the normalized difference vegetation index. These variables affect either or both the virus and aphid vector populations. Altitude did not influence the model, possibly due to disease introduction at mid to high altitudes through infected planting materials. The low-lying zones (around River Nile and Lakes Albert, Edward, and Victoria) are highly vulnerable. BBTD risk was low in northeastern Uganda with low banana production. The prediction map shows some suitable landscapes in the southwest that can expose this major banana production zone to BBTD, necessitating proactive measures.

banana aphid banana bunchy top virus mapping Pentalonia nigronervosa smallholder farmers spatial analysis Uganda vulnerability section-in-acceptance Disease Management

香京julia种子在线播放

    1. <form id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></form>
      <address id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></nobr></address>

      Introduction

      Banana bunchy top disease (BBTD) is a viral disease of bananas and plantains (Musa spp.; hereafter, banana) caused by the banana bunchy top virus (BBTV) (Kumar et al., 2015; Qazi, 2016; Thomas, 2018). BBTD ranks among the top 100 invasive species in the world (Global Invasive Species Database, 2023). In Africa, BBTD was first observed in Egypt in 1900 (Magee, 1927). A second independent introduction happened in the late 1940s or early 1950s at the National Institute for Agronomic Study of the Belgian Congo Yangambi research station in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DR Congo) (Blomme et al., 2013; Wardlaw, 1961). By 1987, the disease was widely spread in the DR Congo, present in Burundi and Rwanda located in the east and central African regions. More recently, BBTD was confirmed in Uganda (Ocimati et al., 2021) and Tanzania (Shimwela et al., 2022), in the East African region.

      Severe BBTV infection is characterized by stunted growth with distorted leaves having a bunchy and erect appearance in young plants, while bunches of mature plants fail to fill, as such fruits remain inedible (Magee, 1927; Niyongere et al., 2011). Banana productivity is severely affected, leading to significant yield and economic losses for farmers. The disease has been reported to cause significant yield losses of up to 100% (Caruana-Iskra, 2003; Kumar et al., 2015; Niyongere et al., 2011). In Australia, BBTD almost wiped out the banana industry between 1913 and 1920 (Magee, 1927), while in the 1990s, in Malawi, it reduced the banana production area from 3,500 ha to 800 ha (Soko et al., 2009).

      In Uganda, bananas are a vital staple food for a significant proportion of the population, providing essential nutrients and contributing to food security. Uganda, with a daily per capita consumption of approximately 0.7 kg/person, ranks highest in the consumption of bananas in the world (Kilimo Trust, 2012). Additionally, bananas serve as an important source of income for smallholder farmers, supporting their livelihoods and fostering economic development in rural communities. Uganda, with a production of 9.2 to 9.4 million tons between 2019 and 2021 ranks fourth in the production of bananas and plantains combined globally and first in Africa (FAO, 2023; UBOS, 2020). The spread of BBTD into Uganda is thus a serious concern because it can cause significant economic losses and food insecurity, negatively impacting the livelihoods of smallholder farmers and other people depending on this crop along the banana value chain. Following the first report of the disease in the northwestern region of Uganda (Ocimati et al., 2021), further incursions have been confirmed in the Kasese district (Rwenzori subregion) bordering the DR Congo (Ocimati, unpublished results). In affected landscapes within Uganda, individual smallholder farms have reported up to 100% loss in yields and incomes (Ocimati, unpublished results).

      The risk of BBTD spread to other banana production zones within Uganda remains high due to several factors including the lack of awareness on BBTD, its symptoms, epidemiology, and control; heavy reliance on suckers sourced from farmers’ own or neighboring farms for planting materials; lack of proper quarantine measures; and limited resources for implementing appropriate control measures. BBTV is known to spread through infected planting materials and via the aphid vector Pentalonia nigronervosa (Magee, 1927) that are omnipresent in all banana-growing regions. The ability of the disease to entrench itself within a landscape given deployment of proper management practices is dependent upon the opportunity for the survival of infective aphids to spread the virus, susceptibility of host plants, and efficiency in detection of infected plants before they become a source of inoculum. In addition to crop management practices, multiple environmental factors including temperature, altitude, precipitation, wind speed, and abundance of the host influence the vulnerability of landscapes to BBTD (Bouwmeester et al., 2023; Niyongere et al., 2013; Raymundo and Pangga, 2011).

      In Uganda, management of the disease in currently infected landscapes and prevention of further spread into new production zones require a proper understanding of the vulnerability of the different banana production landscapes to disease introduction and/or establishment. Thus, mapping of the vulnerability of banana production landscapes to BBTD is an essential step toward developing targeted management strategies and implementing preventive measures. By identifying areas at higher risk of disease introduction and/or establishment, stakeholders can prioritize resources and interventions, thereby reducing the overall impact of BBTD on banana production systems. Moreover, mapping vulnerability will aid in decision-making processes, such as implementing disease surveillance programs, designing strategies for disease containment and eradication, and prioritization of limited resources.

      This study highlights the findings of initial diagnostic studies conducted on sampled farms in the affected regions and provides a prediction of the risk/vulnerabilities of the different banana production landscapes in Uganda to the establishment and local spread of BBTD. The study utilized a combination of field diagnostic surveys and spatial analysis, to assess past distribution patterns and factors influencing the vulnerability of the banana ecosystem in Uganda to BBTD.

      Materials and methods

      This study builds on the first report of BBTD in the West Nile region of Uganda (Ocimati et al., 2021). The study comprised i) field surveys in high-risk zones of Uganda, that either border or are close to the borders of the DR Congo, Rwanda, and Tanzania that are either hot spots or have reported cases of BBTD; and ii) mapping of the disease risk [introduction and spread] for the Ugandan banana-producing landscapes using statistical tools.

      Field surveys to characterize banana farms

      Diagnostic surveys were conducted in 46 districts of Uganda located in the border zones with South Sudan, the DR Congo, Rwanda, and northwestern Tanzania ( Figure 1 ).

      Uganda map showing the surveyed regions and districts.

      A combination of stratified purposive sampling and respondent-driven snowball sampling techniques was employed in this study. A stratified purposive sampling was attained by selecting, with guidance from the district and subcounty agricultural extension staff, subcounties, and parishes with high banana production and/or bordering BBTD hot spots. Farms in these subcounties were randomly visited and sampled through the snowball sampling technique. Snowball sampling is a recruitment technique through which research participants assist in identifying or enlisting other potential subjects (Naderifar et al., 2017). In each visited farm, a simple interview schedule administered by trained agricultural personnel was used to capture information relevant to BBTD establishment and spread. This included the geographical location of the farm (altitude, latitude, and longitude), presence or absence of BBTD, first year of disease observation if present on farm, management practices on the field (e.g., intercropping vs. monoculture, source and type of planting material used), age of banana plantations and the applied management practices, and Musa diversity and affected varieties (Bouwmeester et al., 2023; Niyongere et al., 2013). The interviewers used photos to show the characteristic symptoms of BBTD such as different levels of rosetting and Morse codes, i.e., dark green streaks on the leaves, petioles, midribs, and leaf lamina ( Figure 2 ) to help farmers confirm the presence of symptomatic plants on their farms or in the neighborhood.

      Banana plants with typical banana bunchy top disease symptoms. (A) Rosetted plants with a bunchy appearance and marginal leaf yellowing, (B) Morse codes on the petiole of infected plants, and (C) Morse codes in the form of J-shaped hooks on banana leaf lamina.

      The interviewers examined plants within the fields to confirm the presence or absence of the disease. Where the disease was observed or reported in the neighborhood by farmers, through the snowball approach, these suspected farms were also visited. Samples were collected from plants with characteristic BBTD symptom(s) for laboratory analysis to confirm the presence of the BBTV. BBTV was confirmed with the help of a PCR using primers that amplify a 240-bp conserved domain in the BBTV DNA-mRep segment (Mansoor et al., 2005).

      The datasets were cleaned and preprocessed in Microsoft Excel (version 2302, build 16130.20332), and ANOVA determined using RStudio software (version 2023.3.0.386; RStudio Team, 2023) was used to compare means across sites. R statistical package was also used to generate visuals.

      Mapping the risk of BBTD spread and establishment in Uganda

      For BBTD risk mapping, the entire country of Uganda, covering an area of approximately 241,038 km2, was used. Uganda borders South Sudan in the north, Kenya in the east, Tanzania and Rwanda in the south, and the DR Congo in the west.

      Datasets for disease risk mapping

      Datasets used for BBTD risk mapping consisted of field survey results and maps/databases of key covariates known to influence BBTD spread. Data from three field surveys conducted between 2020 and 2022 that determined the presence and/or absence of BBTD along high-risk banana-producing areas in Ugandan districts bordering the DR Congo, South Sudan, Rwanda, and Tanzania were used. The first two surveys concentrated on the northwestern region of Uganda that already had reported BBTD cases, while the third survey stretched from the border regions with South Sudan in the north, DR Congo in the west, and Rwanda and Tanzania in the south. The three surveys generated a total of 630 survey data points. All plants reported to have BBTD were checked for BBTV using PCR, and only farms with plants confirmed as infected were retained as positive. The field survey datasets were subjected to cleaning and preprocessing using Microsoft Excel (version 2302, build 16130.20332), while shape files were processed using QGIS (version 3.30.0, Hertogenbosch).

      Predictor variables (covariates) for mapping BBTD risk

      The covariate datasets were downloaded as raster files (“.tiff”) from publicly available databases ( Table 1 ). The environmental characteristics, banana production statistics, and other socioeconomic covariates that influence both the banana aphid vector and the virus (Bouwmeester et al., 2023; Niyongere et al., 2013; Raymundo and Pangga, 2011) were used in a model to predict the presence of BBTD or the likelihood (risk) of disease spread to unsurveyed locations (Bouwmeester et al., 2023).

      Initial 33 covariates used in the study.

      Category/covariate (code) Description Source Resolution
      Topo-Graphic
      Elevation (Elev.0) Altitude [masl] http://worldclim.org (adapted from SRTM v4.0) 30 arcsec (~1 km2)
      Climatic
      • Annual mean temperature [°C] (TempA.1)• Annual mean diurnal range (TempDr.2)• Isothermality (isotherm.100.3)• Temperature variance (TempV.4)• Maximum temperature of the warmest month (MTempWam.5)• Minimum temperature of the coldest month (mTempCm.6)• Temperature annual range (TempAr.7) [(MTempWam.5 - mTempCm.6)]• Temperature of the wettest quarter (TempWeq.8)• Temperature of the driest quarter (TempDq.9)• Temperature of the warmest quarter (TempWaq.10)• Temperature of the coldest quarter (TempCq.11) 1970–2000 http://worldclim.org https://biogeo.ucdavis.edu/data/worldclim/v2.1/base/wc2.1_30s_bio.zip 30 arcsec
      • Annual mean precipitation (PrecA.12)• Precipitation of the wettest month (PrecWm.13)• Precipitation of the driest month (PrecDm.14)• Precipitation seasonality (PrecV.15)• Precipitation of the wettest quarter (PrecWeq.16)• Precipitation of the driest quarter (PrecDq.17)• Precipitation of the warmest quarter (PrecWaq.18)• Precipitation of the coldest quarter (PrecCq.19) 1970–2000 http://worldclim.org https://biogeo.ucdavis.edu/data/worldclim/v2.1/base/wc2.1_30s_bio.zip 30 arcsec
      Solar radiation (srad.20) kJ m−1 day−1; annual mean from January to December http://worldclim.org 30 arcsec
      Wind speed (wind.21) ms−1; annual mean from January to December http://worldclim.org 30 arcsec
      Water vapor (vapr.22) kPa; annual mean from January to December http://worldclim.org 30 arcsec
      Recent annual precipitation (Newprec.23) Mean between 2019 and 2021 http://worldclim.org https://biogeo.ucdavis.edu/data/worldclim/v2.1/base/ 30 arcsec
      Recent minimum annual temperature (Newtmin.24) Mean between 2019 and 2021 http://worldclim.org https://biogeo.ucdavis.edu/data/worldclim/v2.1/base/ 30 arcsec
      Recent maximum annual temperature (Newtmax.25) Mean between 2019 and 2021 http://worldclim.org https://biogeo.ucdavis.edu/data/worldclim/v2.1/base/ 30 arcsec
      Land surface temperature difference (LSTD.26) Annual mean from January to December https://neo.gsfc.nasa.gov 0.1
      Vegetation
      Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI.27) Mean of months between Jan 2022 and Jan 2023 (terra/MODIS) https://neo.gsfc.nasa.gov 0.1
      Leaf area index (LAI.28) Mean of Jan and Feb 2017 https://neo.gsfc.nasa.gov 0.1
      Vegetation [land cover] (Cover.33) Africa 2016 https://www.diva-gis.org/gdata or https://2016africalandcover20m.esrin.esa.int/ 30 arcsec
      Banana production
      Banana presence in 2016 (ProdB16.29) Banana presence in 2016 Ochola et al. (2021)
      Attitude (Altitude.ug) This study
      Longitude (Longitude) Derived from SRTM v4.0 elevation data 30 arcsec
      Latitude (Latitude) Derived from SRTM v4.0 elevation data 30 arcsec

      Covariate processing and data analysis were done in RStudio software (version 2023.3.0.386; RStudio Team, 2023), using R programming language (version 4.2.3; R Core Team, 2023). Meanwhile, mapping was done in ArcGIS Pro software (version 3.0.0; Esri, 2023).

      Most of the covariates were imported as objects into RStudio at a resolution of 30 arcsec (~1 km2). Those that were not to this projection were first re-projected to the elevation using the “projectRaster” function of R. Banana presence raster of 2016 (Ochola et al., 2021, 2022) was used for banana production data.

      All variables were masked to the Ugandan polygon shape which is in the WGS 1984 coordinate system and then to the elevation raster to ensure a similar extent, with a bilinear method. The cropped and masked rasters were written as rasters (“writeRaster” function) for future use as Ugandan raster files for plotting covariate maps.

      Variable omissions using correlation and regression analysis

      The data points of each covariate at the surveyed location were first extracted by transforming the surveyed datasets into a data frame of a coordinate system (longitude, latitude, and altitude) using the “extract” function of the raster package in R. The Pearson correlation analysis was performed to establish correlations between all the variables. Correlation analysis was performed to select a single covariate to represent those that are highly correlated or collinear (r ≥ 0.95). A univariate logistic regression analysis of the remaining independent variables (covariates) against disease presence or absence (dependent variable) was then carried out to remove covariates with p-values greater than or equal to 0.25 (p ≥ 0.25). Thus, a combination of causal reasoning, omission of variable with very high collinearity (>95%), and use of information criterion (regression) analysis were used to deal with collinearity or near collinearity between covariates and reduce the number of covariates. Gregorich et al. (2021) suggest the use of casual reasoning and information criterion in dealing with collinearity as the best approaches to prevent the generation of models of little or no practical use and misleading interpretations.

      Model fit in a logistic regression model

      Regression models use the relationship between the dependent variable and the covariates to predict at the unobserved locations. The covariates from the univariate logistic regression analysis with a probability significance of p ≤0.25 were cropped, and their masked raster files were exported to ArcGIS software and each was plotted to the Uganda boundary shape ( Figure 3 ).

      Covariate maps for the eight variables used in the multivariate regression analysis.

      These covariates were then entered into a multivariate logistic regression model using the glm function with the method of “logit.” Using stepwise regression, on both forward and reverse directions, the covariates that were not significant at 5% (p ≤ 0.05) were removed one at a time. In addition, two-way interactions between covariates were included to check for those interaction effects that could improve the likelihood ratio. All significant (p ≤ 0.05) covariates from the first stepwise regression and all significant interactions at p ≤0.001 were included in the final multivariate regression model as above to explain the relationship between BBTD presence or absence with the predictor variables (covariates). The final goodness-of-fit model is expressed as:

      Y = l o g i t ( P ) = I n ( P r e d i c t e d   m a p ,   P 1 P ) = β 0 + β 1 X 1 + β 2 X 2 + β 3 X 3 + + β n X n + ϵ ; P =   1 1 + e z = exp ( z ) 1 + exp ( z )

      and

      z = β 0 + β 1 X 1 + β 2 X 2 + β 3 X 3 + + β n X n + ϵ ;

      Where P is the likelihood of BBTD presence; z is the linear combinations of β i and Xi , β 0 is the intercept, and β 1 ,   β 2 ,   β 3 ,…, to β n are the coefficients of the covariate factors X 1, X 2, X 3,…, to Xn that influence the presence, distribution, and risk of spread of BBTD; and ϵ is the error term.

      The final derived logistic regression model was stacked or applied to the final covariate maps to obtain the regression prediction map showing the risk of spread/environmental suitability of Ugandan landscapes to the spread and establishment of BBTD. The risk of BBTD spread and/or likely distribution in the logistic regression model was therefore expressed by the binary response variable of “1”s and “0”s representing BBTD presence and absence, respectively, regressed to other covariates.

      Results Characteristics of banana farms in Uganda’s high-risk zones

      A total of 630 banana farms were surveyed across four study regions (i.e., northwestern, midwestern, southwestern, and central regions) of Uganda. The mean area under banana production across the study sites was 0.4 ha. The sampled farms were located at varying altitudes, from as low as 604 meters above sea level (masl) to as high as 2,044 masl ( Supplementary Figure 1A ). A significant difference (p < 2.2e−16) was observed in altitude across farms in the four study regions of Uganda. The southwestern farms had the highest mean altitude (1,496 masl) with the lowest in the midwestern region (1,159.7 masl). Farms in the south- and northwestern regions were also more diverse in terms of the altitudes. The age of banana fields also differed across the regions (p < 1.062e−05) with plantations above 20 years of age being common. The northwestern region, with an average age of approximately 7.8 years had the lowest plantation age, while the southwestern region had the oldest plantations with an average age of approximately 15 years ( Supplementary Figure 1B ).

      Banana field management practices significantly differed (p < 0.0007 to p < 2.2e−16) across the study regions. Banana intercropping was predominant across the study sites, except in southwestern Uganda where the proportion of those who are intercropping or sole cropping did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) ( Figure 4A ). Suckers are the predominant planting materials used to establish new plantations and for gap filling ( Figure 4B ) across the study sites. These planting materials were mainly obtained from the farmers’ own farms and/or from within their communities ( Figure 4C ). Few farmers, predominantly in north- and midwestern Uganda, planted materials from outside their communities. Outside community sources included other subcounties, districts, and the neighboring countries.

      Respondents using different cropping systems (A), types of planting materials (B), and sources of planting materials (C) across the study regions along the western border region of Uganda.

      Banana bunchy top disease was observed on approximately 9% of visited farms in the northwestern and midwestern regions. No BBTD was confirmed in the other study regions ( Figure 5 ). Farmers reported to have first observed the disease over a period of 0.5 to 3.35 years (mean = 1.8 years) from the time of the surveys in the northwestern region and over a period of 1.35 to 4.4 years (mean = 2.6 years) in the midwestern region. Mean yield losses between 75% and 91% (mean loss of 89%) were reported by farmers in the northwestern region. High disease severity with losses of up to 100% were also observed on the affected farms in Kasese district, midwestern region. The East African highland bananas (genome AAA) predominate across all the study landscapes. Other banana varieties observed included ‘Bluggoe’ (ABB), ‘Cavendish’ (AAA), apple banana (AAB), FHIA hybrids (AAAB, AAAA), and ‘Pisang Awak’ (ABB). All these banana varieties were observed to succumb to the disease.

      Map showing the presence (red dots) and absence (green dots) of BBTD in the surveyed districts in Uganda.

      Farmers responded differently to banana diseases across the study regions. Cutting single diseased stems was the commonest response to diseases on banana farms and was applied on 57%, 91%, and 100% of the farms in the north-, south- and midwestern regions, respectively ( Figure 6 ). Rouging of entire mats was also applied on some farms, predominantly (78% of farms) in southwestern Uganda. Approximately 57% of the farmers in the northwestern region left infected plants on the farm compared to <7% in the mid- and southwestern regions. A small proportion of farmers also abandoned entire fields in the northwestern region of Uganda ( Figure 6 ).

      The response of farmers to banana diseases across the surveyed banana landscapes in Uganda.

      The risk of BBTD spread and establishment in Uganda Variable omissions using correlation and regression analysis

      Pearson correlation coefficients between the covariates were generally high, especially within covariates that measured a common variable, e.g., temperature and precipitation ( Figure 7 ). For such very high correlations, representative variables were selected for subsequent analysis using the ‘caret’ package in R (Kuhn et al., 2020), reducing the covariates to 21 from an initial 33 covariates. The correlation scores between the covariates and BBTD presence or absence were low, varying between 0 with temperature of the wettest quarter and 0.17 with wind speed ( Figure 7 ). Despite the low loadings, the correlations were highly significant at p <0.05 for seven of the covariates ( Supplementary Table 1 ). Two temperature variables (i.e., annual mean diurnal temperature range and isothermality) had a negative correlation to disease presence, while others were positive. Except for precipitation in the driest month, mean annual precipitation, and coldest quarter, other precipitation variables were negatively correlated to BBTD presence. Wind speed and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) were negatively correlated, while the banana production covariate had a positive correlation ( Figure 3 ). Out of 21 covariates, eight (c.f. Figure 3 ) had probability values less than 0.25 (p ≤ 0.25) following a univariate logistic regression against disease presence or absence (dependent variable). These eight were retained for the multivariate logistic regression and disease mapping.

      Correlation analysis of all 33 covariates and the dependent variable (disease presence/absence) using Pearson’s method. TempDr.2, annual mean diurnal range; isotherm. 100.3, isothermality; TempAr.7, temperature annual range; TempWeq.8, temperature of the wettest quarter; PrecA.12, annual mean precipitation; PrecWm.13, precipitation of the wettest month; PrecDm.14, precipitation of the driest month; PrecV.15, precipitation seasonality; PrecWaq.18, precipitation of the warmest quarter; PrecCq.19, precipitation of the coldest quarter; srad.20, solar radiation; wind.21, wind speed; vapr.22, water vapor; LSTD.26, average land surface temperature; NDVI.27, normalized difference vegetation index; LAI.28, leaf area index; ProdB16.29, banana presence (Ochola et al., 2021); and Cover.33, vegetation [land cover].

      Multivariate logistic regression analysis

      A total of eight covariates were entered into a multivariate logistic regression with BBTD presence/absence. Of the eight covariates, two covariates (annual mean diurnal temperature range, precipitation of coldest quarter) were dropped because they did not contribute enough to lowering the deviance of the model. The model was explained by six covariates and one interaction between two covariates ( Table 2 ). Of the six covariates, three, i.e., precipitation of the driest month, the land surface temperature difference (LSTD), and banana presence in 2016, and the interaction between wind speed and LSTD had significant contributions to the model at p = 0.05 ( Table 2 ). Precipitation in the driest month, LSTD, and banana presence in 2016 positively influenced BBTD presence or development, whereas the interaction between wind speed and LSTD negatively influenced BBTD. Isothermality (extent of day-to-night temperature oscillations) (r = 0.081; p = 0.0527) negatively impacted BBTD presence, while wind speed had a positive (r = 88.7381; p = 0.0554) influence on BBTD presence ( Table 2 ). The residual deviance (245 on 614 df) of the model was significantly smaller (p < 0.001) than the null deviance (323 on 621 df), suggesting that the covariates explained a large part of the variation in the model.

      Estimates, standard errors, and p-values of covariates in multivariate logistic regression with banana bunchy top disease presence or absence on farms.

      Covariate Estimate SE Pr(>|z|)
      (Intercept) −197.8190 89.6144 0.0273*
      Isothermality (isotherm) −0.1326 0.0685 0.0527
      Precipitation in the driest month 0.2155 0.0527 4.35E−05***
      Wind speed 88.7381 46.3263 0.0554
      Normalized difference vegetation index −0.0421 0.0264 0.1108
      Land surface temperature difference (LSTD) 1.1111 0.4592 1.55E−02*
      Banana presence in 2016 (Ochola et al., 2022) 2.5178 1.1035 0.0225*
      Wind speed: LSTD −0.4871 0.2383 0.0409*

      “*,” and “***” denote significance at p ≤ 0.05, and p ≤ 0.001, respectively. Null and residual deviances are, respectively, 323 on 621 degrees of freedom (df) and 245 on 614 df. AIC: 261.

      The risk map for BBTD spread and establishment in Uganda

      The BBTD risk map ( Figure 8 ) was finally obtained by regressing the multivariate logistic regression model in Table 2 to the covariate maps in Figure 3 . The map reflects the potential of the disease to spread and entrench itself within a banana production landscape. The values in the figure reflect the likelihood for BBTD to establish itself and spread following the introduction of the inoculum ( Figure 4 ). High values in the figure suggest a high suitability for BBTD, while a low value suggests a low suitability. The low-lying zone of northwestern Uganda (west of the River Nile); areas next to Lakes Albert, Edward, and George; and the zones west and north of L. Victoria are highly suitable for BBTD establishment. Most of the production zones in the midwestern part of Uganda are moderately suitable for BBTD establishment. Some suitable landscapes are also visible in the main banana production zones of western and southwestern Uganda. BBTD risk is observed to be low or non-existent in most of northern and northeastern Uganda, possibly due to the low suitability of the landscapes for the establishment of the aphid vector and/or the virus, as these areas rank low in banana production.

      Likelihood of establishment and spread of BBTD within different landscapes in Uganda.

      Discussion

      Bananas are an important food and income crop in Uganda with high production concentrations, respectively, in the southwestern, midwestern, and central regions of Uganda. Banana production in the country has been greatly constrained by Xanthomonas wilt of banana, a bacterial disease. The report of BBTD in the northwestern part of the country (Ocimati et al., 2021) and the mid-southwestern district of Kasese (Ocimati, unpublished results) puts more strain on the banana production systems. This study documents the potential spread factors of BBTD at the farm level, delimits the geographical spread of the disease, and maps the vulnerability of the production systems across Uganda, as a basis for proactive interventions to contain its spread.

      The banana production systems were dominated by smallholders with a mean farm area of 0.4 ha. Natural capital such as access to land greatly influences the farmers’ decisions to adopt or dis-adopt innovations and may have implications on future efforts to manage BBTD. Deressa et al. (2009) and Langyintuo and Mulugetta (2008) associated larger farms with greater wealth and thus larger-scale farmers to have the means to adapt and the capacity to bear risks. Thus, most farmers in the studied regions could be constrained by resources to manage BBTD in case of an outbreak. Pagnani et al. (2021) observed that the farmers’ willingness to eradicate the banana bacterial disease was subject to the importance they attribute to bananas as a food and income crop, whereas the adoption of the full package may be too demanding for farmers who have extensive banana production.

      The farms in the midwestern and central regions and much of northern Uganda are in low to mid altitudes which are suitable for aphid-vectored BBTV transmission (c.f. Supplementary Figure 1A ). High BBTV transmission efficiency and banana aphid survival have been reported at lower altitudes with warmer conditions (Niyongere et al., 2013). The high variability in altitude within the southwestern sites (c.f. Supplementary Figure 1A ) suggests the presence of niches that could still harbor the inoculum in case of disease introduction. The northwestern region that has been confirmed to have BBTD (Ocimati et al., 2021) had the youngest plantations. This region is traditionally a non-banana-growing area. Over the past decade, there has been an increasing interest in banana production in the region. The search for banana planting materials for new fields, with farmers going beyond their communities to other districts and even to neighboring DR Congo, makes this landscape vulnerable to new disease introductions and could partly explain the current introduction and rapid spread of BBTD in the region.

      Intercropping though at differing levels of intensity dominated across the studied zones. This could benefit the landscapes through suppression of the BBTV aphid vector. Crop diversification through, e.g., intercrops promote the buildup of a high functionally diverse population of natural enemies, reducing pest densities (Estrada-Carmona et al., 2022; Greenop et al., 2020; Jaworski et al., 2023). High crop species diversity alters crop signals like leaf/stem color and volatile organic compounds necessary for pests to identify their host plants or host patches, reducing pest burden on crops (Cook et al., 2007; Doring and Kirchner, 2022). High levels of monocultures were observed in southwestern Uganda and could increase the risk of BBTD spread across these farms in case of disease introduction.

      The presence of BBTD over a period of 0.5 to 4.4 years on at least 9% of the farms in the northwestern and mid-southern region suggests that the disease was within the landscapes for a long period of time before detection and official reporting. The fact that some farms had just observed the disease is evidence that the disease is actively spreading within landscapes. This coupled with the observed high yield losses (75% to 91%) highlights the need for urgent action to contain the disease. Symptoms were observed in diverse banana varieties and genotypes including the East African highland banana that are the most important and cultivated group in East Africa. Though the survey did not exhaustively observe all the banana varieties in the country, Ferreira et al. (1997), Niyongere et al. (2011), and Ngatat et al. (2017) reported all banana varieties to be susceptible, with susceptibility varying from one variety to another. Genotypes with A genomes are reported to be more susceptible, while those with at least one or two B genomes are more tolerant to BBTV (Hapsari and Masrum, 2012; Niyongere et al., 2011).

      Farmers’ responses to diseases including BBTD were documented as a measure for their likelihood to adopt BBTD control measures. Cutting of single disease stems was common across the study sites. This can be attributed to the wide promotion of the practice for managing banana bacterial wilt disease, which is prevalent in the region (Blomme et al., 2014; Kikulwe et al., 2022; Ocimati et al., 2019). Rouging of entire banana mats, which is also an important IPDM component for managing BBTD, was common though more widely used in the southwestern region. Rouging is a cumbersome exercise and the fact that farms are already using it could suggest a possible positive response toward the practice for managing BBTD in affected landscapes. The northwestern region had over 60% of the farmers abandoning diseased plants or entire farms and would thus need more effort in terms of training, awareness creation, and motivation to manage the disease.

      In line with earlier reports (Anhalt and Almeida, 2008; Bouwmeester et al., 2023; Niyongere et al., 2013), BBTD presence on farms was influenced by temperature variables, wind speed, precipitation variables, presence of the susceptible host, and NDVI (c.f. Figure 3 ).

      Temperature affects the aphid vector biology and movement, virus spread and transmission efficiency, and the rate of disease symptom development (Allen, 1978; Anhalt and Almeida, 2008; Raymundo and Pangga, 2011; Robson et al., 2007). Temperatures between 25°C and 30°C have been reported to be ideal for aphid population buildup, declining with increasing or decreasing temperatures, respectively, above and below this optimum temperature range (Anhalt and Almeida, 2008; Robson et al., 2007; Wu and Su, 1990). For cereal aphids, low temperatures of approximately 14°C to 15°C (Walters and Dixon, 1984) and high temperatures of approximately 31°C (Robert, 1987) and above have been shown to inhibit or delay migration. Wu and Su (1990) reported no BBTV transmission at 16°C. Temperature variables also had a strong correlation to solar radiation that affects the BBTV aphid vector due to its effects through heat (see discussions on temperature above) and visible light. Slosser et al. (1992) reported a significant, negative correlation between solar radiation and the population of cotton aphids. Auclair (1967) observed a higher feeding and survival of cotton aphids under low light intensity, while Hoyt and Madsen (1960) observed the highest migration of the first instar nymphs of the woolly apple aphid in the late afternoon when there is less light. Solar radiation also influences the activity of natural enemies of the BBTV aphid vectors. For example, Elliott et al. (2012) reported an increase in the number of aphids predated upon per minute by adult convergent lady beetles, Hippodamia convergens with increasing intensity of solar radiation.

      High precipitation, despite improving the suitability of the host to the BBTV aphid vectors, raindrops, and runoff water directly dislodge aphids off the plants, thus reducing their populations on plants (Kaakeh and Dutcher, 1993). Niyongere et al. (2013), for example, observed a higher aphid population in the dry season months. Thus, production zones with higher precipitation will have a lower buildup and BBTV spread relative to those with drier conditions. The increase of BBTD presence with precipitation in the driest months suggests that extreme dryness, which could be associated with high temperatures and desiccation, is detrimental to the aphids and the virus. This agrees with the findings of Anhalt and Almeida (2008); Robson et al. (2007), and Wu and Su (1990) who reported high temperatures above the optimal to deter aphid buildup. Thus, precipitation in dry periods moderates the environment making it suitable for the aphid and the virus.

      The negative association of BBTD presence with wind speed could be attributed to the direct dislodgement of BBTV aphid vectors by wind. Previous studies, however, paint a mixed picture of the effect of wind on aphids. Singh et al. (1986) reported a negative effect of wind speed on the population of mustard aphid (Lipaphis erysimi). Devegili et al. (2019) observed wind to trigger the detachment of aphids and their movement toward the unexposed side of the stems; thus, a non-windy condition could expand aphid foraging and infestation rates. Thus, production zones exposed to higher wind speeds could experience lower rates of BBTD spread by banana aphids. In contrast, Singh et al. (2007) only reported a negative wind effect in the declining phase of aphid infestation. Barton (2014) reported wind speed to indirectly lead to an increased aphid density due to alteration of aphid predator behavior. Wind has also been reported to support the dispersal of the alate (winged) aphids over both short and long distances, though wind speeds higher than 8 km h−1 delay or deter aphid migration (Haine, 1955).

      As expected, disease presence was positively correlated to the banana production variable, i.e., banana presence in 2016. The high presence of the host plant creates a suitable environment for the BBTV aphid vector to thrive and thus a higher chance for BBTV spread. Normalized difference vegetation index had a strong negative correlation with BBTD presence. NDVI quantifies the health and density of vegetation and could reflect the role of a healthy and diverse vegetation in creating a suppressive landscape toward the aphid vector. This result, however, contrasts with the findings of Bouwmeester et al. (2023) who found a positive correlation between NDVI and BBTD presence. It is thus possible that the current BBTV infections occur in poorly managed production systems that reflect a lower NDVI score.

      Unexpectedly, a weak negative correlation was observed with altitude (c.f. Figure 3 ), as altitude has been shown to negatively affect the aphid vector’s virus transmission efficiency and disease expression in banana plants. This can be attributed to the presence of BBTD-affected plants/mats at high-altitude locations of the northwestern region, possibly introduced through infected planting materials sourced from BBTD-affected farms and landscapes.

      Only six covariates and the interaction between wind speed and LSTD had a significant (i.e., p < 0.05) contribution to the model for BBTD suitability. The effect of the five covariates in the model is generally consistent with the correlations. Isothermality quantifies the extent of day-to-night temperature oscillations relative to the annual temperature oscillations. Its negative association with BBTD presence can be attributed to its effect on the survival, life cycle, and feeding behavior of the BBTV aphid vector. For example, in comparison to constant temperature conditions, oscillating temperature conditions did not affect pea aphid populations under cooler temperature (20°C vs. 16°C/24°C) conditions, whereas smaller populations were produced under warmer (28°C vs. 24°C/32°C) conditions (Valls, 2018). In a separate study, Chen et al. (2013) observed that aphids under oscillating temperature conditions developed slowly with longer generation times despite having a higher net reproductive rate.

      The LSTD had a strong and positive influence on BBTD presence. Uganda experiences moderate temperatures throughout the year, with monthly minimum air temperatures of 16.6°C to 18.1°C, monthly maximum of 28.0°C to 31.2°C, and monthly average air temperature varying between 22.3°C and 24.3°C. These temperature conditions are within the conducive range for the survival and spread of BBTV and its aphid vector (Wu and Su, 1990; Robson et al., 2007; Anhalt and Almeida, 2008). The significant negative effect of the interaction between wind speed and LSTD on BBTD presence (c.f. Table 2 ) can be attributed to the increase in temperatures with declining wind speeds, reducing the suitability of landscapes to the banana aphid and BBTV. An inverse relationship has been reported between wind speed and LSTD (Back et al., 2023).

      Though altitude did not contribute to the final model, it is highly and negatively correlated to the temperature covariates including LSTD ( Figure 3 and Table 2 ). As explained above, BBTD was observed at high altitudes, possibly transmitted through the introduction of externally sourced infected planting materials. The weak negative association between BBTD and altitude could be suggestive of improvements in the suitability of the mid- to high-altitude landscapes for BBTV transmission by the aphid vector and virus within plant proliferation. This is supported by the fact that several studies have reported temperature increases of up to 1.5°C across most of Uganda, with characteristic rates of warming approximately 0.2°C per decade (Funk et al., 2012; Egeru et al., 2019). A more recent study in Burundi similarly reported BBTD-infected fields at higher altitudes of up to 2,000 masl (Nakato et al., 2023), whereas a decade ago, BBTD-infected mats were only observed up to 1,600 masl.

      The BBTD risk map shows swaths of production zones in the northwestern and central Uganda to be suitable for the disease to establish itself. The low-lying production zones with higher temperatures along the River Nile and around Lake Victoria are highly prone to BBTD. Potential BBTD hot spots also exist in the western and southwestern districts that account for the highest banana production in Uganda. Bouwmeester et al. (2023) ranked these production zones of Uganda as highly prone and of high priority due to their adjacent location and high connectivity to eastern DR Congo, a large hot spot for BBTD, and their favorable climatic conditions for BBTD establishment and spread. The observed presence of potential hot spots in the southwestern region and BBTD at higher altitudes and the current trends in global warming also suggest that the higher production zones in the country, especially in the southwest, are increasingly vulnerable to this disease. Despite the lower transmission efficiency at high altitudes, the aphid vectors have been shown to acquire the virus at mid- and high-altitude areas with lower temperatures (Niyongere et al., 2013). Temperature increases of 1.8°C to 2.1°C between 1940 and 2069 and 2.2°C to 4.0°C by the end of the century under different representative concentration pathways have been projected for Uganda (Egeru et al., 2019). These projections suggest that the suitability of key Ugandan banana landscapes for BBTD establishment is likely to improve.

      BBTD control has been reported to be extremely challenging once established due to the lack of easy environmentally and economically sound control measures and the omnipresence of the BBTV aphid vector in all banana production landscapes (Omondi et al., 2020). It is also difficult to detect the early stages of infection, especially when dealing with a large number of mats on farms. Given the high production zone connectivity within the country, overreliance on suckers as planting materials, and rising temperatures, the risk for disease spread to new production zones from the current locations in the north- and midwestern regions remains high. Proactive surveillance, quarantines, and safe and sustainable seed systems are thus urgently needed for protecting the currently BBTD-free production zones. Measures to eliminate or reduce the inoculum in the affected areas also need to be urgently rolled out.

      Data availability statement

      The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

      Author contributions

      WOc: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GO: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AT: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. JK: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. JT: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. RE: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. WOk: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. GM: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. DK: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. GB: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

      Funding

      The author(s) declare financial funding was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was conducted with the financial support from the One CGIAR Initiative on Plant Health and Rapid Response to Protect Food Security and Livelihoods (Plant Health Initiative). We would like to thank all funders who have supported this research through their contributions to the CGIAR Trust Fund: www.cgiar.org/funders/.

      Acknowledgments

      The authors are grateful for the funding from the One CGIAR Initiative on Plant Health and Rapid Response to Protect Food Security and Livelihoods. The logistical support from the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Animal Industry (MAAIF) – Uganda and the National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO) of Uganda are also acknowledged. The authors also acknowledge the support from district- and subcounty-level agricultural officers and the banana farmers who willingly participated in this study.

      Conflict of interest

      The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

      Publisher’s note

      All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

      Supplementary material

      The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: /articles/10.3389/fagro.2024.1401478/full#supplementary-material

      Altitude at which sampled farms are located (A) and the age of banana plantations (B) across study regions along the western border region of Uganda. The triangles and horizontal lines within the boxes denote the mean and median values, respectively. The lower and upper boundaries of the boxes are respectively, the 25th and 75th percentiles; the bars/whiskers below and above, respectively, the 10th and 90th percentiles and the points beyond the 10th and 90th percentiles are outliers.

      References Allen R. N. (1978). Spread of bunchy top disease in established banana plantations. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 29, 1223. doi: 10.1071/AR9781223 Anhalt M. D. Almeida R. P. P. (2008). Effect of temperature, vector life stage, and plant access period on transmission of banana bunchy top virus to banana. Phytopathol 98, 743748. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-98-6-0743 Auclair J. L. (1967). Effects of light and sugars on rearing the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii, on a germ-free and holidic diet. J. Insect Physiol. 13, 12471268. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(67)90097-2 Back Y. Kumar P. Bach P. M. Rauch W. Kleidorfer M. (2023). Integrating CFD-GIS modelling to refine urban heat and thermal comfort assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 858, 159729. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159729 Barton B. T. (2014). Reduced wind strengthens top-down control of an insect herbivore. Ecol 95, 23752381. doi: 10.1890/13-2171.1 Blomme G. Jacobsen K. Ocimati W. Beed F. Ntamwira J. Sivirihauma C. . (2014). Fine-tuning banana Xanthomonas wilt control options over the past decade in East and Central Africa. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 139, 271287. doi: 10.1007/s10658-014-0402-0 Blomme G. Ploetz R. Jones D. De Langhe E. Price N. Gold C. . (2013). A historical overview of the appearance and spread of Musa pests and pathogens on the African continent: highlighting the importance of clean Musa planting materials and quarantine measures. Ann. Appl. Biol. 162, 426. doi: 10.1111/aab.12002 Bouwmeester H. Blomme G. Omondi A. B. Ocimati W. (2023). Banana bunchy top disease in Africa—Predicting continent-wide disease risks by combining survey data and expert knowledge. Plant Pathol. 00, 115. doi: 10.1111/ppa.13764 Caruana-Iskra M. L. (2003). “Analyse du risque phytosanitaire (ARP),” in Organisme nuisible, banana bunchy top babu virus-BBTV zones ARP (Martinique: CIRAD (Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement)), 714. Chen C. Y. Chiu M. C. Kuo M. H. (2013). Effect of warming with temperature oscillations on a low-latitude aphid, Aphis craccivora . Bull. Entomol. Res. 103, 406413. doi: 10.1017/S0007485312000867 Cook S. M. Khan Z. R. Pickett J. A. (2007). The use of push-pull strategies in integrated pest management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 52, 375400. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091407 Deressa T. T. Hassan R. M. Ringler C. Alemu T. Yesuf M. (2009). Determinants of farmers’ choice of adaptation methods to climate change in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Global Environ. Change 19, 248255. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.01.002 Devegili A. M. Alma A. M. Lescano M. N. Farji-Brener A. G. (2019). Wind matters: Asymmetric distribution of aphids on host plants can be explained by stems functioning as windbreaks. Austral Ecol. 44, 11871195. doi: 10.1111/aec.12796 Doring T. F. Kirchner S. M. (2022). A model for colour preference behaviour of spring migrant aphids. Philos. Trans. R. Soc B. 377, 20210283. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0283 Egeru A. Barasa B. Nampijja J. Siya A. Makooma M. T. Majaliwa M. G. J. (2019). Past, present and future climate trends under varied representative concentration pathways for a sub-humid region in Uganda. Climate 7, 35. doi: 10.3390/cli7030035 Elliott N. C. Kieckhefer R. W. Phoofolo M. W. (2012). Foraging by hippodamia convergens1 for the aphid sitobion avenae2 on wheat plants growing in greenhouse plots. Southwestern Entomol. 37, 467474. doi: 10.3958/059.037.0404 Esri . (2023). ArcGIS Pro (Version 3.0) [Software]. Available online at: https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-pro/overview. Estrada-Carmona N. Sanchez A. C. Remans R. Jones S. K. (2022). Complex agricultural landscapes host more biodiversity than simple ones: a global meta-analysis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, e2203385119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2203385119 FAO . (2023). Crops and livestock products. Available online at: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (Accessed September 19, 2023). Ferreira S. A. Trujillo E. E. Ogata D. Y. (1997). Banana bunchy top virus. In: CTAHR, PD-12. Available online at: https://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/oc/freepubs/pdf/PD-12.pdf (Accessed 14/11/2023). Funk C. Rowland J. Eilerts G. White L. (2012). “Famine early warning systems network- informing climate change adaptation series: A climate trend analysis of Uganda,” in Famine early warning systems network. (Reston, Virginia, USA: United States Geological Survey (USGS)). Available online at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2012/3062/FS2012-3062.pdf. Global Invasive Species Database . (2023). Species profile. In: Banana bunchy top virus (BBTV). Available online at: http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=141 (Accessed 24 April 2023). Greenop A. Cook S. M. Wilby A. Pywell R. F. Woodcock B. A. (2020). Invertebrate community structure predicts natural pest control resilience to insecticide exposure. J. Appl. Ecol. 57, 24412453. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13752 Gregorich M. Strohmaier S. Dunkler D. Heinze G. (2021). Regression with highly correlated predictors: variable omission is not the solution. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 4259. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084259 Haine E. (1955). Aphid take-off in controlled wind speeds. Nat 175, 474475. doi: 10.1038/175474a0 Hapsari L. Masrum A. (2012). Preliminary screening resistance of musa germplasms for banana bunchy top disease in purwodadi botanic garden, pasuruan, east jawa. Buletin Kebun Raya 15, 5770. Available online at: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/55107-EN-preliminary-screening-resistance-of-musa.pdf (Accessed August 30, 2024). Hoyt S. C. Madsen H. F. (1960). Dispersal behavior of the first instar nymphs of the woolly apple aphid. Hilgardia 30, 267299. doi: 10.3733/hilg.v30n10p267 Jaworski C. C. Thomine E. Rusch A. Lavoir A. V. Wang S. Desneux N. (2023). Crop diversification to promote arthropod pest management: a review. Agric. Commun. 1, 100004. doi: 10.1016/j.agcom.2023.100004 Kaakeh W. Dutcher J. D. (1993). Effect of rainfall on population abundance of aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) on pecan. J. Entomol. Sci. 28, 283286. doi: 10.18474/0749-8004-28.3.283 Kikulwe E. Asindu M. Ocimati W. Ajambo S. Tinzaara W. Iradukunda F. . (2022). “Scaling banana bacterial wilt management through single diseased stem removal in the great lakes region,” in Root, tuber and banana food system innovations: value creation for inclusive outcomes (Springer International Publishing, Cham), 289317. Kilimo Trust . (2012). Analysis of the Banana Value Chains in Tanzania and Uganda: Consumption, Productivity and Challenges. Available online at: https://kilimotrust.org/analysis-of-the-banana-value-chains-in-uganda-and-tanzania-2/. Kuhn M. Wing J. Weston S. Williams A. Keefer C. Engelhardt A. . (2020). Package ‘caret’. R J. 223, 48. doi: 10.32614/CRAN.package.caret Kumar P. L. Selvarajan R. Iskra-Caruana M. L. Chabannes M. Hanna R. (2015). Biology, etiology, and control of virus diseases of banana and plantain. Adv. Virus Res. 91, 229269. doi: 10.1016/bs.aivir.2014.10.006 Langyintuo A. Mulugetta M. (2008). Assessing the influence of neighborhood effects on the adoption of improved agricultural technologies in developing agriculture, Mozambique. Afr. J. Agric. Resour. Econom. 2, 151169. Magee C. J. (1927). Investigation on the bunchy top disease of bananas. Bulletin of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research in Australia No. 30. (Melbourne, Australia: Council for Scientific and Industrial Research). Mansoor S. Qazi J. Amin I. Khatri A. Khan I. A. Raza S. . (2005). A PCR-based method, with internal control, for the detection of Banana bunchy top virus in banana. Mol. Biotechnol. 30, 167169. doi: 10.1385/MB:30:2:167 Naderifar M. Goli H. Ghaljaie F. (2017). Snowball sampling: A purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Stride. Dev. Med. Educ. 14, e67670. doi: 10.5812/sdme Nakato G. V. Okonya J. S. Kantungeko D. Ocimati W. Mahuku G. Legg J. P. . (2023). Influence of altitude as a proxy for temperature on key Musa pests and diseases in watershed areas of Burundi and Rwanda. Heliyon 9, e13854. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13854 Ngatat S. Hanna R. Kumar P. L. Gray S. M. Cilia M. Ghogomu R. T. . (2017). Relative susceptibility of Musa genotypes to banana bunchy top disease in Cameroon and implication for disease management. Crop Prot 101, 116122. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2017.07.018 Niyongere C. Ateka E. Losenge T. Blomme G. Lepoint P. (2011). Screening Musa genotypes for banana bunchy top disease resistance in Burundi. Acta Hortic. 897, 439447. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.897.60 Niyongere C. Losenge T. Ateka E. M. Ntukamazina N. Ndayiragije P. Simbare A. . (2013). Understanding banana bunchy top disease epidemiology in Burundi for an enhanced and integrated management approach. Plant Pathol. 62, 562570. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2012.02676.x Ochola D. Boekelo B. van de Ven G. Taulya G. Kubiriba J. van Asten P. . (2021). “Accompanying data and R scripts: Mapping the spatial distribution and geographic shift of East African highland banana (Musa sp.) cropping systems in Uganda (Version 2) [Data set],” in 4TU. Research data. (The Netherlands: 4TU. Research Data). doi: 10.4121/16908469.V2 Ochola D. Boekelo B. van de Ven G. W. Taulya G. Kubiriba J. van Asten P. J. . (2022). Mapping spatial distribution and geographic shifts of East African highland banana (Musa spp.) in Uganda. PloS One 17, e0263439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263439 Ocimati W. Schagen B. V. Kozicka M. Kikulwe E. M. Gotor E. Blomme G. (2019). Banishing banana wilt: can it get any easier. Available online at: https://cgspace.cgiar.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/e0358af3-af29-4eae-b264-e31571786421/content (Accessed 21/02/2024). Ocimati W. Tazuba A. F. Tushemereirwe W. K. Tugume J. Omondi B. A. Acema D. . (2021). First report of banana bunchy top disease caused by Banana bunchy top virus in Uganda. New Dis. Rep. 44, e12052. doi: 10.1002/ndr2.12052 Omondi B. A. Soko M. M. Nduwimana I. Delano R. T. Niyongere C. Simbare A. . (2020). The effectiveness of consistent roguing in managing banana bunchy top disease in smallholder production in Africa. Plant Pathol. 69, 17541766. doi: 10.1111/ppa.13253 Pagnani T. Gotor E. Kikulwe E. Caracciolo F. (2021). Livelihood assets’ influence on Ugandan farmers’ control practices for Banana Xanthomonas Wilt (BXW). Agric. Food Econ. 9, 119. doi: 10.1186/s40100-021-00192-6 Qazi J. (2016). Banana bunchy top virus and the bunchy top disease. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 82, 211. doi: 10.1007/s10327-015-0642-7 RStudio Team . (2023). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA. Available online at: http://www.rstudio.com/. Raymundo A. D. Pangga I. B. (2011). Simulation modeling of bunchy top epidemics in a changing climate. J. Environ. Sci. Manage. 14, 1320. Robert Y. (1987). “Aphids and their environment: dispersion and migration,” in Aphids: Their biology, natural enemies and control, vol. 299 . Eds. Minks A. K. Harrewijn P. (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 313. Robson J. D. Wright M. G. Almeida R. P. P. (2007). Biology of Pentalonia nigronervosa (Hemiptera, Aphididae) on banana using different rearing methods. Environ. Entomol. 36, 4652. doi: 10.1603/0046-225X(2007)36[46:BOPNHA]2.0.CO;2 Shimwela M. M. Mahuku G. Mbanzibwa D. R. Mkamilo G. Mark D. Mosha H. I. . (2022). First report of banana bunchy top virus in banana and plantain (Musa spp.) in Tanzania. Plant Dis. 106, 1312. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-21-1387-PDN Singh H. Singh Z. Naresh J. S. (1986). Path coefficient analysis of abiotic factors affecting the aphid populations on rapeseed. Indian J. Entomol. 48, 156161. Available online at: https://www.entomoljournal.com/archives/2018/vol6issue3/PartL/6-2-169-501.pdf (Accessed August 30, 2024). Singh R. Singh D. Rao V. U. M. (2007). Effect of abiotic factors on mustard aphid (Lipaphis erysimi kalt.) on Indian brassica. Indian J. Agric. Res. 41, 6770. Available online at: https://arccarticles.s3.amazonaws.com/webArticle/articles/ijar2411013.pdf (Accessed August 30, 2024). Slosser J. E. Pinchak W. E. Rummel D. R. (1992). “Population development and regulation of the cotton aphid,” in Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference. (Memphis, Tenn: Nat. Cotton Council Amer.). 2, 10651067. Soko M. M. Dale J. Kumar P. L. (2009). Banana bunchy top disease survey reports, previous control efforts and the way forward (Limbe, Malawi: Agricultural Research Station). Thomas J. E. (2018). “Diseases caused by viruses - Banana bunchy top,” in Handbook of diseases of banana, abacá and enset. Ed. Jones D. (CAB International, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK), 362376. Uganda Bureau of Statistics (2020). Uganda annual agricultural survey 2018 (Kampala, Uganda: UBOS). Valls A. (2018). Effects of temperature on pea aphids, their host plants, and their parasitoids. (Fargo, North Dakota, USA: North Dakota State University). Walters K. F. A. Dixon A. F. G. (1984). The effect of temperature and wind on the flight activity of cereal aphids. Ann. Appl. Biol. 104, 1726. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1984.tb05582.x Wardlaw C. W. (1961). The virus diseases: bunchy top. Banana diseases, including plantains and abaca (London, UK: Longman), 68115. Wu R. Y. Su H. J. (1990). Transmission of banana bunchy top virus by aphids to banana plantlets from tissue culture. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 31, 710. Available online at: https://ejournal.sinica.edu.tw/bbas/content/1990/1/bot311-02.pdf.
      ‘Oh, my dear Thomas, you haven’t heard the terrible news then?’ she said. ‘I thought you would be sure to have seen it placarded somewhere. Alice went straight to her room, and I haven’t seen her since, though I repeatedly knocked at the door, which she has locked on the inside, and I’m sure it’s most unnatural of her not to let her own mother comfort her. It all happened in a moment: I have always said those great motor-cars shouldn’t be allowed to career about the streets, especially when they are all paved with cobbles as they are at Easton Haven, which are{331} so slippery when it’s wet. He slipped, and it went over him in a moment.’ My thanks were few and awkward, for there still hung to the missive a basting thread, and it was as warm as a nestling bird. I bent low--everybody was emotional in those days--kissed the fragrant thing, thrust it into my bosom, and blushed worse than Camille. "What, the Corner House victim? Is that really a fact?" "My dear child, I don't look upon it in that light at all. The child gave our picturesque friend a certain distinction--'My husband is dead, and this is my only child,' and all that sort of thing. It pays in society." leave them on the steps of a foundling asylum in order to insure [See larger version] Interoffice guff says you're planning definite moves on your own, J. O., and against some opposition. Is the Colonel so poor or so grasping—or what? Albert could not speak, for he felt as if his brains and teeth were rattling about inside his head. The rest of[Pg 188] the family hunched together by the door, the boys gaping idiotically, the girls in tears. "Now you're married." The host was called in, and unlocked a drawer in which they were deposited. The galleyman, with visible reluctance, arrayed himself in the garments, and he was observed to shudder more than once during the investiture of the dead man's apparel. HoME香京julia种子在线播放 ENTER NUMBET 0016www.iuzkjx.com.cn
      eedilo.com.cn
      hdelec.net.cn
      getpage.com.cn
      www.hlchain.com.cn
      hzlijiang.org.cn
      langlinx.com.cn
      www.hzfhcc.com.cn
      okpktg.org.cn
      utogwb.com.cn
      处女被大鸡巴操 强奸乱伦小说图片 俄罗斯美女爱爱图 调教强奸学生 亚洲女的穴 夜来香图片大全 美女性强奸电影 手机版色中阁 男性人体艺术素描图 16p成人 欧美性爱360 电影区 亚洲电影 欧美电影 经典三级 偷拍自拍 动漫电影 乱伦电影 变态另类 全部电 类似狠狠鲁的网站 黑吊操白逼图片 韩国黄片种子下载 操逼逼逼逼逼 人妻 小说 p 偷拍10幼女自慰 极品淫水很多 黄色做i爱 日本女人人体电影快播看 大福国小 我爱肏屄美女 mmcrwcom 欧美多人性交图片 肥臀乱伦老头舔阴帝 d09a4343000019c5 西欧人体艺术b xxoo激情短片 未成年人的 插泰国人夭图片 第770弾み1 24p 日本美女性 交动态 eee色播 yantasythunder 操无毛少女屄 亚洲图片你懂的女人 鸡巴插姨娘 特级黄 色大片播 左耳影音先锋 冢本友希全集 日本人体艺术绿色 我爱被舔逼 内射 幼 美阴图 喷水妹子高潮迭起 和后妈 操逼 美女吞鸡巴 鸭个自慰 中国女裸名单 操逼肥臀出水换妻 色站裸体义术 中国行上的漏毛美女叫什么 亚洲妹性交图 欧美美女人裸体人艺照 成人色妹妹直播 WWW_JXCT_COM r日本女人性淫乱 大胆人艺体艺图片 女同接吻av 碰碰哥免费自拍打炮 艳舞写真duppid1 88电影街拍视频 日本自拍做爱qvod 实拍美女性爱组图 少女高清av 浙江真实乱伦迅雷 台湾luanlunxiaoshuo 洛克王国宠物排行榜 皇瑟电影yy频道大全 红孩儿连连看 阴毛摄影 大胆美女写真人体艺术摄影 和风骚三个媳妇在家做爱 性爱办公室高清 18p2p木耳 大波撸影音 大鸡巴插嫩穴小说 一剧不超两个黑人 阿姨诱惑我快播 幼香阁千叶县小学生 少女妇女被狗强奸 曰人体妹妹 十二岁性感幼女 超级乱伦qvod 97爱蜜桃ccc336 日本淫妇阴液 av海量资源999 凤凰影视成仁 辰溪四中艳照门照片 先锋模特裸体展示影片 成人片免费看 自拍百度云 肥白老妇女 女爱人体图片 妈妈一女穴 星野美夏 日本少女dachidu 妹子私处人体图片 yinmindahuitang 舔无毛逼影片快播 田莹疑的裸体照片 三级电影影音先锋02222 妻子被外国老头操 观月雏乃泥鳅 韩国成人偷拍自拍图片 强奸5一9岁幼女小说 汤姆影院av图片 妹妹人艺体图 美女大驱 和女友做爱图片自拍p 绫川まどか在线先锋 那么嫩的逼很少见了 小女孩做爱 处女好逼连连看图图 性感美女在家做爱 近距离抽插骚逼逼 黑屌肏金毛屄 日韩av美少女 看喝尿尿小姐日逼色色色网图片 欧美肛交新视频 美女吃逼逼 av30线上免费 伊人在线三级经典 新视觉影院t6090影院 最新淫色电影网址 天龙影院远古手机版 搞老太影院 插进美女的大屁股里 私人影院加盟费用 www258dd 求一部电影里面有一个二猛哥 深肛交 日本萌妹子人体艺术写真图片 插入屄眼 美女的木奶 中文字幕黄色网址影视先锋 九号女神裸 和骚人妻偷情 和潘晓婷做爱 国模大尺度蜜桃 欧美大逼50p 西西人体成人 李宗瑞继母做爱原图物处理 nianhuawang 男鸡巴的视屏 � 97免费色伦电影 好色网成人 大姨子先锋 淫荡巨乳美女教师妈妈 性nuexiaoshuo WWW36YYYCOM 长春继续给力进屋就操小女儿套干破内射对白淫荡 农夫激情社区 日韩无码bt 欧美美女手掰嫩穴图片 日本援交偷拍自拍 入侵者日本在线播放 亚洲白虎偷拍自拍 常州高见泽日屄 寂寞少妇自卫视频 人体露逼图片 多毛外国老太 变态乱轮手机在线 淫荡妈妈和儿子操逼 伦理片大奶少女 看片神器最新登入地址sqvheqi345com账号群 麻美学姐无头 圣诞老人射小妞和强奸小妞动话片 亚洲AV女老师 先锋影音欧美成人资源 33344iucoom zV天堂电影网 宾馆美女打炮视频 色五月丁香五月magnet 嫂子淫乱小说 张歆艺的老公 吃奶男人视频在线播放 欧美色图男女乱伦 avtt2014ccvom 性插色欲香影院 青青草撸死你青青草 99热久久第一时间 激情套图卡通动漫 幼女裸聊做爱口交 日本女人被强奸乱伦 草榴社区快播 2kkk正在播放兽骑 啊不要人家小穴都湿了 www猎奇影视 A片www245vvcomwwwchnrwhmhzcn 搜索宜春院av wwwsee78co 逼奶鸡巴插 好吊日AV在线视频19gancom 熟女伦乱图片小说 日本免费av无码片在线开苞 鲁大妈撸到爆 裸聊官网 德国熟女xxx 新不夜城论坛首页手机 女虐男网址 男女做爱视频华为网盘 激情午夜天亚洲色图 内裤哥mangent 吉沢明歩制服丝袜WWWHHH710COM 屌逼在线试看 人体艺体阿娇艳照 推荐一个可以免费看片的网站如果被QQ拦截请复制链接在其它浏览器打开xxxyyy5comintr2a2cb551573a2b2e 欧美360精品粉红鲍鱼 教师调教第一页 聚美屋精品图 中韩淫乱群交 俄罗斯撸撸片 把鸡巴插进小姨子的阴道 干干AV成人网 aolasoohpnbcn www84ytom 高清大量潮喷www27dyycom 宝贝开心成人 freefronvideos人母 嫩穴成人网gggg29com 逼着舅妈给我口交肛交彩漫画 欧美色色aV88wwwgangguanscom 老太太操逼自拍视频 777亚洲手机在线播放 有没有夫妻3p小说 色列漫画淫女 午间色站导航 欧美成人处女色大图 童颜巨乳亚洲综合 桃色性欲草 色眯眯射逼 无码中文字幕塞外青楼这是一个 狂日美女老师人妻 爱碰网官网 亚洲图片雅蠛蝶 快播35怎么搜片 2000XXXX电影 新谷露性家庭影院 深深候dvd播放 幼齿用英语怎么说 不雅伦理无需播放器 国外淫荡图片 国外网站幼幼嫩网址 成年人就去色色视频快播 我鲁日日鲁老老老我爱 caoshaonvbi 人体艺术avav 性感性色导航 韩国黄色哥来嫖网站 成人网站美逼 淫荡熟妇自拍 欧美色惰图片 北京空姐透明照 狼堡免费av视频 www776eom 亚洲无码av欧美天堂网男人天堂 欧美激情爆操 a片kk266co 色尼姑成人极速在线视频 国语家庭系列 蒋雯雯 越南伦理 色CC伦理影院手机版 99jbbcom 大鸡巴舅妈 国产偷拍自拍淫荡对话视频 少妇春梦射精 开心激动网 自拍偷牌成人 色桃隐 撸狗网性交视频 淫荡的三位老师 伦理电影wwwqiuxia6commqiuxia6com 怡春院分站 丝袜超短裙露脸迅雷下载 色制服电影院 97超碰好吊色男人 yy6080理论在线宅男日韩福利大全 大嫂丝袜 500人群交手机在线 5sav 偷拍熟女吧 口述我和妹妹的欲望 50p电脑版 wwwavtttcon 3p3com 伦理无码片在线看 欧美成人电影图片岛国性爱伦理电影 先锋影音AV成人欧美 我爱好色 淫电影网 WWW19MMCOM 玛丽罗斯3d同人动画h在线看 动漫女孩裸体 超级丝袜美腿乱伦 1919gogo欣赏 大色逼淫色 www就是撸 激情文学网好骚 A级黄片免费 xedd5com 国内的b是黑的 快播美国成年人片黄 av高跟丝袜视频 上原保奈美巨乳女教师在线观看 校园春色都市激情fefegancom 偷窥自拍XXOO 搜索看马操美女 人本女优视频 日日吧淫淫 人妻巨乳影院 美国女子性爱学校 大肥屁股重口味 啪啪啪啊啊啊不要 操碰 japanfreevideoshome国产 亚州淫荡老熟女人体 伦奸毛片免费在线看 天天影视se 樱桃做爱视频 亚卅av在线视频 x奸小说下载 亚洲色图图片在线 217av天堂网 东方在线撸撸-百度 幼幼丝袜集 灰姑娘的姐姐 青青草在线视频观看对华 86papa路con 亚洲1AV 综合图片2区亚洲 美国美女大逼电影 010插插av成人网站 www色comwww821kxwcom 播乐子成人网免费视频在线观看 大炮撸在线影院 ,www4KkKcom 野花鲁最近30部 wwwCC213wapwww2233ww2download 三客优最新地址 母亲让儿子爽的无码视频 全国黄色片子 欧美色图美国十次 超碰在线直播 性感妖娆操 亚洲肉感熟女色图 a片A毛片管看视频 8vaa褋芯屑 333kk 川岛和津实视频 在线母子乱伦对白 妹妹肥逼五月 亚洲美女自拍 老婆在我面前小说 韩国空姐堪比情趣内衣 干小姐综合 淫妻色五月 添骚穴 WM62COM 23456影视播放器 成人午夜剧场 尼姑福利网 AV区亚洲AV欧美AV512qucomwwwc5508com 经典欧美骚妇 震动棒露出 日韩丝袜美臀巨乳在线 av无限吧看 就去干少妇 色艺无间正面是哪集 校园春色我和老师做爱 漫画夜色 天海丽白色吊带 黄色淫荡性虐小说 午夜高清播放器 文20岁女性荫道口图片 热国产热无码热有码 2015小明发布看看算你色 百度云播影视 美女肏屄屄乱轮小说 家族舔阴AV影片 邪恶在线av有码 父女之交 关于处女破处的三级片 极品护士91在线 欧美虐待女人视频的网站 享受老太太的丝袜 aaazhibuo 8dfvodcom成人 真实自拍足交 群交男女猛插逼 妓女爱爱动态 lin35com是什么网站 abp159 亚洲色图偷拍自拍乱伦熟女抠逼自慰 朝国三级篇 淫三国幻想 免费的av小电影网站 日本阿v视频免费按摩师 av750c0m 黄色片操一下 巨乳少女车震在线观看 操逼 免费 囗述情感一乱伦岳母和女婿 WWW_FAMITSU_COM 偷拍中国少妇在公车被操视频 花也真衣论理电影 大鸡鸡插p洞 新片欧美十八岁美少 进击的巨人神thunderftp 西方美女15p 深圳哪里易找到老女人玩视频 在线成人有声小说 365rrr 女尿图片 我和淫荡的小姨做爱 � 做爱技术体照 淫妇性爱 大学生私拍b 第四射狠狠射小说 色中色成人av社区 和小姨子乱伦肛交 wwwppp62com 俄罗斯巨乳人体艺术 骚逼阿娇 汤芳人体图片大胆 大胆人体艺术bb私处 性感大胸骚货 哪个网站幼女的片多 日本美女本子把 色 五月天 婷婷 快播 美女 美穴艺术 色百合电影导航 大鸡巴用力 孙悟空操美少女战士 狠狠撸美女手掰穴图片 古代女子与兽类交 沙耶香套图 激情成人网区 暴风影音av播放 动漫女孩怎么插第3个 mmmpp44 黑木麻衣无码ed2k 淫荡学姐少妇 乱伦操少女屄 高中性爱故事 骚妹妹爱爱图网 韩国模特剪长发 大鸡巴把我逼日了 中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片 大胆女人下体艺术图片 789sss 影音先锋在线国内情侣野外性事自拍普通话对白 群撸图库 闪现君打阿乐 ady 小说 插入表妹嫩穴小说 推荐成人资源 网络播放器 成人台 149大胆人体艺术 大屌图片 骚美女成人av 春暖花开春色性吧 女亭婷五月 我上了同桌的姐姐 恋夜秀场主播自慰视频 yzppp 屄茎 操屄女图 美女鲍鱼大特写 淫乱的日本人妻山口玲子 偷拍射精图 性感美女人体艺木图片 种马小说完本 免费电影院 骑士福利导航导航网站 骚老婆足交 国产性爱一级电影 欧美免费成人花花性都 欧美大肥妞性爱视频 家庭乱伦网站快播 偷拍自拍国产毛片 金发美女也用大吊来开包 缔D杏那 yentiyishu人体艺术ytys WWWUUKKMCOM 女人露奶 � 苍井空露逼 老荡妇高跟丝袜足交 偷偷和女友的朋友做爱迅雷 做爱七十二尺 朱丹人体合成 麻腾由纪妃 帅哥撸播种子图 鸡巴插逼动态图片 羙国十次啦中文 WWW137AVCOM 神斗片欧美版华语 有气质女人人休艺术 由美老师放屁电影 欧美女人肉肏图片 白虎种子快播 国产自拍90后女孩 美女在床上疯狂嫩b 饭岛爱最后之作 幼幼强奸摸奶 色97成人动漫 两性性爱打鸡巴插逼 新视觉影院4080青苹果影院 嗯好爽插死我了 阴口艺术照 李宗瑞电影qvod38 爆操舅母 亚洲色图七七影院 被大鸡巴操菊花 怡红院肿么了 成人极品影院删除 欧美性爱大图色图强奸乱 欧美女子与狗随便性交 苍井空的bt种子无码 熟女乱伦长篇小说 大色虫 兽交幼女影音先锋播放 44aad be0ca93900121f9b 先锋天耗ばさ无码 欧毛毛女三级黄色片图 干女人黑木耳照 日本美女少妇嫩逼人体艺术 sesechangchang 色屄屄网 久久撸app下载 色图色噜 美女鸡巴大奶 好吊日在线视频在线观看 透明丝袜脚偷拍自拍 中山怡红院菜单 wcwwwcom下载 骑嫂子 亚洲大色妣 成人故事365ahnet 丝袜家庭教mp4 幼交肛交 妹妹撸撸大妈 日本毛爽 caoprom超碰在email 关于中国古代偷窥的黄片 第一会所老熟女下载 wwwhuangsecome 狼人干综合新地址HD播放 变态儿子强奸乱伦图 强奸电影名字 2wwwer37com 日本毛片基地一亚洲AVmzddcxcn 暗黑圣经仙桃影院 37tpcocn 持月真由xfplay 好吊日在线视频三级网 我爱背入李丽珍 电影师傅床戏在线观看 96插妹妹sexsex88com 豪放家庭在线播放 桃花宝典极夜著豆瓜网 安卓系统播放神器 美美网丝袜诱惑 人人干全免费视频xulawyercn av无插件一本道 全国色五月 操逼电影小说网 good在线wwwyuyuelvcom www18avmmd 撸波波影视无插件 伊人幼女成人电影 会看射的图片 小明插看看 全裸美女扒开粉嫩b 国人自拍性交网站 萝莉白丝足交本子 七草ちとせ巨乳视频 摇摇晃晃的成人电影 兰桂坊成社人区小说www68kqcom 舔阴论坛 久撸客一撸客色国内外成人激情在线 明星门 欧美大胆嫩肉穴爽大片 www牛逼插 性吧星云 少妇性奴的屁眼 人体艺术大胆mscbaidu1imgcn 最新久久色色成人版 l女同在线 小泽玛利亚高潮图片搜索 女性裸b图 肛交bt种子 最热门有声小说 人间添春色 春色猜谜字 樱井莉亚钢管舞视频 小泽玛利亚直美6p 能用的h网 还能看的h网 bl动漫h网 开心五月激 东京热401 男色女色第四色酒色网 怎么下载黄色小说 黄色小说小栽 和谐图城 乐乐影院 色哥导航 特色导航 依依社区 爱窝窝在线 色狼谷成人 91porn 包要你射电影 色色3A丝袜 丝袜妹妹淫网 爱色导航(荐) 好男人激情影院 坏哥哥 第七色 色久久 人格分裂 急先锋 撸撸射中文网 第一会所综合社区 91影院老师机 东方成人激情 怼莪影院吹潮 老鸭窝伊人无码不卡无码一本道 av女柳晶电影 91天生爱风流作品 深爱激情小说私房婷婷网 擼奶av 567pao 里番3d一家人野外 上原在线电影 水岛津实透明丝袜 1314酒色 网旧网俺也去 0855影院 在线无码私人影院 搜索 国产自拍 神马dy888午夜伦理达达兔 农民工黄晓婷 日韩裸体黑丝御姐 屈臣氏的燕窝面膜怎么样つぼみ晶エリーの早漏チ○ポ强化合宿 老熟女人性视频 影音先锋 三上悠亚ol 妹妹影院福利片 hhhhhhhhsxo 午夜天堂热的国产 强奸剧场 全裸香蕉视频无码 亚欧伦理视频 秋霞为什么给封了 日本在线视频空天使 日韩成人aⅴ在线 日本日屌日屄导航视频 在线福利视频 日本推油无码av magnet 在线免费视频 樱井梨吮东 日本一本道在线无码DVD 日本性感诱惑美女做爱阴道流水视频 日本一级av 汤姆avtom在线视频 台湾佬中文娱乐线20 阿v播播下载 橙色影院 奴隶少女护士cg视频 汤姆在线影院无码 偷拍宾馆 业面紧急生级访问 色和尚有线 厕所偷拍一族 av女l 公交色狼优酷视频 裸体视频AV 人与兽肉肉网 董美香ol 花井美纱链接 magnet 西瓜影音 亚洲 自拍 日韩女优欧美激情偷拍自拍 亚洲成年人免费视频 荷兰免费成人电影 深喉呕吐XXⅩX 操石榴在线视频 天天色成人免费视频 314hu四虎 涩久免费视频在线观看 成人电影迅雷下载 能看见整个奶子的香蕉影院 水菜丽百度影音 gwaz079百度云 噜死你们资源站 主播走光视频合集迅雷下载 thumbzilla jappen 精品Av 古川伊织star598在线 假面女皇vip在线视频播放 国产自拍迷情校园 啪啪啪公寓漫画 日本阿AV 黄色手机电影 欧美在线Av影院 华裔电击女神91在线 亚洲欧美专区 1日本1000部免费视频 开放90后 波多野结衣 东方 影院av 页面升级紧急访问每天正常更新 4438Xchengeren 老炮色 a k福利电影 色欲影视色天天视频 高老庄aV 259LUXU-683 magnet 手机在线电影 国产区 欧美激情人人操网 国产 偷拍 直播 日韩 国内外激情在线视频网给 站长统计一本道人妻 光棍影院被封 紫竹铃取汁 ftp 狂插空姐嫩 xfplay 丈夫面前 穿靴子伪街 XXOO视频在线免费 大香蕉道久在线播放 电棒漏电嗨过头 充气娃能看下毛和洞吗 夫妻牲交 福利云点墦 yukun瑟妃 疯狂交换女友 国产自拍26页 腐女资源 百度云 日本DVD高清无码视频 偷拍,自拍AV伦理电影 A片小视频福利站。 大奶肥婆自拍偷拍图片 交配伊甸园 超碰在线视频自拍偷拍国产 小热巴91大神 rctd 045 类似于A片 超美大奶大学生美女直播被男友操 男友问 你的衣服怎么脱掉的 亚洲女与黑人群交视频一 在线黄涩 木内美保步兵番号 鸡巴插入欧美美女的b舒服 激情在线国产自拍日韩欧美 国语福利小视频在线观看 作爱小视颍 潮喷合集丝袜无码mp4 做爱的无码高清视频 牛牛精品 伊aⅤ在线观看 savk12 哥哥搞在线播放 在线电一本道影 一级谍片 250pp亚洲情艺中心,88 欧美一本道九色在线一 wwwseavbacom色av吧 cos美女在线 欧美17,18ⅹⅹⅹ视频 自拍嫩逼 小电影在线观看网站 筱田优 贼 水电工 5358x视频 日本69式视频有码 b雪福利导航 韩国女主播19tvclub在线 操逼清晰视频 丝袜美女国产视频网址导航 水菜丽颜射房间 台湾妹中文娱乐网 风吟岛视频 口交 伦理 日本熟妇色五十路免费视频 A级片互舔 川村真矢Av在线观看 亚洲日韩av 色和尚国产自拍 sea8 mp4 aV天堂2018手机在线 免费版国产偷拍a在线播放 狠狠 婷婷 丁香 小视频福利在线观看平台 思妍白衣小仙女被邻居强上 萝莉自拍有水 4484新视觉 永久发布页 977成人影视在线观看 小清新影院在线观 小鸟酱后丝后入百度云 旋风魅影四级 香蕉影院小黄片免费看 性爱直播磁力链接 小骚逼第一色影院 性交流的视频 小雪小视频bd 小视频TV禁看视频 迷奸AV在线看 nba直播 任你在干线 汤姆影院在线视频国产 624u在线播放 成人 一级a做爰片就在线看狐狸视频 小香蕉AV视频 www182、com 腿模简小育 学生做爱视频 秘密搜查官 快播 成人福利网午夜 一级黄色夫妻录像片 直接看的gav久久播放器 国产自拍400首页 sm老爹影院 谁知道隔壁老王网址在线 综合网 123西瓜影音 米奇丁香 人人澡人人漠大学生 色久悠 夜色视频你今天寂寞了吗? 菲菲影视城美国 被抄的影院 变态另类 欧美 成人 国产偷拍自拍在线小说 不用下载安装就能看的吃男人鸡巴视频 插屄视频 大贯杏里播放 wwwhhh50 233若菜奈央 伦理片天海翼秘密搜查官 大香蕉在线万色屋视频 那种漫画小说你懂的 祥仔电影合集一区 那里可以看澳门皇冠酒店a片 色自啪 亚洲aV电影天堂 谷露影院ar toupaizaixian sexbj。com 毕业生 zaixian mianfei 朝桐光视频 成人短视频在线直接观看 陈美霖 沈阳音乐学院 导航女 www26yjjcom 1大尺度视频 开平虐女视频 菅野雪松协和影视在线视频 华人play在线视频bbb 鸡吧操屄视频 多啪啪免费视频 悠草影院 金兰策划网 (969) 橘佑金短视频 国内一极刺激自拍片 日本制服番号大全magnet 成人动漫母系 电脑怎么清理内存 黄色福利1000 dy88午夜 偷拍中学生洗澡磁力链接 花椒相机福利美女视频 站长推荐磁力下载 mp4 三洞轮流插视频 玉兔miki热舞视频 夜生活小视频 爆乳人妖小视频 国内网红主播自拍福利迅雷下载 不用app的裸裸体美女操逼视频 变态SM影片在线观看 草溜影院元气吧 - 百度 - 百度 波推全套视频 国产双飞集合ftp 日本在线AV网 笔国毛片 神马影院女主播是我的邻居 影音资源 激情乱伦电影 799pao 亚洲第一色第一影院 av视频大香蕉 老梁故事汇希斯莱杰 水中人体磁力链接 下载 大香蕉黄片免费看 济南谭崔 避开屏蔽的岛a片 草破福利 要看大鸡巴操小骚逼的人的视频 黑丝少妇影音先锋 欧美巨乳熟女磁力链接 美国黄网站色大全 伦蕉在线久播 极品女厕沟 激情五月bd韩国电影 混血美女自摸和男友激情啪啪自拍诱人呻吟福利视频 人人摸人人妻做人人看 44kknn 娸娸原网 伊人欧美 恋夜影院视频列表安卓青青 57k影院 如果电话亭 avi 插爆骚女精品自拍 青青草在线免费视频1769TV 令人惹火的邻家美眉 影音先锋 真人妹子被捅动态图 男人女人做完爱视频15 表姐合租两人共处一室晚上她竟爬上了我的床 性爱教学视频 北条麻妃bd在线播放版 国产老师和师生 magnet wwwcctv1024 女神自慰 ftp 女同性恋做激情视频 欧美大胆露阴视频 欧美无码影视 好女色在线观看 后入肥臀18p 百度影视屏福利 厕所超碰视频 强奸mp magnet 欧美妹aⅴ免费线上看 2016年妞干网视频 5手机在线福利 超在线最视频 800av:cOm magnet 欧美性爱免播放器在线播放 91大款肥汤的性感美乳90后邻家美眉趴着窗台后入啪啪 秋霞日本毛片网站 cheng ren 在线视频 上原亚衣肛门无码解禁影音先锋 美脚家庭教师在线播放 尤酷伦理片 熟女性生活视频在线观看 欧美av在线播放喷潮 194avav 凤凰AV成人 - 百度 kbb9999 AV片AV在线AV无码 爱爱视频高清免费观看 黄色男女操b视频 观看 18AV清纯视频在线播放平台 成人性爱视频久久操 女性真人生殖系统双性人视频 下身插入b射精视频 明星潜规测视频 mp4 免賛a片直播绪 国内 自己 偷拍 在线 国内真实偷拍 手机在线 国产主播户外勾在线 三桥杏奈高清无码迅雷下载 2五福电影院凸凹频频 男主拿鱼打女主,高宝宝 色哥午夜影院 川村まや痴汉 草溜影院费全过程免费 淫小弟影院在线视频 laohantuiche 啪啪啪喷潮XXOO视频 青娱乐成人国产 蓝沢润 一本道 亚洲青涩中文欧美 神马影院线理论 米娅卡莉法的av 在线福利65535 欧美粉色在线 欧美性受群交视频1在线播放 极品喷奶熟妇在线播放 变态另类无码福利影院92 天津小姐被偷拍 磁力下载 台湾三级电髟全部 丝袜美腿偷拍自拍 偷拍女生性行为图 妻子的乱伦 白虎少妇 肏婶骚屄 外国大妈会阴照片 美少女操屄图片 妹妹自慰11p 操老熟女的b 361美女人体 360电影院樱桃 爱色妹妹亚洲色图 性交卖淫姿势高清图片一级 欧美一黑对二白 大色网无毛一线天 射小妹网站 寂寞穴 西西人体模特苍井空 操的大白逼吧 骚穴让我操 拉好友干女朋友3p